Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44853, 44572, 44797, 44439, 44902)
Revert "[Federation] Build a simple hyperkube image on-the-fly only containing the hyperkube binary for development and testing purposes."
Reverts kubernetes/kubernetes#43181
Federation CI and PR tests are completely broken. No time to root cause this, but the merge time of PR #43181 and failures match. So we are going to try by reverting this.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44741, 44853, 44572, 44797, 44439)
controller: fix saturation check in Deployments
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/44436
@kubernetes/sig-apps-bugs
I'll cherry-pick this back to 1.6 and 1.5
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44741, 44853, 44572, 44797, 44439)
Check errors before logging providers
The logProviders() should check errors firstly, and do not log
providers when providers is null.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44741, 44853, 44572, 44797, 44439)
add tests for managed hosts file content
**What this PR does / why we need it**: a tiny refactor to separate concerns host file content from the logic ensuring that the file exists, and also adds unit test.
This is to prepare extending the host file logic to include customized entries described in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43632. I'm wary of changing that logic in absence of any unit tests.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Refine ESIPP validation logic in validation.go
Separated from #41162.
The previous ESIPP validation logic in validation.go has a huge overlap with [function healthCheckNodePortUpdate in service/rest.go](870585e8e1/pkg/registry/core/service/rest.go (L283-L373)), in which we reject any invalid modifications on ESIPP annotations.
This PR removes the overlap, and make validation.go only check if values are legal and whether user mixes different API versions (alpha & beta).
We are indeed removing the alpha annotation support, but it is kept in the codes for the ease of transiting the same logic onto beta/GA.
/assign @thockin @freehan
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move remain ESIPP tests to the slow suite
Continue PR of #38149.
It moves the remain ESIPP tests to the slow suite to help capture breaking changes.
/assign @thockin @freehan
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40060, 44860, 44865, 44825, 44162)
Remove unused chmod/chown abstractions
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Simplifies the code
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40060, 44860, 44865, 44825, 44162)
Validate etcd only when expecting to run etcd
If running kubelet only, there is no need to validate etcd as the script will not attempt to start etcd. In fact, validating etcd here may cause the script to fail when one wants to run "nokubelet" right before "kubeletonly" because etcd will definitely be running
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40060, 44860, 44865, 44825, 44162)
servicecontroller: remove unused zone field
The zone field was unused, and this complicated e.g. #39996
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44862, 42241, 42101, 43181, 44147)
Update limitedByDefault() which does not return error
The limitedByDefault() just get the set of resources names, no error.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44862, 42241, 42101, 43181, 44147)
[Federation] Build a simple hyperkube image on-the-fly only containing the hyperkube binary for development and testing purposes.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44862, 42241, 42101, 43181, 44147)
Feature/hpa upscale downscale delay configurable
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Makes "upscale forbidden window" and "downscale forbidden window" duration configurable in arguments of kube-controller-manager. Those are options of horizontal pod autoscaler.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please have a look @DirectXMan12 , the PR as discussed in Slack.
**Release note**:
```
Make "upscale forbidden window" and "downscale forbidden window" duration configurable in arguments of kube-controller-manager. Those are options of horizontal pod autoscaler. Right now are hardcoded 3 minutes for upscale, and 5 minutes to downscale. But sometimes cluster administrator might want to change this for his own needs.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44862, 42241, 42101, 43181, 44147)
Add short name "netpol" for networkpolicies
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add short name for `networkpolicies` in kubectl command for good user experience.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
None
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
None
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add short name "netpol" for networkpolicies
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Stop treating in-cluster-config namespace as an override
Fixes#44835
The namespace of an in-cluster config should behave like the namespace specified in a kubeconfig file... it should be used as the default namespace, but be able to be overridden by namespaces specified in yaml files passed to `kubectl create -f`.
```release-note
Restored the ability of kubectl running inside a pod to consume resource files specifying a different namespace than the one the pod is running in.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add EditOptions to make edit reusable
FYI. Added `EditOptions` to decouple edit implementation from cobra command, thus make edit reusable. Once this get merged, we can refactor `create` commands to put them in their own package. @kubernetes/sig-cli-misc please give a quick review, and I would like to get this merged asap.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
PATCH: Fix erroneous meaningful conflict for numeric values.
The wrong json package was used, resulting in patches being unmarshaled with numbers as float64 rather than int64. This in turn confused `HasConflicts()` which expects numeric types to match.
The end result was false positives of meaningful conflicts, such as:
```
there is a meaningful conflict (firstResourceVersion: "8517", currentResourceVersion: "8519"):
diff1={"metadata":{"resourceVersion":"8519"},"spec":{"replicas":0},"status":"conditions":null,"fullyLabeledReplicas":null,"replicas":0}}
, diff2={"spec":{"replicas":0}}
```
This is branched from a discussion on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43469.
```release-note
Fix false positive "meaningful conflict" detection for strategic merge patch with integer values.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Document the NodePort workflow for kubernetes-worker
closes
https://github.com/juju-solutions/bundle-canonical-kubernetes/issues/259
NodePort networking model has no daemon listening to lend a hand so any
NodePort services will need to be manually declared and exposed.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Updates the documentation around using NodePort networking with the kubernetes-worker charm.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: This is a working fix for using NodePort style networking with kubernetes-workers in the juju ecosystem. Declaring a simple workload as type NodePort, then following the updated documentation will make it reachable via the open-world network connection.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Documented NodePort networking for CDK.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43575, 44672)
Update deployment and daemonset completeness checks
maxUnavailable being taken into account for deployment completeness has caused a lot of confusion (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/44395, https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/44657, https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40496, others as well I am sure) so I am willing to just stop using it and require all of the new Pods for a Deployment to be available for the Deployment to be considered complete (hence both `rollout status` and ProgressDeadlineSeconds will not be successful in cases where a 1-pod Deployment never becomes successful because its Pod never transitions to ready).
@kubernetes/sig-apps-api-reviews thoughts?
```release-note
Deployments and DaemonSets are now considered complete once all of the new pods are up and running - affects `kubectl rollout status` (and ProgressDeadlineSeconds for Deployments)
```
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/44395
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43575, 44672)
util/iptables: check for and use new iptables-restore 'wait' argument
iptables-restore did not previously perform any locking, meaning that
when callers (like kube-proxy) asked iptables-restore to write large
numbers of rules, the iptables-restore process might run in parallel
with other 'iptables' invocations in kubelet (hostports), docker,
and other software. This causes errors like:
"CNI request failed with status 400: 'Failed to ensure that nat chain
POSTROUTING jumps to MASQUERADE: error checking rule: exit status 4:
iptables: Resource temporarily unavailable."
or from Docker:
"Failed to allocate and map port 1095-1095: iptables failed:
iptables --wait -t nat -A DOCKER -p tcp -d 0/0 --dport 1095
-j DNAT --to-destination 10.1.0.2:1095 ! -i lbr0: iptables:
Resource temporarily unavailable.\n (exit status 4)"
iptables-restore "wait" functionality was added in iptables git
commit 999eaa241212d3952ddff39a99d0d55a74e3639e which
is not yet in a release.
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417234
@eparis @knobunc @kubernetes/rh-networking @kubernetes/sig-network-misc @freehan @thockin @brendandburns
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove unused function - verifyDNSPodIsRunning
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In ea4a7e24ad, we removed the cluster
DNS verification check from the test, but neglected to remove the
method itself. Let's remove this as it is not used anywhere else.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44837, 44779, 44492)
remove duplicate code from restful namer
The deleted codes have the same logic with function ObjectName.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44837, 44779, 44492)
Default ObjectNameFunc for all REST Stores
All `Store`s in Kubernetes follow the same logic for determining the name of an object. This change makes it so that `CompleteWithOptions` defaults the `ObjectNameFunc` if it is not specified. Thus a user does not need to remember to use `ObjectMeta.Name`. Using the wrong field as the name can lead to an object which has a name that bypasses normal object name validation.
Signed-off-by: Monis Khan <mkhan@redhat.com>
cc @liggitt @soltysh for review
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix Content-Type error of apis
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Response's Content-type of `/apis` is `text/plain`, not `application/json`.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#44646
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
We could use `responsewriters.WriteObjectNegotiated()` to write Content-type correctly.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
unit test for kubectl config set
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
unit test for kubectl config set
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
think you
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
support subresource when running kubectl create role
```
#kubect create role foo --verb=get,list,watch --resource=pods/status
the server doesn't have a resource type "pods/status"
```
In ea4a7e24ad, we removed the cluster
DNS verification check from the test, but neglected to remove the
method itself. Let's remove this as it is not used anywhere else.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Exclude master from LoadBalancer / NodePort
The servicecontroller documents that the master is excluded from the
LoadBalancer / NodePort, but this is broken for clusters where we are
using taints for the master (as introduced in 1.6), instead of marking
the master as unschedulable.
This restores the desired documented behaviour, by excluding nodes that
are labeled as masters with the new 1.6 labels, even if they use the new
1.6 taints.
Fix#33884
```release-note
Exclude nodes labeled as master from LoadBalancer / NodePort; restores documented behaviour
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use provided VipPortID for OpenStack LB
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When creating an OpenStack LoadBalancer, Kubernetes will search through the tenant trying to match the LB's VIP with a port. This is problematic because multiple ports may have the same fixed IP, therefore leading to routing inconsistencies. We should use the port ID provided by the LB's response body instead.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43909
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Since this involves non-deterministic testing, it'd be best if we can run this in a staging environment for a few days before merging (say until early next week).
**Release note**:
```release-note
Fixes issue during LB creation where ports where incorrectly assigned to a floating IP
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove unused function - verifyDNSPodIsRunning
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In ea4a7e24ad, we removed the cluster
DNS verification check from the test, but neglected to remove the
method itself.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```