Automatic merge from submit-queue
Node E2E: Change the node e2e junit file name to junit_{image-name}{test-node-number}.xml
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/30103.
Reuse the `report-prefix` in e2e test framework. Now the junit file will be like: `junit_{image-name}{test-node-number}.xml`.
Mark P2 to fix the test result.
/cc @rmmh
Automatic merge from submit-queue
federation: Adding secret API
Adding secret API to federation-apiserver and updating the federation client to include secrets
Automatic merge from submit-queue
pv e2e refactor and pre-bind test
refactored persistentvolume e2e so that multiple It() tests can be run. Added one test case for pre-binding, but the overall structure of the test should allow additional test cases to be more easily added.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix deployment e2e test: waitDeploymentStatus should error when entering an invalid state
Follow up #28162
1. We should check that max unavailable and max surge aren't violated at all times in e2e tests (didn't check this in deployment scaled rollout yet, but we should wait for it to become valid and then continue do the check until it finishes)
2. Fix some minor bugs in e2e tests
@kubernetes/deployment
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Revert "Revert "Drop support for --gce-service-account, require activated creds""
Reverts kubernetes/kubernetes#29242
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Limit number of pods spawned in SchedulerPredicates validates resourc…
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/29190,
With this patch test should spawn at most 10 pods on the smallest node.
Add min size of pod and max number of pods for SchedulerPredicates validate resouce limits test
Fix typo in patch for SchedulerPredicates validate resouce limits test
Moving max number of pods and min pod cpu request to constants
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add support to quota pvc storage requests
Adds support to quota cumulative `PersistentVolumeClaim` storage requests in a namespace.
Per our chat today @markturansky @abhgupta - this is not done (lacks unit testing), but is functional.
This lets quota enforcement for `PersistentVolumeClaim` to occur at creation time. Supporting bind time enforcement would require substantial more work. It's possible this is sufficient for many, so I am opening it up for feedback.
In the future, I suspect we may want to treat local disk in a special manner, but that would have to be a different resource altogether (i.e. `requests.disk`) or something.
Example quota:
```
apiVersion: v1
kind: ResourceQuota
metadata:
name: quota
spec:
hard:
persistentvolumeclaims: "10"
requests.storage: "40Gi"
```
/cc @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra @deads2k
bindata and yaml, Gobindata automation
bindata utils for generating, go generate
match server version
gitignore for dirty, ca, rbase, KUBE_ROOT, buildfix
(rebased jul-25,29)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove redundant pod deletion in scheduler predicates tests and fix taints-tolerations e2e
~~In scheduler predicates test, some tests won't clean pods they created when exit with failure, which may lead to pod leak. This PR is to fix it.~~
Remove redundant pod deletion in scheduler predicates tests, since framework.AfterEach() already did the cleanup work after every test.
Also fix the test "validates that taints-tolerations is respected if not matching", refer to the change on taint-toleration test in #29003, and https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/24134#discussion_r63794924.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Faster test
<!--
Checklist for submitting a Pull Request
Please remove this comment block before submitting.
1. Please read our [contributor guidelines](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
2. See our [developer guide](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md).
3. If you want this PR to automatically close an issue when it is merged,
add `fixes #<issue number>` or `fixes #<issue number>, fixes #<issue number>`
to close multiple issues (see: https://github.com/blog/1506-closing-issues-via-pull-requests).
4. Follow the instructions for [labeling and writing a release note for this PR](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes) in the block below.
-->
In attempting to troubleshoot flakes with this test case I actually wanted to understand how it worked.
There's some poor comments that need work.
I added some additional output which may or may not help in debugging the flakes.
I doubt this fixes the flake.
My major concern is the 'refactor' I did of the test case to batch up runs by sub-test-case. As it stood there was a 200ms pause between each sub, so they should not have interfered with each other. Now they are just started as fast as possible, but only 20 run at a time before moving on to the next 20. I am not sure if I am violating the ethos of the original test case.
Runs on my computer are down from 2m40s -> 40s.
Getting rid of the arbitrary client limiting brings it down to ~12 seconds. 11 to fetch the image and <1 to actually run the tests against the proxies. I can add a zero to the number of loops if you want to hit it harder. It would result in 10x as much text output though.
[]()
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add support for kubectl create quota command
Follow-up of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/19625
```
Create a resourcequota with the specified name, hard limits and optional scopes
Usage:
kubectl create quota NAME [--hard=key1=value1,key2=value2] [--scopes=Scope1,Scope2] [--dry-run=bool] [flags]
Aliases:
quota, q
Examples:
// Create a new resourcequota named my-quota
$ kubectl create quota my-quota --hard=cpu=1,memory=1G,pods=2,services=3,replicationcontrollers=2,resourcequotas=1,secrets=5,persistentvolumeclaims=10
// Create a new resourcequota named best-effort
$ kubectl create quota best-effort --hard=pods=100 --scopes=BestEffort
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Rework pod waiting mechanism in e2e tests to accept pod and watch based
This PR re-applies #28212 which was reverted in #29223. The only difference is that the initial PR contained also `PodStartTimeout` shortening (see [here](4b0c0bd924)) which might caused the problems. Let's give it a 2nd try. I've tested all the flakes and they were passing on my machine.
@smarterclayton @apelisse ptal
Kubernetes Submit Queue