Automatic merge from submit-queue
Change rbac roleref to reflect the information we want
@liggitt @ericchiang This is a version of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/31359 which updates the `RoleRef` to be (I think) the type that we want, with a group, resource, and name.
This is **not** backwards compatible with any existing data. I'm ok with doing this since rbac was considered alpha, but its something to consider.
If we want this instead, I'll close the previous pull (or update it with this content).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
update taints e2e, restrict taints operation with key, effect
Since taints are now unique by key, effect on a node, this PR is to restrict existing taints adding/removing/updating operations in taints e2e.
Also fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/31066#issuecomment-242870101
Related prior Issue/PR #29362 and #30590
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add group prefix matching for kubectl usage
Adds prefix matching for groups so that `kubectl get storageclass.storage` matches `storageclass.storage.k8s.io`.
@kubernetes/kubectl
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Split path validation into a separate library
This PR splits path segment validation into it's own package. This cuts off one of the restclient's dependency paths to some docker packages, and completely eliminates its dependency on go-restful swagger validation.
cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Generate versioned client for pvc
I noticed while trying to use client-go that there is no way to get PVC with versioned clientset. I don't know why it is excluded, I cannot find any discussion about this, so I am creating this assuming it is just an oversight...
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add AppArmor feature gate
Add option to disable AppArmor via a feature gate. This PR treats AppArmor as Beta, and thus depends on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/31471 (I will remove `do-not-merge` once that merges).
Note that disabling AppArmor means that pods with AppArmor annotations will be rejected in validation. It does not mean that the components act as though AppArmor was never implemented. This is by design, because we want to make it difficult to accidentally run a Pod with an AppArmor annotation without AppArmor protection.
/cc @dchen1107
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add validation preventing recycle of / in a hostPath PV
Adds a validation that prevents a user from recycling `/` when it is used in a hostPath PV
cc @kubernetes/sig-storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add validation for PV spec to ensure correct values are used for ReclaimPolicy on initial create
k8 currently allows invalid values for ReclaimPolicy (i.e. "scotto") - this allows the PV to be created and even bound, however, when the pvc or pod is deleted and the recycler is triggered, an error is thrown
```
Events:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
36s 36s 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning VolumeUnknownReclaimPolicy Volume has unrecognized PersistentVolumeReclaimPolicy
```
New behavior will not allow the user to create the PV:
```
[root@k8dev nfs]# kubectl create -f nfs-pv-bad.yaml
The PersistentVolume "pv-gce" is invalid: spec.persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Unsupported value: "scotto": supported values: Delete, Recycle, Retain
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
support Azure data disk volume
This is a WIP of supporting azure data disk volume. Will add test and dynamic provisioning support once #29006 is merged
replace #25915fix#23259
@kubernetes/sig-storage
@colemickens @brendandburns
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[GarbageCollector] Allow per-resource default garbage collection behavior
What's the bug:
When deleting an RC with `deleteOptions.OrphanDependents==nil`, garbage collector is supposed to treat it as `deleteOptions.OrphanDependents==true", and orphan the pods created by it. But the apiserver is not doing that.
What's in the pr:
Allow each resource to specify the default garbage collection behavior in the registry. For example, RC registry's default GC behavior is Orphan, and Pod registry's default GC behavior is CascadingDeletion.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add readyReplicas to replica sets
@bgrant0607 for the api changes
@bprashanth for the controllers changes
@deads2k fyi
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move init-container feature from alpha to beta.
```release-note
Moved init-container feature from alpha to beta.
In 1.3, an init container is specified with this annotation key
on the pod or pod template: `pods.alpha.kubernetes.io/init-containers`.
In 1.4, either that key or this key: pods.beta.kubernetes.io/init-containers`,
can be used.
When you GET an object, you will see both annotation keys with the same values.
You can safely roll back from 1.4 to 1.3, and things with init-containers
will still work (pods, deployments, etc).
If you are running 1.3, only use the alpha annotation, or it may be lost when
rolling forward.
The status has moved from annotation key
`pods.beta.kubernetes.io/init-container-statuses` to
`pods.beta.kubernetes.io/init-container-statuses`.
Any code that inspects this annotation should be changed to use the new key.
State of Initialization will continue to be reported in both pods.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized
and in `podStatus.conditions.{status: "True", type: Initialized}`
```
Mini-design for this change:
Goals:
1. A user can create an object with the beta annotation
on 1.4, and it works. The fact that the annotation has beta
in it communicates to the user that the feature is beta,
and so the user should have confidence in using it. Preferably,
when the user gets the annotation back, he see the beta
annotation.
1) If someone had an existing alpha object in their apiserver,
such as a RS with a pod template with an init-containers
annotation on it, it should continue to work (init containers
run) when stack upgraded to 1.4.
2) If someone is using a chart or blog post that has alpha
annotation on it and they create it on a 1.4 cluster, it should
work.
3) If someone had something with an init container in 1.4
and they roll back stack to 1.3, it should not silently stop
working (init containers don't run anymore).
To meet all these, we mirror an absent beta label from the alpha
key and vice versa. If they are out of sync, we use the alpha
one. We do this in conversion since there was already logic there.
In 1.3 code, all annotations are preserved across a round trip
(v1 -> api -> v1), and the alpha annotation turns into the internal
field that kubelet uses.
In 1.4 code, the alpha annotation is always preserved across
a round trip, and a beta annotation is always set equal to
the alpha one, after a round trip.
Currently, the kubelet always sees the object after a round trip
when it GETs it. But, we don't want to rely on that behavior,
since it will break when fastpath is implemented.
So, we rely on this:
all objects either are created with an alpha annotation (1.3 or 1.4
code) or are created with a beta annotation under 1.4. In the later
case, they are round tripped at creation time, and so get both
annotations. So all subsequent GETs see both labels.
The serviceAccountName is occasionally useful for clients running on
Kube that need to know who they are when talking to other components.
The nodeName is useful for PetSet or DaemonSet pods that need to make
calls back to the API to fetch info about their node.
Both fields are immutable, and cannot easily be retrieved in another
way.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make labels, fields expose selectable requirements
What?
This is to change the labels/fields Selector interface and make them expose selectable requirements. We reuse labels.Requirement struct for label selector and add fields.Requirement for field selector.
Why?
In order to index labels/fields, we need them to tell us three things: index key (a field or a label), operator (greater, less, or equal), and value (string, int, etc.). By getting selectable requirements, we are able to pass them down and use them for indexing in storage layer.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Basic scaler/reaper for petset
Currently scaling or upgrading a petset is more complicated than it should be. Would be nice if this made code freeze on friday. I'm planning on a follow up change with generation number and e2es post freeze.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
change all PredicateFunc to use SelectionPredicate
What?
- This PR changes all PredicateFunc in registry to return SelectionPredicate instead of Matcher interface.
Why?
- We want to pass SelectionPredicate to storage layer. Matcher interface did not expose enough information for indexing.
Kubernetes Submit Queue