Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49847, 49743, 49853, 50225, 50479)
Add node benchmark tests for cos-m60 with docker 1.12.6
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42926
This PR adds a benchmark tests against cos-m60 with docker 1.12.6 on http://node-perf-dash.k8s.io. This test is useful for docker validation -- we can compare the performance of different dockers on the same OS.
cos-m60 comes with docker 1.13.1 by default, so we need to use cloud-init to downgrade the version to 1.12.6.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/assign @dchen1107
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49725, 50367, 50391, 48857, 50181)
Add e2e test for privileged containers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds node e2e test for privileged containers.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Part of #44118.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @Random-Liu
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50016, 49583, 49930, 46254, 50337)
Alpha Dynamic Kubelet Configuration
Feature: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/281
This proposal contains the alpha implementation of the Dynamic Kubelet Configuration feature proposed in ~#29459~ [community/contributors/design-proposals/dynamic-kubelet-configuration.md](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/dynamic-kubelet-configuration.md).
Please note:
- ~The proposal doc is not yet up to date with this implementation, there are some subtle differences and some more significant ones. I will update the proposal doc to match by tomorrow afternoon.~
- ~This obviously needs more tests. I plan to write several O(soon). Since it's alpha and feature-gated, I'm decoupling this review from the review of the tests.~ I've beefed up the unit tests, though there is still plenty of testing to be done.
- ~I'm temporarily holding off on updating the generated docs, api specs, etc, for the sake of my reviewers 😄~ these files now live in a separate commit; the first commit is the one to review.
/cc @dchen1107 @vishh @bgrant0607 @thockin @derekwaynecarr
```release-note
Adds (alpha feature) the ability to dynamically configure Kubelets by enabling the DynamicKubeletConfig feature gate, posting a ConfigMap to the API server, and setting the spec.configSource field on Node objects. See the proposal at https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/dynamic-kubelet-configuration.md for details.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add waitForFailure for e2e test framework
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add waitForFailure for e2e test framework, this could reduce the reliance on logs.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
Part of #44118. Refer https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/48858#discussion_r128331726
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50087, 39587, 50042, 50241, 49914)
Add node e2e test for Docker's shared PID namespace
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42926
This PR adds a simple test for the shared PID namespace that's enabled when Docker is 1.13.1+.
/sig node
/area node-e2e
/assign @yujuhong
**Release note**:
```
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49916, 50050)
Update images used in the node e2e benchmark tests
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42926
- Update the cosbeta image since the new version contains a 'du' command fix that affects Docker performance.
- Add the coreos and ubuntu image that run Docker 1.12.6 so that we will have more data to compare.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49651, 49707, 49662, 47019, 49747)
Add support for `no_new_privs` via AllowPrivilegeEscalation
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Implements kubernetes/community#639
Fixes#38417
Adds `AllowPrivilegeEscalation` and `DefaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation` to `PodSecurityPolicy`.
Adds `AllowPrivilegeEscalation` to container `SecurityContext`.
Adds the proposed behavior to `kuberuntime`, `dockershim`, and `rkt`. Adds a bunch of unit tests to ensure the desired default behavior and that when `DefaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation` is explicitly set.
Tests pass locally with docker and rkt runtimes. There are also a few integration tests with a `setuid` binary for sanity.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Adds AllowPrivilegeEscalation to control whether a process can gain more privileges than it's parent process
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45813, 49594, 49443, 49167, 47539)
Add node e2e tests for GKE environment
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46891
This PR adds node e2e tests for validating images used on GKE.
- We pass the `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME` to the node e2e test process via the flag `--system-spec-name` so that we can skip the environment specific tests using `RunIfSystemSpecNameIs()`.
- Also added `SkipIfContainerRuntimeIs()` as the opposite of `RunIfContainerRuntimeIs()`.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46913, 48910, 48858, 47160)
Add e2e test for readOnlyRootFilesystem containers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds node e2e test for readOnlyRootFilesystem containers.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Part of #44118.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48976, 49474, 40050, 49426, 49430)
Use presence of kubeconfig file to toggle standalone mode
Fixes#40049
```release-note
The deprecated --api-servers flag has been removed. Use --kubeconfig to provide API server connection information instead. The --require-kubeconfig flag is now deprecated. The default kubeconfig path is also deprecated. Both --require-kubeconfig and the default kubeconfig path will be removed in Kubernetes v1.10.0.
```
/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-misc @kubernetes/sig-node-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48224, 45431, 45946, 48775, 49396)
Update cos-dev image in benchmark tests to cos-dev-61-9759-0-0
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42926
`cos-dev-61-9759-0-0` contains a fix in Linux utility `du` that would affect the measurement of docker performance in kubelet. I'd like to update the benchmark to use the new image.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/assign @tallclair
/cc @kewu1992 @abgworrall
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48636, 49088, 49251, 49417, 49494)
Fix issues for local storage allocatable feature
This PR fixes the following issues:
1. Use ResourceStorageScratch instead of ResourceStorage API to represent
local storage capacity
2. In eviction manager, use container manager instead of node provider
(kubelet) to retrieve the node capacity and reserved resources. Node
provider (kubelet) has a feature gate so that storagescratch information
may not be exposed if feature gate is not set. On the other hand,
container manager has all the capacity and allocatable resource
information.
This PR fixes issue #47809
Replaces use of --api-servers with --kubeconfig in Kubelet args across
the turnup scripts. In many cases this involves generating a kubeconfig
file for the Kubelet and placing it in the correct location on the node.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove redundant param in e2e_node/remote
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
* remove redundant param in e2e_node/remote/remote.go
* fix a small typo
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49316, 46117, 49064, 48073, 49323)
Test Ubuntu image using GKE image spec on master
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46891
This PR changes the files referenced in test-infra for running Ubuntu image tests against GKE system spec on master.
The two properties files are shared by the tests against all k8s branches but the `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME` is only available on master. This should be fine because the tests in the non master branches will just ignore the unknown env variable.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/assign @yujuhong
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48377, 48940, 49144, 49062, 49148)
Add cos-dev-61-9733-0-0 to the benchmark tests
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42926
m60 has docker 1.13.1 while m61 has 17.03. This PR adds m61 to the benchmark tests so that we will have more data to compare.
PS: We will support fetching the latest image in an image family in the node e2e tests in the future.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/assign @yujuhong
/cc @kewu1992 @abgworrall
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48890, 46893, 48872, 48896)
Support customized system spec in the node conformance test and create the GKE system spec
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46891
- System specs are located in `test/e2e_node/system/specs`. Created one for validating GKE images in `test/e2e_node/system/specs/gke.yaml`.
- `--image-spec-name` can be used to specify a system spec in node e2e and conformance tests. This option maps to `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME` in a test properties file, which is the user facing configuration. So, users can specify `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME=gke` to run the image validation using the GKE system spec.
- If `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME` is unspecified, the default spec (`system.DefaultSysSpec`) will be used.
- We can also use `make test-e2e-node SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME=gke` to run tests using GKE image spec.
**Release note**:
`None`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add dockershim checkpoint node e2e test
Add a bunch of disruptive cases to test kubelet/dockershim's checkpoint work flow.
Some steps are quite hacky. Not sure if there is better ways to do things.
This PR fixes the following issues:
1. Use ResourceStorageScratch instead of ResourceStorage API to represent
local storage capacity
2. In eviction manager, use container manager instead of node provider
(kubelet) to retrieve the node capacity and reserved resources. Node
provider (kubelet) has a feature gate so that storagescratch information
may not be exposed if feature gate is not set. On the other hand,
container manager has all the capacity and allocatable resource
information.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48698, 48712, 48516, 48734, 48735)
Name change: s/timstclair/tallclair/
I changed my name, and I'm migrating my user name to be consistent.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46865, 48661, 48598, 48658, 48614)
Move metrics_grabbert to test/e2e
cc @aleksandra-malinowska
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Changes node e2e tests to use the new Ubuntu image
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46891
`ubuntu-docker10` and `ubuntu-docker12` images are deprecated in favor of the new one.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/sig node
/area node-e2e
/assign @dchen1107
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48074, 47971, 48044, 47514, 47647)
e2e: bump kubelet's resurce usage limit
We don't have per-OS image limits. Bumping these to more generous
numbers to not fail the tests.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47993, 47892, 47591, 47469, 47845)
Bump up npd version to v0.4.1
```
Bump up npd version to v0.4.1
```
Fixes#47219
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47922, 47195, 47241, 47095, 47401)
Run cAdvisor on the same interface as kubelet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
cAdvisor currently binds to all interfaces. Currently the only
solution is to use iptables to block access to the port. We
are better off making cAdvisor to bind to the interface that
kubelet uses for better security.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes#11710
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
cAdvisor binds only to the interface that kubelet is running on instead of all interfaces.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46327, 47166)
mark --network-plugin-dir deprecated for kubelet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes#43967
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47530, 47679)
Use cos-stable-59-9460-64-0 instead of cos-beta-59-9460-20-0.
Remove dead code that has now moved to another repo as part of #47467
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig node
- It contains a fix for ipaliasing.
- It contains a fix which decouples GPU driver installation from kernel
version.
Remove dead code that has now moved to another repo as part of #47467
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Shorten eviction tests, and increase test suite timeout
After #43590, the eviction manager is less aggressive when evicting pods. Because of that, many runs in the flaky suite time out.
To shorten the inode eviction test, I have lowered the eviction threshold.
To shorten the allocatable eviction test, I now set KubeReserved = NodeMemoryCapacity - 200Mb, so that any pod using 200Mb will be evicted. This shortens this test from 40 minutes, to 10 minutes.
While this should be enough to not hit the flaky suite timeout anymore, it is better to keep lower individual test timeouts than a lower suite timeout, since hitting the suite timeout means that even successful test runs are not reported.
/assign @Random-Liu @mtaufen
issue: #31362
When no nvidia device was attached, the -ne check had a syntax error:
sh: -ne: argument expected
This resulted in 'Success' being echoed and the test passing incorrectly.
This was found while debugging issue #47216
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Kubelet: rename cri package name to pkg/kubelet/apis/cri/v1alpha1/runtime
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We have moved CRI from api/v1alpha1/runtime to apis/cri/v1alpha1, which changed the package name of CRI. This would cause a significant problem: old-versioned runtime (based on CRI in v1.6) doesn't work with latest kubelet v1.7, and vice versa.
This PR renames cri package name to `pkg/kubelet/apis/cri/v1alpha1/runtime` for fixing the problem.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
fixes#47012
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Should be included in v1.7.
**Release note**:
```release-note
CRI has been moved to package `pkg/kubelet/apis/cri/v1alpha1/runtime`.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move the nvidia installer to the beginning.
When the installer runs for the first time, it disables loadpin and restarts
the node. So, it is better to run it in the beginning so that we can avoid
redoing the later steps. One of the later steps include downloading a tar file
and untarring it. Doing that only once saves around 1m30s in test runtime for
the gci image.
/sig node
/area node-e2e
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46885, 47197)
Let COS docker validation node test against gci-next-canary
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is for COS docker validation node test. We plan to use family gci-next-canary in container-vm-image-staging for future Docker upgration and validation.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#47134
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
cAdvisor currently binds to all interfaces. Currently the only
solution is to use iptables to block access to the port. We
are better off making cAdvisor to bind to the interface that
kubelet uses for better security.
Fixes#11710
When the installer runs for the first time, it disables loadpin and restarts
the node. So, it is better to run it in the beginning so that we can avoid
redoing the later steps. One of the later steps include downloading a tar file
and untarring it. Doing that only once saves around 1m30s in test runtime for
the gci image.
Di Xu