Commit Graph

90 Commits (ca3119bd24c451851c15e47642e85b449552d85c)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Štibraný 422e7839d4
Add more size checks when writing individual sections in the index. (#9710)
* Add more size checks when writing individual sections in the index.

Signed-off-by: Peter Štibraný <pstibrany@gmail.com>

* Use uint and add comment about it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Štibraný <pstibrany@gmail.com>
2021-11-11 15:44:28 +05:30
beorn7 c954cd9d1d Move packages out of deprecated pkg directory
This creates a new `model` directory and moves all data-model related
packages over there:
  exemplar labels relabel rulefmt textparse timestamp value

All the others are more or less utilities and have been moved to `util`:
  gate logging modetimevfs pool runtime

Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
2021-11-09 08:03:10 +01:00
Dieter Plaetinck cda025b5b5
TSDB: demistify SeriesRefs and ChunkRefs (#9536)
* TSDB: demistify seriesRefs and ChunkRefs

The TSDB package contains many types of series and chunk references,
all shrouded in uint types.  Often the same uint value may
actually mean one of different types, in non-obvious ways.

This PR aims to clarify the code and help navigating to relevant docs,
usage, etc much quicker.

Concretely:

* Use appropriately named types and document their semantics and
  relations.
* Make multiplexing and demuxing of types explicit
  (on the boundaries between concrete implementations and generic
  interfaces).
* Casting between different types should be free.  None of the changes
  should have any impact on how the code runs.

TODO: Implement BlockSeriesRef where appropriate (for a future PR)

Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>

* feedback

Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>

* agent: demistify seriesRefs and ChunkRefs

Signed-off-by: Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@grafana.com>
2021-11-06 15:40:04 +05:30
Mateusz Gozdek 1a6c2283a3 Format Go source files using 'gofumpt -w -s -extra'
Part of #9557

Signed-off-by: Mateusz Gozdek <mgozdekof@gmail.com>
2021-11-02 19:52:34 +01:00
Jupiter 84ab705318
32 should better be replaced by "symbolFactor" (#9203)
Signed-off-by: tanghengjian <1040104807@qq.com>
2021-08-13 16:38:53 +05:30
Marco Pracucci 84e786ebc1
Fixed Decoder.Series() error checking (#9201)
Signed-off-by: Marco Pracucci <marco@pracucci.com>
2021-08-13 16:11:41 +05:30
Oleg Zaytsev b1ed4a0a66
LabelNames API with matchers (#9083)
* Push the matchers for LabelNames all the way into the index.

NB This doesn't actually implement it in the index, just plumbs it through for now...

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom@grafana.com>

* Hack it up.  Does not work.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom@grafana.com>

* Revert changes I don't understand

Can't see why do we need to hold a mutex on symbols, and the purpose of
the LabelNamesFor method.

Maybe I'll need to re-add this later.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Implement LabelNamesFor

This method provides the label names that appear in the postings
provided. We do that deeper than the label values because we know
beforehand that most of the label names we'll be the same across
different postings, and we don't want to go down an up looking up the
same symbols for all different series.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Mutex on symbols should be unlocked

However, I still don't understand why do we need a mutex here.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Fix head.LabelNamesFor

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Implement mockIndex LabelNames with matchers

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Nitpick on slice initialisation

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Add tests for LabelNamesWithMatchers

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Fix the mutex mess on head.LabelValues/LabelNames

I still don't see why we need to grab that unrelated mutex, but at least
now we're grabbing it consistently

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Check error after iterating postings

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Use the error from posting when there was en error in postings

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Update storage/interface.go comment

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update tsdb/index/index.go comment

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update tsdb/index/index.go wrapped error msg

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update tsdb/index/index.go wrapped error msg

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update tsdb/index/index.go warpped error msg

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>

* Remove unneeded comment

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Add testcases for LabelNames w/matchers in api.go

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

* Use t.Cleanup() instead of defer in tests

Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>

Co-authored-by: Tom Wilkie <tom@grafana.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-07-20 18:08:08 +05:30
Jupiter 7337ecf0d3
Log when total symbol size exceeds 2^32 bytes. (#9104)
* Compaction fails when total symbol size exceeds 2^32 bytes.
Signed-off-by: tanghengjian <1040104807@qq.com>

* Compaction fails when total symbol size exceeds 2^32 bytes.

Signed-off-by: tanghengjian <1040104807@qq.com>

* Compaction fails when total symbol size exceeds 2^32 bytes.

Signed-off-by: root <tanghengjian@oppo.com>

Co-authored-by: root <tanghengjian@oppo.com>
2021-07-20 15:51:36 +05:30
Mauro Stettler 7715fe3219
Add matchers to LabelValues() call (#8400)
* Accept matchers in querier LabelValues()

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* create matcher to only select metrics which have searched label

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* test case for merge querier with matchers

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* test LabelValues with matchers on head

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* add test for LabelValues on block

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* formatting fix

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* Add comments

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* add missing lock release

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* remove unused parameter

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* Benchmarks for LabelValues() methods on block/head

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* Better comment

Co-authored-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* update comment

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* minor refactor make code cleaner

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* better comments

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* fix expected errors in test

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* Deleting parameter which can only be empty

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* fix comments

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* remove unnecessary lock

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* only lookup label value if label name was looked up

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* Return error when there is one

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* Call .Get() on decoder before checking errors

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* only lock head.symMtx when necessary

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* remove unnecessary delete()

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* re-use code instead of duplicating it

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* Consistently return error from LabelValueFor()

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* move helper func from util.go to querier.go

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* Fix test expectation

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>

* ensure result de-duplication and sorting works

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

* return named error from LabelValueFor()

Signed-off-by: Mauro Stettler <mauro.stettler@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <15064823+codesome@users.noreply.github.com>
2021-02-09 23:08:35 +05:30
Chris Marchbanks c8f810083d
Cache label name and last value when adding series (#8192)
Signed-off-by: Chris Marchbanks <csmarchbanks@gmail.com>
2020-11-19 11:18:12 -07:00
Bartlomiej Plotka 3d8826a3d4
MultiError: Refactored MultiError for more concise and safe usage. (#8066)
* MultiError: Refactored MultiError for more concise and safe usage.

* Less lines
* Goland IDE was marking every usage of old MultiError "potential nil" error
* It was easy to forgot using Err() when error was returned, now it's safely assured on compile time.

NOTE: Potentially I would rename package to merrors. (: In different PR.

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>

* Addressed review comments.

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>

* Addressed comments.

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>

* Fix after rebase.

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
2020-10-28 15:24:58 +00:00
Julien Pivotto 4e5b1722b3
Move away from testutil, refactor imports (#8087)
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@inuits.eu>
2020-10-22 11:00:08 +02:00
Guangwen Feng 9439b2150d
Fix golint warning caused by misspell (#7842)
Signed-off-by: Guangwen Feng <fenggw-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2020-08-25 09:17:41 +01:00
Ganesh Vernekar 082c17b691
Introduce SortedLabelValues/LabelValues to speedup queries for high cardinality (#7448)
* Introduce LabelValuesUnsorted to speedup queries for high cardinality

Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>

* Add sort check

Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
2020-06-25 14:10:29 +01:00
Julien Pivotto 0cff72d756 tsdb: writePostingsToTmpFiles returns nil instead of err (#6618)
Signed-off-by: Julien Pivotto <roidelapluie@inuits.eu>
2020-01-13 22:40:12 +00:00
Bartlomiej Plotka 1e64d757f7
Merge pull request #6585 from prometheus/fix-symbols-lookup
tsdb: Fixed Symbol Lookup edge case; Added tests.
2020-01-10 11:44:23 +00:00
Guangwen Feng 5e906cc09a Fix typo in comment for func AddPadding
Signed-off-by: Guangwen Feng <fenggw-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
2020-01-10 18:11:30 +08:00
Bartlomiej Plotka 59ea320d96 tsdb: Fixed Symbol Lookup edge case; Added tests.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
2020-01-09 11:35:58 +00:00
Bartlomiej Plotka 863613300d Exposed FileWriter. (#6589)
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Plotka <bwplotka@gmail.com>
2020-01-09 11:28:10 +00:00
Brian Brazil 4708915ac6 Replace StringTuples with []string
Benchmarks show slight cpu/allocs improvements.

benchmark                                                               old ns/op      new ns/op      delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1"-4                               269978625      235305110      -12.84%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",j="foo"-4                       129739974      121646193      -6.24%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/j="foo",n="1"-4                       123826274      122056253      -1.43%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",j!="foo"-4                      126962188      130038235      +2.42%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~".*"-4                             6423653989     5991126455     -6.73%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~".+"-4                             6934647521     7033370634     +1.42%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~""-4                               1177781285     1121497736     -4.78%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i!=""-4                               7033680256     7246094991     +3.02%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4               293702332      287440212      -2.13%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4        307628268      307039964      -0.19%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i!=""-4                         512247746      480003862      -6.29%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                 361199794      367066917      +1.62%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4               478863761      476037784      -0.59%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4              103394659      102902098      -0.48%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4        482552781      475453903      -1.47%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4      559257389      589297047      +5.37%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              36492          37012          +1.42%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      557788         611903         +9.70%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      554443         573814         +3.49%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     553227         553826         +0.11%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            113855090      111707221      -1.89%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            133994674      136520728      +1.89%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              38138091       36299898       -4.82%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              28861213       27396723       -5.07%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              112699941      110853868      -1.64%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       113198026      111389742      -1.60%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        28994069       27363804       -5.62%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                29709406       28589223       -3.77%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              134695119      135736971      +0.77%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             26783286       25826928       -3.57%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       134733254      134116739      -0.46%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     160713937      158802768      -1.19%

benchmark                                                               old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1"-4                               36             36             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",j="foo"-4                       38             38             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/j="foo",n="1"-4                       38             38             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",j!="foo"-4                      42             40             -4.76%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~".*"-4                             61             59             -3.28%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~".+"-4                             100088         100087         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~""-4                               100053         100051         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i!=""-4                               100087         100085         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4               44             42             -4.55%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4        50             48             -4.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i!=""-4                         100076         100074         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                 100077         100075         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4               100077         100074         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4              11167          11165          -0.02%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4        100082         100080         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4      111265         111261         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              6              6              +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      11             11             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      11             11             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     15             13             -13.33%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            12             10             -16.67%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            100040         100038         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              100045         100043         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              100041         100039         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              17             15             -11.76%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       23             21             -8.70%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        100046         100044         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                100050         100048         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              100049         100047         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             11150          11148          -0.02%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       100055         100053         -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     111238         111234         -0.00%

benchmark                                                               old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1"-4                               10887816      10887817      +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",j="foo"-4                       5456648       5456648       +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/j="foo",n="1"-4                       5456648       5456648       +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",j!="foo"-4                      5456792       5456712       -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~".*"-4                             258254408     258254328     -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~".+"-4                             273912888     273912904     +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i=~""-4                               17266680      17266600      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/i!=""-4                               273912416     273912336     -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4               7062578       7062498       -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4        7062770       7062690       -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i!=""-4                         28152346      28152266      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                 22721178      22721098      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4               22721336      22721224      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4              3623804       3623733       -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4        22721480      22721400      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Head/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4      24816652      24816444      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              296           296           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      424           424           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      424           424           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     1544          1464          -5.18%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            1606114       1606045       -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            17264709      17264629      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              17264780      17264696      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              17264680      17264600      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              1606253       1606165       -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       1606445       1606348       -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        17264808      17264728      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                17264936      17264856      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              17264965      17264885      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             3148262       3148182       -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       17265141      17265061      -0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     20416944      20416784      -0.00%

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2020-01-07 12:20:03 +00:00
Brian Brazil e9ede51753 Remove last vestiges of never used composite index code.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2020-01-07 12:20:03 +00:00
Brian Brazil 000e306f2f
Handle V1 indexes, some of which have unsorted posting offset tables. (#6564)
Fixes #6535

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2020-01-06 14:06:11 +00:00
Brian Brazil 536d416299
Fix tsdb code and tests to work on Windows. (#6547)
Add back Windows CI, we lost it when tsdb was merged into the prometheus
repo. There's many tests failing outside tsdb, so only test tsdb for
now.

Fixes #6513

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2020-01-04 14:55:02 +00:00
Brian Brazil 2b653ee230 Write label indices based on the posting offset table.
This avoids having to build it up in RAM, and means that all variable
memory usage for compactions is now 0.25 bytes per symbol plus a few
O(labelnames) structures. So in practice, pretty close to constant
memory for compactions.

benchmark                                                                                   old ns/op       new ns/op       delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4        662974828       667162981       +0.63%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4       2459590377      2131168138      -13.35%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4       3808280548      3919290378      +2.91%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4       8513884311      8738099339      +2.63%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4      1898843003      1944131966      +2.39%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4     5601478437      6031391658      +7.67%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4     11225096097     11359624463     +1.20%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4     23994637282     23919583343     -0.31%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                               891042098       826898358       -7.20%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                               915949138       902555676       -1.46%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                               955138431       879067946       -7.96%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                               991447640       958785968       -3.29%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                               1068729356      980249080       -8.28%

benchmark                                                                                   old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4        470778         470556         -0.05%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4       791429         791225         -0.03%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4       1111514        1111257        -0.02%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4       2111498        2111369        -0.01%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4      841433         841220         -0.03%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4     1911469        1911202        -0.01%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4     3041558        3041328        -0.01%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4     6741534        6741382        -0.00%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                               824856         820873         -0.48%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                               887220         885180         -0.23%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                               905253         901539         -0.41%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                               925148         913632         -1.24%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                               1019141        978727         -3.97%

benchmark                                                                                   old bytes      new bytes      delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4        35694744       41523836       +16.33%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4       53405264       59499056       +11.41%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4       74160320       78151568       +5.38%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4       120878480      135364672      +11.98%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4      203832448      209925504      +2.99%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4     341029208      346551064      +1.62%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4     580217176      582345224      +0.37%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4     1356872288     1363495368     +0.49%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                               119535672      94815920       -20.68%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                               115352280      95980776       -16.79%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                               119472320      98724460       -17.37%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                               111979312      94325456       -15.77%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                               116628584      98566344       -15.49%

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-18 12:05:42 +00:00
Brian Brazil 7d1aad46b8 Put postings in a temporary file during index writing.
Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-18 00:55:29 +00:00
Brian Brazil dee6981a6c Move writing of index label indices into IndexWriter.
Now you only need to provide symbols and series to IndexWriter.

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-17 22:15:35 +00:00
Brian Brazil 1733724e30 Factor out index file writing code.
Now that we have more than one file open at a time, deduplicate a bit.

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-17 21:54:13 +00:00
Brian Brazil 85964ce567 During compaction spool postings offset table on the side.
This avoids building it up in memory.

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-17 21:20:10 +00:00
Brian Brazil d782387f81
Stream symbols during compaction. (#6468)
Rather than buffer up symbols in RAM, do it one by one
during compaction. Then use the reader's symbol handling
for symbol lookups during the rest of the index write.

There is some slowdown in compaction, due to having to look through a file
rather than a hash lookup. This is noise to the overall cost of compacting
series with thousands of samples though.

benchmark                                                                                   old ns/op       new ns/op       delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4        539917175       675341565       +25.08%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4       2441815993      2477453524      +1.46%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4       3978543559      3922909687      -1.40%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4       8430219716      8586610007      +1.86%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4      1786424591      1909552782      +6.89%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4     5328998202      6020839950      +12.98%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4     10085059958     11085278690     +9.92%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4     25497010155     27018079806     +5.97%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                               2427391406      2817217987      +16.06%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                               2592965497      2538805050      -2.09%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                               2437388343      2668012858      +9.46%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                               2317095324      2787423966      +20.30%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                               2600239857      2096973860      -19.35%

benchmark                                                                                   old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4        500851         470794         -6.00%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4       821527         791451         -3.66%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4       1141562        1111508        -2.63%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4       2141576        2111504        -1.40%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4      871466         841424         -3.45%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4     1941428        1911415        -1.55%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4     3071573        3041510        -0.98%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4     6771648        6741509        -0.45%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                               731493         824888         +12.77%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                               793918         887311         +11.76%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                               811842         905204         +11.50%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                               832244         925081         +11.16%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                               921553         1019162        +10.59%

benchmark                                                                                   old bytes      new bytes      delta
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4        40532648       35698276       -11.93%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4       60340216       53409568       -11.49%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4       81087336       72065552       -11.13%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=normal,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4       142485576      120878544      -15.16%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=101-4      208661368      203831136      -2.31%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=1001-4     347345904      340484696      -1.98%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=2001-4     585185856      576244648      -1.53%
BenchmarkCompaction/type=vertical,blocks=4,series=10000,samplesPerSeriesPerBlock=5001-4     1357641792     1358966528     +0.10%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                               126486664      119666744      -5.39%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                               122323192      115117224      -5.89%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                               126404504      119469864      -5.49%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                               119047832      112230408      -5.73%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                               136576016      116634800      -14.60%

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-17 19:49:54 +00:00
Brian Brazil 767fa704b6 Load only some offsets into the symbol table into memory.
Rather than keeping the entire symbol table in memory, keep every nth
offset and walk from there to the entry we need. This ends up slightly
slower, ~360ms per 1M series returned from PostingsForMatchers which is
not much considering the rest of the CPU such a query would go on to
use.

Make LabelValues use the postings tables, rather than having
to do symbol lookups. Use yoloString, as PostingsForMatchers
doesn't need the strings to stick around and adjust the API
call to keep the Querier open until it's all marshalled.

Remove allocatedSymbols memory optimisation, we no longer keep all the
symbol strings in heap memory. Remove LabelValuesFor and LabelIndices,
they're dead code. Ensure we've still tests for label indices,
and add missing test that we can work with old V1 Format index files.

PostingForMatchers performance is slightly better, with a big drop in
allocation counts due to using yoloString for LabelValues:

benchmark                                                               old ns/op     new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              36698         36681         -0.05%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      522786        560887        +7.29%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      511652        537680        +5.09%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     522102        564239        +8.07%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            113689911     111795919     -1.67%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            135825572     132871085     -2.18%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              40782628      38038181      -6.73%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              31267869      29194327      -6.63%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              112733329     111568823     -1.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       112868153     111232029     -1.45%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        31338257      29349446      -6.35%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                32054482      29972436      -6.50%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              136504654     133968442     -1.86%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             27960350      27264997      -2.49%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       136765564     133860724     -2.12%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     163714583     159453668     -2.60%

benchmark                                                               old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              6              6              +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      11             11             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      11             11             +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     17             15             -11.76%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            100012         12             -99.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            200040         100040         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              200045         100045         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              200041         100041         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              100017         17             -99.98%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       100023         23             -99.98%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        200046         100046         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                200050         100050         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              200049         100049         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             111150         11150          -89.97%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       200055         100055         -49.99%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     311238         111238         -64.26%

benchmark                                                               old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              296           296           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      424           424           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      424           424           +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     552           1544          +179.71%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            1600482       1606125       +0.35%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            17259065      17264709      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              17259150      17264780      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              17259048      17264680      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              1600610       1606242       +0.35%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       1600813       1606434       +0.35%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        17259176      17264808      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                17259304      17264936      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              17259333      17264965      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             3142628       3148262       +0.18%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       17259509      17265141      +0.03%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     20405680      20416944      +0.06%

However overall Select performance is down and involves more allocs, due to
having to do more than a simple map lookup to resolve a symbol and that all the strings
returned are allocated:

benchmark                                           old ns/op     new ns/op      delta
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1of1000000-4           506092636     862678244      +70.46%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10of1000000-4          505638968     860917636      +70.26%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100of1000000-4         505229450     882150048      +74.60%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000of1000000-4        515905414     862241115      +67.13%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10000of1000000-4       516785354     874841110      +69.29%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100000of1000000-4      540742808     907030187      +67.74%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000000of1000000-4     815224288     1181236903     +44.90%

benchmark                                           old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1of1000000-4           4000020        6000020        +50.00%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10of1000000-4          4000038        6000038        +50.00%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100of1000000-4         4000218        6000218        +50.00%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000of1000000-4        4002018        6002018        +49.97%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10000of1000000-4       4020018        6020018        +49.75%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100000of1000000-4      4200018        6200018        +47.62%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000000of1000000-4     6000018        8000019        +33.33%

benchmark                                           old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1of1000000-4           176001468     227201476     +29.09%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10of1000000-4          176002620     227202628     +29.09%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100of1000000-4         176014140     227214148     +29.09%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000of1000000-4        176129340     227329348     +29.07%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/10000of1000000-4       177281340     228481348     +28.88%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/100000of1000000-4      188801340     240001348     +27.12%
BenchmarkQuerierSelect/Block/1000000of1000000-4     304001340     355201616     +16.84%

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-17 18:56:58 +00:00
Brian Brazil 0482d93fe6 Add contexts to index writer to fix test races.
With recent speed improvements to populate block,
the cancellation test now fails regularly on CI.
Use contexts to get the index writer to shut down
much faster, and that allows us to make the cancellation
test faster too.

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-16 17:28:29 +00:00
Brian Brazil cf76daed2f Avoid WriteAt for Postings.
Flushing buffers and doing a pwrite per posting is expensive
time wise, so go back to the old way for those. This doubles
our memory usage, but that's still small as it's only
~8 bytes per time series in the index. This is 30-40% faster.

benchmark                                                         old ns/op      new ns/op     delta
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4     1101429174     724362123     -34.23%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4     1074466374     720977022     -32.90%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4     1166510282     677702636     -41.90%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4     1075013071     696855960     -35.18%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4     1231673790     829328610     -32.67%

benchmark                                                         old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4     832571         731435         -12.15%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4     894875         793823         -11.29%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4     912931         811804         -11.08%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4     933511         832366         -10.83%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4     1022791        921554         -9.90%

benchmark                                                         old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4     129063496     126472364     -2.01%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4     124154888     122300764     -1.49%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4     128790648     126394856     -1.86%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4     120570696     118946548     -1.35%
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4     138754288     136317432     -1.76%

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-16 15:30:49 +00:00
Brian Brazil 971dafdfbe Coalesce series reads where we can.
When compacting rather than doing a read of all
series in the index per label name, do many at once
but only when it won't use (much) more ram than writing the
special all index does.

original in-memory postings:
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                  1        1202383447 ns/op        158936496 B/op   1031511 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                  1        1141792706 ns/op        154453408 B/op   1093453 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                  1        1169288829 ns/op        161072336 B/op   1110021 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                  1        1115700103 ns/op        149480472 B/op   1129180 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                  1        1283813141 ns/op        162937800 B/op   1202771 allocs/op

before:
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                  1        1145195941 ns/op        131749984 B/op    834400 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                  1        1233526345 ns/op        127889416 B/op    897033 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                  1        1821942296 ns/op        131665648 B/op    914836 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                  1        8035568665 ns/op        123811832 B/op    934312 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                  1       71325926267 ns/op        140722648 B/op   1016824 allocs/op

after:
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1,labelvalues=100000-4                  1        1101429174 ns/op        129063496 B/op    832571 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10,labelvalues=10000-4                  1        1074466374 ns/op        124154888 B/op    894875 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=100,labelvalues=1000-4                  1        1166510282 ns/op        128790648 B/op    912931 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=1000,labelvalues=100-4                  1        1075013071 ns/op        120570696 B/op    933511 allocs/op
BenchmarkCompactionFromHead/labelnames=10000,labelvalues=10-4                  1        1231673790 ns/op        138754288 B/op   1022791 allocs/op

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-12 08:38:14 +00:00
Brian Brazil 373a1fdfbf Reread index series rather than storing in memory.
Rather than building up a 2nd copy of all the posting
tables, construct it from the data we've already written
to disk. This takes more time, but saves memory.

Current benchmark numbers have this as slightly faster, but that's
likely due to the synthetic data not having many label names.
Memory usage is roughly halved for the relevant bits.

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-11 22:23:39 +00:00
Brian Brazil 48d25e6fe7 Reduce memory used by postings offset table.
Rather than keeping the offset of each postings list, instead
keep the nth offset of the offset of the posting list. As postings
list offsets have always been sorted, we can then get to the closest
entry before the one we want an iterate forwards.

I haven't done much tuning on the 32 number, it was chosen to try
not to read through more than a 4k page of data.

Switch to a bulk interface for fetching postings. Use it to avoid having
to re-read parts of the posting offset table when querying lots of it.

For a index with what BenchmarkHeadPostingForMatchers uses RAM
for r.postings drops from 3.79MB to 80.19kB or about 48x.
Bytes allocated go down by 30%, and suprisingly CPU usage drops by
4-6% for typical queries too.

benchmark                                                               old ns/op      new ns/op      delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              35231          36673          +4.09%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      563380         540627         -4.04%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      536782         534186         -0.48%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     533990         541550         +1.42%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            113374598      117969608      +4.05%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            146329884      139651442      -4.56%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              50346510       44961127       -10.70%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              41261550       35356165       -14.31%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              112544418      116904010      +3.87%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       112487086      116864918      +3.89%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        41094758       35457904       -13.72%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                41906372       36151473       -13.73%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              147262414      140424800      -4.64%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             28615629       27872072       -2.60%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       147117177      140462403      -4.52%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     175096826      167902298      -4.11%

benchmark                                                               old allocs     new allocs     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              4              6              +50.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      7              11             +57.14%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      7              11             +57.14%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     15             17             +13.33%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            100010         100012         +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            200069         200040         -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              200072         200045         -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              200070         200041         -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              100013         100017         +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       100017         100023         +0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        200073         200046         -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                200075         200050         -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              200074         200049         -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             111165         111150         -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       200078         200055         -0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     311282         311238         -0.01%

benchmark                                                               old bytes     new bytes     delta
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1"-4                              264           296           +12.12%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j="foo"-4                      360           424           +17.78%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/j="foo",n="1"-4                      360           424           +17.78%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",j!="foo"-4                     520           552           +6.15%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".*"-4                            1600461       1600482       +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~".+"-4                            24900801      17259077      -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i=~""-4                              24900836      17259151      -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/i!=""-4                              24900760      17259048      -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",j="foo"-4              1600557       1600621       +0.00%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".*",i!="2",j="foo"-4       1600717       1600813       +0.01%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!=""-4                        24900856      17259176      -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i!="",j="foo"-4                24900952      17259304      -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",j="foo"-4              24900993      17259333      -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~"1.+",j="foo"-4             3788311       3142630       -17.04%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!="2",j="foo"-4       24901137      17259509      -30.69%
BenchmarkPostingsForMatchers/Block/n="1",i=~".+",i!~"2.*",j="foo"-4     28693086      20405680      -28.88%

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-11 19:59:31 +00:00
Brian Brazil 4df814f509
Don't buffer up tables in memory on compaction. (#6422)
We can instead write it as we go, and then go back and write in the
length at the end.

Also fix the compaction benchmark, which indicates no changes.

For the benchmark, this brings maximum memory usage of the buffers 
from ~200kB down to 128B.

Signed-off-by: Brian Brazil <brian.brazil@robustperception.io>
2019-12-11 12:49:13 +00:00
Ben Ye c0250cf120 Fix some typos(#6423)
Signed-off-by: yeya24 <yb532204897@gmail.com>
2019-12-08 19:16:46 +00:00
Tom Wilkie de0a772b8e Port tsdb to use pkg/labels. (#6326)
* Port tsdb to use pkg/labels.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com>

* Get tests passing.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com>

* Remove useless cast.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com>

* Appease linters.

Signed-off-by: Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@gmail.com>

* Fix review comments

Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
2019-11-18 11:53:33 -08:00
Ganesh Vernekar 5ecef3542d
Cleanup after merging tsdb into prometheus
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
2019-08-13 14:04:14 +05:30
Ganesh Vernekar 7cf09b0395
Moving tsdb into its own subdirectory
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <cs15btech11018@iith.ac.in>
2019-08-13 13:58:49 +05:30