mirror of https://github.com/k3s-io/k3s
58 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
# Add dual stack support to netpol agent
|
|
|
|
Date: 2021-12-13
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
|
|
Accepted
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Currently the network policy agent included in k3s is in fact a copied code of
|
|
[kube-router's](https://github.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router) network policy
|
|
controller, which can be found [here](https://github.com/k3s-io/k3s/tree/master/pkg/agent/netpol).
|
|
|
|
The first and the most important issue is that kube-router lacks support for
|
|
dual-stack (and even IPv6 in general in the most of its components). However,
|
|
implementing such support is a non-trivial task.
|
|
|
|
The second issue is that we include a copy of kube-router code in k3s, which
|
|
makes it hard to consume updates. Even if we need some changes on top of
|
|
upstream code, we should rather use a fork which is easy to rebase with
|
|
upstream.
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
We implement a feature of supporting dual stack Kubernetes clusters in network
|
|
policy controller in kube-router. We start from network policy controller, as
|
|
we don't consume any other kube-router components in k3s.
|
|
|
|
Once it's done and working, we submit a pull request:
|
|
|
|
* to [our fork of kube-router](https://github.com/k3s-io/kube-router)
|
|
* [upstream](https://github.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router)
|
|
|
|
The motivation behind keeping a fork is that:
|
|
|
|
* upstream might ask for implementing dual-stack in all kube-router
|
|
components (which would be understandable)
|
|
* acceepting a solution upstream might take long time
|
|
|
|
Our fork of kube-router is going to be used as a vendored library inside k3s
|
|
code. And the currently copied code in k3s in `pkg/agent/netpol` is going to
|
|
be removed in favor of using kube-router as a library.
|
|
|
|
As soon as dual-stack becomes an upstream feature - k3s is going to use
|
|
upstream kube-router as a vendored library.
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
It will increase k3s product portfolio by fully supporting dual-stack
|
|
networking.
|
|
|
|
However, it might also introduce significant amount of work for developers
|
|
which could be related to:
|
|
|
|
* agreeing with proper solution upstream
|
|
* maintaining a fork until that happens (rebasing with upstream releases)
|