We need to make sure that `tsdb_errors.NewMulti` handles the errors.Is()
calls properly, like it's done in grafana/dskit.
Also we need to check that `errors.Is(err, context.Canceled)`, not that
`err == context.Canceled`.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
Test that blocks are not marked as "compaction failed" during shutdown.
This shouldn't happen but this test currently fails.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zaytsev <mail@olegzaytsev.com>
It took a `Labels` where the memory could be re-used, but in practice
this hardly ever benefitted. Especially after converting `relabel.Process`
to `relabel.ProcessBuilder`.
Comparing the parameter to `nil` was a bug; `EmptyLabels` is not `nil`
so the slice was reallocated multiple times by `append`.
Lastly `Builder.Labels()` now estimates that the final size will depend
on labels added and deleted.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
* Adds an affirmative log message for successful WAL repair
Signed-off-by: Vernon Miller <vernon.miller@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: Vernon Miller <96601789+aldernero@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Without this fix, if snapshots were enabled, and wbl goes missing
between restarts, then TSDB does not recognize that there are ooo
mmap chunks on disk and we cannot query them until those chunks
are compacted into blocks.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
If the snapshot was enabled with some ooo mmap chunks on disk,
and wbl was removed between restarts, then we should still be able
to query the ooo mmap chunks after a restart. This test shows that
we are not able to query those ooo mmap chunks after a restart
under this situation.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
M-map chunks replayed on startup are discarded if there
was no WAL and no snapshot loaded, because there is no
series created in the Head that it can map to. So only
load m-map chunks from disk if there is either a snapshot
loaded or there is WAL on disk.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Adds `WALReplayConcurrency` as an option on tsdb `Options` and `HeadOptions`.
If it is not set or set <=0, then `GOMAXPROCS` is used, which matches the previous behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Yuri Nikolic <durica.nikolic@grafana.com>
These benchmarks are all testing things related to what Prometheus does,
so perhaps have some historical interest, but we should not retain them
in the main repo.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
`safeChunk` is only obtained from the `headChunkReader.Chunk` call where
the chunk is already fetched and stored with the `safeChunk`. So, when
getting the iterator for the `safeChunk`, we don't need to get the chunk again.
Also removed a couple of unnecessary fields from `safeChunk` as a part of this.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* Export single ith test histogram generation functions
Signed-off-by: György Krajcsovits <gyorgy.krajcsovits@grafana.com>
* Do not set counter reset hint for non-gauge histograms individually
Signed-off-by: György Krajcsovits <gyorgy.krajcsovits@grafana.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: George Krajcsovits <krajorama@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: György Krajcsovits <gyorgy.krajcsovits@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: George Krajcsovits <krajorama@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
This is a bit more conservative than we could be. As long as a chunk
isn't the first in a block, we can be pretty sure that the previous
chunk won't disappear. However, the incremental gain of returning
NotCounterReset in these cases is probably very small and might not be
worth the code complications.
Wwith this, we now also pay attention to an explicitly set counter
reset during ingestion. While the case doesn't show up in practice
yet, there could be scenarios where the metric source knows there was
a counter reset even if it might not be visible from the values in the
histogram. It is also useful for testing.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
- Adjust doc comments to go1.19 style.
- Break down some overly long lines.
- Minor doc comment tweaks and fixes.
- Some renaming.
Some rationales for the last point:
I have renamed “interjections” into “inserts”, mostly because it is
shorter, and the word shows up a lot by now (and the concept is
cryptic enough to not obfuscate it even more with abbreviations).
I have also tried to find more descriptive naming for the “compare
spans” functions.
Signed-off-by: beorn7 <beorn@grafana.com>
This is an optimization on the existing append in OOOChunk.
What we've been doing so far is find the place inside the out-of-order
slice where the new sample should go in and then place it there and move
any samples to the right if necessary. This is OK but requires a binary
search every time the slice is bigger than 0.
The optimization is opinionated and suggests that although out-of-order
samples can be out-of-order amongst themselves they'll probably be in
order thus we can probably optimistically append at the end and if not
do the binary search.
OOOChunks are capped to 30 samples by default so this is a small
optimization but everything adds up, specially if you handle many active
timeseries with out-of-order samples.
Signed-off-by: Jesus Vazquez <jesus.vazquez@grafana.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesus Vazquez <jesusvazquez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
* adapt code.go and write_handler.go to support float histograms
* adapt watcher.go to support float histograms
* wip adapt queue_manager.go to support float histograms
* address comments for metrics in queue_manager.go
* set test cases for queue manager
* use same counts for histograms and float histograms
* refactor createHistograms tests
* fix float histograms ref in watcher_test.go
* address PR comments
Signed-off-by: Marc Tuduri <marctc@protonmail.com>
This is to check if a gauge histogram can be appended to the given chunk.
If not, it tells what changes to make to the chunk and the histogram
if possible.
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Vernekar <ganeshvern@gmail.com>
In the head and in v1 postings on disk, it makes no difference whether
postings are sorted. Only for v2 does the code step through in order.
So, move the sorting to where it is required, and thus skip it entirely
in the head.
Label values in on-disk blocks are already sorted, but `slices.Sort` is
very fast on already-sorted data so we don't bother checking.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
This allocates memory for all the returned values, which skews the
result. We aren't trying to benchmark `ExpandPostings`, so just step
through all the values without storing them to consume them.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Previously all the postings constructed were consumed on the first
iteration, so subsequent iterations did no work.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Boreham <bjboreham@gmail.com>
Alan Protasio