* chunkenc: allow missing empty buckets on histogram append
Allow appending to chunks when the histogram to be added is missing
some buckets, but the missing buckets are empty in the chunk.
For example bucket at index 5 is present in the chunk, but its value
is 0 and the new histogram doesn't have a bucket at index 5.
This fixes an issue of merging chunks where one chunk was recoded to
retroactively have some empty buckets in all the histograms and we are
merging in a histogram that doesn't have the empty bucket (because it
was not recoded yet).
The operation alters the histogram that is being added, however this has
already been the case when appending gauge histograms. Thus the test
TestHistogramSeriesToChunks in storage package is changed to explicitly
test what happened to the appended histogram - Compact(0) call is removed.
The new expandIntSpansAndBuckets and expandFloatSpansAndBuckets functions
are a merge of expandSpansForward and counterResetInAnyBucket and
counterResetInAnyFloatBucket.
Signed-off-by: György Krajcsovits <gyorgy.krajcsovits@grafana.com>
The histogram stats iterator does not fully clear the histogram object
and is not resilient to new fields being added to the histogram type.
To resolve the issue, the commit uses the CopyTo methods which should
be future proof to new fields being added.
Signed-off-by: Filip Petkovski <filip.petkovsky@gmail.com>
Don't reshard if we haven't successfully sent a sample in the last
shardUpdateDuration seconds.
Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kushagra Shukla <kushalshukla110@gmail.com>
We don't use seriesShard during DB initialization, so we can use the
same 8 bytes to store mmMaxTime, and save those during the rest of the
lifetime of the database.
This doesn't affect CPU performance.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Believed to trigger segmentation faults due to memory-mapped block
data still being accessed by iterators after the querier is closed.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
The histogram stats decoder keeps track of the last seen histogram sample
in order to properly detect counter resets. We are seeing an issue where
a histogram with UnknownResetHint gets treated as a counter reset when it follows
a stale histogram sample.
I believe that this is incorrect since stale samples should be completely ignored
in PromQL. As a result, they should not be stored in the histogram stats iterator
and the counter reset detection needs to be done against the last non-stale sample.
Signed-off-by: Filip Petkovski <filip.petkovsky@gmail.com>
I often see people ask questions that indicate they don't understand
this point, and launching into "instant vector" and "range vector" is
likely to point them in the wrong direction.
Remove the admonishment that the reader mustn't confuse these things.
Remove mention of "inferred sample timestamps" that is never explained.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
`TestMergeQuerierWithSecondaries_ErrorHandling` now tests `NewMergeQuerier`
rather than creating the data structure directly. This means we now test
short-circuiting when only a single querier is required.
Merge `mockGenericQuerier` into `mockQuerier`.
Replace `unwrapMockGenericQuerier` with a visitor pattern.
No change in functionality intended.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Rules: Refactor concurrency controller interface
Even though the main purpose of this refactor is to modify the interface of the concurrency controller to accept a Context. I did two drive-by modifications that I think are sensible:
1. I have moved the check for dependencies on rules to the controller itself - this aligns with how the controller should behave as it is a deciding factor on wether we should run concurrently or not.
2. I cleaned up some unused methods from the days of the old interface before #13527 changed it.
Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: gotjosh <josue.abreu@gmail.com>
Previously, the config doc suggested that scrapes are simply failed if
the bucket limit is exceeded. However, instead Prometheus first
attempts to reduce the resolution. This will succeed in almost all
non-pathological cases. However, in the rare case that it doesn't, the
scrape will be failed after all.
For the resolution limit AKA `native_histogram_min_bucket_factor`, the
logic is a bit different. Once the highest factor, i.e. schema -4, is
reached, the scrape will still succeed.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
Callum Styan