Handle more arithmetic operators and aggregators for native histograms
This includes operators for multiplication (formerly known as scaling), division, and subtraction. Plus aggregations for average and the avg_over_time function.
Stdvar and stddev will (for now) ignore histograms properly (rather than counting them but adding a 0 for them).
Signed-off-by: Jeanette Tan <jeanette.tan@grafana.com>
Wiser coders than myself have come to the conclusion that a `switch`
statement is almost always superior to a statement that includes any
`else if`.
The exceptions that I have found in our codebase are just these two:
* The `if else` is followed by an additional statement before the next
condition (separated by a `;`).
* The whole thing is within a `for` loop and `break` statements are
used. In this case, using `switch` would require tagging the `for`
loop, which probably tips the balance.
Why are `switch` statements more readable?
For one, fewer curly braces. But more importantly, the conditions all
have the same alignment, so the whole thing follows the natural flow
of going down a list of conditions. With `else if`, in contrast, all
conditions but the first are "hidden" behind `} else if `, harder to
spot and (for no good reason) presented differently from the first
condition.
I'm sure the aforemention wise coders can list even more reasons.
In any case, I like it so much that I have found myself recommending
it in code reviews. I would like to make it a habit in our code base,
without making it a hard requirement that we would test on the CI. But
for that, there has to be a role model, so this commit eliminates all
`if else` occurrences, unless it is autogenerated code or fits one of
the exceptions above.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
Extends Appender.AppendHistogram function to accept the FloatHistogram. TSDB supports appending, querying, WAL replay, for this new type of histogram.
Signed-off-by: Marc Tudurí <marctc@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* histogram: Simplify iterators
We don't really need currLower and currUpper and can calculate it when
needed (as already done for the floatBucketIterator). The calculation
is cheap, while keeping those extra variables around costs RAM
(potentially a lot with many iterators).
* histogram: Convert Bucket/FloatBucket to one generic type
* histogram: Move some bucket iterator code into generic base iterator
* histogram: Remove cumulative iterator for FloatHistogram
We added it in the past for completeness (Histogram has one), but it
has never been used. Plus, even the cumulative iterator for Histogram
is only there for test reasons.
We can always add it back, and then maybe even using generics.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
And use the new method to call to compact Histograms during
parsing. This happens for both `Histogram` and `FloatHistogram`. In
this way, if targets decide to optimize the exposition size by merging
spans with empty buckets in between, we still get a normalized
results. It will also normalize away any valid but weird
representations like empty spans, spans with offset zero, and empty
buckets at the start or end of a span.
The implementation seemed easy at first as it just turns the
`compactBuckets` helper into a generic function (which now got its own
file). However, the integer Histograms have delta buckets instead of
absolute buckets, which had to be treated specially in the generic
`compactBuckets` function. To make sure it works, I have added plenty
of explicit tests for `Histogram` in addition to the `FloatHistogram`
tests.
I have also updated the doc comment for the `Compact` method.
Based on the insights now expressed in the doc comment, compacting
with a maxEmptyBuckets > 0 is rarely useful. Therefore, this commit
also sets the value to 0 in the two cases we were using 3 so far. We
might still want to reconsider, so I don't want to remove the
maxEmptyBuckets parameter right now.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
If the zero threshold overlaps with the highest negative bucket and/or
the lowest positive bucket, its upper or lower boundary, respectively,
has to be adjusted. In valid histograms, only ever the highest
negative bucket and/or the lowest positive bucket may overlap with the
zero bucket. This is assumed in this code to simplify the checks.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
* MergeFloatBucketIterator for []FloatBucketIterator
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* histogram_quantile for histograms
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Fix histogram_quantile
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Unit test and enhancements
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Iterators to iterate buckets in reverse and all buckets together including zero bucket
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Consider all buckets for histogram_quantile and fix the implementation
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Remove unneeded code
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Fix lint
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
- Pick At... method via return value of Next/Seek.
- Do not clobber returned buckets.
- Add partial FloatHistogram suppert.
Note that the promql package is now _only_ dealing with
FloatHistograms, following the idea that PromQL only knows float
values.
As a byproduct, I have removed the histogramSeries metric. In my
understanding, series can have both float and histogram samples, so
that metric doesn't make sense anymore.
As another byproduct, I have converged the sampleBuf and the
histogramSampleBuf in memSeries into one. The sample type stored in
the sampleBuf has been extended to also contain histograms even before
this commit.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
Including a few adjustments for normal Histogram, too, e.g. use
pointer receiver to avoid the large copy on method calls.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
zenador