Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove alphaProvisioner in PVController and AlphaStorageClassAnnotation
remove alpha annotation and alphaProvisioner
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Improve event msg for PV controller when using external provisioner
Improve event msg for PV controller when using external provisioner
**Which issue this PR fixes** *:
Fixed part of #42121
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@jsafrane, as many of our users are confused by the original message, can we fix the message first and then consider how to control the count of the events?
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41775, 39678, 42629, 42524, 43028)
matchPredicate does not fit findByClaim()
matchPredicate has two args which are type of PV,and is not used in function findByClaim(),remove it
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43453, 42992)
make sure that the volume satisfies the requirements of the claim before binding
check if the volume requested by the claim satisfies the requirements of the claim before binding when
syncUnboundClaim and claim.Spec.VolumeName is not set, although the volume is asked by user
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Adding gnufied as reviewer for volume controller
I have helped review several PRs and made new
PRs to this area.
cc @childsb @saad-ali
check if the volume requested by the claim satisfies the requirements of the claim before binding when
syncUnboundClaim and claim.Spec.VolumeName is not set
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make Constants Public so that They Can Be Used in an Ext. Provisioner
Out-of-tree external provisioners have the same purpose as in-tree provisioners. As external provisioners work with PV and PVC datastructures it's an advantage to import certain Kubernetes packages instead of copy-pasting the Kubernetes code.
That's why the constants are made public so that they can be used in an external provisioner.
@jsafrane @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
update pkg/controller/volume/OWNER to add appropriate approvers for both volume controllers
Update pkg/controller/volume approvers so that the attach/detach and binding controllers have approvers.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Attach/detach controller: fix potential race in constructor
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There is a potential race condition in the Attach/detach controller: The "constructor" first installs informer event handlers and then creates and initializes the other data structures. However there is no guarantee an event cannot arrive before the data structures required by the event handlers are ready. This may result in nil pointer derefernces and potential crashes (e.g. the nodeAdd method calls adc.actualStateOfWorld.SetNodeStatusUpdateNeeded even though the actualStateOfWorld might be still nil).
It should be enough just to move the event handlers installation at the end of the constructor function.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix createProvisionedPV result err judgenment bug
When ctrl.kubeClient.Core().PersistentVolumes().Create(volume) returns no err, and storeVolumeUpdate() fails, we save PV sucessfully ,but here err is not nil,we should not run the codes next in block if err != nil {} to delete the storage asset.
same in the deletion retries below
change the err names to make it clear
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@jsafrane @saad-ali PTAL. Thanks
When ctrl.kubeClient.Core().PersistentVolumes().Create(volume) returns no err, but storeVolumeUpdate() failed, we save PV sucessfully ,but here err is not nil,
we should not run the codes next in block if err != nil {}
same in the deletion retries below
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42522, 42545, 42556, 42006, 42631)
optimize the binding logic of bindClaimToVolume
extract var shouldSetBoundByController and do not need to judge volumename twice
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Out-of-tree external provisioners have the same purpose as in-tree provisioners. As external provisioners work with PV and PVC datastructures it's an advantage to import certain Kubernetes packages instead of copy-pasting the Kubernetes code.
That's why the constants are made public so that they can be used in an external provisioner.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41306, 42187, 41666, 42275, 42266)
Implement bulk polling of volumes
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
cc @justinsb
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)
pv_controller: Do not report exponential backoff as error.
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
This just pollutes logs without any useful information:
```
E0214 08:00:30.428073 77288 pv_controller.go:1410] error scheduling operaion "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]": Failed to create operation with name "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]". An operation with that name failed at 2017-02-14 08:00:15.631133152 -0500 EST. No retries permitted until 2017-02-14 08:00:31.631133152 -0500 EST (16s). Last error: "Cannot delete the volume \"11a4faea-bfc7-4713-88b3-dec492480dba\", it's still attached to a node".
```
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41364, 40317, 41326, 41783, 41782)
changes to cleanup the volume plugin for recycle
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Code cleanup. Changing from creating a new interface from the plugin, that then calls a function to recycle a volume, to adding the function to the plugin itself.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#26230
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Took same approach from closed PR #28432.
Do you want the approach to be the same for NewDeleter(), NewMounter(), NewUnMounter() and should they be in this same PR or submit different PR's for those?
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove alpha provisioning
This is the first part of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/36
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
**Release note**:
```release-note
Alpha version of dynamic volume provisioning is removed in this release. Annotation
"volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class" does not have any special meaning. A default storage class
and DefaultStorageClass admission plugin can be used to preserve similar behavior of Kubernetes cluster,
see https://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/persistent-volumes/#class-1 for details.
```
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Replace hand-written informers with generated ones
Replace existing uses of hand-written informers with generated ones.
Follow-up commits will switch the use of one-off informers to shared
informers.
This is a precursor to #40097. That PR will switch one-off informers to shared informers for the majority of the code base (but not quite all of it...).
NOTE: this does create a second set of shared informers in the kube-controller-manager. This will be resolved back down to a single factory once #40097 is reviewed and merged.
There are a couple of places where I expanded the # of caches we wait for in the calls to `WaitForCacheSync` - please pay attention to those. I also added in a commented-out wait in the attach/detach controller. If @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews is ok with enabling the waiting, I'll do it (I'll just need to tweak an integration test slightly).
@deads2k @sttts @smarterclayton @liggitt @soltysh @timothysc @lavalamp @wojtek-t @gmarek @sjenning @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40855, 40859)
PV binding: send an event when there are no PVs to bind
This is similar to scheduler that says "no nodes available to schedule pods"
when it can't schedule a pod.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
This fix prevents the PV controller from forcefully overwriting the provisioned volume's name with the generated PV name. Instead, it allows dynamic provisioner implementers to set the name of the volume to a value that they choose.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40126, 40565, 38777, 40564, 40572)
Do not swallow error in asw.updateNodeStatusUpdateNeeded
Ref #39056
Bubble the error up to `SetNodeUpdateStatusNeeded` and log it out.
NOTE: This does not modify interface of `SetNodeUpdateStatusNeeded`
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39064, 40294)
Refactor persistent volume tests
This is an attempt to make the binder tests a bit more concise. The PVCs are being created by a "templating" function. There is also a handful of PVs in the tests but those vary quite more and I don't think similar approach would save us much code.
Reference:
https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/29006#-KPJuVeDE0O6TvDP9jia
@jsafrane: I hope this is what you have on mind.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39628, 39551, 38746, 38352, 39607)
Increasing times on reconciling volumes fixing impact to AWS.
#**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We are currently blocked by API timeouts with PV volumes. See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/39526. This is a workaround, not a fix.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
A second PR will be dropped with CLI cobra options in it, but we are starting with increasing the reconciliation periods. I am dropping this without major testing and will test on our AWS account. Will be marked WIP until I run smoke tests.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Provide kubernetes-controller-manager flags to control volume attach/detach reconciler sync. The duration of the syncs can be controlled, and the syncs can be shut off as well.
```
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Chao Xu