Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50257, 50247, 50665, 50554, 51077)
Replace hard-code "cpu" and "memory" to consts
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There are many places using hard coded "cpu" and "memory" as resource name. This PR replace them to consts.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/kind cleanup
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50277, 50823, 50376, 50867)
Move e2e taints test file to sig-scheduling
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Move taint test file to e2e scheduling and add sig-scheduling prefix.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Ref Umbrella issue #49161
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
none
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49358, 49253)
Remove hostname label condition in SchedulerPredicates
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
```
validates that NodeSelector is respected if matching [Conformance]
validates that required NodeAffinity setting is respected if matching
```
The two tests above make the assumption that the node names are equal to the `kubernetes.io/hostname` labels. Unfortunately, this is not necessarily true all the time. For instance, when using the AWS Cloud Provider + Container Linux:
- The node name is set using the AWS SDK's `ec2.Instance.PrivateDnsName` and has the form `ip-10-0-35-57.ca-central-1.compute.internal` [[1](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.7.1/pkg/cloudprovider/providers/aws/aws.go#L3343-L3346)] [[2](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/master/service/ec2/api.go)]
- The node's hostname, however, is a simple call to `os.Hostname()`, itself reading `/proc/sys/kernel/hostname`, which contains what the AWS DHCP assigned to the instance, typically the hostname short-form: `ip-10-0-16-137`. [[1](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/v1.7.1/pkg/util/node/node.go#L43-L54)]
Consequently, we are trying to assign a pod to a node having the following label: `kubernetes.io/hostname=ip-10-0-35-57.ca-central-1.compute.internal` (in addition to the randomly generated label), whereas the actual label on the node is `kubernetes.io/hostname=ip-10-0-35-57`.
Furthermore, this inaccurate `kubernetes.io/hostname=<nodename>` condition is actually useless given we already match over a random label, that was assigned to that node. Later, the test ensures that the scheduled pod was scheduled to the right node by comparing the pod's node name and the node name we expected the pod to be on:
```
framework.ExpectNoError(framework.WaitForPodNotPending(cs, ns, labelPodName))
labelPod, err := cs.Core().Pods(ns).Get(labelPodName, metav1.GetOptions{})
framework.ExpectNoError(err)
Expect(labelPod.Spec.NodeName).To(Equal(nodeName))
```
The `k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types/nodename` data structure actually [warns](55bee3ad21/staging/src/k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types/nodename.go (L40-L43)) about the fact that the node name might be different than the hostname on AWS.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add an integration test library and some integration tests for scheduler
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. Add an integration test library (utils.go) for scheduler testing.
2. Cleaned up some of the tests in scheduler_test.go with the new integration test library.
3. Add priority_test.go with a couple of examples on how to test scheduler priority function in integration tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
ref/ #48176
@kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews
@davidopp @k82cn @vikaschoudhary16
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48043, 48200, 49139, 36238, 49130)
Implement equivalence cache by caching and re-using predicate result
The last part of #30844, I opened a new PR instead of overwrite the old one because we changed some basic assumption by allowing invalidating equivalence cache item by individual predicate.
The idea of this PR is based on discussion in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32024
- [x] Pods belong to same controllerRef considered to be equivalent
- [x] ` podFitsOnNode` will use cached predicate result if it's available
- [x] Equivalence cache will be updated when if a fresh new predicate is done
- [x] `factory.go` will invalid specific predicate cache(s) based on the object change
- [x] Since `schedule` and `bind` are async, we need to optimistically invalid affected cache(s) before `bind`
- [x] Fully unit test of affected files
- [x] e2e test to verify cache update/invalid workflow
- [x] performance test results
- [x] Some nits fixes related but expected to result in `needs-rebase` so they are split to: #36060#35968#37512
cc @wojtek-t @davidopp
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49055, 49128, 49132, 49134, 49110)
Remove affinity annotations leftover
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is a further cleanup for affinity annotations, following #47869.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
ref: #47869
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
- I remove the commented test cases and just leave TODOs instead. I think converting these untestable test cases for now is not necessary. We can add new test cases in future.
- I remove the e2e test case `validates that embedding the JSON PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity setting as a string in the annotation value work` because we have a test case `validates that InterPod Affinity and AntiAffinity is respected if matching` to test the same thing.
/cc @aveshagarwal @bsalamat @gyliu513 @k82cn @timothysc
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47417, 47638, 46930)
Added scheduler integration test owners.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add OWNER file into scheduler integration test.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes # N/A
**Release note**:
```release-note-none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Delete unused return
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We do not use the function return, it's better not to write the return.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 45610, 47628)
Replace capacity with allocatable to calculate pod resource
It is not accurate to use capacity to do the calculation.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The currently cpu resource calculation for a pod in end2end test is incorrect.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fixes#47627
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
More details about capacity and allocatable:
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/node-allocatable.md
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47883, 47179, 46966, 47982, 47945)
Remove e2e test for least requested prioirty function
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Deletes a flaky e2e test for "least requested" priority function of the scheduler. This priority function is tested more extensively in our unit tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#47769
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes Submit Queue