Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Default to using token discovery.
Recent changes to support multiple methods for discovery meant that
"kubeadm init" no longer was sufficient and users would need to add
"--discovery token://" to achieve the same results.
Instead lets assume discovery if the user does not specify anything else
to maintain parity and the brevity of our original instructions.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
CC @mikedanese @luxas
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38920, 38090)
Improve error message for name/label validation.
Instead of just providing regex in name/label validation error output, we need to add the naming rules of the name/label, which is more end-user readable.
Fixed#37654
Recent changes to support multiple methods for discovery meant that
"kubeadm init" no longer was sufficient and users would need to add
"--discovery token://" to achieve the same results.
Instead lets assume discovery if the user does not specify anything else
to maintain parity and the brevity of our original instructions.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement kubeadm bootstrap token management
Creates bootstrap tokens as secrets per the specification in #30707
_WARNING_: These are not currently hooked up to the discovery service or the token it creates.
Still TODO:
- [x] delete tokens
- [x] merge with #35144 and adopt it's testing approach
- [x] determine if we want wholesale json output & templating like kubectl (we do not have an API object with the data we want here) may require a bit of plumbing.
- [x] allow specifying a token duration on the CLI
- [x] allow configuring the default token duration
- [x] hook up the initial token created during init
Sample output:
```
(root@centos1 ~) $ kubeadm token create
Running pre-flight checks
<cmd/token> Token secret created: f6dc69.c43e491752c4a0fd
(root@centos1 ~) $ kubeadm token create
Running pre-flight checks
<cmd/token> Token secret created: 8fad2f.e7b78c8a5f7c7b9a
(root@centos1 ~) $ kubeadm token list
Running pre-flight checks
ID TOKEN EXPIRATION
44d805 44d805.a4e78b6cf6435e33 23h
4f65bb 4f65bb.d006a3c7a0e428c9 23h
6a086e 6a086e.2ff99f0823236b5b 23h
8fad2f 8fad2f.e7b78c8a5f7c7b9a 23h
f6dc69 f6dc69.c43e491752c4a0fd 23h
f81653 f81653.9ab82a2926c7e985 23h
```
Adds kubeadm subcommands to create, list, and delete bootstrap tokens.
Tokens can be created with a TTL duration, or 0 for tokens that will not
expire. The create command can also be used to specify your own token
(for use when bootstrapping masters and nodes in parallel), or update an
existing token's secret or ttl.
Marked "ex" for experimental for now as the boostrap controllers are not
yet hooked up in core.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38724, 38699)
improve the forbidden message
Improves the forbidden message to include more details about what was denied.
`User "foo" cannot list replicasets.extensions in the namespace "default". `
`User "foo" cannot list replicasets.extensions at the cluster scope. `
@xilabao looks like you looking in a similar area, but focused on errors.
@sttts a lot of usual reviewers are out.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38720, 38533)
Priority REST Mapper: Actually honor user choice
```release-note
Fixes bug in resolving client-requested API versions
```
RESTMapping takes a desired GroupKind, and a set of versions, and
returns a rest mapper for the first matching version. It also has a
list of built-in discovered prioritized versions, to which it appends
the user versions.
However, when it goes to parse the versions, it parses them as
GroupVersions. Since only a version was passed, the group will be the
empty group (""), which will only match rest mappings for the empty
group, ergo, none of the user's versions will match if they are
attempting a match for a non-emtpy-group GroupKind.
This fixes that by taking the parsed GroupVersion, and overriding the
Group with the Group from the passed-in GroupKind.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38171, 37968)
add QoS pod status field
Right now, applications retrieving pod information must reimplement the QoS classification logic on the client side if they wish to know the QoS class of the pod.
The PR adds the QoS class to the pod status so it can be used directly by clients.
This is a step toward addressing #33255
@ConnorDoyle @derekwaynecarr @vishh
RESTMapping takes a desired GroupKind, and a set of versions, and
returns a rest mapper for the first matching version. It also has a
list of built-in discovered prioritized versions, to which it appends
the user versions.
However, when it goes to parse the versions, it parses them as
GroupVersions. Since only a version was passed, the group will be the
empty group (""), which will only match rest mappings for the empty
group, ergo, none of the user's versions will match if they are
attempting a match for a non-emtpy-group GroupKind.
This fixes that by taking the parsed GroupVersion, and overriding the
Group with the Group from the passed-in GroupKind.
RESTMapping method can now rely on RESTMappings by passing versions parameter and taking the first match found by RESTMappings method. In addition
a UT that test the new method has been added.
The only change in logic to what was before is when calling RESTMapping
we search all defaultGroupVersion as opposed to just one when no mapping was found for provided versions.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38049, 37823, 38000, 36646)
Test 0-length-arrays in fuzzing tests
While hacking on #37289 I noticed that our fuzzing tests test nil slices and slices of length 1, but not slices of length 0, meaning we aren't testing that 0-length slices get treated the same as nil in all the places we expect them to (and in particular, we aren't ensuring that comparisons always use api.Semantic.DeepEqual rather than reflect.DeepEqual). (Though in fact, changing the fuzzer didn't turn up any bugs, so maybe this effectively gets tested somewhere else...)
`fuzz.New().NilChance(.5).NumElements(0, 1)` means we end up generating `nil` 50% of the time, a length 0 array 25% of the time, and a length 1 array 25% of the time... maybe it should be `fuzz.New().NilChance(.33).NumElements(0, 1)` instead?
The gofuzz rebase is to pull in https://github.com/google/gofuzz/pull/20, and the other fix is just a drive-by.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35300, 36709, 37643, 37813, 37697)
Add generated informers
Add informer-gen and the informers it generates. We'll do follow-up PRs to convert everything currently using the hand-written informers to the generated ones.
TODO:
- [x] switch to `GroupVersionResource`
- [x] finish godoc
@deads2k @caesarxuchao @sttts @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37608, 37103, 37320, 37607, 37678)
Remove stray quote from API docs
There was a PR that removed backquote from the line recently, but there's also extra quote.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove ExportOptions from api/internal and use unversioned
Should only have one internal object in use
Part of #37530
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make pvc storage class annotation immutable after create
Fixes#34516
Added immutable check in validation.go
```
# Please edit the object below. Lines beginning with a '#' will be ignored,
# and an empty file will abort the edit. If an error occurs while saving this file will be
# reopened with the relevant failures.
#
# persistentvolumeclaims "gce-claim-storageclass" was not valid:
# * metadata.annotations.volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-class: Invalid value: "slow2": field is immutable
#
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix logic error in graceful deletion
If a resource has the following criteria:
1. deletion timestamp is not nil
2. deletion graceperiod seconds as persisted in storage is 0
the resource could never be deleted as we always returned pending graceful.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Improved validation error message when env.valueFrom contains no (or …
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
A misleading error message is shown if the user mistypes (or forgets to specify) a field under env.valueFrom. This is the error message: "may not have more than one field specified at a time". But there is only one (misspelled) field specified.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```
Improved error message for missing/misspelled field under env.valueFrom
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/api
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add tests for deepcopy of structs
Until https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35728 merges, we want to at least fuzz/test that deepcopy isn't shallow-copying problematic fields
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix kubectl drain for statefulset
Support deleting pets for `kubectl drain`.
Use evict to delete pods.
Fixes: #33727
```release-note
Adds support for StatefulSets in kubectl drain.
Switches to use the eviction sub-resource instead of deletion in kubectl drain, if server supports.
```
@foxish @caesarxuchao
Automatic merge from submit-queue
copy PodInitialized condition to v1
Copied from pkg/api/types.go
I might batch this change with other similar changes, but want to gets this reviewed first.
cc @dchen1107 @yujuhong
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[RFC] Prepare for deprecating NodeLegacyHostIP
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/9267#issuecomment-257994766
*What this PR does*
- Add comments saying "LegacyHostIP" will be deprecated in 1.7;
- Add v1.NodeLegacyHostIP to be consistent with the internal API (useful for client-go migration #35159)
- Let cloudproviders who used to only set LegacyHostIP set the IP as both InternalIP and ExternalIP
- Master used to ssh tunnel to node's ExternalIP or LegacyHostIP to do [healthz check](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blame/master/pkg/master/master.go#L328-L332). OTOH, if on-prem, kubelet only [sets](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/kubelet/kubelet_node_status.go#L430-L431) LegacyHostIP or InternalIP. In order to deprecate LegacyHostIP in 1.7, I let healthz check to use InternalIP if ExternalIP is not available. (The healthz check is the only consumer of LegacyHostIP in k8s.)
@liggitt @justinsb @bgrant0607
```release-note
LegacyHostIP will be deprecated in 1.7.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
SetSelfLink is inefficient
Generating self links, especially for lists, is inefficient. Replace
use of net.URL.String() call with direct encoding that reduces number of
allocations. Switch from calling meta.ExtractList|SetList to a function
that iterates over each object in the list.
In steady state for nodes performing frequently small get/list
operations, and for larger LISTs significantly reduces CPU and
allocations.
@wojtek-t this is the next big chunk of CPU use during the large N nodes simulation test (11% of master CPU). Takes a few allocations out of the critical path
Kubernetes Submit Queue