Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50254, 50174, 50179)
Moved node/testutil to upper dir.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Moved node/testutil to upper directory (`pkg/controller`); it's used by several controllers, and we need to test some helper func in `pkg/controller`.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: part of #49522
**Release note**:
```release-note
N/A
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Removed un-used InodePressure condition.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Removed un-used InodePressure condition; kubelet did not report it anymore, so remove it.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49103
**Release note**:
```release-note
The node condition 'NodeInodePressure' was removed, as kubelet did not report it.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49524, 46760, 50206, 50166, 49603)
Handled taints on node in batch.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Enhanced helpers to handled taints on node in batch.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49522
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49885, 49751, 49441, 49952, 49945)
There is no need to split service key repeatedly
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix typo in replenishment_controller.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix typo
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #N/A
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49855, 49915)
Let controllers ignore initialization timeout when creating pods
Partially address https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48893#issuecomment-318540129.
This only updates the controllers that create pods with `GenerateName`.
The controllers ignore the timeout error when creating the pods, depending on how the initialization progress:
* If the initialization is successful in less than 5 mins, the controller will observe the creation via the informer. All is good.
* If the initialization fails, server will delete the pod, but the controller won't receive any event. The controller will not create new pod until the Creation expectation expires in 5 min.
* If the initialization takes too long (> 5 mins), the Creation expectation expires and the controller will create extra pods.
I'll send follow-up PRs to fix the latter two cases, e.g., by refactoring the sharedInformer.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47416, 47408, 49697, 49860, 50162)
fix error message for cronjob
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix error message for cronjob
expected an error would be better than unexpected lack of error.
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/cmd/genutils/genutils_test.go#L33
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46685, 49863, 50098, 50070, 50096)
Remove 0,1,3 from rand.String to avoid 'bad words'
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Remove 0,1,3 from the runes to prevent accidental bad words profanity
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49543
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @mml @jamesawebb1 @spiffxp
**Release note**:
```release-note
Remove 0,1,3 from rand.String, to avoid 'bad words'
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50103, 49677, 49449, 43586, 48969)
Adding IPv6 to cidr_set and cidr_set_test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This allows IPv6 in cidr_set
Currently cidr_set only supports IPv4. This adds IPv6 compatibility and adds
IPv6 unit tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#43588
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The IPv6 code here makes some assumptions.
The subnets should be at least /64. (maximum 64 bits of prefix)
The subnet mask size cannot be greater than 30 more than the cluster mask size.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50103, 49677, 49449, 43586, 48969)
Add missing UID in SubjectAccessReviewSpec
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
WebhookAuthorizer's Authorize should send *all* the information
present in the user.Info data structure. We are not sending the
UID currently.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
The SubjectAccessReview API in the authorization.k8s.io API group now allows providing the user uid.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49237, 49656, 49980, 49841, 49899)
GC shouldn't send empty patch
The scope of the `if` statement was wrong, causing GC to sometimes send empty patch.
Found this bug while investigating https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/49966.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50029, 48517, 49739, 49866, 49782)
Update generated deepcopy code
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In generated deepcopy code, the method names in comments do not match the real method names.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#49755
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @sttts @caesarxuchao
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49870, 49416, 49872, 49892, 49908)
Renamed zoneNotReadyOrUnreachableTainer to zoneNoExecuteTainer.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: partially fixes#42001
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49898, 49897, 49919, 48860, 49491)
Fix usage a make(struct, len()) followed by append()
A couple of places in the code we allocate with make() but then use
append(), instead of copy() or direct assignment. This results in a
slice with len() zero elements at the front followed by the expected
data. The correct form for such usage is `make(struct, 0, len())`.
I found these by running:
```
$ git grep -EI -A7 'make\([^,]*, len\(' | grep 'append(' -B7 | grep -v vendor
```
And then manually looking through the results. I'm sure something better
could exist.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46519, 49794, 49720, 49692, 49821)
[route_controller] Emit event when failed to create route
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When route controller failed to create route for nodes, pod's networking is likely broken. We surface this situation through node condition (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.7.2/pkg/controller/route/routecontroller.go#L197-L231), but this might not be easily tracked when user have a large cluster with many nodes. Surface the error through event might make things more obvious.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @bowei
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46519, 49794, 49720, 49692, 49821)
Log attach detach controller skipping pods at higher priority
This will help us in tracking down problems related to pods
not getting added to desired state of world because of events
arriving out of order or some other problem related to that.
cc @kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
A couple of places in the code we allocate with make() but then use
append(), instead of copy() or direct assignment. This results in a
slice with len() zero elements at the front followed by the expected
data. The correct form for such usage is `make(struct, 0, len())`.
I found these by running:
```
$ git grep -EI -A7 'make\([^,]*, len\(' | grep 'append(' -B7 | grep -v vendor
```
And then manually looking through the results. I'm sure something better
could exist.
This will help us in tracking down problems related to pods
not getting added to desired state of world because of events
arriving out of order or some other problem related to that.
Enhance the garbage collector to periodically refresh the resources it
monitors (via discovery) to enable custom resource definition GC.
This implementation caches Unstructured structs for any kinds not
covered by a shared informer. The existing meta-only codec only supports
compiled types; an improved codec which supports arbitrary types could
be introduced to optimize caching to store only metadata for all
non-informer types.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49619, 49598, 47267, 49597, 49638)
replicaset fix typo
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
reopen#47821
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@NickrenREN
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49665, 49689, 49495, 49146, 48934)
make it possible to allow discovery errors for controllers
Update the discovery client to return partial discovery information *and* an error. Since we can aggregate API servers, discovery of some resources can fail independently. Callers of this function who want to tolerate the errors can, existing callers will still get an error and fail in normal blocks.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48976, 49474, 40050, 49426, 49430)
Remove duplicated import and wrong alias name of api package
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#48975
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @caesarxuchao
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48224, 45431, 45946, 48775, 49396)
[client-go] Fake Dynamic Client
This commit converts `"k8s.io/client-go/dynamic".Client` to an interface, and implements fake versions of both `ClientPool` and `Client`. This allows components which make uses of these clients to be tested in the same way that clientset-based components can be tested, using the standard `testing.Fake` machinery.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48224, 45431, 45946, 48775, 49396)
add reflector metrics
This adds metrics (optionally prometheus) to reflectors so that you can see when one reflector is behaving poorly and just how poorly its doing.
@eparis
```release-note
Adds metrics for checking reflector health.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[trival] fix typo
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
some file word spell error that amend correct
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue
deployment: SetNewReplicaSetAnnotations() should compare revisions as numbers than strings
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1) SetNewReplicaSetAnnotations() when deployment revision annotation is copied over to RS, it performs a string comparison instead of int comparison, due to this any revision beyond 9 might not get copied.
2) Slightly improves the coverage by adding UT for Annotation related functions
3) Upgrade the test suite to use go-langs sub-test, which is very useful while investigating UT related failures.
```
--- FAIL: TestAnnotationUtils (0.00s)
--- FAIL: TestAnnotationUtils/SetNewReplicaSetAnnotations (0.00s)
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=10 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=11 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=12 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=13 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=14 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=15 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=16 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=17 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=18 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=19 Obtained=9
deployment_util_test.go:1283: Revision Expected=20 Obtained=9
--- PASS: TestAnnotationUtils/SetReplicasAnnotations (0.00s)
--- PASS: TestAnnotationUtils/IsSaturated (0.00s)
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**: None
```release-note
```
cc: @kargakis
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49420, 49296, 49299, 49371, 46514)
Refactoring taint functions to reduce sprawl
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#45060
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@gmarek @timothysc @k82cn @jayunit100 - I moved some fn's to helpers and some to utils. LMK, if you are ok with this change.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This adds an interface form of dynamic.Client and
dynamic.ResourceClient, making those two follow the general client
conventions: `Interface` is an interface, and `Client` is the concrete
implementation. `ClientPool` retains it's interface status.
This allows us to create a fake implemenation of dyanmic.Interface,
dynamic.ResourceInterface, and dynamic.ClientPool for testing.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49328, 49285, 49307, 49127, 49163)
fix mutation in statefulset sync
Original issue: https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/15324
Seems like something inside `UpdateStatefulSet` mutates the StatefulSet. We might need to dig deeper to find the exact location where the non-copy mutation happens.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49116, 49095)
Move pkg/api/v1/ref -> client-go/tools/reference
`pkg/api/v1/ref` is the only remaining package copied from pkg/api/v1 to client-go via staging/copy.sh.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add approvers to owners file for hpa
Currently none of hpa developers or people in sig-autoscaling has the right to approve PRs to hpa, meaning it needs to be approved at pkg/controller level by people not working on autoscaling.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46094, 48544, 48807, 49102, 44174)
Static deepcopy – phase 1
This PR is the follow-up of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36412, replacing the
dynamic reflection based deepcopy with static DeepCopy+DeepCopyInto methods on API types.
This PR **does not yet** include the code dropping the cloner from the scheme and all the
porting of the calls to scheme.Copy. This will be part of a follow-up "Phase 2" PR.
A couple of the commits will go in first:
- [x] audit: fix deepcopy registration https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/48599
- [x] apimachinery+apiserver: separate test types in their own packages #48601
- [x] client-go: remove TPR example #48604
- [x] apimachinery: remove unneeded GetObjectKind() impls #48608
- [x] sanity check against origin, that OpenShift's types are fine for static deepcopy https://github.com/deads2k/origin/pull/34
TODO **after** review here:
- [x] merge https://github.com/kubernetes/gengo/pull/32 and update vendoring commit
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48983, 49013)
Added comments on not set node network/inode condition to unknown.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#48982
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48231, 47377, 48797, 49020, 49033)
Migrate kubelet and linked code from clientset_generated to client-go
Ran a script in the kubernetes repo to migrate kubelet and linked code from clientset_generated package imports to client-go imports.
**NOTE:** There are also some manual changes that were made in order to accommodate some
differences between clientset_generated and client-go. The manual changes are isolated into a
single commit titled "Manual changes."
```sh
#! /bin/bash
for file in $(find . \( -name "clientset_generated" -o -name "informers_generated" \) -prune -o -type f -name "*.go"); do
if [[ -d $file ]]; then
continue
fi
if [[ $file == "./cmd/libs/go2idl/informer-gen/main.go" ]]; then
continue
fi
sed -i '
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset"|clientset "k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"|;
# Correct a couple of unique cases.
s|clientset clientset "k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"|clientset "k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"|;
s|cs clientset "k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"|clientset "k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"|;
s|VersionedClientSetPackage: clientset "k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"|VersionedClientSetPackage: "k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/certificates/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/certificates/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/core/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/core/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/extensions/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/extensions/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/autoscaling/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/autoscaling/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/authentication/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/authentication/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/authorization/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/authorization/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/apps/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/apps/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/rbac/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/rbac/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/fake"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/fake"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset/typed/core/v1/fake"|"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/typed/core/v1/fake"|;
s|k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/clientset_generated/clientset|k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes|;
s|informers "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/core/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers/core/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/apps/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers/apps/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/extensions/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers/extensions/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/batch/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers/batch/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/autoscaling/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers/autoscaling/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/policy/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers/policy/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/certificates/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers/certificates/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/informers/informers_generated/externalversions/storage/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/informers/storage/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/core/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/listers/core/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/apps/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/listers/apps/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/extensions/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/listers/extensions/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/autoscaling/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/listers/autoscaling/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/batch/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/listers/batch/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/certificates/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/listers/certificates/v1beta1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/storage/v1"|"k8s.io/client-go/listers/storage/v1"|;
s|"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/client/listers/policy/v1beta1"|"k8s.io/client-go/listers/policy/v1beta1"|;
' $file
done
hack/update-bazel.sh
hack/update-gofmt.sh
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49017, 45440, 48384, 45894, 48808)
Export BaseControllerRefManager
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
It exports go struct `baseControllerRefManager`. This is needed so other distributions like OpenShift or TPR controllers can reuse that code for writing ref managers for other objects.
**Release note**:
It is not worthy of a release note.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48997, 48595, 48898, 48711, 48972)
remove useless code in podautoscaler
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
code optimization,remove some useless code.
**Special notes for your reviewer:**
My first Kubernetes PR，please let me know if anything wrong on this one.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48997, 48595, 48898, 48711, 48972)
hpa: Prevent scaling below MinReplicas if desiredReplicas is zero
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Prevent a HPA scaling below `minReplicas` if `desiredReplicas` is calculated as `0`.
Example events of a HPA continuously scaling between `1` and `MinReplicas`:
```
2h 59s 22 horizontal-pod-autoscaler Normal SuccessfulRescale New size: 1; reason: All metrics below target
2h 29s 22 horizontal-pod-autoscaler Normal SuccessfulRescale New size: 15; reason: Current number of replicas below Spec.MinReplicas
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49028
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
hpa: Prevent scaling below MinReplicas if desiredReplicas is zero
```
We want relatively short resync period of PV/PVCs and at the same time we
don't want to force such short resync to all shared informer consumers.
Therefore we need to make our own periodic resync.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Changes to fix the node eviction flake
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#39975
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48594, 47042, 48801, 48641, 48243)
Validated expected event numbers for damoncontroller test.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#46629
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48279, 48566, 48319, 48794, 47952)
Added pod evictors for new zone.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Added pod evictors for new zone which was added manually.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#47791
**Release note**:
```release-note-none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48672, 47140, 48709, 48786, 48757)
Fix flaky test Test_Run_OneVolumeAttachAndDetachMultipleNodesWithReadWriteMany
Only relying on the NewAttacher/Detacher call counts is not enough as they
happen in parallel to the testing/verification code and thus the actual
attaching/detaching may not be done yet, resulting in flaky test results.
Fixes#46244
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47232, 48625, 48613, 48567, 39173)
Include leaderelection in client-go;
Fix#39117
Fix https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/issues/28
This PR:
* includes the leaderelection to the staging client-go
* to avoid conflict with golang's testing package, renames package /testing to /testutil, and renames cache/testing to cache/testframework
```release-note
client-go now includes the leaderelection package
```
Only relying on the NewAttacher/Detacher call counts is not enough as they
happen in parallel to the testing/verification code and thus the actual
attaching/detaching may not be done yet, resulting in flaky test results.
Fixes#46244
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Factored out simulate from nodeShouldRunDaemonPod.
Addressed comments from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/48189#issuecomment-312223162
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
/sig apps
Automatic merge from submit-queue
support NoSchedule taints correctly in DaemonSet controller
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48190
```release-note
Support NoSchedule taints correctly in DaemonSet controller.
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43558, 48261, 42376, 46803, 47058)
Fix removing finalizer for garbage collector
The loop should use 'continue' not 'break', otherwise removeFinalizer()
not only removes "orphaningFinalizer" from its finalizers list but
also removes others.
Fix#48363
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47850, 47835, 46197, 47250, 48284)
Populate endpoints for headless service with no ports
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- populate endpoints with headless service (thanks @fraenkel for the original PR!)
- allow ports with headless service
- nits
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#32796https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32796#issuecomment-270462724
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @thockin @fraenkel
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
The loop should use 'continue' not 'break', otherwise removeFinalizer()
not only removes "orphaningFinalizer" from its finalizers list but
also removes others.
This partially reverts commit 2b311fefba.
We drop the changes to the DaemonSet controller but leave the test. By
reverting the changes, we make it easier to return different values of
shouldContinueRunning for intentional predicate failures, rather then
lumping all intentional predicate failures together. The test should
continue to pass after the fix.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
deletePod handler in the deployment controller shouldn't set owner refs
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR stops the deletePod handler in the deployment controller from adopting replica sets when determining if a deployment needs to be requeued. It leaves this logic to the replication loop, removing the replica set adoption side effect.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#46933
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@kargakis PR for delete pod handler setting owner refs issue
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48106, 46761)
removing unnecessary shallow copy on SyncService
**What this PR does / why we need it**: remove shallow copy + avoid using same index name as the nested loop
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#46703
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use endpoints informer for the endpoint controller
This substantially reduces the number of API calls made by the endpoint
controller. Currently the controller makes an API call per endpoint for
each service that is synced. When the 30s resync is triggered, this
results in an API call for every single endpoint in the cluster. This
quickly exceeds the default qps/burst limit of 20/30 even in small
clusters, leading to delays in endpoint updates.
This change modifies the controller to use the endpoint informer cache
for all endpoint GETs. This means we only make API calls for changes in
endpoints. As a result, qps only depends on the pod activity in the
cluster, rather than the number of services.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Address endpoint update delays as described in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/47597.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/47597
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
This substantially reduces the number of API calls made by the endpoint
controller. Currently the controller makes an API call per endpoint for
each service that is synced. When the 30s resync is triggered, this
results in an API call for every single endpoint in the cluster. This
quickly exceeds the default qps/burst limit of 20/30 even in small
clusters, leading to delays in endpoint updates.
This change modifies the controller to use the endpoint informer cache
for all endpoint GETs. This means we only make API calls for changes in
endpoints. As a result, qps only depends on the pod activity in the
cluster, rather than the number of services.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44058, 48085, 48077, 48076, 47823)
Make background garbage collection cascading
Fix#44046, fix#47843 where user reported that the garbage collector didn't delete pods when a deployment was deleted with PropagationPolicy=Background.
The cause is that when propagating background garbage collection request, the garbage collector deletes dependents with DeleteOptions.PropagationPolicy=nil, which means the default GC policy of a resource (defined by its REST strategy) and the existing GC-related finalizers will decide how the delete request is propagated further. Unfortunately, the default GC policy for RS is orphaning, so the pods are behind when a deployment is deleted.
This PR changes the garbage collector to delete dependents with DeleteOptions.PropagationPolicy=Background when the owner is deleted in background. This means the dependent's existing GC finalizers will be overridden, making orphaning less flexible (see this made-up [case](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/149#issuecomment-278942012)). I think sacrificing the flexibility of orphaning is worthwhile, because making the behavior of background garbage collection matching users' expectation is more important.
cc @lavalamp @kargakis @krmayankk @enisoc
```release-note
The garbage collector now cascades deletion properly when deleting an object with propagationPolicy="background". This resolves issue [#44046](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/44046), so that when a deployment is deleted with propagationPolicy="background", the garbage collector ensures dependent pods are deleted as well.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Get rid of 30s ResyncPeriod in endpoint controller
Ref: #47597
This should fix one of the demons of endpoint controller.
/cc @smarterclayton @gmarek
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix const naming in node/metrics
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
zhangxiaoyu-zidif