7.4 KiB
layout | page_title | sidebar_current | description |
---|---|---|---|
docs | ACL System | docs-internals-acl | Consul provides an optional Access Control List (ACL) system which can be used to control access to data and APIs. The ACL system is a Capability-based system that relies on tokens which can have fine grained rules applied to them. It is very similar to AWS IAM in many ways. |
ACL System
Consul provides an optional Access Control List (ACL) system which can be used to control access to data and APIs. The ACL system is a Capability-based system that relies on tokens to which fine grained rules can be applied. It is very similar to AWS IAM in many ways.
ACL Design
The ACL system is designed to be easy to use, fast to enforce, flexible to new policies, all while providing administrative insight. It has been modeled on the AWS IAM system, as well as the more general object-capability model. The system is modeled around "tokens".
Every token has an ID, name, type and rule set. The ID is a randomly generated UUID, making it unfeasible to guess. The name is opaque and human readable. The type is either "client" meaning it cannot modify ACL rules, and is restricted by the provided rules, or is "management" and is allowed to perform all actions.
The token ID is passed along with each RPC request to the servers. Agents
can be configured with an acl_token
property
to provide a default token, but the token can also be specified by a client on a
per-request basis. ACLs are new as of Consul 0.4, meaning
prior versions do not provide a token. This is handled by the special "anonymous"
token. Anytime there is no token provided, the rules defined by that token are
automatically applied. This allows policy to be enforced on legacy clients.
Enforcement is always done by the server nodes. All servers must be configured
to provide an acl_datacenter
which
enables ACL enforcement but also specifies the authoritative datacenter. Consul does not
replicate data cross-WAN, and instead relies on RPC forwarding
to support Multi-Datacenter configurations. However, because requests can be
made across datacenter boundaries, ACL tokens must be valid globally. To avoid
replication issues, a single datacenter is considered authoritative and stores
all the tokens.
When a request is made to any non-authoritative server with a token, it must
be resolved into the appropriate policy. This is done by reading the token
from the authoritative server and caching a configurable
acl_ttl
. The implication
of caching is that the cache TTL is an upper bound on the staleness of policy
that is enforced. It is possible to set a zero TTL, but this has adverse
performance impacts, as every request requires refreshing the policy.
Another possible issue is an outage of the
acl_datacenter
or networking
issues preventing access. In this case, it may be impossible for non-authoritative
servers to resolve tokens. Consul provides a number of configurable
acl_down_policy
choices to tune behavior. It is possible to deny or permit all actions, or to ignore
cache TTLs and enter a fail-safe mode.
ACLs can also act in either a whitelist or blacklist mode depending
on the configuration of
acl_default_policy
. If the default
policy is to deny all actions, then token rules can be set to allow or whitelist
actions. In the inverse, the allow all default behavior is a blacklist,
where rules are used to prohibit actions.
Blacklist mode and consul exec
If you set acl_default_policy
to deny
, the anonymous
token won't have the permission to read the default
_rexec
prefix, and therefore token-less Consul agents (using the anonymous
token)
won't be able to perform consul exec
actions.
There is a subtle interaction there. The agents will need permission to
read/write to the _rexec
prefix for consul exec
to
work properly. They use that as the transport for most data, only the edge trigger
uses the event system.
You can do this by allowing the anonymous
token to access that prefix, or by
providing tokens to the agents that enable it. The former can be done by giving
this rule to the anonymous
token:
key "_rexec/" {
policy = "write"
}
Bootstrapping ACLs
Bootstrapping the ACL system is done by providing an initial acl_master_token
configuration, which will be created
as a "management" type token if it does not exist. Note that the acl_master_token
is only installed when a server acquires
cluster leadership. If you would like to install or change the
acl_master_token
, set the new value for
acl_master_token
in the configuration
for all servers. Once this is done, restart the current leader to force a leader election.
Rule Specification
A core part of the ACL system is a rule language which is used to describe the policy that must be enforced. We make use of the HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) to specify policy. This language is human readable and interoperable with JSON making it easy to machine generate.
As of Consul 0.4, it is only possible to specify policies for the KV store. Specification in the HCL format looks like:
# Default all keys to read-only
key "" {
policy = "read"
}
key "foo/" {
policy = "write"
}
key "foo/private/" {
# Deny access to the private dir
policy = "deny"
}
# Default all services to allowing registration
service "" {
policy = "write"
}
service "secure" {
# Deny registration access to secure service
policy = "read"
}
This is equivalent to the following JSON input:
{
"key": {
"": {
"policy": "read"
},
"foo/": {
"policy": "write"
},
"foo/private": {
"policy": "deny"
}
},
"service": {
"": {
"policy": "write"
},
"secure": {
"policy": "read"
}
}
}
Key policies provide both a prefix and a policy. The rules are enforced
using a longest-prefix match policy. This means we pick the most specific
policy possible. The policy is either "read", "write" or "deny". A "write"
policy implies "read", and there is no way to specify write-only. If there
is no applicable rule, the
acl_default_policy
is applied.
Services policies provide both a service name and a policy. The rules are
enforced using an exact match policy. The default rule is provided using
the empty string. The policy is either "read", "write", or "deny". A "write"
policy implies "read", and there is no way to specify write-only. If there
is no applicable rule, the
acl_default_policy
is
applied. Currently, only the "write" level is enforced for registration of
services. The policy for the "consul" service is always "write" as it is
managed internally.