This has two main advantages:
* The use of the mock package to verify API calls against the aws SDK
* Nicer error messages for asserts without having to use if statements
We return an error if the user specifies a non 0.0.0.0/0 load balancer
source restriction on OpenStack, where we can't enforce the restriction
(currently).
This refactors #21431 to pull a lot of the code into cloudprovider so it
can be reused by AWS.
It also changes the name of the annotation to be non-GCE specific:
service.beta.kubernetes.io/load-balancer-source-ranges
Fix#21651
for Instance.List and Routes.List which we will definitely have
more than 500 of when supporting 1000 nodes.
Add TODOs for other GCE List API calls to do similar fixes.
Add more logging to GCE's routecontroller.go when creating or deleting routes.
Fix the AWS subnet lookup that checks if a subnet is public, which was
missing a few cases:
- Subnets without explicit routing tables, which use the main VPC
routing table.
- Routing tables not tagged with KubernetesCluster. The filter for this
is now removed.
Like everything else AWS, we differentiate between k8s-owned security
groups and k8s-not-owned security groups using tags.
When we are setting up the ingress rule for ELBs, pick the security
group that is tagged over any others.
We continue to tolerate a single security group being untagged, but
having multiple security groups without tagging is now an error, as it
leads to undefined behaviour.
We also log at startup if the cluster tag is not defined.
Fix#21986
Follow up from #20731. I have no way of testing this.
There's an additional group of functions (Get|Delete|Reserve)GlobalStaticIP that can create an IP without the
service description, but those are not called anywhere in the Kubernetes codebase and are probably for the
Ingress project. I'm leaving those alone for now.
Add aws cloud config:
[global]
disableSecurityGroupIngress = true
The aws provider creates an inbound rule per load balancer on the node
security group. However, this can quickly run into the AWS security
group rule limit of 50.
This disables the automatic ingress creation. It requires that the user
has setup a rule that allows inbound traffic on kubelet ports from the
local VPC subnet (so load balancers can access it). E.g. `10.82.0.0/16
30000-32000`.
Limits: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/UserGuide/VPC_Appendix_Limits.html#vpc-limits-security-groups
Authors: @jsravn, @balooo
When finding instance by node name in AWS, only retrieve running
instances. Otherwise terminated, old nodes can show up with the same
tag when rebuilding nodes in the cluster.
Another improvement made is to filter instances by the node names
provided, rather than selecting all instances and filtering in code.
Authors: @jsravn, @chbatey, @balooo
This applies a cross-request time delay when we observe
RequestLimitExceeded errors, unlike the default library behaviour which
only applies a *per-request* backoff.
Issue #12121
In the AWS API (generally) we tag things we create, and then we filter
to find them. However, creation & tagging are typically two separate
calls. So there is a chance that we will create an object, but fail to
tag it.
We fix this (done here in the case of security groups, but we can do
this more generally) by retrieving the resource without a tag filter.
If the retrieved resource has the correct tags, great. If it has the
tags for another cluster, that's a problem, and we raise an error. If
it has no tags at all, we add the tags.
This only works where the resource is uniquely named (or we can
otherwise retrieve it uniquely). For security groups, the SG name comes
from the service UUID, so that's unique.
Fixes#11324
Volume names have now format <cluster-name>-dynamic-<pv-name>.
pv-name is guaranteed to be unique in Kubernetes cluster, adding
<cluster-name> ensures we don't conflict with any running cluster
in the cloud project (kube-controller-manager --cluster-name=XXX).
'kubernetes' is the default cluster name.
AWS doesn't support type=LoadBalancer with UDP services. For now, we
simply skip over the test with type=LoadBalancer on AWS for the UDP
service.
Fix#20911
This commit allows the AWS cloud provider plugin to work on EC2 instances
that do not have a public IP. The EC2 metadata service returns a 404 for the
'public-ipv4' endpoint for private instances, and the plugin was bubbling this
up as a fatal error.
We are (sadly) using a copy-and-paste of the GCE PD code for AWS EBS.
This code hasn't been updated in a while, and it seems that the GCE code
has some code to make volume mounting more robust that we should copy.
GCE disks don't have tags, we must encode the tags into Description field.
It's encoded as JSON, which is both human and machine readable:
description: '{"kubernetes.io/created-for/pv/name":"pv-gce-oxwts","kubernetes.io/created-for/pvc/name":"myclaim","kubernetes.io/created-for/pvc/namespace":"default"}'
The ip permission method now checks for containment, not equality, so
order of parameters matter. This change fixes
`removeSecurityGroupIngress` to pass in the removal permission first to
compare against the existing permission.
Change isEqualIPPermission to consider the entire list of security group
ids on when checking if a security group id has already been added.
This is used for example when adding and removing ingress rules to the
cluster nodes from an elastic load balancer. Without this, once there
are multiple load balancers, the method as it stands incorrectly returns
false even if the security group id is in the list of group ids. This
causes a few problems: dangling security groups which fill up an
account's limit since they don't get removed, and inability to recreate
load balancers in certain situations (receiving an
InvalidPermission.Duplicate from AWS when adding the same security
group).
According to AWS, the ELB healthy threshold is "Number of consecutive health check successes before declaring an EC2 instance healthy." It has an unusual interaction with Kubernetes, since all nodes will enter either an unhealthy state or a healthy state together depending on the service's healthiness as a whole.
We have observed that if our service goes down for the unhealthy threshold (which is 2 checks at 30 second intervals = 60 seconds), then the ELB will stop serving traffic to all nodes in the cluster, and will wait for the healthy threshold (currently 10 * 30 = 300 seconds) AFTER the service is restored to add back the cluster nodes, meaning it remains unreachable for an extra 300 seconds.
With the new settings, the ELB will continue to timeout dead nodes after 60 seconds, but will restore healthy nodes after 20 seconds. The minimum value for healthyThreshold is 2, and the minimum value for interval is 5 seconds. I went for 10 seconds instead of the minimum sort of arbitrarily because I was not sure how much this value may affect the scalability of clusters in EC2, as it does put some extra load on the kube-proxy.
We don't cope well if a PD is in multiple zones, but this is actually
fairly easy to detect. This is probably justified purely on the basis
that we never want to delete the wrong volume (DeleteDisk), but also
because this means that we now warn on creation if a disk is in multiple
zones (with the labeling admission controller).
This also means that with the scheduling predicate in place, that many
of our volume problems "go away" in practice: you still can't create or
delete a volume when it is ambiguous, but thereafter the volume will be
labeled with the zone, that will match it only to nodes with the same
zone, and then we query for the volume in that zone when we
attach/detach it.
This removes a panic I mistakenly introduced when an instance is not
found, and also restores the exact prior behaviour for
getInstanceByName, where it returns cloudprovider.InstanceNotFound when
the instance is not found.
We adapt the existing code to work across all zones in a region.
We require a feature-flag to enable Ubernetes-Lite
Reasons:
* There are some behavioural changes if users create volumes with
the same name in two zones.
* We don't want to make one API call per zone if we're not running
Ubernetes-Lite.
* Ubernetes-Lite is still experimental.
There isn't a parallel flag implemented for AWS, because at the moment
there would be no behaviour changes from this.
findInstancesByNodeNames was a simple loop around
findInstanceByNodeName, which made an EC2 API call for each call.
We've had trouble with this sort of behaviour hitting EC2 rate limits on
bigger clusters (e.g. #11979).
Instead, change this method to fetch _all_ the tagged EC2 instances, and
then loop through the local results. This is one API call (modulo
paging).
We are currently only using findInstancesByNodeNames for the load
balancer, where we attach every node, so we were fetching all but one of
the instances anyway.
Issue #11979
Christopher Batey