From 447fa3da8247998e2462f1786320b9389eff9a6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edgar Hipp Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 16:44:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add alternative to `fpp` I'm using the alternative to fpp which is https://github.com/edi9999/path-extractor and fzf, and works very well for me. I'm the creator of https://github.com/edi9999/path-extractor, so I don't know if you are going te be willing to accept this pull request. --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 13f8e6b..e3a4957 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ Notes: - For interactive selection of values from the output of another command, use [`percol`](https://github.com/mooz/percol) or [`fzf`](https://github.com/junegunn/fzf). -- For interaction with files based on the output of another command (like `git`), use `fpp` ([PathPicker](https://github.com/facebook/PathPicker)). +- For interaction with files based on the output of another command (like `git`), use `fpp` ([PathPicker](https://github.com/facebook/PathPicker)) or `pe + fzf.` ([pe: path extractor](https://github.com/edi9999/path-extractor)) - For a simple web server for all files in the current directory (and subdirs), available to anyone on your network, use: `python -m SimpleHTTPServer 7777` (for port 7777 and Python 2) and `python -m http.server 7777` (for port 7777 and Python 3).