Add alternative to `fpp`
I'm using the alternative to fpp which is https://github.com/edi9999/path-extractor and fzf, and works very well for me. I'm the creator of https://github.com/edi9999/path-extractor, so I don't know if you are going te be willing to accept this pull request.pull/159/head
parent
34381b5177
commit
447fa3da82
|
@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Notes:
|
|||
|
||||
- For interactive selection of values from the output of another command, use [`percol`](https://github.com/mooz/percol) or [`fzf`](https://github.com/junegunn/fzf).
|
||||
|
||||
- For interaction with files based on the output of another command (like `git`), use `fpp` ([PathPicker](https://github.com/facebook/PathPicker)).
|
||||
- For interaction with files based on the output of another command (like `git`), use `fpp` ([PathPicker](https://github.com/facebook/PathPicker)) or `pe + fzf.` ([pe: path extractor](https://github.com/edi9999/path-extractor))
|
||||
|
||||
- For a simple web server for all files in the current directory (and subdirs), available to anyone on your network, use:
|
||||
`python -m SimpleHTTPServer 7777` (for port 7777 and Python 2) and `python -m http.server 7777` (for port 7777 and Python 3).
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue