Automatic merge from submit-queue
Should generate files before scheduler perf
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
For a newly cloned project, generated files are not included. Then scheduler_perf will fail:
```
undefined: openapi.GetOpenAPIDefinitions
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
fixes: #51090
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50893, 50913, 50963, 50629, 50640)
gce external LB: add a function to verify the requested IP address
Factor out the logic for verifying the user-requested IP for better
readability and testing. Also rename a few variables for clarity.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50893, 50913, 50963, 50629, 50640)
kubeadm: Add back labels for the Static Pod control plane (attempt 2)
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Exactly the same PR as https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50174, but that PR was appearently lost in a rebase/mis-merge or something, so resending this one.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50893, 50913, 50963, 50629, 50640)
Increase latency threshold for list api calls
This is only a short-term solution to make our density test green. In the long-term, we should measure as per our new SLIs.
From @wojtek-t's [doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q5qxdeBPgTTIXZxdsFILg7kgqWhvOwY8uROEf0j5YBw) on the new SLIs/SLOs, we have the following SLO for list calls:
```
SLO1: In default Kubernetes installation, 99th percentile of SLI2 per cluster-day:
<= 1s if total number of objects of the same type as resource in the system <= X
<= 5s if total number of objects of the same type as resource in the system <= Y
<= 30s if total number of objects of the same types as resource in the system <= Z
```
I would guess that 170,000 pods would fall into the 2nd bracket (at least) and hence the new value of 5s. WDYT?
cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc @wojtek-t @gmarek
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50893, 50913, 50963, 50629, 50640)
[advanced audit api] fuzz Event with random value
This is an error import by me:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/49115
We need to fuzz other parts of Event with random value, otherwise
this round trip test will not make too much sense.
@sttts
@ericchiang is also researching this.
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix the link of doc
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
the link of doc point one pr,I think point the kubernetes documents better,thanks!
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46458, 50934, 50766, 50970, 47698)
kubeadm: Warn in preflight checks if KubernetesVersion is of a newer branch than kubeadm
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
see https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/307
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/307
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46458, 50934, 50766, 50970, 47698)
kubeadm: Make the self-hosting with certificates in Secrets mode work again
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR:
- makes the self-hosting with certificates in Secrets mode work
- makes the wait functions timeoutable
- fixes a race condition where the kubelet may be slow to remove the Static Pod
- cleans up some of the self-hosting logic
- makes self-hosting-with-secrets respect the feature flag
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fixes: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/405
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is work in progress. I'll add unit tests, rebase upon https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50762 and maybe split out some of the functionatlity here into a separate PR
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46458, 50934, 50766, 50970, 47698)
Skip non-update endpoint updates
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
On large clusters, a large percentage of endpoint updates are actually non-updates that occur as a result of a change in an associated pod. This results in endpoint updates where the only field that has changed is the `TargetRef.ResourceVersion` in the endpoint address associated with the changed pod. Given enough of these non-updates, the endpoint controller's queue rate limit can be overwhelmed and legitimate updates can be delayed, resulting in (temporarily) broken services. We have clusters where we've seen endpoint updates take 9 minutes.
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes#50936
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
N/A
**Release note**:
```release-note
Prevent unneeded endpoint updates
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46458, 50934, 50766, 50970, 47698)
Prepare VolumeHost for running mount tools in containers
This is the first part of implementation of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/278 - running mount utilities in containers.
It updates `VolumeHost` interface:
* `GetMounter()` now requires volume plugin name, as it is going to return different mounter to different volume plugings, because mount utilities for these plugins can be on different places.
* New `GetExec()` method that should volume plugins use to execute any utilities. This new `Exec` interface will execute them on proper place.
* `SafeFormatAndMount` is updated to the new `Exec` interface.
This is just a preparation, `GetExec` right now leads to simple `os.Exec` and mount utilities are executed on the same place as before. Also, the volume plugins will be updated in subsequent PRs (split into separate PRs, some plugins required lot of changes).
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
@rootfs @gnufied
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Revert #50362.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: part of #50884
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50531, 50853, 49976, 50939, 50607)
Log error from ensureDNSRecords
Hiding errors is not a good idea. It took me some time to figure it out why my coredns is not working. It turned out that I had wrong etcd configuration but errors about it were hidden.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50531, 50853, 49976, 50939, 50607)
Fix duplicate field in kubeconfig
The server field was accidentally duplicated during a rebase of #40050.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50531, 50853, 49976, 50939, 50607)
Do not allow empty topology key for pod affinities.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR do not allow empty topology key for all 4 pod affinities.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Affinity in annotations alpha feature is no longer supported in 1.8. Anyone upgrading from 1.7 with AffinityInAnnotation feature enabled must ensure pods (specifically with pod anti-affinity PreferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution) with empty TopologyKey fields must be removed before upgrading to 1.8.
```
@kubernetes/sig-scheduling-bugs @bsalamat @davidopp
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50531, 50853, 49976, 50939, 50607)
cni: print better error when a CNI .configlist is put into a .config
If the admin mistakenly puts a CNI configlist into a "conf" file, that's not correct, but kubelet will still read the config file and then fail to start the pod because "type=". Be a bit smarter about that. Should also be fixed in CNI, which I'm doing a PR for as well.
@squeed @thockin @freehan
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50531, 50853, 49976, 50939, 50607)
Updated gRPC vendoring to support Keep Alive
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR bumps the version of the vendored version of gRPC from v1.0.4 to v1.5.1
This is needed as part of the Device Plugin API where we expect client and server to use the Keep alive feature in order to detect an error.
Unfortunately I had to also bump the version of `golang.org/x/text` and `golang.org/x/net`.
- Design document: kubernetes/community#695
- PR tracking: [kubernetes/features#368](https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/368#issuecomment-321625420)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@vishh @jiayingz
**Release note**:
```
Bumped gRPC from v1.0.4 to v1.5.1
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50693, 50831, 47506, 49119, 50871)
Added lister expansions for DaemonSet, Deployment, ReplicaSet, and StatefulSet for apps/v1beta2
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR copies list expansions for `DaemonSet`, `Deployment`, `ReplicaSet`, and `StatefulSet` to `apps/v1beta2` from `extensions/v1beta1` and `apps/v1beta1`.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#50870.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@kow3ns @janetkuo
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50693, 50831, 47506, 49119, 50871)
kubeadm: Implement support for using images from CI builds
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Implements support for CI images in kubeadm
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixeskubernetes/kubeadm#337
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
- kubeadm now supports "ci/latest-1.8" or "ci-cross/latest-1.8" and similar labels.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50693, 50831, 47506, 49119, 50871)
Use reflect.DeepEqual to replace slicesEqual
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/50952
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50693, 50831, 47506, 49119, 50871)
Add instance metadata from flag even when using image config.
Also add instance metadata from flag even when we are using image config.
* Sometimes we need to dynamically generate instance metadata, it's troublesome to put them into image config.
* Sometimes we want to apply instance metadata to all images, it's duplicated to add them to each image in the image config.
/assign @yguo0905 Could you help me review this?
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50693, 50831, 47506, 49119, 50871)
fix two typos in quobyte error message
Signed-off-by: allencloud <allen.sun@daocloud.io>
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix two typos in quobyte error message
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix bad url in the README file
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix bad url in the README file
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47896, 50678, 50620, 50631, 51005)
Made the difference between scale-up timeout and cluster set-up timeout explicit.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47896, 50678, 50620, 50631, 51005)
kubeadm: Adds dry-run support for kubeadm using the `--dry-run` option
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds dry-run support to kubeadm by creating a fake clientset that can get totally fake values (like in the init case), or delegate GETs/LISTs to a real API server but discard all edits like POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fixes: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/389
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This PR depends on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50626, first three commits are from there
This PR is a dependency for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/48899 (kubeadm upgrades)
I have some small things to fixup and I'll yet write unit tests, but PTAL if you think this is going in the right direction
**Release note**:
```release-note
kubeadm: Adds dry-run support for kubeadm using the `--dry-run` option
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47896, 50678, 50620, 50631, 51005)
allow heapster option defaults to be set - kubectl top node|pod
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Allows downstream / outside consumers of `NewCmdTopNode` and `NewCmdTopPod` commands to set project or case-specific heapster option defaults.
Related downstream PR: https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/15764
cc @fabianofranz
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47896, 50678, 50620, 50631, 51005)
Remove deprecated lookup cache flags.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Remove deprecated lookup cache flags: `replication-controller-lookup-cache-size, replicaset-lookup-cache-size, daemonset-lookup-cache-size`
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#43388
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @enisoc
**Release note**:
```release-note
The following deprecated flags have been removed from `kube-controller-manager`: `replication-controller-lookup-cache-size`, `replicaset-lookup-cache-size`, and `daemonset-lookup-cache-size`. Make sure you no longer attempt to set them.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47896, 50678, 50620, 50631, 51005)
MakeEventRecorder function cleanup
delete KubeletConfiguration arg since it is unused
fixes#50969
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46512, 50146)
Make metav1.(Micro)?Time functions take pointers
Is there any reason for those functions not to be on pointers?
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46512, 50146)
Default NODE_OS to gci on GCE installs
Looking at https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/tree/master/jobs,
any job with "cvm" in the name explicitly sets this variable, so I hope
it is only the default.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Change GCE installs (kube-up.sh) to use GCI/COS for node OS, by default.
```
@mtaufen @dchen1107 @ixdy
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Reduce one time url redirection
Reduce one time url direction
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/50954
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Christopher M. Luciano