Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix createProvisionedPV result err judgenment bug
When ctrl.kubeClient.Core().PersistentVolumes().Create(volume) returns no err, and storeVolumeUpdate() fails, we save PV sucessfully ,but here err is not nil,we should not run the codes next in block if err != nil {} to delete the storage asset.
same in the deletion retries below
change the err names to make it clear
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@jsafrane @saad-ali PTAL. Thanks
When ctrl.kubeClient.Core().PersistentVolumes().Create(volume) returns no err, but storeVolumeUpdate() failed, we save PV sucessfully ,but here err is not nil,
we should not run the codes next in block if err != nil {}
same in the deletion retries below
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42522, 42545, 42556, 42006, 42631)
optimize the binding logic of bindClaimToVolume
extract var shouldSetBoundByController and do not need to judge volumename twice
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Out-of-tree external provisioners have the same purpose as in-tree provisioners. As external provisioners work with PV and PVC datastructures it's an advantage to import certain Kubernetes packages instead of copy-pasting the Kubernetes code.
That's why the constants are made public so that they can be used in an external provisioner.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41306, 42187, 41666, 42275, 42266)
Implement bulk polling of volumes
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
cc @justinsb
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)
pv_controller: Do not report exponential backoff as error.
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
This just pollutes logs without any useful information:
```
E0214 08:00:30.428073 77288 pv_controller.go:1410] error scheduling operaion "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]": Failed to create operation with name "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]". An operation with that name failed at 2017-02-14 08:00:15.631133152 -0500 EST. No retries permitted until 2017-02-14 08:00:31.631133152 -0500 EST (16s). Last error: "Cannot delete the volume \"11a4faea-bfc7-4713-88b3-dec492480dba\", it's still attached to a node".
```
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41364, 40317, 41326, 41783, 41782)
changes to cleanup the volume plugin for recycle
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Code cleanup. Changing from creating a new interface from the plugin, that then calls a function to recycle a volume, to adding the function to the plugin itself.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#26230
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Took same approach from closed PR #28432.
Do you want the approach to be the same for NewDeleter(), NewMounter(), NewUnMounter() and should they be in this same PR or submit different PR's for those?
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove alpha provisioning
This is the first part of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/36
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
**Release note**:
```release-note
Alpha version of dynamic volume provisioning is removed in this release. Annotation
"volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class" does not have any special meaning. A default storage class
and DefaultStorageClass admission plugin can be used to preserve similar behavior of Kubernetes cluster,
see https://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/persistent-volumes/#class-1 for details.
```
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Replace hand-written informers with generated ones
Replace existing uses of hand-written informers with generated ones.
Follow-up commits will switch the use of one-off informers to shared
informers.
This is a precursor to #40097. That PR will switch one-off informers to shared informers for the majority of the code base (but not quite all of it...).
NOTE: this does create a second set of shared informers in the kube-controller-manager. This will be resolved back down to a single factory once #40097 is reviewed and merged.
There are a couple of places where I expanded the # of caches we wait for in the calls to `WaitForCacheSync` - please pay attention to those. I also added in a commented-out wait in the attach/detach controller. If @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews is ok with enabling the waiting, I'll do it (I'll just need to tweak an integration test slightly).
@deads2k @sttts @smarterclayton @liggitt @soltysh @timothysc @lavalamp @wojtek-t @gmarek @sjenning @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40855, 40859)
PV binding: send an event when there are no PVs to bind
This is similar to scheduler that says "no nodes available to schedule pods"
when it can't schedule a pod.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
This fix prevents the PV controller from forcefully overwriting the provisioned volume's name with the generated PV name. Instead, it allows dynamic provisioner implementers to set the name of the volume to a value that they choose.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40126, 40565, 38777, 40564, 40572)
Do not swallow error in asw.updateNodeStatusUpdateNeeded
Ref #39056
Bubble the error up to `SetNodeUpdateStatusNeeded` and log it out.
NOTE: This does not modify interface of `SetNodeUpdateStatusNeeded`
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39064, 40294)
Refactor persistent volume tests
This is an attempt to make the binder tests a bit more concise. The PVCs are being created by a "templating" function. There is also a handful of PVs in the tests but those vary quite more and I don't think similar approach would save us much code.
Reference:
https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/29006#-KPJuVeDE0O6TvDP9jia
@jsafrane: I hope this is what you have on mind.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39628, 39551, 38746, 38352, 39607)
Increasing times on reconciling volumes fixing impact to AWS.
#**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We are currently blocked by API timeouts with PV volumes. See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/39526. This is a workaround, not a fix.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
A second PR will be dropped with CLI cobra options in it, but we are starting with increasing the reconciliation periods. I am dropping this without major testing and will test on our AWS account. Will be marked WIP until I run smoke tests.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Provide kubernetes-controller-manager flags to control volume attach/detach reconciler sync. The duration of the syncs can be controlled, and the syncs can be shut off as well.
```
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38377, 36365, 36648, 37691, 38339)
Exponential back off when volume delete fails
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements ability in pv_controller to back off when deleting a volume fails from plugin API.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
Partly fixes#38295 , but I think volume delete is most problematic thing happening in pv_controller without any sort of backoff.
After this change the attempts of volume deletion look like:
```
controller : I1208 00:18:35.532061 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:20:50.578325 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:23:05.563488 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:25:20.599158 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:27:35.560009 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:29:50.594967 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:32:05.539168 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:34:20.581665 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
```
This implements pv_controller to exponentially backoff
when deleting a volume fails in Cloud API. It ensures that
we aren't making too many calls to Cloud API
This adds tests for code introduced here :
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/26994
Via integration test we can now verify that if pod delete
event is somehow missed by AttachDetach controller - it still
get cleaned up by Desired State of World populator.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37608, 37103, 37320, 37607, 37678)
Fix issue #37377: Report an event on successful PVC provisioning
This is a simple patch to fix the issue #37377: On a successful PVC provisioning an event is emitted so it's clear the provisioning actually succeeded.
cc: @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue
SetNodeUpdateStatusNeeded whenever nodeAdd event is received
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Bug fix and SetNodeStatusUpdateNeeded for a node whenever its api object is added. This is to ensure that we don't lose the attached list of volumes in the node when its api object is deleted and recreated.
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37586https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37585
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
Automatic merge from submit-queue
controller manager refactors
The controller manager needs some significant cleanup. This starts us down the patch by respecting parameters like `stopCh`, simplifying discovery checks, removing unnecessary parameters, preventing unncessary fatals, and using our client builder.
@sttts @ncdc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix kubectl Stratigic Merge Patch compatibility
As @smarterclayton pointed out in [comment1](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35647#pullrequestreview-8290820) and [comment2](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35647#pullrequestreview-8290847) in PR #35647,
we cannot assume the API servers publish version and they shares the same version.
This PR removes all the calls of GetServerSupportedSMPatchVersion().
Change the behavior of `apply` and `edit` to:
Retrying with the old patch version, if the new version fails.
Default other usage of SMPatch to the new version, since they don't update list of primitives.
fixes#36916
cc: @pwittrock @smarterclayton
This PR is to fix the issue in converting aws volume id from mount
paths. Currently there are three aws volume id formats supported. The
following lists example of those three formats and their corresponding
global mount paths:
1. aws:///vol-123456
(/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/aws-ebs/mounts/aws/vol-123456)
2. aws://us-east-1/vol-123456
(/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/mounts/aws/us-est-1/vol-123455)
3. vol-123456
(/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/mounts/aws/us-est-1/vol-123455)
For the first two cases, we need to check the mount path and convert
them back to the original format.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix strategic patch for list of primitive type with merge sementic
Fix strategic patch for list of primitive type when the patch strategy is `merge`.
Before: we cannot replace or delete an item in a list of primitive, e.g. string, when the patch strategy is `merge`. It will always append new items to the list.
This patch will generate a map to update the list of primitive type.
The server with this patch will accept either a new patch or an old patch.
The client will found out the APIserver version before generate the patch.
Fixes#35163, #32398
cc: @pwittrock @fabianofranz
``` release-note
Fix strategic patch for list of primitive type when patch strategy is `merge` to remove deleted objects.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Better messaging for missing volume binaries on host
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When mount binaries are not present on a host, the error returned is a generic one.
This change is to check the mount binaries before the mount and return a user-friendly error message.
This change is specific to GCI and the flag is experimental now.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/36098
**Release note**:
Introduces a flag `check-node-capabilities-before-mount` which if set, enables a check (`CanMount()`) prior to mount operations to verify that the required components (binaries, etc.) to mount the volume are available on the underlying node. If the check is enabled and `CanMount()` returns an error, the mount operation fails. Implements the `CanMount()` check for NFS.
Sample output post change :
rkouj@rkouj0:~/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes$ kubectl describe pods
Name: sleepyrc-fzhyl
Namespace: default
Node: e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa/10.240.0.3
Start Time: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 21:28:36 -0800
Labels: name=sleepy
Status: Pending
IP:
Controllers: ReplicationController/sleepyrc
Containers:
sleepycontainer1:
Container ID:
Image: gcr.io/google_containers/busybox
Image ID:
Port:
Command:
sleep
6000
QoS Tier:
cpu: Burstable
memory: BestEffort
Requests:
cpu: 100m
State: Waiting
Reason: ContainerCreating
Ready: False
Restart Count: 0
Environment Variables:
Conditions:
Type Status
Initialized True
Ready False
PodScheduled True
Volumes:
data:
Type: NFS (an NFS mount that lasts the lifetime of a pod)
Server: 127.0.0.1
Path: /export
ReadOnly: false
default-token-d13tj:
Type: Secret (a volume populated by a Secret)
SecretName: default-token-d13tj
Events:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
7s 7s 1 {default-scheduler } Normal Scheduled Successfully assigned sleepyrc-fzhyl to e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa
6s 3s 4 {kubelet e2e-test-rkouj-minion-group-oxxa} Warning FailedMount Unable to mount volume kubernetes.io/nfs/32c7ef16-a574-11e6-813d-42010af00002-data (spec.Name: data) on pod sleepyrc-fzhyl (UID: 32c7ef16-a574-11e6-813d-42010af00002). Verify that your node machine has the required components before attempting to mount this volume type. Required binary /sbin/mount.nfs is missing
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement external provisioning proposal
In other words, add "provisioned-by" annotation to all PVCs that should be provisioned dynamically.
Most of the changes are actually in tests.
@kubernetes/sig-storage
At master volume reconciler, the information about which volumes are
attached to nodes is cached in actual state of world. However, this
information might be out of date in case that node is terminated (volume
is detached automatically). In this situation, reconciler assume volume
is still attached and will not issue attach operation when node comes
back. Pods created on those nodes will fail to mount.
This PR adds the logic to periodically sync up the truth for attached volumes kept in the actual state cache. If the volume is no longer attached to the node, the actual state will be updated to reflect the truth. In turn, reconciler will take actions if needed.
To avoid issuing many concurrent operations on cloud provider, this PR
tries to add batch operation to check whether a list of volumes are
attached to the node instead of one request per volume.
More details are explained in PR #33760
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Node status updater should SetNodeStatusUpdateNeeded if it fails to
update status
When volume controller tries to update the node status, if it fails to
update the nodes status, it should call SetNodeStatusUpdateNeeded so
that the volume list could be updated next time.
Objects from shared informer must not be changed, they are shared among all
controllers.
This fixes CacheMutationDetector panic with this output:
CACHE *api.Node[5] ALTERED!
{"metadata":{"name":"ip-172-18-8-71.ec2.internal","selfLink":"/api/v1/nodes/ip-172-18-8-71.ec2.internal","uid":"73d07d16-976e-11e6-8225-0e2f14b56070","resourceVersion":"136","creationTimestamp":"2016-10-21T09:12:12Z","labels":{"beta.kubernetes.io/arch":"amd64","beta.kubernetes.io/instance-type":"t2.medium","beta.kubernetes.io/os":"linux","failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region":"us-east-1","failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone":"us-east-1d","kubernetes.io/hostname":"ip-172-18-8-71.ec2.internal"},"annotations":{"volumes.kubernetes.io/controller-managed-attach-detach":"true"}},"spec":{"externalID":"i-9cb6180f","providerID":"aws:///us-east-1d/i-9cb6180f"},"status":{"capacity":{"alpha.kubernetes.io/nvidia-gpu":"0","cpu":"2","memory":"4045568Ki","pods":"110"},"allocatable":{"alpha.kubernetes.io/nvidia-gpu":"0","cpu":"2","memory":"4045568Ki","pods":"110"},"conditions":[{"type":"OutOfDisk","status":"False","lastHeartbeatTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:52Z","lastTransitionTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:12Z","reason":"KubeletHasSufficientDisk","message":"kubelet has sufficient disk space available"},{"type":"MemoryPressure","status":"False","lastHeartbeatTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:52Z","lastTransitionTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:12Z","reason":"KubeletHasSufficientMemory","message":"kubelet has sufficient memory available"},{"type":"DiskPressure","status":"False","lastHeartbeatTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:52Z","lastTransitionTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:12Z","reason":"KubeletHasNoDiskPressure","message":"kubelet has no disk pressure"},{"type":"InodePressure","status":"False","lastHeartbeatTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:52Z","lastTransitionTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:12Z","reason":"KubeletHasNoInodePressure","message":"kubelet has no inode pressure"},{"type":"Ready","status":"True","lastHeartbeatTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:52Z","lastTransitionTime":"2016-10-21T09:12:22Z","reason":"KubeletReady","message":"kubelet is posting ready status"}],"addresses":[{"type":"InternalIP","address":"172.18.8.71"},{"type":"LegacyHostIP","address":"172.18.8.71"},{"type":"ExternalIP","address":"54.85.104.236"}],"daemonEndpoints":{"kubeletEndpoint":{"Port":10250}},"nodeInfo":{"machineID":"78a79498db8e4fdc9ac24b5e436a982c","systemUUID":"EC2BB406-5467-4ABE-B54D-D9993C45714F","bootID":"2553d6b8-1ddb-4ef0-902a-d09a807b89ba","kernelVersion":"4.6.7-300.fc24.x86_64","osImage":"Fedora 24 (Cloud Edition)","containerRuntimeVersion":"docker://1.10.3","kubeletVersion":"v1.5.0-alpha.1.726+5aac5eddb809e4","kubeProxyVersion":"v1.5.0-alpha.1.726+5aac5eddb809e4","operatingSystem":"linux","architecture":"amd64"},"images":[{"names":["openshift/origin-release:latest"],"sizeBytes":714569002},{"names":["openshift/origin-haproxy-router-base:latest"],"sizeBytes":294417608},{"names":["openshift/origin-base:latest"],"sizeBytes":275310761},{"names":["docker.io/centos@sha256:2ae0d2c881c7123870114fb9cc7afabd1e31f9888dac8286884f6cf59373ed9b","docker.io/centos:centos7"],"sizeBytes":196744353},{"names":["gcr.io/google_containers/busybox@sha256:4bdd623e848417d96127e16037743f0cd8b528c026e9175e22a84f639eca58ff","gcr.io/google_containers/busybox:1.24"],"sizeBytes":1113554},{"names":["gcr.io/google_containers/pause-amd64@sha256:163ac025575b775d1c0f9bf0bdd0f086883171eb475b5068e7defa4ca9e76516","gcr.io/google_containers/pause-amd64:3.0"],"sizeBytes":746888}],"volumesInUse":["kubernetes.io/aws-ebs/aws://us-east-1d/vol-f4bd0352"]
A: ,"volumesAttached":[{"name":"kubernetes.io/aws-ebs/aws://us-east-1d/vol-f4bd0352","devicePath":"/dev/xvdba"}]}}
B: }}
update status
When volume controller tries to update the node status, if it fails to
update the nodes status, it should call SetNodeStatusUpdateNeeded so
that the volume list could be updated next time.
Gluster provisioner is interested in pvc.Namespace and I don't want to add
at as a new field in VolumeOptions - it would contain almost whole PVC.
Let's pass direct reference to PVC instead and let the provisioner to pick
information it is interested in.
When volume is attached, it is possible that the actual state
already has this volume object (e.g., the volume is attached to multiple
nodes, or volume was detached and attached again). We need to update the
device path in such situation, otherwise, the device path would be stale
information and cause kubelet mount to the wrong device.
This PR partially fixes issue #29324
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use strongly-typed types.NodeName for a node name
We had another bug where we confused the hostname with the NodeName.
Also, if we want to use different values for the Node.Name (which is
an important step for making installation easier), we need to keep
better control over this.
A tedious but mechanical commit therefore, to change all uses of the
node name to use types.NodeName
We had another bug where we confused the hostname with the NodeName.
To avoid this happening again, and to make the code more
self-documenting, we use types.NodeName (a typedef alias for string)
whenever we are referring to the Node.Name.
A tedious but mechanical commit therefore, to change all uses of the
node name to use types.NodeName
Also clean up some of the (many) places where the NodeName is referred
to as a hostname (not true on AWS), or an instanceID (not true on GCE),
etc.
persistentvolumecontroller.NewPersistentVolumeController has 11 arguments now,
put them into a structure.
Also, rename NewPersistentVolumeController to NewController, persistentvolume
is already name of the package.
Fixes#30219
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Do not report error when deleting an attached volume
Persistent volume controller should not send warning events to a PV and mark the PV as failed when the volume is still attached.
This happens when a user quickly deletes a pod and associated PVC - PV is slowly detaching, while the PVC is already deleted and the PV enters Failed phase.
`Deleter.Deleter` can now return `tryAgainError`, which is sent as INFO to the PV to let the user know we did not forget to delete the PV, however the PV stays in Released state. The controller tries again in the next sync (15 seconds by default).
Fixes#31511
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix race condition in setting node statusUpdateNeeded flag
This PR fixes the race condition in setting node statusUpdateNeeded flag
in master's attachdetach controller. This flag is used to indicate
whether a node status has been updated by the node_status_updater or
not. When updater finishes update a node status, it is set to false.
When the node status is changed such as volume is detached or new volume
is attached to the node, the flag is set to true so that updater can
update the status again. The previous workflow has a race condition as
follows
1. updater gets the currently attached volume list from the node which needs to be
updated.
2. A new volume A is attached to the same node right after 1 and set the
flag to TRUE
3. updater updates the node attached volume list (which does not include volume A) and then set the flag to FALSE.
The result is that volume A will be never added to the attached volume
list so at node side, this volume is never attached.
So in this PR, the flag is set to FALSE when updater tries to get the
attached volume list (as in an atomic operation). So in the above
example, after step 2, the flag will be TRUE again, in step 3, updater
does not set the flag if updates is sucessful. So after that, flag is
still TRUE and in next round of update, the node status will be updated.
This PR fixes the race condition in setting node statusUpdateNeeded flag
in master's attachdetach controller. This flag is used to indicate
whether a node status has been updated by the node_status_updater or
not. When updater finishes update a node status, it is set to false.
When the node status is changed such as volume is detached or new volume
is attached to the node, the flag is set to true so that updater can
update the status again. The previous workflow has a race condition as
follows
1. updater gets the currently attached volume list from the node which needs to be
updated.
2. A new volume A is attached to the same node right after 1 and set the
flag to TRUE
3. updater updates the node attached volume list (which does not include volume A) and then set the flag to FALSE.
The result is that volume A will be never added to the attached volume
list so at node side, this volume is never attached.
So in this PR, the flag is set to FALSE when updater tries to get the
attached volume list (as in an atomic operation). So in the above
example, after step 2, the flag will be TRUE again, in step 3, updater
does not set the flag if updates is sucessful. So after that, flag is
still TRUE and in next round of update, the node status will be updated.
This PR also changes a unit test due to the workflow changes
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Send recycle events from pod to pv.
This allows users to diagnose what's wrong with recycler. Recycler pods are started automatically with a cryptic name and they are deleted immediately when they finish.
e.g, `kubectl describe pv` could show that NFS cannot be mounted (and how many pods have tried it):
```
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
59m 59m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(5421800e-347b-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
53m 53m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(3c9809e5-347c-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
46m 46m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(250dd2a2-347d-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
40m 40m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(0d84ea33-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
33m 33m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(f5fb63bf-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
27m 27m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(de7128fd-347f-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
1h 3m 75 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Successfully assigned recycler-for-nfs to 127.0.0.1
1h 3m 76 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Pod was active on the node longer than specified deadline
1h 1m 12 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Error syncing pod, skipping: timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
20m 1m 4 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod (events with common reason combined)
```
These steps were necessary:
- added event watcher to volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion
- pass all these events through volume plugins to volume controller
- rework volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion unit tests to a table (too much copy-paste)
- fix all unit tests along the way
When Kubernetes does not have a plugin to delete a PV it should wait for
either external deleter or storage admin to delete the volume instead of
throwing an error.
Related to #32077
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix race condition in updating attached volume between master and node
This PR tries to fix issue #29324. The cause of this issue is that a race
condition happens when marking volumes as attached for node status. This
PR tries to clean up the logic of when and where to mark volumes as
attached/detached. Basically the workflow as follows,
1. When volume is attached sucessfully, the volume and node info is
added into nodesToUpdateStatusFor to mark the volume as attached to the
node.
2. When detach request comes in, it will check whether it is safe to
detach now. If the check passes, remove the volume from volumesToReportAsAttached
to indicate the volume is no longer considered as attached now.
Afterwards, reconciler tries to update node status and trigger detach
operation. If any of these operation fails, the volume is added back to
the volumesToReportAsAttached list showing that it is still attached.
These steps should make sure that kubelet get the right (might be
outdated) information about which volume is attached or not. It also
garantees that if detach operation is pending, kubelet should not
trigger any mount operations.
This PR tries to fix issue #29324. This cause of this issue is a race
condition happens when marking volumes as attached for node status. This
PR tries to clean up the logic of when and where to mark volumes as
attached/detached. Basically the workflow as follows,
1. When volume is attached sucessfully, the volume and node info is
added into nodesToUpdateStatusFor to mark the volume as attached to the
node.
2. When detach request comes in, it will check whether it is safe to
detach now. If the check passes, remove the volume from volumesToReportAsAttached
to indicate the volume is no longer considered as attached now.
Afterwards, reconciler tries to update node status and trigger detach
operation. If any of these operation fails, the volume is added back to
the volumesToReportAsAttached list showing that it is still attached.
These steps should make sure that kubelet get the right (might be
outdated) information about which volume is attached or not. It also
garantees that if detach operation is pending, kubelet should not
trigger any mount operations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use PV shared informer in PV controller
Use the PV shared informer, addressing (partially) https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/26247 . Using the PVC shared informer is not so simple because sometimes the controller wants to `Requeue` and...
This allows users to diagnose what's wrong with recycler. Recycler pods are
started automatically with a cryptic name and they are deleted immediately
when they finish.
kubectl describe pods will show:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
59m 59m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(5421800e-347b-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
53m 53m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(3c9809e5-347c-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
46m 46m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(250dd2a2-347d-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
40m 40m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(0d84ea33-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
33m 33m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(f5fb63bf-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
27m 27m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(de7128fd-347f-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
1h 3m 75 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Successfully assigned recycler-for-nfs to 127.0.0.1
1h 3m 76 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Pod was active on the node longer than specified deadline
1h 1m 12 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Error syncing pod, skipping: timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
20m 1m 4 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod (events with common reason combined)
These steps were necessary:
- added event watcher to volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion
- pass all these events through volume plugins to volume controller
- rework volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion unit tests to a table
(too much copy-paste)
- fix all unit tests along the way
with StorageClass.Provisioner == <unknown plugin>, we should wait for
either external provisioner or volume admin to provide a PV for a claim
instead of reporting an error.
Fixes#31723
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Post event message for volume attachment
This PR is to add event message when attaching volume fails to help
users to debug. For detach failure, may address in a different PR since
it requires more data structure change.
This PR is to add event message when attaching volume fails to help
users to debug. For detach failure, may address in a different PR since
it requires more data structure change.
Kubernetes Submit Queue