Drop the secondary queue and add either ratelimited or after the
required amount of time that we need to wait directly in the main
queue. In this way we can always be sure that we will sync back
the Deployment if its progress has yet to resolve into a complete
(NewReplicaSetAvailable) or TimedOut condition.
To prepare for implementing ControllerRef across all controllers,
this pushes the common adopt/orphan logic into ControllerRefManager
so each controller doesn't have to duplicate it.
This also shares the adopt/orphan logic between Pods and ReplicaSets,
so it lives in only one place.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41196, 41252, 41300, 39179, 41449)
controller: cleanup workload controllers a bit
* Switches glog.Errorf to utilruntime.HandleError in DS and RC controllers
* Drops a couple of unused variables in the DS, SS, and Deployment controllers
* Updates some comments
@kubernetes/sig-apps-misc
* Switches glog.Errorf to utilruntime.HandleError in DS and RC controllers
* Drops a couple of unused variables in the DS, SS, and Deployment controllers
* Updates some comments
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 34543, 40606)
sync client-go and move util/workqueue
The vision of client-go is that it provides enough utilities to build a reasonable controller. It has been copying `util/workqueue`. This makes it authoritative.
@liggitt I'm getting really close to making client-go authoritative ptal.
approved based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40363
Automatic merge from submit-queue
controller: don't run informers in unit tests when unnecessary
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/39908
@mfojtik it seems that using informers makes the deployment sync for the initial relist so this races with the enqueue that these tests are testing.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40239, 40397, 40449, 40448, 40360)
move the discovery and dynamic clients
Moved the dynamic client, discovery client, testing/core, and testing/cache to `client-go`. Dependencies on api groups we don't have generated clients for have dropped out, so federation, kubeadm, and imagepolicy.
@caesarxuchao @sttts
approved based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40363
Deployments get cleaned up only when they are paused, they get scaled up/down,
or when the strategy that drives rollouts completes. This means that stuck
deployments that fall into none of the above categories will not get cleaned
up. Since cleanup is already safe by itself (we only delete old replica sets
that are synced by the replica set controller and have no replicas) we can
execute it for every deployment when there is no intention to rollback.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Updated unit tests
@janetkuo updated the flaky unit test to have the same structure with regard to uncasting as the rest of the tests. ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39807, 37505, 39844, 39525, 39109)
Update deployment equality helper
@mfojtik @janetkuo this is split out of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38714 to reduce the size of that PR, ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38608, 38299)
controller: set unavailableReplicas correctly when scaling down
```
deployment_controller.go:299] Error syncing deployment
e2e-tests-kubectl-2l7xx/e2e-test-nginx-deployment:
Deployment.extensions "e2e-test-nginx-deployment" is invalid:
status.unavailableReplicas: Invalid value: -1:
must be greater than or equal to 0
```
The validation error above occurs usually when a Deployment is
scaled down. In such a case we should default unavailableReplicas
to 0 instead of making an invalid api call.
@kubernetes/deployment
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38377, 36365, 36648, 37691, 38339)
controller: sync stuck deployments in a secondary queue
@kubernetes/deployment this makes Deployments not depend on a tight resync interval in order to estimate progress.
deployment_controller.go:299] Error syncing deployment
e2e-tests-kubectl-2l7xx/e2e-test-nginx-deployment:
Deployment.extensions "e2e-test-nginx-deployment" is invalid:
status.unavailableReplicas: Invalid value: -1:
must be greater than or equal to 0
The validation error above occurs usually when a Deployment is
scaled down. In such a case we should default unavailableReplicas
to 0 instead of making an invalid api call.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Restore event messages for replica sets in the deployment controller
Needed to unblock release upgrade tests (see https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/36453)
@kubernetes/deployment ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update how we detect overlapping deployments
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#24152
**Special notes for your reviewer**: cc @kubernetes/deployment
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
NONE
```
When looking for overlapping deployments, we should also find other deployments that select current deployment's pods,
not just the ones whose pods are selected by current deployment.
This commit adds support for failing deployments based on a timeout
parameter defined in the spec. If there is no progress for the amount
of time defined as progressDeadlineSeconds then the deployment will be
marked as failed by adding a condition with a ProgressDeadlineExceeded
reason in it. Progress in the context of a deployment means the creation
or adoption of a new replica set, scaling up new pods, and scaling down
old pods.
When looking for overlapping deployments, we should also find other deployments that select current deployment's pods,
not just the ones whose pods are selected by current deployment.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Let release_1_5 clientset include multiple versions of a group
Fix#35237
This PR make versioned clientset to include multiple versions of a group. Currently only `batch` has `v1` and `v2alpha1`. The clientset interface now looks like:
```go
BatchV2alpha1() v2alpha1batch.BatchV2alpha1Interface
BatchV1() v1batch.BatchV1Interface
// Deprecated: please explicitly pick a version if possible.
Batch() v1batch.BatchV1Interface
```
Commit "update client-gen to say internalversion rather than unversioned" fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/24481.
cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery @soltysh @deads2k @nikhiljindal
```release-note
release_1_5 clientset supports multiple versions of a group.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make overlapping deployments deletable
@kubernetes/deployment ptal
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/34466 by 1) not adding the overlapping annotation in the working deployment, 2) updates observedGeneration for overlapping deployments, and 3) updates the kubectl deployment reaper to do non-cascading deletion for deployments with the overlapping annotation.
Janet Kuo