You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
prometheus/promql/functions.go

1805 lines
60 KiB

// Copyright 2015 The Prometheus Authors
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package promql
import (
"errors"
"fmt"
"math"
"slices"
"sort"
"strconv"
"strings"
"time"
"github.com/facette/natsort"
"github.com/grafana/regexp"
"github.com/prometheus/common/model"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/model/histogram"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/model/labels"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/promql/parser"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/promql/parser/posrange"
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/util/annotations"
)
// FunctionCall is the type of a PromQL function implementation
//
// vals is a list of the evaluated arguments for the function call.
//
// For range vectors it will be a Matrix with one series, instant vectors a
// Vector, scalars a Vector with one series whose value is the scalar
// value,and nil for strings.
//
// args are the original arguments to the function, where you can access
// matrixSelectors, vectorSelectors, and StringLiterals.
//
// enh.Out is a pre-allocated empty vector that you may use to accumulate
// output before returning it. The vectors in vals should not be returned.a
//
// Range vector functions need only return a vector with the right value,
// the metric and timestamp are not needed.
//
// Instant vector functions need only return a vector with the right values and
// metrics, the timestamp are not needed.
//
// Scalar results should be returned as the value of a sample in a Vector.
type FunctionCall func(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations)
// === time() float64 ===
func funcTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
return Vector{Sample{
F: float64(enh.Ts) / 1000,
}}, nil
}
// extrapolatedRate is a utility function for rate/increase/delta.
// It calculates the rate (allowing for counter resets if isCounter is true),
// extrapolates if the first/last sample is close to the boundary, and returns
// the result as either per-second (if isRate is true) or overall.
func extrapolatedRate(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper, isCounter, isRate bool) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
ms := args[0].(*parser.MatrixSelector)
vs := ms.VectorSelector.(*parser.VectorSelector)
var (
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
samples = vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
rangeStart = enh.Ts - durationMilliseconds(ms.Range+vs.Offset)
rangeEnd = enh.Ts - durationMilliseconds(vs.Offset)
resultFloat float64
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
resultHistogram *histogram.FloatHistogram
firstT, lastT int64
numSamplesMinusOne int
annos annotations.Annotations
)
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
// We need either at least two Histograms and no Floats, or at least two
// Floats and no Histograms to calculate a rate. Otherwise, drop this
// Vector element.
metricName := samples.Metric.Get(labels.MetricName)
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(samples.Histograms) > 0 && len(samples.Floats) > 0 {
return enh.Out, annos.Add(annotations.NewMixedFloatsHistogramsWarning(metricName, args[0].PositionRange()))
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
switch {
case len(samples.Histograms) > 1:
numSamplesMinusOne = len(samples.Histograms) - 1
firstT = samples.Histograms[0].T
lastT = samples.Histograms[numSamplesMinusOne].T
var newAnnos annotations.Annotations
resultHistogram, newAnnos = histogramRate(samples.Histograms, isCounter, metricName, args[0].PositionRange())
annos.Merge(newAnnos)
if resultHistogram == nil {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
// The histograms are not compatible with each other.
return enh.Out, annos
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
case len(samples.Floats) > 1:
numSamplesMinusOne = len(samples.Floats) - 1
firstT = samples.Floats[0].T
lastT = samples.Floats[numSamplesMinusOne].T
resultFloat = samples.Floats[numSamplesMinusOne].F - samples.Floats[0].F
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if !isCounter {
break
}
// Handle counter resets:
prevValue := samples.Floats[0].F
for _, currPoint := range samples.Floats[1:] {
if currPoint.F < prevValue {
resultFloat += prevValue
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
prevValue = currPoint.F
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
default:
// TODO: add RangeTooShortWarning
return enh.Out, annos
}
// Duration between first/last samples and boundary of range.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
durationToStart := float64(firstT-rangeStart) / 1000
durationToEnd := float64(rangeEnd-lastT) / 1000
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
sampledInterval := float64(lastT-firstT) / 1000
averageDurationBetweenSamples := sampledInterval / float64(numSamplesMinusOne)
promql: Fix limiting of extrapolation to negative values This is a bit tough to explain, but I'll try: `rate` & friends have a sophisticated extrapolation algorithm. Usually, we extrapolate the result to the total interval specified in the range selector. However, if the first sample within the range is too far away from the beginning of the interval, or if the last sample within the range is too far away from the end of the interval, we assume the series has just started half a sampling interval before the first sample or after the last sample, respectively, and shorten the extrapolation interval correspondingly. We calculate the sampling interval by looking at the average time between samples within the range, and we define "too far away" as "more than 110% of that sampling interval". However, if this algorithm leads to an extrapolated starting value that is negative, we limit the start of the extrapolation interval to the point where the extrapolated starting value is zero. At least that was the intention. What we actually implemented is the following: If extrapolating all the way to the beginning of the total interval would lead to an extrapolated negative value, we would only extrapolate to the zero point as above, even if the algorithm above would have selected a starting point that is just half a sampling interval before the first sample and that starting point would not have an extrapolated negative value. In other word: What was meant as a _limitation_ of the extrapolation interval yielded a _longer_ extrapolation interval in this case. There is an exception to the case just described: If the increase of the extrapolation interval is more than 110% of the sampling interval, we suddenly drop back to only extrapolate to half a sampling interval. This behavior can be nicely seen in the testcounter_zero_cutoff test, where the rate goes up all the way to 0.7 and then jumps back to 0.6. This commit changes the behavior to what was (presumably) intended from the beginning: The extension of the extrapolation interval is only limited if actually needed to prevent extrapolation to negative values, but the "limitation" never leads to _more_ extrapolation anymore. The difference is subtle, and probably it never bothered anyone. However, if you calculate a rate of a classic histograms, the old behavior might create non-monotonic histograms as a result (because of the jumps you can see nicely in the old version of the testcounter_zero_cutoff test). With this fix, that doesn't happen anymore. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
9 months ago
// If the first/last samples are close to the boundaries of the range,
// extrapolate the result. This is as we expect that another sample
// will exist given the spacing between samples we've seen thus far,
// with an allowance for noise.
extrapolationThreshold := averageDurationBetweenSamples * 1.1
extrapolateToInterval := sampledInterval
if durationToStart >= extrapolationThreshold {
durationToStart = averageDurationBetweenSamples / 2
}
if isCounter && resultFloat > 0 && len(samples.Floats) > 0 && samples.Floats[0].F >= 0 {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
// Counters cannot be negative. If we have any slope at all
// (i.e. resultFloat went up), we can extrapolate the zero point
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
// of the counter. If the duration to the zero point is shorter
// than the durationToStart, we take the zero point as the start
// of the series, thereby avoiding extrapolation to negative
// counter values.
promql: Fix limiting of extrapolation to negative values This is a bit tough to explain, but I'll try: `rate` & friends have a sophisticated extrapolation algorithm. Usually, we extrapolate the result to the total interval specified in the range selector. However, if the first sample within the range is too far away from the beginning of the interval, or if the last sample within the range is too far away from the end of the interval, we assume the series has just started half a sampling interval before the first sample or after the last sample, respectively, and shorten the extrapolation interval correspondingly. We calculate the sampling interval by looking at the average time between samples within the range, and we define "too far away" as "more than 110% of that sampling interval". However, if this algorithm leads to an extrapolated starting value that is negative, we limit the start of the extrapolation interval to the point where the extrapolated starting value is zero. At least that was the intention. What we actually implemented is the following: If extrapolating all the way to the beginning of the total interval would lead to an extrapolated negative value, we would only extrapolate to the zero point as above, even if the algorithm above would have selected a starting point that is just half a sampling interval before the first sample and that starting point would not have an extrapolated negative value. In other word: What was meant as a _limitation_ of the extrapolation interval yielded a _longer_ extrapolation interval in this case. There is an exception to the case just described: If the increase of the extrapolation interval is more than 110% of the sampling interval, we suddenly drop back to only extrapolate to half a sampling interval. This behavior can be nicely seen in the testcounter_zero_cutoff test, where the rate goes up all the way to 0.7 and then jumps back to 0.6. This commit changes the behavior to what was (presumably) intended from the beginning: The extension of the extrapolation interval is only limited if actually needed to prevent extrapolation to negative values, but the "limitation" never leads to _more_ extrapolation anymore. The difference is subtle, and probably it never bothered anyone. However, if you calculate a rate of a classic histograms, the old behavior might create non-monotonic histograms as a result (because of the jumps you can see nicely in the old version of the testcounter_zero_cutoff test). With this fix, that doesn't happen anymore. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
9 months ago
// TODO(beorn7): Do this for histograms, too.
durationToZero := sampledInterval * (samples.Floats[0].F / resultFloat)
if durationToZero < durationToStart {
durationToStart = durationToZero
}
}
promql: Fix limiting of extrapolation to negative values This is a bit tough to explain, but I'll try: `rate` & friends have a sophisticated extrapolation algorithm. Usually, we extrapolate the result to the total interval specified in the range selector. However, if the first sample within the range is too far away from the beginning of the interval, or if the last sample within the range is too far away from the end of the interval, we assume the series has just started half a sampling interval before the first sample or after the last sample, respectively, and shorten the extrapolation interval correspondingly. We calculate the sampling interval by looking at the average time between samples within the range, and we define "too far away" as "more than 110% of that sampling interval". However, if this algorithm leads to an extrapolated starting value that is negative, we limit the start of the extrapolation interval to the point where the extrapolated starting value is zero. At least that was the intention. What we actually implemented is the following: If extrapolating all the way to the beginning of the total interval would lead to an extrapolated negative value, we would only extrapolate to the zero point as above, even if the algorithm above would have selected a starting point that is just half a sampling interval before the first sample and that starting point would not have an extrapolated negative value. In other word: What was meant as a _limitation_ of the extrapolation interval yielded a _longer_ extrapolation interval in this case. There is an exception to the case just described: If the increase of the extrapolation interval is more than 110% of the sampling interval, we suddenly drop back to only extrapolate to half a sampling interval. This behavior can be nicely seen in the testcounter_zero_cutoff test, where the rate goes up all the way to 0.7 and then jumps back to 0.6. This commit changes the behavior to what was (presumably) intended from the beginning: The extension of the extrapolation interval is only limited if actually needed to prevent extrapolation to negative values, but the "limitation" never leads to _more_ extrapolation anymore. The difference is subtle, and probably it never bothered anyone. However, if you calculate a rate of a classic histograms, the old behavior might create non-monotonic histograms as a result (because of the jumps you can see nicely in the old version of the testcounter_zero_cutoff test). With this fix, that doesn't happen anymore. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
9 months ago
extrapolateToInterval += durationToStart
promql: Fix limiting of extrapolation to negative values This is a bit tough to explain, but I'll try: `rate` & friends have a sophisticated extrapolation algorithm. Usually, we extrapolate the result to the total interval specified in the range selector. However, if the first sample within the range is too far away from the beginning of the interval, or if the last sample within the range is too far away from the end of the interval, we assume the series has just started half a sampling interval before the first sample or after the last sample, respectively, and shorten the extrapolation interval correspondingly. We calculate the sampling interval by looking at the average time between samples within the range, and we define "too far away" as "more than 110% of that sampling interval". However, if this algorithm leads to an extrapolated starting value that is negative, we limit the start of the extrapolation interval to the point where the extrapolated starting value is zero. At least that was the intention. What we actually implemented is the following: If extrapolating all the way to the beginning of the total interval would lead to an extrapolated negative value, we would only extrapolate to the zero point as above, even if the algorithm above would have selected a starting point that is just half a sampling interval before the first sample and that starting point would not have an extrapolated negative value. In other word: What was meant as a _limitation_ of the extrapolation interval yielded a _longer_ extrapolation interval in this case. There is an exception to the case just described: If the increase of the extrapolation interval is more than 110% of the sampling interval, we suddenly drop back to only extrapolate to half a sampling interval. This behavior can be nicely seen in the testcounter_zero_cutoff test, where the rate goes up all the way to 0.7 and then jumps back to 0.6. This commit changes the behavior to what was (presumably) intended from the beginning: The extension of the extrapolation interval is only limited if actually needed to prevent extrapolation to negative values, but the "limitation" never leads to _more_ extrapolation anymore. The difference is subtle, and probably it never bothered anyone. However, if you calculate a rate of a classic histograms, the old behavior might create non-monotonic histograms as a result (because of the jumps you can see nicely in the old version of the testcounter_zero_cutoff test). With this fix, that doesn't happen anymore. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
9 months ago
if durationToEnd >= extrapolationThreshold {
durationToEnd = averageDurationBetweenSamples / 2
}
promql: Fix limiting of extrapolation to negative values This is a bit tough to explain, but I'll try: `rate` & friends have a sophisticated extrapolation algorithm. Usually, we extrapolate the result to the total interval specified in the range selector. However, if the first sample within the range is too far away from the beginning of the interval, or if the last sample within the range is too far away from the end of the interval, we assume the series has just started half a sampling interval before the first sample or after the last sample, respectively, and shorten the extrapolation interval correspondingly. We calculate the sampling interval by looking at the average time between samples within the range, and we define "too far away" as "more than 110% of that sampling interval". However, if this algorithm leads to an extrapolated starting value that is negative, we limit the start of the extrapolation interval to the point where the extrapolated starting value is zero. At least that was the intention. What we actually implemented is the following: If extrapolating all the way to the beginning of the total interval would lead to an extrapolated negative value, we would only extrapolate to the zero point as above, even if the algorithm above would have selected a starting point that is just half a sampling interval before the first sample and that starting point would not have an extrapolated negative value. In other word: What was meant as a _limitation_ of the extrapolation interval yielded a _longer_ extrapolation interval in this case. There is an exception to the case just described: If the increase of the extrapolation interval is more than 110% of the sampling interval, we suddenly drop back to only extrapolate to half a sampling interval. This behavior can be nicely seen in the testcounter_zero_cutoff test, where the rate goes up all the way to 0.7 and then jumps back to 0.6. This commit changes the behavior to what was (presumably) intended from the beginning: The extension of the extrapolation interval is only limited if actually needed to prevent extrapolation to negative values, but the "limitation" never leads to _more_ extrapolation anymore. The difference is subtle, and probably it never bothered anyone. However, if you calculate a rate of a classic histograms, the old behavior might create non-monotonic histograms as a result (because of the jumps you can see nicely in the old version of the testcounter_zero_cutoff test). With this fix, that doesn't happen anymore. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
9 months ago
extrapolateToInterval += durationToEnd
factor := extrapolateToInterval / sampledInterval
if isRate {
factor /= ms.Range.Seconds()
}
if resultHistogram == nil {
resultFloat *= factor
} else {
resultHistogram.Mul(factor)
}
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: resultFloat, H: resultHistogram}), annos
}
// histogramRate is a helper function for extrapolatedRate. It requires
// points[0] to be a histogram. It returns nil if any other Point in points is
// not a histogram, and a warning wrapped in an annotation in that case.
// Otherwise, it returns the calculated histogram and an empty annotation.
func histogramRate(points []HPoint, isCounter bool, metricName string, pos posrange.PositionRange) (*histogram.FloatHistogram, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
prev := points[0].H
usingCustomBuckets := prev.UsesCustomBuckets()
last := points[len(points)-1].H
if last == nil {
return nil, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedFloatsHistogramsWarning(metricName, pos))
}
minSchema := prev.Schema
if last.Schema < minSchema {
minSchema = last.Schema
}
if last.UsesCustomBuckets() != usingCustomBuckets {
return nil, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedExponentialCustomHistogramsWarning(metricName, pos))
}
var annos annotations.Annotations
// We check for gauge type histograms in the loop below, but the loop below does not run on the first and last point,
// so check the first and last point now.
if isCounter && (prev.CounterResetHint == histogram.GaugeType || last.CounterResetHint == histogram.GaugeType) {
annos.Add(annotations.NewNativeHistogramNotCounterWarning(metricName, pos))
}
// First iteration to find out two things:
// - What's the smallest relevant schema?
// - Are all data points histograms?
// TODO(beorn7): Find a way to check that earlier, e.g. by handing in a
// []FloatPoint and a []HistogramPoint separately.
for _, currPoint := range points[1 : len(points)-1] {
curr := currPoint.H
if curr == nil {
return nil, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedFloatsHistogramsWarning(metricName, pos))
}
if !isCounter {
continue
}
if curr.CounterResetHint == histogram.GaugeType {
annos.Add(annotations.NewNativeHistogramNotCounterWarning(metricName, pos))
}
if curr.Schema < minSchema {
minSchema = curr.Schema
}
if curr.UsesCustomBuckets() != usingCustomBuckets {
return nil, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedExponentialCustomHistogramsWarning(metricName, pos))
}
}
h := last.CopyToSchema(minSchema)
_, err := h.Sub(prev)
if err != nil {
if errors.Is(err, histogram.ErrHistogramsIncompatibleSchema) {
return nil, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedExponentialCustomHistogramsWarning(metricName, pos))
} else if errors.Is(err, histogram.ErrHistogramsIncompatibleBounds) {
return nil, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewIncompatibleCustomBucketsHistogramsWarning(metricName, pos))
}
}
if isCounter {
// Second iteration to deal with counter resets.
for _, currPoint := range points[1:] {
curr := currPoint.H
if curr.DetectReset(prev) {
_, err := h.Add(prev)
if err != nil {
if errors.Is(err, histogram.ErrHistogramsIncompatibleSchema) {
return nil, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedExponentialCustomHistogramsWarning(metricName, pos))
} else if errors.Is(err, histogram.ErrHistogramsIncompatibleBounds) {
return nil, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewIncompatibleCustomBucketsHistogramsWarning(metricName, pos))
}
}
}
prev = curr
}
} else if points[0].H.CounterResetHint != histogram.GaugeType || points[len(points)-1].H.CounterResetHint != histogram.GaugeType {
annos.Add(annotations.NewNativeHistogramNotGaugeWarning(metricName, pos))
}
h.CounterResetHint = histogram.GaugeType
return h.Compact(0), annos
}
// === delta(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcDelta(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return extrapolatedRate(vals, args, enh, false, false)
}
// === rate(node parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcRate(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return extrapolatedRate(vals, args, enh, true, true)
}
// === increase(node parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcIncrease(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return extrapolatedRate(vals, args, enh, true, false)
}
// === irate(node parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcIrate(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return instantValue(vals, enh.Out, true)
}
// === idelta(node model.ValMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcIdelta(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return instantValue(vals, enh.Out, false)
}
func instantValue(vals []parser.Value, out Vector, isRate bool) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
samples := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
// No sense in trying to compute a rate without at least two points. Drop
// this Vector element.
// TODO: add RangeTooShortWarning
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(samples.Floats) < 2 {
return out, nil
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
lastSample := samples.Floats[len(samples.Floats)-1]
previousSample := samples.Floats[len(samples.Floats)-2]
var resultValue float64
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if isRate && lastSample.F < previousSample.F {
// Counter reset.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
resultValue = lastSample.F
} else {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
resultValue = lastSample.F - previousSample.F
}
sampledInterval := lastSample.T - previousSample.T
if sampledInterval == 0 {
// Avoid dividing by 0.
return out, nil
}
if isRate {
// Convert to per-second.
resultValue /= float64(sampledInterval) / 1000
}
return append(out, Sample{F: resultValue}), nil
}
// Calculate the trend value at the given index i in raw data d.
// This is somewhat analogous to the slope of the trend at the given index.
// The argument "tf" is the trend factor.
// The argument "s0" is the computed smoothed value.
// The argument "s1" is the computed trend factor.
// The argument "b" is the raw input value.
func calcTrendValue(i int, tf, s0, s1, b float64) float64 {
if i == 0 {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return b
}
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
x := tf * (s1 - s0)
y := (1 - tf) * b
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return x + y
}
// Holt-Winters is similar to a weighted moving average, where historical data has exponentially less influence on the current data.
9 years ago
// Holt-Winter also accounts for trends in data. The smoothing factor (0 < sf < 1) affects how historical data will affect the current
// data. A lower smoothing factor increases the influence of historical data. The trend factor (0 < tf < 1) affects
// how trends in historical data will affect the current data. A higher trend factor increases the influence.
// of trends. Algorithm taken from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_smoothing titled: "Double exponential smoothing".
func funcHoltWinters(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
samples := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
// The smoothing factor argument.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
sf := vals[1].(Vector)[0].F
// The trend factor argument.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
tf := vals[2].(Vector)[0].F
// Check that the input parameters are valid.
if sf <= 0 || sf >= 1 {
panic(fmt.Errorf("invalid smoothing factor. Expected: 0 < sf < 1, got: %f", sf))
}
if tf <= 0 || tf >= 1 {
panic(fmt.Errorf("invalid trend factor. Expected: 0 < tf < 1, got: %f", tf))
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
l := len(samples.Floats)
// Can't do the smoothing operation with less than two points.
if l < 2 {
return enh.Out, nil
}
var s0, s1, b float64
// Set initial values.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
s1 = samples.Floats[0].F
b = samples.Floats[1].F - samples.Floats[0].F
// Run the smoothing operation.
var x, y float64
for i := 1; i < l; i++ {
// Scale the raw value against the smoothing factor.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
x = sf * samples.Floats[i].F
// Scale the last smoothed value with the trend at this point.
b = calcTrendValue(i-1, tf, s0, s1, b)
y = (1 - sf) * (s1 + b)
s0, s1 = s1, x+y
}
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: s1}), nil
}
// === sort(node parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSort(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
// NaN should sort to the bottom, so take descending sort with NaN first and
// reverse it.
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
byValueSorter := vectorByReverseValueHeap(vals[0].(Vector))
sort.Sort(sort.Reverse(byValueSorter))
return Vector(byValueSorter), nil
}
// === sortDesc(node parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSortDesc(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
// NaN should sort to the bottom, so take ascending sort with NaN first and
// reverse it.
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
byValueSorter := vectorByValueHeap(vals[0].(Vector))
sort.Sort(sort.Reverse(byValueSorter))
return Vector(byValueSorter), nil
}
// === sort_by_label(vector parser.ValueTypeVector, label parser.ValueTypeString...) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSortByLabel(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
// First, sort by the full label set. This ensures a consistent ordering in case sorting by the
// labels provided as arguments is not conclusive.
slices.SortFunc(vals[0].(Vector), func(a, b Sample) int {
return labels.Compare(a.Metric, b.Metric)
})
labels := stringSliceFromArgs(args[1:])
// Next, sort by the labels provided as arguments.
slices.SortFunc(vals[0].(Vector), func(a, b Sample) int {
// Iterate over each given label.
for _, label := range labels {
lv1 := a.Metric.Get(label)
lv2 := b.Metric.Get(label)
// If we encounter multiple samples with the same label values, the sorting which was
// performed in the first step will act as a "tie breaker".
if lv1 == lv2 {
continue
}
if natsort.Compare(lv1, lv2) {
return -1
}
return +1
}
return 0
})
return vals[0].(Vector), nil
}
// === sort_by_label_desc(vector parser.ValueTypeVector, label parser.ValueTypeString...) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSortByLabelDesc(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
// First, sort by the full label set. This ensures a consistent ordering in case sorting by the
// labels provided as arguments is not conclusive.
slices.SortFunc(vals[0].(Vector), func(a, b Sample) int {
return labels.Compare(b.Metric, a.Metric)
})
labels := stringSliceFromArgs(args[1:])
// Next, sort by the labels provided as arguments.
slices.SortFunc(vals[0].(Vector), func(a, b Sample) int {
// Iterate over each given label.
for _, label := range labels {
lv1 := a.Metric.Get(label)
lv2 := b.Metric.Get(label)
// If we encounter multiple samples with the same label values, the sorting which was
// performed in the first step will act as a "tie breaker".
if lv1 == lv2 {
continue
}
if natsort.Compare(lv1, lv2) {
return +1
}
return -1
}
return 0
})
return vals[0].(Vector), nil
}
// === clamp(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector, min, max Scalar) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcClamp(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
vec := vals[0].(Vector)
minVal := vals[1].(Vector)[0].F
maxVal := vals[2].(Vector)[0].F
if maxVal < minVal {
return enh.Out, nil
}
for _, el := range vec {
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric.DropMetricName(),
F: math.Max(minVal, math.Min(maxVal, el.F)),
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === clamp_max(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector, max Scalar) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcClampMax(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
vec := vals[0].(Vector)
maxVal := vals[1].(Vector)[0].F
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
for _, el := range vec {
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric.DropMetricName(),
F: math.Min(maxVal, el.F),
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === clamp_min(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector, min Scalar) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcClampMin(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
vec := vals[0].(Vector)
minVal := vals[1].(Vector)[0].F
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
for _, el := range vec {
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric.DropMetricName(),
F: math.Max(minVal, el.F),
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === round(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector, toNearest=1 Scalar) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcRound(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
vec := vals[0].(Vector)
// round returns a number rounded to toNearest.
// Ties are solved by rounding up.
toNearest := float64(1)
if len(args) >= 2 {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
toNearest = vals[1].(Vector)[0].F
}
// Invert as it seems to cause fewer floating point accuracy issues.
toNearestInverse := 1.0 / toNearest
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
for _, el := range vec {
f := math.Floor(el.F*toNearestInverse+0.5) / toNearestInverse
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric.DropMetricName(),
F: f,
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === Scalar(node parser.ValueTypeVector) Scalar ===
func funcScalar(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
v := vals[0].(Vector)
if len(v) != 1 {
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: math.NaN()}), nil
}
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: v[0].F}), nil
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
func aggrOverTime(vals []parser.Value, enh *EvalNodeHelper, aggrFn func(Series) float64) Vector {
el := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: aggrFn(el)})
}
func aggrHistOverTime(vals []parser.Value, enh *EvalNodeHelper, aggrFn func(Series) (*histogram.FloatHistogram, error)) (Vector, error) {
el := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
res, err := aggrFn(el)
return append(enh.Out, Sample{H: res}), err
}
// === avg_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAvgOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
firstSeries := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
if len(firstSeries.Floats) > 0 && len(firstSeries.Histograms) > 0 {
metricName := firstSeries.Metric.Get(labels.MetricName)
return enh.Out, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedFloatsHistogramsWarning(metricName, args[0].PositionRange()))
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
if len(firstSeries.Floats) == 0 {
// The passed values only contain histograms.
vec, err := aggrHistOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) (*histogram.FloatHistogram, error) {
count := 1
mean := s.Histograms[0].H.Copy()
for _, h := range s.Histograms[1:] {
count++
left := h.H.Copy().Div(float64(count))
right := mean.Copy().Div(float64(count))
toAdd, err := left.Sub(right)
if err != nil {
return mean, err
}
_, err = mean.Add(toAdd)
if err != nil {
return mean, err
}
}
return mean, nil
})
if err != nil {
metricName := firstSeries.Metric.Get(labels.MetricName)
if errors.Is(err, histogram.ErrHistogramsIncompatibleSchema) {
return enh.Out, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedExponentialCustomHistogramsWarning(metricName, args[0].PositionRange()))
} else if errors.Is(err, histogram.ErrHistogramsIncompatibleBounds) {
return enh.Out, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewIncompatibleCustomBucketsHistogramsWarning(metricName, args[0].PositionRange()))
}
}
return vec, nil
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
var (
sum, mean, count, kahanC float64
incrementalMean bool
)
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
for _, f := range s.Floats {
count++
if !incrementalMean {
newSum, newC := kahanSumInc(f.F, sum, kahanC)
// Perform regular mean calculation as long as
// the sum doesn't overflow and (in any case)
// for the first iteration (even if we start
// with ±Inf) to not run into division-by-zero
// problems below.
if count == 1 || !math.IsInf(newSum, 0) {
sum, kahanC = newSum, newC
continue
}
// Handle overflow by reverting to incremental calculation of the mean value.
incrementalMean = true
mean = sum / (count - 1)
kahanC /= count - 1
}
if math.IsInf(mean, 0) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if math.IsInf(f.F, 0) && (mean > 0) == (f.F > 0) {
// The `mean` and `f.F` values are `Inf` of the same sign. They
// can't be subtracted, but the value of `mean` is correct
// already.
continue
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if !math.IsInf(f.F, 0) && !math.IsNaN(f.F) {
// At this stage, the mean is an infinite. If the added
// value is neither an Inf or a Nan, we can keep that mean
// value.
// This is required because our calculation below removes
// the mean value, which would look like Inf += x - Inf and
// end up as a NaN.
continue
}
}
correctedMean := mean + kahanC
mean, kahanC = kahanSumInc(f.F/count-correctedMean/count, mean, kahanC)
}
if incrementalMean {
return mean + kahanC
}
return (sum + kahanC) / count
}), nil
}
// === count_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Notes) ===
func funcCountOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
return float64(len(s.Floats) + len(s.Histograms))
}), nil
}
// === last_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Notes) ===
func funcLastOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
el := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
var f FPoint
if len(el.Floats) > 0 {
f = el.Floats[len(el.Floats)-1]
}
var h HPoint
if len(el.Histograms) > 0 {
h = el.Histograms[len(el.Histograms)-1]
}
if h.H == nil || h.T < f.T {
return append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric,
F: f.F,
}), nil
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
return append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric,
H: h.H.Copy(),
}), nil
}
// === mad_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcMadOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
if len(vals[0].(Matrix)[0].Floats) == 0 {
return enh.Out, nil
}
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
values := make(vectorByValueHeap, 0, len(s.Floats))
for _, f := range s.Floats {
values = append(values, Sample{F: f.F})
}
median := quantile(0.5, values)
values = make(vectorByValueHeap, 0, len(s.Floats))
for _, f := range s.Floats {
values = append(values, Sample{F: math.Abs(f.F - median)})
}
return quantile(0.5, values)
}), nil
}
// === max_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcMaxOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(vals[0].(Matrix)[0].Floats) == 0 {
// TODO(beorn7): The passed values only contain
// histograms. max_over_time ignores histograms for now. If
// there are only histograms, we have to return without adding
// anything to enh.Out.
return enh.Out, nil
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
maxVal := s.Floats[0].F
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
for _, f := range s.Floats {
if f.F > maxVal || math.IsNaN(maxVal) {
maxVal = f.F
}
}
return maxVal
}), nil
}
// === min_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcMinOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(vals[0].(Matrix)[0].Floats) == 0 {
// TODO(beorn7): The passed values only contain
// histograms. min_over_time ignores histograms for now. If
// there are only histograms, we have to return without adding
// anything to enh.Out.
return enh.Out, nil
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
minVal := s.Floats[0].F
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
for _, f := range s.Floats {
if f.F < minVal || math.IsNaN(minVal) {
minVal = f.F
}
}
return minVal
}), nil
}
// === sum_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSumOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
firstSeries := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
if len(firstSeries.Floats) > 0 && len(firstSeries.Histograms) > 0 {
metricName := firstSeries.Metric.Get(labels.MetricName)
return enh.Out, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedFloatsHistogramsWarning(metricName, args[0].PositionRange()))
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
if len(firstSeries.Floats) == 0 {
// The passed values only contain histograms.
vec, err := aggrHistOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) (*histogram.FloatHistogram, error) {
sum := s.Histograms[0].H.Copy()
for _, h := range s.Histograms[1:] {
_, err := sum.Add(h.H)
if err != nil {
return sum, err
}
}
return sum, nil
})
if err != nil {
metricName := firstSeries.Metric.Get(labels.MetricName)
if errors.Is(err, histogram.ErrHistogramsIncompatibleSchema) {
return enh.Out, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewMixedExponentialCustomHistogramsWarning(metricName, args[0].PositionRange()))
} else if errors.Is(err, histogram.ErrHistogramsIncompatibleBounds) {
return enh.Out, annotations.New().Add(annotations.NewIncompatibleCustomBucketsHistogramsWarning(metricName, args[0].PositionRange()))
}
}
return vec, nil
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
var sum, c float64
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
for _, f := range s.Floats {
sum, c = kahanSumInc(f.F, sum, c)
}
if math.IsInf(sum, 0) {
return sum
}
return sum + c
}), nil
}
// === quantile_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcQuantileOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
q := vals[0].(Vector)[0].F
el := vals[1].(Matrix)[0]
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(el.Floats) == 0 {
// TODO(beorn7): The passed values only contain
// histograms. quantile_over_time ignores histograms for now. If
// there are only histograms, we have to return without adding
// anything to enh.Out.
return enh.Out, nil
}
var annos annotations.Annotations
if math.IsNaN(q) || q < 0 || q > 1 {
annos.Add(annotations.NewInvalidQuantileWarning(q, args[0].PositionRange()))
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
values := make(vectorByValueHeap, 0, len(el.Floats))
for _, f := range el.Floats {
values = append(values, Sample{F: f.F})
}
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: quantile(q, values)}), annos
}
// === stddev_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcStddevOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(vals[0].(Matrix)[0].Floats) == 0 {
// TODO(beorn7): The passed values only contain
// histograms. stddev_over_time ignores histograms for now. If
// there are only histograms, we have to return without adding
// anything to enh.Out.
return enh.Out, nil
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
var count float64
var mean, cMean float64
var aux, cAux float64
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
for _, f := range s.Floats {
count++
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
delta := f.F - (mean + cMean)
mean, cMean = kahanSumInc(delta/count, mean, cMean)
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
aux, cAux = kahanSumInc(delta*(f.F-(mean+cMean)), aux, cAux)
}
return math.Sqrt((aux + cAux) / count)
}), nil
}
// === stdvar_over_time(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcStdvarOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(vals[0].(Matrix)[0].Floats) == 0 {
// TODO(beorn7): The passed values only contain
// histograms. stdvar_over_time ignores histograms for now. If
// there are only histograms, we have to return without adding
// anything to enh.Out.
return enh.Out, nil
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
var count float64
var mean, cMean float64
var aux, cAux float64
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
for _, f := range s.Floats {
count++
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
delta := f.F - (mean + cMean)
mean, cMean = kahanSumInc(delta/count, mean, cMean)
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
aux, cAux = kahanSumInc(delta*(f.F-(mean+cMean)), aux, cAux)
}
return (aux + cAux) / count
}), nil
}
// === absent(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAbsent(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
if len(vals[0].(Vector)) > 0 {
return enh.Out, nil
}
return append(enh.Out,
Sample{
Metric: createLabelsForAbsentFunction(args[0]),
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: 1,
}), nil
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
}
// === absent_over_time(Vector parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
// As this function has a matrix as argument, it does not get all the Series.
// This function will return 1 if the matrix has at least one element.
// Due to engine optimization, this function is only called when this condition is true.
// Then, the engine post-processes the results to get the expected output.
func funcAbsentOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: 1}), nil
}
// === present_over_time(Vector parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcPresentOverTime(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
return aggrOverTime(vals, enh, func(s Series) float64 {
return 1
}), nil
}
func simpleFunc(vals []parser.Value, enh *EvalNodeHelper, f func(float64) float64) Vector {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
for _, el := range vals[0].(Vector) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if el.H == nil { // Process only float samples.
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric.DropMetricName(),
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: f(el.F),
})
}
}
return enh.Out
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
}
// === abs(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAbs(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Abs), nil
}
// === ceil(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcCeil(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Ceil), nil
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
}
// === floor(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcFloor(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Floor), nil
}
// === exp(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcExp(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Exp), nil
}
// === sqrt(Vector VectorNode) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSqrt(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Sqrt), nil
}
// === ln(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcLn(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Log), nil
}
// === log2(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcLog2(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Log2), nil
}
// === log10(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcLog10(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Log10), nil
}
// === sin(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSin(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Sin), nil
}
// === cos(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcCos(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Cos), nil
}
// === tan(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcTan(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Tan), nil
}
// === asin(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAsin(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Asin), nil
}
// === acos(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAcos(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Acos), nil
}
// === atan(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAtan(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Atan), nil
}
// === sinh(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSinh(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Sinh), nil
}
// === cosh(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcCosh(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Cosh), nil
}
// === tanh(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcTanh(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Tanh), nil
}
// === asinh(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAsinh(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Asinh), nil
}
// === acosh(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAcosh(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Acosh), nil
}
// === atanh(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcAtanh(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, math.Atanh), nil
}
// === rad(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcRad(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, func(v float64) float64 {
return v * math.Pi / 180
}), nil
}
// === deg(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcDeg(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, func(v float64) float64 {
return v * 180 / math.Pi
}), nil
}
// === pi() Scalar ===
func funcPi(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return Vector{Sample{F: math.Pi}}, nil
}
// === sgn(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcSgn(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return simpleFunc(vals, enh, func(v float64) float64 {
switch {
case v < 0:
return -1
case v > 0:
return 1
default:
return v
}
}), nil
}
// === timestamp(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcTimestamp(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
vec := vals[0].(Vector)
for _, el := range vec {
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric.DropMetricName(),
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: float64(el.T) / 1000,
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
func kahanSumInc(inc, sum, c float64) (newSum, newC float64) {
t := sum + inc
switch {
case math.IsInf(t, 0):
c = 0
// Using Neumaier improvement, swap if next term larger than sum.
case math.Abs(sum) >= math.Abs(inc):
c += (sum - t) + inc
default:
c += (inc - t) + sum
}
return t, c
}
// linearRegression performs a least-square linear regression analysis on the
// provided SamplePairs. It returns the slope, and the intercept value at the
// provided time.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
func linearRegression(samples []FPoint, interceptTime int64) (slope, intercept float64) {
var (
n float64
sumX, cX float64
sumY, cY float64
sumXY, cXY float64
sumX2, cX2 float64
initY float64
constY bool
)
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
initY = samples[0].F
constY = true
for i, sample := range samples {
// Set constY to false if any new y values are encountered.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if constY && i > 0 && sample.F != initY {
constY = false
}
n += 1.0
x := float64(sample.T-interceptTime) / 1e3
sumX, cX = kahanSumInc(x, sumX, cX)
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
sumY, cY = kahanSumInc(sample.F, sumY, cY)
sumXY, cXY = kahanSumInc(x*sample.F, sumXY, cXY)
sumX2, cX2 = kahanSumInc(x*x, sumX2, cX2)
}
if constY {
if math.IsInf(initY, 0) {
return math.NaN(), math.NaN()
}
return 0, initY
}
sumX += cX
sumY += cY
sumXY += cXY
sumX2 += cX2
covXY := sumXY - sumX*sumY/n
varX := sumX2 - sumX*sumX/n
slope = covXY / varX
intercept = sumY/n - slope*sumX/n
return slope, intercept
}
// === deriv(node parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcDeriv(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
samples := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
// No sense in trying to compute a derivative without at least two points.
// Drop this Vector element.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(samples.Floats) < 2 {
return enh.Out, nil
}
// We pass in an arbitrary timestamp that is near the values in use
// to avoid floating point accuracy issues, see
// https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/issues/2674
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
slope, _ := linearRegression(samples.Floats, samples.Floats[0].T)
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: slope}), nil
}
// === predict_linear(node parser.ValueTypeMatrix, k parser.ValueTypeScalar) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcPredictLinear(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
samples := vals[0].(Matrix)[0]
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
duration := vals[1].(Vector)[0].F
// No sense in trying to predict anything without at least two points.
// Drop this Vector element.
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(samples.Floats) < 2 {
return enh.Out, nil
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
slope, intercept := linearRegression(samples.Floats, enh.Ts)
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: slope*duration + intercept}), nil
}
// === histogram_count(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcHistogramCount(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
inVec := vals[0].(Vector)
for _, sample := range inVec {
// Skip non-histogram samples.
if sample.H == nil {
continue
}
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: sample.Metric.DropMetricName(),
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: sample.H.Count,
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === histogram_sum(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcHistogramSum(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
inVec := vals[0].(Vector)
for _, sample := range inVec {
// Skip non-histogram samples.
if sample.H == nil {
continue
}
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: sample.Metric.DropMetricName(),
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: sample.H.Sum,
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === histogram_avg(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcHistogramAvg(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
inVec := vals[0].(Vector)
for _, sample := range inVec {
// Skip non-histogram samples.
if sample.H == nil {
continue
}
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: sample.Metric.DropMetricName(),
F: sample.H.Sum / sample.H.Count,
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === histogram_stddev(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcHistogramStdDev(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
inVec := vals[0].(Vector)
for _, sample := range inVec {
// Skip non-histogram samples.
if sample.H == nil {
continue
}
mean := sample.H.Sum / sample.H.Count
var variance, cVariance float64
it := sample.H.AllBucketIterator()
for it.Next() {
bucket := it.At()
if bucket.Count == 0 {
continue
}
var val float64
if bucket.Lower <= 0 && 0 <= bucket.Upper {
val = 0
} else {
val = math.Sqrt(bucket.Upper * bucket.Lower)
if bucket.Upper < 0 {
val = -val
}
}
delta := val - mean
variance, cVariance = kahanSumInc(bucket.Count*delta*delta, variance, cVariance)
}
variance += cVariance
variance /= sample.H.Count
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: sample.Metric.DropMetricName(),
F: math.Sqrt(variance),
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === histogram_stdvar(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcHistogramStdVar(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
inVec := vals[0].(Vector)
for _, sample := range inVec {
// Skip non-histogram samples.
if sample.H == nil {
continue
}
mean := sample.H.Sum / sample.H.Count
var variance, cVariance float64
it := sample.H.AllBucketIterator()
for it.Next() {
bucket := it.At()
if bucket.Count == 0 {
continue
}
var val float64
if bucket.Lower <= 0 && 0 <= bucket.Upper {
val = 0
} else {
val = math.Sqrt(bucket.Upper * bucket.Lower)
if bucket.Upper < 0 {
val = -val
}
}
delta := val - mean
variance, cVariance = kahanSumInc(bucket.Count*delta*delta, variance, cVariance)
}
variance += cVariance
variance /= sample.H.Count
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: sample.Metric.DropMetricName(),
F: variance,
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === histogram_fraction(lower, upper parser.ValueTypeScalar, Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcHistogramFraction(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
lower := vals[0].(Vector)[0].F
upper := vals[1].(Vector)[0].F
inVec := vals[2].(Vector)
for _, sample := range inVec {
// Skip non-histogram samples.
if sample.H == nil {
continue
}
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: sample.Metric.DropMetricName(),
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: histogramFraction(lower, upper, sample.H),
})
}
return enh.Out, nil
}
// === histogram_quantile(k parser.ValueTypeScalar, Vector parser.ValueTypeVector) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcHistogramQuantile(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
q := vals[0].(Vector)[0].F
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
inVec := vals[1].(Vector)
var annos annotations.Annotations
if math.IsNaN(q) || q < 0 || q > 1 {
annos.Add(annotations.NewInvalidQuantileWarning(q, args[0].PositionRange()))
}
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
if enh.signatureToMetricWithBuckets == nil {
change labelset comparison in promql engine to avoid false positive during detection of duplicates (#7058) * Use go1.14 new hash/maphash to hash both RHS and LHS instead of XOR'ing which has been resulting in hash collisions. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Refactor engine labelset signature generation, just use labels.Labels instead of hashes. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Address review comments; function comments + store result of lhs.String+rhs.String as key. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Replace all signatureFunc usage with signatureFuncString. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Make optimizations to labels String function and generation of rhs+lhs as string in resultMetric. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Use separate string functions that don't use strconv just for engine maps. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Use a byte invalid separator instead of quoting and have a buffer attached to EvalNodeHelper instead of using a global pool in the labels package. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Address review comments. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Address more review comments, labels has a function that now builds a byte slice without turning it into a string. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * Use two different non-ascii hex codes as byte separators between labels and between sets of labels when building bytes of a Labels struct. Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com> * We only need the 2nd byte invalid sep. at the beginning of a labels.Bytes Signed-off-by: Callum Styan <callumstyan@gmail.com>
5 years ago
enh.signatureToMetricWithBuckets = map[string]*metricWithBuckets{}
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
} else {
for _, v := range enh.signatureToMetricWithBuckets {
v.buckets = v.buckets[:0]
}
}
var histogramSamples []Sample
for _, sample := range inVec {
// We are only looking for classic buckets here. Remember
// the histograms for later treatment.
if sample.H != nil {
histogramSamples = append(histogramSamples, sample)
continue
}
upperBound, err := strconv.ParseFloat(
sample.Metric.Get(model.BucketLabel), 64,
)
if err != nil {
annos.Add(annotations.NewBadBucketLabelWarning(sample.Metric.Get(labels.MetricName), sample.Metric.Get(model.BucketLabel), args[1].PositionRange()))
continue
}
enh.lblBuf = sample.Metric.BytesWithoutLabels(enh.lblBuf, labels.BucketLabel)
mb, ok := enh.signatureToMetricWithBuckets[string(enh.lblBuf)]
if !ok {
sample.Metric = labels.NewBuilder(sample.Metric).
Del(excludedLabels...).
Labels()
mb = &metricWithBuckets{sample.Metric, nil}
enh.signatureToMetricWithBuckets[string(enh.lblBuf)] = mb
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
mb.buckets = append(mb.buckets, bucket{upperBound, sample.F})
}
// Now deal with the histograms.
for _, sample := range histogramSamples {
// We have to reconstruct the exact same signature as above for
// a classic histogram, just ignoring any le label.
enh.lblBuf = sample.Metric.Bytes(enh.lblBuf)
if mb, ok := enh.signatureToMetricWithBuckets[string(enh.lblBuf)]; ok && len(mb.buckets) > 0 {
// At this data point, we have classic histogram
// buckets and a native histogram with the same name and
// labels. Do not evaluate anything.
annos.Add(annotations.NewMixedClassicNativeHistogramsWarning(sample.Metric.Get(labels.MetricName), args[1].PositionRange()))
delete(enh.signatureToMetricWithBuckets, string(enh.lblBuf))
continue
}
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: sample.Metric.DropMetricName(),
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: histogramQuantile(q, sample.H),
})
}
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
for _, mb := range enh.signatureToMetricWithBuckets {
if len(mb.buckets) > 0 {
res, forcedMonotonicity, _ := bucketQuantile(q, mb.buckets)
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
Metric: mb.metric,
F: res,
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
})
if forcedMonotonicity {
annos.Add(annotations.NewHistogramQuantileForcedMonotonicityInfo(mb.metric.Get(labels.MetricName), args[1].PositionRange()))
}
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
}
}
return enh.Out, annos
}
// === resets(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcResets(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
floats := vals[0].(Matrix)[0].Floats
histograms := vals[0].(Matrix)[0].Histograms
resets := 0
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(floats) > 1 {
prev := floats[0].F
for _, sample := range floats[1:] {
current := sample.F
if current < prev {
resets++
}
prev = current
}
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(histograms) > 1 {
prev := histograms[0].H
for _, sample := range histograms[1:] {
current := sample.H
if current.DetectReset(prev) {
resets++
}
prev = current
}
}
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: float64(resets)}), nil
}
// === changes(Matrix parser.ValueTypeMatrix) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcChanges(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
floats := vals[0].(Matrix)[0].Floats
changes := 0
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
if len(floats) == 0 {
// TODO(beorn7): Only histogram values, still need to add support.
return enh.Out, nil
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
}
prev := floats[0].F
for _, sample := range floats[1:] {
current := sample.F
if current != prev && !(math.IsNaN(current) && math.IsNaN(prev)) {
changes++
}
prev = current
}
return append(enh.Out, Sample{F: float64(changes)}), nil
}
// label_replace function operates only on series; does not look at timestamps or values.
func (ev *evaluator) evalLabelReplace(args parser.Expressions) (parser.Value, annotations.Annotations) {
var (
dst = stringFromArg(args[1])
repl = stringFromArg(args[2])
src = stringFromArg(args[3])
regexStr = stringFromArg(args[4])
)
regex, err := regexp.Compile("^(?:" + regexStr + ")$")
if err != nil {
panic(fmt.Errorf("invalid regular expression in label_replace(): %s", regexStr))
}
if !model.LabelNameRE.MatchString(dst) {
panic(fmt.Errorf("invalid destination label name in label_replace(): %s", dst))
}
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
val, ws := ev.eval(args[0])
matrix := val.(Matrix)
lb := labels.NewBuilder(labels.EmptyLabels())
for i, el := range matrix {
srcVal := el.Metric.Get(src)
indexes := regex.FindStringSubmatchIndex(srcVal)
if indexes != nil { // Only replace when regexp matches.
res := regex.ExpandString([]byte{}, repl, srcVal, indexes)
lb.Reset(el.Metric)
lb.Set(dst, string(res))
matrix[i].Metric = lb.Labels()
}
}
if matrix.ContainsSameLabelset() {
ev.errorf("vector cannot contain metrics with the same labelset")
}
return matrix, ws
}
// === label_replace(Vector parser.ValueTypeVector, dst_label, replacement, src_labelname, regex parser.ValueTypeString) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcLabelReplace(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
panic("funcLabelReplace wrong implementation called")
}
// === Vector(s Scalar) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcVector(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return append(enh.Out,
Sample{
Metric: labels.Labels{},
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: vals[0].(Vector)[0].F,
}), nil
}
// label_join function operates only on series; does not look at timestamps or values.
func (ev *evaluator) evalLabelJoin(args parser.Expressions) (parser.Value, annotations.Annotations) {
var (
dst = stringFromArg(args[1])
sep = stringFromArg(args[2])
srcLabels = make([]string, len(args)-3)
)
for i := 3; i < len(args); i++ {
src := stringFromArg(args[i])
if !model.LabelName(src).IsValid() {
panic(fmt.Errorf("invalid source label name in label_join(): %s", src))
}
srcLabels[i-3] = src
}
if !model.LabelName(dst).IsValid() {
panic(fmt.Errorf("invalid destination label name in label_join(): %s", dst))
}
val, ws := ev.eval(args[0])
matrix := val.(Matrix)
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
srcVals := make([]string, len(srcLabels))
lb := labels.NewBuilder(labels.EmptyLabels())
for i, el := range matrix {
for i, src := range srcLabels {
srcVals[i] = el.Metric.Get(src)
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
}
strval := strings.Join(srcVals, sep)
lb.Reset(el.Metric)
lb.Set(dst, strval)
matrix[i].Metric = lb.Labels()
}
return matrix, ws
}
// === label_join(vector model.ValVector, dest_labelname, separator, src_labelname...) (Vector, Annotations) ===
func funcLabelJoin(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
panic("funcLabelReplace wrong implementation called")
}
// Common code for date related functions.
func dateWrapper(vals []parser.Value, enh *EvalNodeHelper, f func(time.Time) float64) Vector {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
if len(vals) == 0 {
return append(enh.Out,
Sample{
Metric: labels.Labels{},
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: f(time.Unix(enh.Ts/1000, 0).UTC()),
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
})
}
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
for _, el := range vals[0].(Vector) {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
t := time.Unix(int64(el.F), 0).UTC()
enh.Out = append(enh.Out, Sample{
Metric: el.Metric.DropMetricName(),
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
F: f(t),
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
})
}
return enh.Out
}
// === days_in_month(v Vector) Scalar ===
func funcDaysInMonth(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return dateWrapper(vals, enh, func(t time.Time) float64 {
return float64(32 - time.Date(t.Year(), t.Month(), 32, 0, 0, 0, 0, time.UTC).Day())
}), nil
}
// === day_of_month(v Vector) Scalar ===
func funcDayOfMonth(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return dateWrapper(vals, enh, func(t time.Time) float64 {
return float64(t.Day())
}), nil
}
// === day_of_week(v Vector) Scalar ===
func funcDayOfWeek(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return dateWrapper(vals, enh, func(t time.Time) float64 {
return float64(t.Weekday())
}), nil
}
// === day_of_year(v Vector) Scalar ===
func funcDayOfYear(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
return dateWrapper(vals, enh, func(t time.Time) float64 {
return float64(t.YearDay())
}), nil
}
// === hour(v Vector) Scalar ===
func funcHour(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return dateWrapper(vals, enh, func(t time.Time) float64 {
return float64(t.Hour())
}), nil
}
// === minute(v Vector) Scalar ===
func funcMinute(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return dateWrapper(vals, enh, func(t time.Time) float64 {
return float64(t.Minute())
}), nil
}
// === month(v Vector) Scalar ===
func funcMonth(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return dateWrapper(vals, enh, func(t time.Time) float64 {
return float64(t.Month())
}), nil
}
// === year(v Vector) Scalar ===
func funcYear(vals []parser.Value, args parser.Expressions, enh *EvalNodeHelper) (Vector, annotations.Annotations) {
Optimise PromQL (#3966) * Move range logic to 'eval' Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make aggregegate range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * PromQL is statically typed, so don't eval to find the type. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Extend rangewrapper to multiple exprs Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Start making function evaluation ranged Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make instant queries a special case of range queries Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Eliminate evalString Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Evaluate range vector functions one series at a time Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make unary operators range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make binops range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Pass time to range-aware functions. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple _over_time functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce allocs when working with matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add basic benchmark for range evaluation Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse objects for function arguments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Do dropmetricname and allocating output vector only once. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add range-aware support for range vector functions with params Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise holt_winters, cut cpu and allocs by ~25% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make rate&friends range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware. Document calling convention. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make date functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make simple math functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Convert more functions to be range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make more functions range aware Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Specialcase timestamp() with vector selector arg for range awareness Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove transition code for functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the rest of the engine transition code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove more obselete code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove the last uses of the eval* functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove engine finalizers to prevent corruption The finalizers set by matrixSelector were being called just before the value they were retruning to the pool was then being provided to the caller. Thus a concurrent query could corrupt the data that the user has just been returned. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add new benchmark suite for range functinos Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Migrate existing benchmarks to new system Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand promql benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simply test by removing unused range code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * When testing instant queries, check range queries too. To protect against subsequent steps in a range query being affected by the previous steps, add a test that evaluates an instant query that we know works again as a range query with the tiimestamp we care about not being the first step. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse ring for matrix iters. Put query results back in pool. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse buffer when iterating over matrix selectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Unary minus should remove metric name Cut down benchmarks for faster runs. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reduce repetition in benchmark test cases Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Work series by series when doing normal vectorSelectors Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise benchmark setup, cuts time by 60% Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Have rangeWrapper use an evalNodeHelper to cache across steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use evalNodeHelper with functions Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cache dropMetricName within a node evaluation. This saves both the calculations and allocs done by dropMetricName across steps. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse input vectors in rangewrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Reuse the point slices in the matrixes input/output by rangeWrapper Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make benchmark setup faster using AddFast Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Simplify benchmark code. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add caching in VectorBinop Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Use xor to have one-level resultMetric hash key Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Add more benchmarks Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Call Query.Close in apiv1 This allows point slices allocated for the response data to be reused by later queries, saving allocations. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise histogram_quantile It's now 5-10% faster with 97% less garbage generated for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make the input collection in rangeVector linear rather than quadratic Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_replace, for 1k steps 15x fewer allocs and 3x faster Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Optimise label_join, 1.8x faster and 11x less memory for 1k steps Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Expand benchmarks, cleanup comments, simplify numSteps logic. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Fabian's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Comments from Alin. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address jrv's comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Remove dead code Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Address Simon's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Rename populateIterators, pre-init some sizes Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Handle case where function has non-matrix args first Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Split rangeWrapper out to rangeEval function, improve comments Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Cleanup and make things more consistent Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Make EvalNodeHelper public Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io> * Fabian's comments. Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
7 years ago
return dateWrapper(vals, enh, func(t time.Time) float64 {
return float64(t.Year())
}), nil
}
// FunctionCalls is a list of all functions supported by PromQL, including their types.
var FunctionCalls = map[string]FunctionCall{
"abs": funcAbs,
"absent": funcAbsent,
"absent_over_time": funcAbsentOverTime,
"acos": funcAcos,
"acosh": funcAcosh,
"asin": funcAsin,
"asinh": funcAsinh,
"atan": funcAtan,
"atanh": funcAtanh,
"avg_over_time": funcAvgOverTime,
"ceil": funcCeil,
"changes": funcChanges,
"clamp": funcClamp,
"clamp_max": funcClampMax,
"clamp_min": funcClampMin,
"cos": funcCos,
"cosh": funcCosh,
"count_over_time": funcCountOverTime,
"days_in_month": funcDaysInMonth,
"day_of_month": funcDayOfMonth,
"day_of_week": funcDayOfWeek,
"day_of_year": funcDayOfYear,
"deg": funcDeg,
"delta": funcDelta,
"deriv": funcDeriv,
"exp": funcExp,
"floor": funcFloor,
"histogram_avg": funcHistogramAvg,
"histogram_count": funcHistogramCount,
"histogram_fraction": funcHistogramFraction,
"histogram_quantile": funcHistogramQuantile,
"histogram_sum": funcHistogramSum,
"histogram_stddev": funcHistogramStdDev,
"histogram_stdvar": funcHistogramStdVar,
"holt_winters": funcHoltWinters,
"hour": funcHour,
"idelta": funcIdelta,
"increase": funcIncrease,
"irate": funcIrate,
"label_replace": funcLabelReplace,
"label_join": funcLabelJoin,
"ln": funcLn,
"log10": funcLog10,
"log2": funcLog2,
"last_over_time": funcLastOverTime,
"mad_over_time": funcMadOverTime,
"max_over_time": funcMaxOverTime,
"min_over_time": funcMinOverTime,
"minute": funcMinute,
"month": funcMonth,
"pi": funcPi,
"predict_linear": funcPredictLinear,
"present_over_time": funcPresentOverTime,
"quantile_over_time": funcQuantileOverTime,
"rad": funcRad,
"rate": funcRate,
"resets": funcResets,
"round": funcRound,
"scalar": funcScalar,
"sgn": funcSgn,
"sin": funcSin,
"sinh": funcSinh,
"sort": funcSort,
"sort_desc": funcSortDesc,
"sort_by_label": funcSortByLabel,
"sort_by_label_desc": funcSortByLabelDesc,
"sqrt": funcSqrt,
"stddev_over_time": funcStddevOverTime,
"stdvar_over_time": funcStdvarOverTime,
"sum_over_time": funcSumOverTime,
"tan": funcTan,
"tanh": funcTanh,
"time": funcTime,
"timestamp": funcTimestamp,
"vector": funcVector,
"year": funcYear,
}
// AtModifierUnsafeFunctions are the functions whose result
// can vary if evaluation time is changed when the arguments are
// step invariant. It also includes functions that use the timestamps
// of the passed instant vector argument to calculate a result since
// that can also change with change in eval time.
var AtModifierUnsafeFunctions = map[string]struct{}{
// Step invariant functions.
"days_in_month": {}, "day_of_month": {}, "day_of_week": {}, "day_of_year": {},
"hour": {}, "minute": {}, "month": {}, "year": {},
"predict_linear": {}, "time": {},
// Uses timestamp of the argument for the result,
// hence unsafe to use with @ modifier.
"timestamp": {},
}
type vectorByValueHeap Vector
func (s vectorByValueHeap) Len() int {
return len(s)
}
func (s vectorByValueHeap) Less(i, j int) bool {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
// We compare histograms based on their sum of observations.
// TODO(beorn7): Is that what we want?
vi, vj := s[i].F, s[j].F
if s[i].H != nil {
vi = s[i].H.Sum
}
if s[j].H != nil {
vj = s[j].H.Sum
}
if math.IsNaN(vi) {
return true
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
return vi < vj
}
func (s vectorByValueHeap) Swap(i, j int) {
s[i], s[j] = s[j], s[i]
}
func (s *vectorByValueHeap) Push(x interface{}) {
*s = append(*s, *(x.(*Sample)))
}
func (s *vectorByValueHeap) Pop() interface{} {
old := *s
n := len(old)
el := old[n-1]
*s = old[0 : n-1]
return el
}
type vectorByReverseValueHeap Vector
func (s vectorByReverseValueHeap) Len() int {
return len(s)
}
func (s vectorByReverseValueHeap) Less(i, j int) bool {
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
// We compare histograms based on their sum of observations.
// TODO(beorn7): Is that what we want?
vi, vj := s[i].F, s[j].F
if s[i].H != nil {
vi = s[i].H.Sum
}
if s[j].H != nil {
vj = s[j].H.Sum
}
if math.IsNaN(vi) {
return true
}
promql: Separate `Point` into `FPoint` and `HPoint` In other words: Instead of having a “polymorphous” `Point` that can either contain a float value or a histogram value, use an `FPoint` for floats and an `HPoint` for histograms. This seemingly small change has a _lot_ of repercussions throughout the codebase. The idea here is to avoid the increase in size of `Point` arrays that happened after native histograms had been added. The higher-level data structures (`Sample`, `Series`, etc.) are still “polymorphous”. The same idea could be applied to them, but at each step the trade-offs needed to be evaluated. The idea with this change is to do the minimum necessary to get back to pre-histogram performance for functions that do not touch histograms. Here are comparisons for the `changes` function. The test data doesn't include histograms yet. Ideally, there would be no change in the benchmark result at all. First runtime v2.39 compared to directly prior to this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 542µs ± 1% +38.58% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 617µs ± 2% +36.48% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.36ms ± 2% +21.58% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 8.94ms ± 1% +14.21% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.30ms ± 1% +10.67% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.10ms ± 1% +11.82% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 11.8ms ± 1% +12.50% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 87.4ms ± 1% +12.63% (p=0.000 n=9+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 32.8ms ± 1% +8.01% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.6ms ± 2% +9.64% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 117ms ± 1% +11.69% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 876ms ± 1% +11.83% (p=0.000 n=9+10) ``` And then runtime v2.39 compared to after this commit: ``` name old time/op new time/op delta RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1-16 391µs ± 2% 547µs ± 1% +39.84% (p=0.000 n=9+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=10-16 452µs ± 2% 616µs ± 2% +36.15% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=100-16 1.12ms ± 1% 1.26ms ± 1% +12.20% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_one[1d]),steps=1000-16 7.83ms ± 1% 7.95ms ± 1% +1.59% (p=0.000 n=10+8) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1-16 2.98ms ± 0% 3.38ms ± 2% +13.49% (p=0.000 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=10-16 3.66ms ± 1% 4.02ms ± 1% +9.80% (p=0.000 n=10+9) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=100-16 10.5ms ± 0% 10.8ms ± 1% +3.08% (p=0.000 n=8+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_ten[1d]),steps=1000-16 77.6ms ± 1% 78.1ms ± 1% +0.58% (p=0.035 n=9+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1-16 30.4ms ± 2% 33.5ms ± 4% +10.18% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=10-16 37.1ms ± 2% 40.0ms ± 1% +7.98% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=100-16 105ms ± 1% 107ms ± 1% +1.92% (p=0.000 n=10+10) RangeQuery/expr=changes(a_hundred[1d]),steps=1000-16 783ms ± 3% 775ms ± 1% -1.02% (p=0.019 n=9+9) ``` In summary, the runtime doesn't really improve with this change for queries with just a few steps. For queries with many steps, this commit essentially reinstates the old performance. This is good because the many-step queries are the one that matter most (longest absolute runtime). In terms of allocations, though, this commit doesn't make a dent at all (numbers not shown). The reason is that most of the allocations happen in the sampleRingIterator (in the storage package), which has to be addressed in a separate commit. Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2 years ago
return vi > vj
}
func (s vectorByReverseValueHeap) Swap(i, j int) {
s[i], s[j] = s[j], s[i]
}
func (s *vectorByReverseValueHeap) Push(x interface{}) {
*s = append(*s, *(x.(*Sample)))
}
func (s *vectorByReverseValueHeap) Pop() interface{} {
old := *s
n := len(old)
el := old[n-1]
*s = old[0 : n-1]
return el
}
// createLabelsForAbsentFunction returns the labels that are uniquely and exactly matched
// in a given expression. It is used in the absent functions.
func createLabelsForAbsentFunction(expr parser.Expr) labels.Labels {
b := labels.NewBuilder(labels.EmptyLabels())
var lm []*labels.Matcher
switch n := expr.(type) {
case *parser.VectorSelector:
lm = n.LabelMatchers
case *parser.MatrixSelector:
lm = n.VectorSelector.(*parser.VectorSelector).LabelMatchers
default:
return labels.EmptyLabels()
}
// The 'has' map implements backwards-compatibility for historic behaviour:
// e.g. in `absent(x{job="a",job="b",foo="bar"})` then `job` is removed from the output.
// Note this gives arguably wrong behaviour for `absent(x{job="a",job="a",foo="bar"})`.
has := make(map[string]bool, len(lm))
for _, ma := range lm {
if ma.Name == labels.MetricName {
continue
}
if ma.Type == labels.MatchEqual && !has[ma.Name] {
b.Set(ma.Name, ma.Value)
has[ma.Name] = true
} else {
b.Del(ma.Name)
}
}
return b.Labels()
}
func stringFromArg(e parser.Expr) string {
tmp := unwrapStepInvariantExpr(e) // Unwrap StepInvariant
unwrapParenExpr(&tmp) // Optionally unwrap ParenExpr
return tmp.(*parser.StringLiteral).Val
}
func stringSliceFromArgs(args parser.Expressions) []string {
tmp := make([]string, len(args))
for i := 0; i < len(args); i++ {
tmp[i] = stringFromArg(args[i])
}
return tmp
}