Commit Graph

144 Commits (e5efc21de6e257a46f695b985447f3057d79fc71)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mike Danese c87de85347 autoupdate BUILD files 2016-12-12 13:30:07 -08:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue d6b9a7aa60 Merge pull request #37693 from wojtek-t/pipe_get_options_to_storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37693, 38085)

Pipe get options to storage

Ref #37473
2016-12-07 00:52:26 -08:00
mbohlool a9cee59f69 Fix pods/log OpenAPI/Swagger spec to return string instead of v1.Pod 2016-12-06 13:59:20 -08:00
Wojciech Tyczynski 3432fea8b2 Pipe GetOptions to storage 2016-12-06 11:48:37 +01:00
Clayton Coleman 3454a8d52c
refactor: update bazel, codec, and gofmt 2016-12-03 19:10:53 -05:00
Clayton Coleman 5df8cc39c9
refactor: generated 2016-12-03 19:10:46 -05:00
Derek Carr 14730841f3 Fix logic in graceful deletion if existing grace period was 0 2016-12-01 14:24:50 -05:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 9b2d17608e Merge pull request #36525 from apelisse/owners-pkg-api
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Curating Owners: pkg/api

cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607

In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.


If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------

We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories.  Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.

Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).

At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.

Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.

TLDR:
-----

As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:

1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.

2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.

3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed.  Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.

4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
2016-11-28 11:44:04 -08:00
Clayton Coleman 35a6bfbcee
generated: refactor 2016-11-23 22:30:47 -06:00
Antoine Pelisse 5e26788aba Update OWNERS approvers and reviewers: pkg/api 2016-11-09 10:18:08 -08:00
Mike Danese 3b6a067afc autogenerated 2016-10-21 17:32:32 -07:00
Hongchao Deng 078f2d6be9 Revert "Work around the etcd watch issue" 2016-09-26 23:54:10 -07:00
Hongchao Deng 28c489654b work around the etcd watch issue 2016-09-20 09:26:47 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue 9f58a867e1 Merge pull request #31522 from krousey/path_validation
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Split path validation into a separate library

This PR splits path segment validation into it's own package. This cuts off one of the restclient's dependency paths to some docker packages, and completely eliminates its dependency on go-restful swagger validation.


cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery
2016-09-07 10:14:32 -07:00
Jedrzej Nowak a6c0e23fd2 Fix various typos in pkg/api 2016-08-29 11:31:16 +02:00
Kris e87edf9bd5 Split path validation into a separate library 2016-08-26 08:05:20 -07:00
Kubernetes Submit Queue f297ea966e Merge pull request #30838 from caesarxuchao/per-resource-orphan-behavior
Automatic merge from submit-queue

[GarbageCollector] Allow per-resource default garbage collection behavior

What's the bug:
When deleting an RC with `deleteOptions.OrphanDependents==nil`, garbage collector is supposed to treat it as `deleteOptions.OrphanDependents==true", and orphan the pods created by it. But the apiserver is not doing that.

What's in the pr:
Allow each resource to specify the default garbage collection behavior in the registry. For example, RC registry's default GC behavior is Orphan, and Pod registry's default GC behavior is CascadingDeletion.
2016-08-23 08:46:32 -07:00
jianhuiz 858e515f85 ignore clusterName on create and update 2016-08-22 21:09:57 -07:00
Chao Xu 67b7c7290a Allow per-resource default garbage collection behavior 2016-08-22 11:37:04 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt 4db004972a
Plumb context to strategy methods 2016-08-08 22:33:25 -04:00
Michal Rostecki 59ca5986dd Print/log pointers of structs with %#v instead of %+v
There are many places in k8s where %+v is used to format a pointer
to struct, which isn't working as expected.

Fixes #26591
2016-08-01 22:27:56 +02:00
Davanum Srinivas 2b0ed014b7 Use Go canonical import paths
Add canonical imports only in existing doc.go files.
https://golang.org/doc/go1.4#canonicalimports

Fixes #29014
2016-07-16 13:48:21 -04:00
Michail Kargakis 93c2656d5a api: validate generation updates 2016-07-07 13:09:48 +02:00
gmarek 2a5914d61c Fix logic of consecutive DELETE calls when gracefull deletion is enabled 2016-07-05 10:42:50 +02:00
gmarek 638f4e1192 Setting deletion timestamp bumps object's generation 2016-07-01 16:45:43 +02:00
David McMahon ef0c9f0c5b Remove "All rights reserved" from all the headers. 2016-06-29 17:47:36 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot db62715c65 Merge pull request #26240 from liggitt/wrap-updated-object
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Add WrapUpdatedObjectInfo helper

This makes it easier to attach checks/transformations to the updated object in storage Update functions, while still keeping the data flow intact (so admission, patch, and other injected checks continue to work as intended), without needing to do anything tricky to get the updated object out of the UpdatedObjectInfo introduced in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/25787

This is especially useful when one storage is delegating to another, but wants its checks to be run in the heart of the eventual GuaranteedUpdate call.
2016-06-25 04:44:40 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot e543bd6452 Merge pull request #26007 from smarterclayton/watch_opt
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Additional optimizations to the encode/decode paths

Builds on top of #25983 with a number of other optimizations.
2016-05-28 06:27:00 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt 10c1234c98 Add WrapUpdatedObjectInfo helper 2016-05-24 22:35:19 -04:00
Jordan Liggitt 29252acd1a Change rest storage Update interface to retrieve updated object
Add OldObject to admission attributes

Update resthandler Patch/Update admission plumbing
2016-05-23 21:09:26 -04:00
Clayton Coleman c6961d6fd6
Remove runtime.Typer, reduce to ObjectKinds(1) (3)
Remove the unnecessary variants, which avoids allocations in several
core paths.
2016-05-21 23:55:42 -04:00
k8s-merge-robot 4f09f51486 Merge pull request #24800 from thockin/validation_pt8-3
Automatic merge from submit-queue

Make name validators return string slices

Part of the larger validation PR, broken out for easier review and merge.  Builds on previous PRs in the series.
2016-05-19 02:15:27 -07:00
Tim Hockin 152c86ab06 Make name validators return string slices 2016-05-18 00:48:01 -07:00
k8s-merge-robot 6376b52b90 Merge pull request #25271 from euank/fix-missing-resttest-call
Automatic merge from submit-queue

test: Call forgotten resttest test

PR #3789 introduced this test, but it was never called.

This test was created, but never called.
Written, but never run.
It has neither flaked nor asserted. At its inception it was deserted.
My change gives this test a chance, to at long last finally pass.

The resttest stuff is a bit complicated and I'm not totally sure I put it in the right place  @smarterclayton, want to double check this change makes sense?
2016-05-16 23:49:39 -07:00
Euan Kemp 713853d3a8 test: Call forgotten resttest test
PR #3789 introduced this test, but it was never called.
2016-05-11 10:55:07 -07:00
Jordan Liggitt 6c323a4f72 Remove name generation from thirdpartyresource 2016-05-09 09:27:54 -04:00
Daniel Smith 4c539bf082 Merge pull request #23490 from wojtek-t/remove_set_from_storage_interface
Remove Set() from storage.Interface.
2016-04-13 14:22:05 -07:00
goltermann 696423e044 Vet fixes, mostly pass lock by value errors. 2016-04-06 11:27:40 -07:00
Wojciech Tyczynski 53f433f019 Remove Set() from storage.Interface. 2016-04-04 17:54:18 +02:00
Chao Xu 31b425b3a1 add delete precondition 2016-03-25 11:21:39 -07:00
goltermann 34d4eaea08 Fixing several (but not all) go vet errors. Most are around string formatting, or unreachable code. 2016-03-22 17:26:50 -07:00
Wojciech Tyczynski 89585237cd Rename RawJSON to Raw in runtime.RawExtension and add ContentType & ContentEncoding. 2016-03-18 12:35:27 +01:00
Chao Xu 8566056d18 revert 20202 2016-02-28 19:03:22 -08:00
Fabio Yeon 375b4ca8d6 Revert "Revert 20202. Use other measures to prevent race in test-cmd.sh" 2016-02-26 19:25:08 -08:00
Chao Xu 4342a8c4f0 revert 20202 2016-02-19 11:37:54 -08:00
laushinka 7ef585be22 Spelling fixes inspired by github.com/client9/misspell 2016-02-18 06:58:05 +07:00
Jan Chaloupka 4389b3f0d6 Rewritte util.* -> wait.* wherever reasonable 2016-02-07 12:02:20 +01:00
k8s-merge-robot 5914deeac8 Merge pull request #19380 from brendandburns/apiresource
Auto commit by PR queue bot
2016-02-03 00:49:47 -08:00
Chao Xu fdf6a0f61c skip update when deleting with grace-period=0 2016-02-02 10:53:25 -08:00
k8s-merge-robot 9d9864486b Merge pull request #19342 from caesarxuchao/remove-resourceversion-check
Auto commit by PR queue bot
2016-01-31 18:11:47 -08:00