* adding information about the health and errors for Rules
adding Health() and LastError() to the Rule interface. This will allow
us to easily surface information about rules.
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* updating rules.html with fields for Rule errors and health state
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* fix code comment grammar & access Rule health/error info using a mutex
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* s/Errors/Error/ in rules.html to remain consistent with targets.html
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* adding periods to code comments in reporting/alerting
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
* putting health/error below mutex in struct field
Signed-off-by: noqcks <benny@noqcks.io>
Previously it would set no preconditions and check no postconditions,
as the `groups` member was empty.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
This adds a parameter to the storage selection interface which allows
query engine(s) to pass information about the operations surrounding a
data selection.
This can for example be used by remote storage backends to infer the
correct downsampling aggregates that need to be provided.
* Use testutil in rules subpackage
* Fix manager test
* Use testutil in rules subpackage
* Fix manager test
* Fix rebase
* Change to testutil for applyConfig tests
* Re-add contexts to storage.Storage.Querier()
These are needed when replacing the storage by a multi-tenant
implementation where the tenant is stored in the context.
The 1.x query interfaces already had contexts, but they got lost in 2.x.
* Convert promql.Engine to use native contexts
Clicking on a rule, either the name or the expression, opens the rule
result (or the corresponding expression, repsectively) in the
expression browser. This should by default happen in the console tab,
as, more often than not, displaying it in the graph tab runs into a
timeout.
* Move fingerprint to Hash()
* Move away from tsdb.MultiError
* 0777 -> 0666 for files
* checkOverflow of extra fields
Signed-off-by: Goutham Veeramachaneni <cs14btech11014@iith.ac.in>
Usually rules don't more around, and if they do it's likely
that rules/alerts with the same name stay in the same order.
If rules/alerts with the same name are added/removed this
could cause a blip for one cycle, but this is unavoidable
without requiring rule and alert names to be unique - which we don't
want to do.