2015-01-21 19:07:45 +00:00
|
|
|
// Copyright 2013 The Prometheus Authors
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package remote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
"math"
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
"sync"
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-23 18:20:39 +00:00
|
|
|
"golang.org/x/time/rate"
|
|
|
|
|
2015-05-20 16:10:29 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus"
|
2015-10-03 08:21:43 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/prometheus/common/log"
|
2015-08-20 15:18:46 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/prometheus/common/model"
|
2017-02-13 20:43:20 +00:00
|
|
|
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/config"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/prometheus/prometheus/relabel"
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2014-06-18 17:43:15 +00:00
|
|
|
// String constants for instrumentation.
|
|
|
|
const (
|
2014-07-23 17:55:33 +00:00
|
|
|
namespace = "prometheus"
|
2014-10-22 17:21:23 +00:00
|
|
|
subsystem = "remote_storage"
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
queue = "queue"
|
2017-02-13 20:43:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
// With a maximum of 1000 shards, assuming an average of 100ms remote write
|
|
|
|
// time and 100 samples per batch, we will be able to push 1M samples/s.
|
|
|
|
defaultMaxShards = 1000
|
2017-02-13 20:43:20 +00:00
|
|
|
defaultMaxSamplesPerSend = 100
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
// defaultQueueCapacity is per shard - at 1000 shards, this will buffer
|
|
|
|
// 100M samples. It is configured to buffer 1000 batches, which at 100ms
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
// per batch is 1:40mins.
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
defaultQueueCapacity = defaultMaxSamplesPerSend * 1000
|
2017-02-13 20:43:20 +00:00
|
|
|
defaultBatchSendDeadline = 5 * time.Second
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We track samples in/out and how long pushes take using an Exponentially
|
|
|
|
// Weighted Moving Average.
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
ewmaWeight = 0.2
|
|
|
|
shardUpdateDuration = 10 * time.Second
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
// Allow 30% too many shards before scaling down.
|
|
|
|
shardToleranceFraction = 0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Limit to 1 log event every 10s
|
|
|
|
logRateLimit = 0.1
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
logBurst = 10
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
2014-07-23 17:55:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
sentSamplesTotal = prometheus.NewCounterVec(
|
|
|
|
prometheus.CounterOpts{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: namespace,
|
|
|
|
Subsystem: subsystem,
|
|
|
|
Name: "sent_samples_total",
|
|
|
|
Help: "Total number of processed samples sent to remote storage.",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
[]string{queue},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
failedSamplesTotal = prometheus.NewCounterVec(
|
|
|
|
prometheus.CounterOpts{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: namespace,
|
|
|
|
Subsystem: subsystem,
|
|
|
|
Name: "failed_samples_total",
|
|
|
|
Help: "Total number of processed samples which failed on send to remote storage.",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
[]string{queue},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
droppedSamplesTotal = prometheus.NewCounterVec(
|
|
|
|
prometheus.CounterOpts{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: namespace,
|
|
|
|
Subsystem: subsystem,
|
|
|
|
Name: "dropped_samples_total",
|
|
|
|
Help: "Total number of samples which were dropped due to the queue being full.",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
[]string{queue},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
sentBatchDuration = prometheus.NewHistogramVec(
|
|
|
|
prometheus.HistogramOpts{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: namespace,
|
|
|
|
Subsystem: subsystem,
|
|
|
|
Name: "sent_batch_duration_seconds",
|
|
|
|
Help: "Duration of sample batch send calls to the remote storage.",
|
|
|
|
Buckets: prometheus.DefBuckets,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
[]string{queue},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
queueLength = prometheus.NewGaugeVec(
|
|
|
|
prometheus.GaugeOpts{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: namespace,
|
|
|
|
Subsystem: subsystem,
|
|
|
|
Name: "queue_length",
|
|
|
|
Help: "The number of processed samples queued to be sent to the remote storage.",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
[]string{queue},
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
queueCapacity = prometheus.NewGaugeVec(
|
|
|
|
prometheus.GaugeOpts{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: namespace,
|
|
|
|
Subsystem: subsystem,
|
|
|
|
Name: "queue_capacity",
|
|
|
|
Help: "The capacity of the queue of samples to be sent to the remote storage.",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
[]string{queue},
|
|
|
|
)
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
numShards = prometheus.NewGaugeVec(
|
|
|
|
prometheus.GaugeOpts{
|
|
|
|
Namespace: namespace,
|
|
|
|
Subsystem: subsystem,
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
Name: "shards",
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
Help: "The number of shards used for parallel sending to the remote storage.",
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
[]string{queue},
|
|
|
|
)
|
2014-06-18 17:43:15 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
func init() {
|
|
|
|
prometheus.MustRegister(sentSamplesTotal)
|
|
|
|
prometheus.MustRegister(failedSamplesTotal)
|
|
|
|
prometheus.MustRegister(droppedSamplesTotal)
|
|
|
|
prometheus.MustRegister(sentBatchDuration)
|
|
|
|
prometheus.MustRegister(queueLength)
|
|
|
|
prometheus.MustRegister(queueCapacity)
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
prometheus.MustRegister(numShards)
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-30 00:42:04 +00:00
|
|
|
// StorageClient defines an interface for sending a batch of samples to an
|
|
|
|
// external timeseries database.
|
|
|
|
type StorageClient interface {
|
2015-04-02 18:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
// Store stores the given samples in the remote storage.
|
2015-08-20 15:18:46 +00:00
|
|
|
Store(model.Samples) error
|
2015-04-02 18:20:00 +00:00
|
|
|
// Name identifies the remote storage implementation.
|
|
|
|
Name() string
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
// QueueManagerConfig configures a storage queue.
|
|
|
|
type QueueManagerConfig struct {
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
QueueCapacity int // Number of samples to buffer per shard before we start dropping them.
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
MaxShards int // Max number of shards, i.e. amount of concurrency.
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
MaxSamplesPerSend int // Maximum number of samples per send.
|
|
|
|
BatchSendDeadline time.Duration // Maximum time sample will wait in buffer.
|
2017-02-13 20:43:20 +00:00
|
|
|
ExternalLabels model.LabelSet
|
|
|
|
RelabelConfigs []*config.RelabelConfig
|
|
|
|
Client StorageClient
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
// QueueManager manages a queue of samples to be sent to the Storage
|
2015-03-30 00:42:04 +00:00
|
|
|
// indicated by the provided StorageClient.
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
type QueueManager struct {
|
2017-02-23 18:20:39 +00:00
|
|
|
cfg QueueManagerConfig
|
|
|
|
queueName string
|
|
|
|
logLimiter *rate.Limiter
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shardsMtx sync.Mutex
|
|
|
|
shards *shards
|
|
|
|
numShards int
|
|
|
|
reshardChan chan int
|
|
|
|
quit chan struct{}
|
|
|
|
wg sync.WaitGroup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
samplesIn, samplesOut, samplesOutDuration ewmaRate
|
|
|
|
integralAccumulator float64
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
// NewQueueManager builds a new QueueManager.
|
|
|
|
func NewQueueManager(cfg QueueManagerConfig) *QueueManager {
|
2017-02-13 20:43:20 +00:00
|
|
|
if cfg.QueueCapacity == 0 {
|
|
|
|
cfg.QueueCapacity = defaultQueueCapacity
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if cfg.MaxShards == 0 {
|
|
|
|
cfg.MaxShards = defaultMaxShards
|
2017-02-13 20:43:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if cfg.MaxSamplesPerSend == 0 {
|
|
|
|
cfg.MaxSamplesPerSend = defaultMaxSamplesPerSend
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if cfg.BatchSendDeadline == 0 {
|
|
|
|
cfg.BatchSendDeadline = defaultBatchSendDeadline
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
t := &QueueManager{
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
cfg: cfg,
|
|
|
|
queueName: cfg.Client.Name(),
|
|
|
|
logLimiter: rate.NewLimiter(logRateLimit, logBurst),
|
|
|
|
numShards: 1,
|
|
|
|
reshardChan: make(chan int),
|
|
|
|
quit: make(chan struct{}),
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
samplesIn: newEWMARate(ewmaWeight, shardUpdateDuration),
|
|
|
|
samplesOut: newEWMARate(ewmaWeight, shardUpdateDuration),
|
|
|
|
samplesOutDuration: newEWMARate(ewmaWeight, shardUpdateDuration),
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
t.shards = t.newShards(t.numShards)
|
|
|
|
numShards.WithLabelValues(t.queueName).Set(float64(t.numShards))
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
queueCapacity.WithLabelValues(t.queueName).Set(float64(t.cfg.QueueCapacity))
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
return t
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-03-30 00:42:04 +00:00
|
|
|
// Append queues a sample to be sent to the remote storage. It drops the
|
2016-01-27 18:07:46 +00:00
|
|
|
// sample on the floor if the queue is full.
|
2016-02-02 13:01:44 +00:00
|
|
|
// Always returns nil.
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func (t *QueueManager) Append(s *model.Sample) error {
|
2017-02-13 20:43:20 +00:00
|
|
|
var snew model.Sample
|
|
|
|
snew = *s
|
|
|
|
snew.Metric = s.Metric.Clone()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for ln, lv := range t.cfg.ExternalLabels {
|
|
|
|
if _, ok := s.Metric[ln]; !ok {
|
|
|
|
snew.Metric[ln] = lv
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
snew.Metric = model.Metric(
|
|
|
|
relabel.Process(model.LabelSet(snew.Metric), t.cfg.RelabelConfigs...))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if snew.Metric == nil {
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
t.shardsMtx.Lock()
|
|
|
|
enqueued := t.shards.enqueue(&snew)
|
|
|
|
t.shardsMtx.Unlock()
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
if enqueued {
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
queueLength.WithLabelValues(t.queueName).Inc()
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
droppedSamplesTotal.WithLabelValues(t.queueName).Inc()
|
2017-02-23 18:20:39 +00:00
|
|
|
if t.logLimiter.Allow() {
|
|
|
|
log.Warn("Remote storage queue full, discarding sample. Multiple subsequent messages of this kind may be suppressed.")
|
|
|
|
}
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-02-02 13:01:44 +00:00
|
|
|
return nil
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
// NeedsThrottling implements storage.SampleAppender. It will always return
|
|
|
|
// false as a remote storage drops samples on the floor if backlogging instead
|
|
|
|
// of asking for throttling.
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func (*QueueManager) NeedsThrottling() bool {
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
return false
|
2014-06-18 17:43:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
// Start the queue manager sending samples to the remote storage.
|
|
|
|
// Does not block.
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func (t *QueueManager) Start() {
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
t.wg.Add(2)
|
|
|
|
go t.updateShardsLoop()
|
|
|
|
go t.reshardLoop()
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
t.shardsMtx.Lock()
|
|
|
|
defer t.shardsMtx.Unlock()
|
|
|
|
t.shards.start()
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Stop stops sending samples to the remote storage and waits for pending
|
|
|
|
// sends to complete.
|
2017-02-21 20:45:43 +00:00
|
|
|
func (t *QueueManager) Stop() {
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
log.Infof("Stopping remote storage...")
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
close(t.quit)
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
t.wg.Wait()
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
t.shardsMtx.Lock()
|
|
|
|
defer t.shardsMtx.Unlock()
|
|
|
|
t.shards.stop()
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
log.Info("Remote storage stopped.")
|
|
|
|
}
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
func (t *QueueManager) updateShardsLoop() {
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
defer t.wg.Done()
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ticker := time.Tick(shardUpdateDuration)
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-ticker:
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
t.calculateDesiredShards()
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
case <-t.quit:
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
func (t *QueueManager) calculateDesiredShards() {
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
t.samplesIn.tick()
|
|
|
|
t.samplesOut.tick()
|
|
|
|
t.samplesOutDuration.tick()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We use the number of incoming samples as a prediction of how much work we
|
|
|
|
// will need to do next iteration. We add to this any pending samples
|
|
|
|
// (received - send) so we can catch up with any backlog. We use the average
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
// outgoing batch latency to work out how many shards we need.
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
samplesIn = t.samplesIn.rate()
|
|
|
|
samplesOut = t.samplesOut.rate()
|
|
|
|
samplesPending = samplesIn - samplesOut
|
|
|
|
samplesOutDuration = t.samplesOutDuration.rate()
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We use an integral accumulator, like in a PID, to help dampen oscillation.
|
|
|
|
t.integralAccumulator = t.integralAccumulator + (samplesPending * 0.1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if samplesOut <= 0 {
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
timePerSample = samplesOutDuration / samplesOut
|
|
|
|
desiredShards = (timePerSample * (samplesIn + samplesPending + t.integralAccumulator)) / float64(time.Second)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
log.Debugf("QueueManager.caclulateDesiredShards samplesIn=%f, samplesOut=%f, samplesPending=%f, desiredShards=%f",
|
|
|
|
samplesIn, samplesOut, samplesPending, desiredShards)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-13 21:24:49 +00:00
|
|
|
// Changes in the number of shards must be greater than shardToleranceFraction.
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
lowerBound = float64(t.numShards) * (1. - shardToleranceFraction)
|
|
|
|
upperBound = float64(t.numShards) * (1. + shardToleranceFraction)
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
log.Debugf("QueueManager.updateShardsLoop %f <= %f <= %f", lowerBound, desiredShards, upperBound)
|
|
|
|
if lowerBound <= desiredShards && desiredShards <= upperBound {
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
numShards := int(math.Ceil(desiredShards))
|
|
|
|
if numShards > t.cfg.MaxShards {
|
|
|
|
numShards = t.cfg.MaxShards
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if numShards == t.numShards {
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Resharding can take some time, and we want this loop
|
|
|
|
// to stay close to shardUpdateDuration.
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case t.reshardChan <- numShards:
|
|
|
|
log.Infof("Remote storage resharding from %d to %d shards.", t.numShards, numShards)
|
|
|
|
t.numShards = numShards
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
log.Infof("Currently resharding, skipping.")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (t *QueueManager) reshardLoop() {
|
|
|
|
defer t.wg.Done()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case numShards := <-t.reshardChan:
|
|
|
|
t.reshard(numShards)
|
|
|
|
case <-t.quit:
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (t *QueueManager) reshard(n int) {
|
|
|
|
numShards.WithLabelValues(t.queueName).Set(float64(n))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.shardsMtx.Lock()
|
|
|
|
newShards := t.newShards(n)
|
|
|
|
oldShards := t.shards
|
|
|
|
t.shards = newShards
|
|
|
|
t.shardsMtx.Unlock()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oldShards.stop()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We start the newShards after we have stopped (the therefore completely
|
|
|
|
// flushed) the oldShards, to guarantee we only every deliver samples in
|
|
|
|
// order.
|
|
|
|
newShards.start()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type shards struct {
|
|
|
|
qm *QueueManager
|
|
|
|
queues []chan *model.Sample
|
|
|
|
done chan struct{}
|
|
|
|
wg sync.WaitGroup
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (t *QueueManager) newShards(numShards int) *shards {
|
|
|
|
queues := make([]chan *model.Sample, numShards)
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < numShards; i++ {
|
|
|
|
queues[i] = make(chan *model.Sample, t.cfg.QueueCapacity)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
s := &shards{
|
|
|
|
qm: t,
|
|
|
|
queues: queues,
|
|
|
|
done: make(chan struct{}),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
s.wg.Add(numShards)
|
|
|
|
return s
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *shards) len() int {
|
|
|
|
return len(s.queues)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *shards) start() {
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < len(s.queues); i++ {
|
|
|
|
go s.runShard(i)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *shards) stop() {
|
|
|
|
for _, shard := range s.queues {
|
|
|
|
close(shard)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
s.wg.Wait()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *shards) enqueue(sample *model.Sample) bool {
|
|
|
|
s.qm.samplesIn.incr(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fp := sample.Metric.FastFingerprint()
|
|
|
|
shard := uint64(fp) % uint64(len(s.queues))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case s.queues[shard] <- sample:
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func (s *shards) runShard(i int) {
|
|
|
|
defer s.wg.Done()
|
|
|
|
queue := s.queues[i]
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Send batches of at most MaxSamplesPerSend samples to the remote storage.
|
2015-03-30 00:42:04 +00:00
|
|
|
// If we have fewer samples than that, flush them out after a deadline
|
|
|
|
// anyways.
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
pendingSamples := model.Samples{}
|
|
|
|
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
for {
|
|
|
|
select {
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
case sample, ok := <-queue:
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
if !ok {
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
if len(pendingSamples) > 0 {
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
log.Debugf("Flushing %d samples to remote storage...", len(pendingSamples))
|
|
|
|
s.sendSamples(pendingSamples)
|
|
|
|
log.Debugf("Done flushing.")
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
queueLength.WithLabelValues(s.qm.queueName).Dec()
|
|
|
|
pendingSamples = append(pendingSamples, sample)
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
for len(pendingSamples) >= s.qm.cfg.MaxSamplesPerSend {
|
|
|
|
s.sendSamples(pendingSamples[:s.qm.cfg.MaxSamplesPerSend])
|
|
|
|
pendingSamples = pendingSamples[s.qm.cfg.MaxSamplesPerSend:]
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
case <-time.After(s.qm.cfg.BatchSendDeadline):
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
if len(pendingSamples) > 0 {
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
s.sendSamples(pendingSamples)
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
pendingSamples = pendingSamples[:0]
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
func (s *shards) sendSamples(samples model.Samples) {
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
// Samples are sent to the remote storage on a best-effort basis. If a
|
|
|
|
// sample isn't sent correctly the first time, it's simply dropped on the
|
|
|
|
// floor.
|
|
|
|
begin := time.Now()
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
err := s.qm.cfg.Client.Store(samples)
|
|
|
|
duration := time.Since(begin)
|
2016-08-29 15:08:19 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
log.Warnf("error sending %d samples to remote storage: %s", len(samples), err)
|
|
|
|
failedSamplesTotal.WithLabelValues(s.qm.queueName).Add(float64(len(samples)))
|
2016-09-19 20:47:51 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
sentSamplesTotal.WithLabelValues(s.qm.queueName).Add(float64(len(samples)))
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-03-07 14:36:40 +00:00
|
|
|
sentBatchDuration.WithLabelValues(s.qm.queueName).Observe(duration.Seconds())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s.qm.samplesOut.incr(int64(len(samples)))
|
|
|
|
s.qm.samplesOutDuration.incr(int64(duration))
|
Add optional sample replication to OpenTSDB.
Prometheus needs long-term storage. Since we don't have enough resources
to build our own timeseries storage from scratch ontop of Riak,
Cassandra or a similar distributed datastore at the moment, we're
planning on using OpenTSDB as long-term storage for Prometheus. It's
data model is roughly compatible with that of Prometheus, with some
caveats.
As a first step, this adds write-only replication from Prometheus to
OpenTSDB, with the following things worth noting:
1)
I tried to keep the integration lightweight, meaning that anything
related to OpenTSDB is isolated to its own package and only main knows
about it (essentially it tees all samples to both the existing storage
and TSDB). It's not touching the existing TieredStorage at all to avoid
more complexity in that area. This might change in the future,
especially if we decide to implement a read path for OpenTSDB through
Prometheus as well.
2)
Backpressure while sending to OpenTSDB is handled by simply dropping
samples on the floor when the in-memory queue of samples destined for
OpenTSDB runs full. Prometheus also only attempts to send samples once,
rather than implementing a complex retry algorithm. Thus, replication to
OpenTSDB is best-effort for now. If needed, this may be extended in the
future.
3)
Samples are sent in batches of limited size to OpenTSDB. The optimal
batch size, timeout parameters, etc. may need to be adjusted in the
future.
4)
OpenTSDB has different rules for legal characters in tag (label) values.
While Prometheus allows any characters in label values, OpenTSDB limits
them to a to z, A to Z, 0 to 9, -, _, . and /. Currently any illegal
characters in Prometheus label values are simply replaced by an
underscore. Especially when integrating OpenTSDB with the read path in
Prometheus, we'll need to reconsider this: either we'll need to
introduce the same limitations for Prometheus labels or escape/encode
illegal characters in OpenTSDB in such a way that they are fully
decodable again when reading through Prometheus, so that corresponding
timeseries in both systems match in their labelsets.
Change-Id: I8394c9c55dbac3946a0fa497f566d5e6e2d600b5
2013-12-09 16:03:49 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|