Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix typos: remove duplicated word in comments
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Remove the duplicated word `the` in comments
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
```release-note
NONE
```
kube-proxy currently checks for a bind address of 0.0.0.0 (IPv4 all-zeros)
when calculating kube-proxy's node IP, but it does not check for
an address of '::' (IPv6 all-zeros). For either of those all-zeros
addresses, the node IP should be determined based on the hostname,
rather than using the address directly.
Also added a helpful log message when the kube-proxy protocol is
determined to be IPv6.
fixes#52613
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Switch from package syscall to golang.org/x/sys/unix
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The syscall package is locked down and the comment in https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/syscall/syscall.go#L21-L24 advises to switch code to use the corresponding package from golang.org/x/sys. This PR does so and replaces usage of package syscall with package golang.org/x/sys/unix where applicable. This will also allow to get updates and fixes
without having to use a new go version.
In order to get the latest functionality, golang.org/x/sys/ is re-vendored. This also allows to use Eventfd() from this package instead of calling the eventfd() C function.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This follows previous works in other Go projects, see e.g. moby/moby#33399, cilium/cilium#588
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
The syscall package is locked down and the comment in [1] advises to
switch code to use the corresponding package from golang.org/x/sys. Do
so and replace usage of package syscall with package
golang.org/x/sys/unix where applicable.
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/blob/master/src/syscall/syscall.go#L21-L24
This will also allow to get updates and fixes for syscall wrappers
without having to use a new go version.
Errno, Signal and SysProcAttr aren't changed as they haven't been
implemented in /x/sys/. Stat_t from syscall is used if standard library
packages (e.g. os) require it. syscall.SIGTERM is used for
cross-platform files.
Allows the proxier to be used on an interface that's not the default route,
otherwise hostIP gets set to the default route interface even if that's
not what the user intended.
If listen IP isn't given, falls back to previous behavior.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Edge-based userspace LB in kube-proxy
@thockin @bowei - if one of you could take a look if that PR doesn't break some basic kube-proxy assumptions. The similar change for winuserproxy should be pretty trivial.
And we should also do that for iptables, but that requires splitting the iptables code to syncProxyRules (which from what I know @thockin already started working on so we should probably wait for it to be done).
This changes the userspace proxy so that it cleans up its conntrack
settings when a service is removed (as the iptables proxy already
does). This could theoretically cause problems when a UDP service
as deleted and recreated quickly (with the same IP address). As
long as packets from the same UDP source IP and port were going to
the same destination IP and port, the the conntrack would apply and
the packets would be sent to the old destination.
This is astronomically unlikely if you did not specify the IP address
to use in the service, and even then, only happens with an "established"
UDP connection. However, in cases where a service could be "switched"
between using the iptables proxy and the userspace proxy, this case
becomes much more frequent.
This commit makes the userspace proxy keep an ObjectReference to the
service being proxied. This allows the consumers of the `ServiceInfo`
struct, like `ProxySockets` to emit events about or otherwise refer to
the service.
This commit adds a new method for constructing userspace proxiers,
`NewCustomProxier`. `NewCustomProxier` functions identically to
`NewProxier`, except that it allows a custom constructor method to
be passed in to construct instances of ProxySocket.
This commit makes it possible for the `ProxySocket` interface to be
implemented by types outside of the `userspace` package. It mainly just
exposes relevant types and fields as public.
This commit adds a method to the `LoadBalancer` interface in the
userspace proxy which allows consumers of the `LoadBalancer` to check if
it thinks a given service has endpoints available.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Cover port_allocator_test with more conditions
The test cases of port_allocator_test should cover more conditions, such as `rangeAllocator.used.Bit`.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/proxy
cc @thockin
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Kubernetes Submit Queue