The codec factory should support two distinct interfaces - negotiating
for a serializer with a client, vs reading or writing data to a storage
form (etcd, disk, etc). Make the EncodeForVersion and DecodeToVersion
methods only take Encoder and Decoder, and slight refactoring elsewhere.
In the storage factory, use a content type to control what serializer to
pick, and use the universal deserializer. This ensures that storage can
read JSON (which might be from older objects) while only writing
protobuf. Add exceptions for those resources that may not be able to
write to protobuf (specifically third party resources, but potentially
others in the future).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Provide flags to use etcd3 backed storage
ref: #24405
What's in this PR?
- Add a new flag "storage-backend" to choose "etcd2" or "etcd3". By default (i.e. empty), it's "etcd2".
- Take out etcd config code into a standalone package and let it create etcd2 or etcd3 storage backend given user input.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use the first version as thirdparty resource preferredVersion
First commit is a one-liner, which implements the server-half of #23985.
The other two commits rearrange the test code, and add back a commented out test of thirdparty resource.
@lavalamp @nikhiljindal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make etcd cache size configurable
Instead of the prior 50K limit, allow users to specify a more sensible size for their cluster.
I'm not sure what a sensible default is here. I'm still experimenting on my own clusters. 50 gives me a 270MB max footprint. 50K caused my apiserver to run out of memory as it exceeded >2GB. I believe that number is far too large for most people's use cases.
There are some other fundamental issues that I'm not addressing here:
- Old etcd items are cached and potentially never removed (it stores using modifiedIndex, and doesn't remove the old object when it gets updated)
- Cache isn't LRU, so there's no guarantee the cache remains hot. This makes its performance difficult to predict. More of an issue with a smaller cache size.
- 1.2 etcd entries seem to have a larger memory footprint (I never had an issue in 1.1, even though this cache existed there). I suspect that's due to image lists on the node status.
This is provided as a fix for #23323
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Additional go vet fixes
Mostly:
- pass lock by value
- bad syntax for struct tag value
- example functions not formatted properly
Pass down into the server initialization the necessary interface for
handling client/server content type negotiation. Add integration tests
for the negotiation.
Clayton Coleman