Automatic merge from submit-queue
Reserve kubernetes.io and k8s.io namespace for flex volume options
Split from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39488.
Flex volume already stuffs system information into the options map, and assumes it is free to do so:
```
optionFSType = "kubernetes.io/fsType"
optionReadWrite = "kubernetes.io/readwrite"
optionKeySecret = "kubernetes.io/secret"
```
this formalizes that by reserving the `kubernetes.io` and `k8s.io` namespaces so that user-specified options are never stomped by the system, and flex plugins can know that options with those namespaces came from the system, not user-options.
```release-note
Parameter keys in a StorageClass `parameters` map may not use the `kubernetes.io` or `k8s.io` namespaces.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)
Add a unit test for idempotent applys to the TPR entries.
The test in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
The apply operation expects a last-modified-configuration annotation.
That is written verbatim in the test/fixture file.
References #40841
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds one unit test for TPR's using applies.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
References:
https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/95https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40841#issue-204769102
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I am not super proud of the tpr-entry name.
But I feel like we need to call the two objects differently.
The one which has Kind:ThirdPartyResource
and the one has Kind:Foo.
Is the name "ThirdPartyResource" used interchangeably for both ? I used tpr-entry for the Kind:Foo object.
Also I !assume! this is testing an idempotent apply because the last-applied-configuration annotation is the same as the object itself.
This is the state I see in the logs of kubectl if I do a proper idempotent apply of a third party resource entry.
I guess I will know more once I start playing around with apply command that change TPR objects.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41234, 42186, 41615, 42028, 41788)
apimachinery: handle duplicated and conflicting type registration
Double registrations were leading to duplications in `KnownKinds()`. Conflicting registrations with same gvk, but different types were not detected.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41234, 42186, 41615, 42028, 41788)
Make DaemonSet respect critical pods annotation when scheduling
**What this PR does / why we need it**: #41612
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#41612
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Make DaemonSet respect critical pods annotation when scheduling.
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-apps-feature-requests @erictune @vishh @liggitt @kargakis @lukaszo @piosz @davidopp
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enforce Node Allocatable via cgroups
This PR enforces node allocatable across all pods using a top level cgroup as described in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/348
This PR also provides an option to enforce `kubeReserved` and `systemReserved` on user specified cgroups.
This PR will by default make kubelet create top level cgroups even if `kubeReserved` and `systemReserved` is not specified and hence `Allocatable = Capacity`.
```release-note
New Kubelet flag `--enforce-node-allocatable` with a default value of `pods` is added which will make kubelet create a top level cgroup for all pods to enforce Node Allocatable. Optionally, `system-reserved` & `kube-reserved` values can also be specified separated by comma to enforce node allocatable on cgroups specified via `--system-reserved-cgroup` & `--kube-reserved-cgroup` respectively. Note the default value of the latter flags are "".
This feature requires a **Node Drain** prior to upgrade failing which pods will be restarted if possible or terminated if they have a `RestartNever` policy.
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests
TODO:
- [x] Adjust effective Node Allocatable to subtract hard eviction thresholds
- [x] Add unit tests
- [x] Complete pending e2e tests
- [x] Manual testing
- [x] Get the proposal merged
@dashpole is working on adding support for evictions for enforcing Node allocatable more gracefully. That work will show up in a subsequent PR for v1.6
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41205, 42196, 42068, 41588, 41271)
[CRI] enable kubenet traffic shaping
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37316
Another way to do this is to expose another interface in network host to allow network plugins to retrieve annotation. But that seems unnecessary and more complicated.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42053, 41282, 42056, 41663, 40927)
Allow getting logs directly from deployment, job and statefulset
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@smarterclayton you asked for it in OpenShift
```release-note
kubectl logs allows getting logs directly from deployment, job and statefulset
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42053, 41282, 42056, 41663, 40927)
Update kubeadm token to work as expected
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Follows up: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41509
Updates `kubeadm token` to work as discussed in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1deJYPIF4LmhGjDVaqrswErIrV7mtwJgovtLnPCDxP7U/edit#
Promotes the command from the `ex` subcommand which now is named `alpha` for clarity. (This will later become `kubeadm alpha phase`)
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Example UX:
```console
sudo ./kubeadm token --help
This command will manage Bootstrap Token for you.
Please note this usage of this command is optional, and mostly for advanced users.
In short, Bootstrap Tokens are used for establishing bidirectional trust between a client and a server.
A Bootstrap Token can be used when a client (for example a node that's about to join the cluster) needs
to trust the server it is talking to. Then a Bootstrap Token with the "signing" usage can be used.
Bootstrap Tokens can also function as a way to allow short-lived authentication to the API Server
(the token serves as a way for the API Server to trust the client), for example for doing the TLS Bootstrap.
What is a Bootstrap Token more exactly?
- It is a Secret in the kube-system namespace of type "bootstrap.kubernetes.io/token".
- A Bootstrap Token must be of the form "[a-z0-9]{6}.[a-z0-9]{16}"; the former part is the public Token ID,
and the latter is the Token Secret, which must be kept private at all circumstances.
- The name of the Secret must be named "bootstrap-token-(token-id)".
You can read more about Bootstrap Tokens in this proposal:
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/bootstrap-discovery.md
Usage:
kubeadm token [flags]
kubeadm token [command]
Available Commands:
create Create bootstrap tokens on the server.
delete Delete bootstrap tokens on the server.
generate Generate and print a bootstrap token, but do not create it on the server.
list List bootstrap tokens on the server.
Flags:
--kubeconfig string The KubeConfig file to use for talking to the cluster (default "/etc/kubernetes/admin.conf")
Use "kubeadm token [command] --help" for more information about a command.
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm token list
TOKEN TTL EXPIRES USAGES DESCRIPTION
70c388.41a07b703aa4bedf <forever> <never> authentication,signing The default bootstrap token generated by 'kubeadm init'.
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm token create
c57e6a.abb75fa1debe555f
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm token list
TOKEN TTL EXPIRES USAGES DESCRIPTION
70c388.41a07b703aa4bedf <forever> <never> authentication,signing The default bootstrap token generated by 'kubeadm init'.
c57e6a.abb75fa1debe555f <forever> <never> authentication,signing <none>
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm token create s
token ["s"] was not of form ["^([a-z0-9]{6})\\.([a-z0-9]{16})$"]
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm token create c57e6a.abb75fa1debe555f
a token with id "c57e6a" already exists
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm token delete c57e6a.abb75fa1debe555f
bootstrap token with id "c57e6a" deleted
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@dmmcquay @jbeda @mikedanese @errordeveloper @pires
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42053, 41282, 42056, 41663, 40927)
Fully remove hand-written listers and informers
Note: the first commit is from #41927. Adding do-not-merge for now as we'll want that to go in first, and then I'll rebase this on top.
Update statefulset controller to use a lister for PVCs instead of a client request. Also replace a unit test's dependency on legacylisters with the generated ones. cc @kargakis @kow3ns @foxish @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Remove all references to pkg/controller/informers and pkg/client/legacylisters, and remove those packages.
@smarterclayton @deads2k this should be it!
cc @gmarek @wojtek-t @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
The tests in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
In PATCH request rount-tripper we check that the kubectl apply
implementation worked as expected.
References #40841
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41116, 41804, 42104, 42111, 42120)
make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Part of feature forgiveness implementation, make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Related Issue: #1574
Related PR: #39469
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41116, 41804, 42104, 42111, 42120)
Remove SandboxReceived event
This PR removes SandboxReceived event in sync pod.
> This event seems somewhat meaningless, and clouds the event records for a pod. Do we actually need it? Pulling and pod received on the node are very relevant, this seems much less so. Would suggest we either remove it, or turn it into a message that clearly indicates why it has value.
Refer d65309399a (commitcomment-21052453).
cc @smarterclayton @yujuhong
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41116, 41804, 42104, 42111, 42120)
Add support for attacher/detacher interface in Flex volume
Add support for attacher/detacher interface in Flex volume
This change breaks backward compatibility and requires to be release noted.
```release-note
Flex volume plugin is updated to support attach/detach interfaces. It broke backward compatibility. Please update your drivers and implement the new callouts.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41962, 42055, 42062, 42019, 42054)
dockershim puts pause container in pod cgroup
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The CRI was not launching the pause container in the pod level cgroup. The non-CRI code path was.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42044, 41694, 41927, 42050, 41987)
Add apply set-last-applied subcommand
implement part of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/287, will rebase after https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41699 got merged, EDIT: since bug output format has been confirmed, will update the behavior of output format soon
cc @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @AdoHe @pwittrock
```release-note
Support kubectl apply set-last-applied command to update the applied-applied-configuration annotation
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35408, 41915, 41992, 41964, 41925)
azure: document config file (+ remove unused field)
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
* documents the config file used by the Azure cloudprovider
* removes an unused field that shouldn't have been added
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35408, 41915, 41992, 41964, 41925)
add secret option to flag
To resolve the issue of security(pr #35030 ),
> @smarterclayton commented 5 days ago
> This is unfortunately not all flags that could be secrets. The best option would be to add support in spf13/pflag to tag a flag as a secret, and then use that bit to determine the list.
>
> Also, Command() could be used in contexts that need exact parameters (for subshell execution), so we would need to add a new method or extend the signature here to allow exact flags to be retrieved.
we could add a secret option to the flags.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
make iscsi portals optional
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Make iSCSI portals optional
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41954, 40528, 41875, 41165, 41877)
Updating apiserver to return 202 when resource is being deleted asynchronously via cascading deletion
As per https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33196#issuecomment-278440622.
cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews @smarterclayton @caesarxuchao @bgrant0607 @kubernetes/api-reviewers
```release-note
Updating apiserver to return http status code 202 for a delete request when the resource is not immediately deleted because of user requesting cascading deletion using DeleteOptions.OrphanDependents=false.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
Allow updates to pod tolerations.
Opening this PR to continue discussion for pod spec tolerations updates when a pod has been scheduled already. This PR is built on top of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38957.
@kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews @liggitt @davidopp @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra
Kubernetes Submit Queue