Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make ThirdPartyResource a root scoped object
ThirdPartyResource (the registration of a third party type) belongs at the cluster scope. It results in resource handlers installed in every namespace, and the same name in two namespaces collides (namespace is ignored when determining group/kind).
ThirdPartyResourceData (an actual instance of that type) is still namespace-scoped.
This PR moves ThirdPartyResource to be a root scope object. Someone previously using ThirdPartyResource definitions in alpha should be able to move them from namespace to root scope like this:
setup (run on 1.2):
```
kubectl create ns ns1
echo '{"kind":"ThirdPartyResource","apiVersion":"extensions/v1beta1","metadata":{"name":"foo.example.com"},"versions":[{"name":"v8"}]}' | kubectl create -f - --namespace=ns1
echo '{"kind":"Foo","apiVersion":"example.com/v8","metadata":{"name":"MyFoo"},"testkey":"testvalue"}' | kubectl create -f - --namespace=ns1
```
export:
```
kubectl get thirdpartyresource --all-namespaces -o yaml > tprs.yaml
```
remove namespaced kind registrations (this shouldn't remove the data of that type, which is another possible issue):
```
kubectl delete -f tprs.yaml
```
... upgrade ...
re-register the custom types at the root scope:
```
kubectl create -f tprs.yaml
```
Additionally, pre-1.3 clients that expect to read/write ThirdPartyResource at a namespace scope will not be compatible with 1.3+ servers, and 1.3+ clients that expect to read/write ThirdPartyResource at a root scope will not be compatible with pre-1.3 servers.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
API changes for Cascading deletion
This PR includes the necessary API changes to implement cascading deletion with finalizers as proposed is in #23656. Comments are welcome.
@lavalamp @derekwaynecarr @bgrant0607 @rata @hongchaodeng
Having internal and external integer types being different hides
potential conversion problems. Propagate that out further (which will
also allow us to better optimize conversion).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make all defaulters public
Will allow for generating direct accessors in conversion code instead of using reflection.
@wojtek-t
Here are a list of changes along with an explanation of how they work:
1. Add a new string field called TargetSelector to the external version of
extensions Scale type (extensions/v1beta1.Scale). This is a serialized
version of either the map-based selector (in case of ReplicationControllers)
or the unversioned.LabelSelector struct (in case of Deployments and
ReplicaSets).
2. Change the selector field in the internal Scale type (extensions.Scale) to
unversioned.LabelSelector.
3. Add conversion functions to convert from two external selector fields to a
single internal selector field. The rules for conversion are as follows:
i. If the target resource that this scale targets supports LabelSelector
(Deployments and ReplicaSets), then serialize the LabelSelector and
store the string in the TargetSelector field in the external version
and leave the map-based Selector field as nil.
ii. If the target resource only supports a map-based selector
(ReplicationControllers), then still serialize that selector and
store the serialized string in the TargetSelector field. Also,
set the the Selector map field in the external Scale type.
iii. When converting from external to internal version, parse the
TargetSelector string into LabelSelector struct if the string isn't
empty. If it is empty, then check if the Selector map is set and just
assign that map to the MatchLabels component of the LabelSelector.
iv. When converting from internal to external version, serialize the
LabelSelector and store it in the TargetSelector field. If only
the MatchLabel component is set, then also copy that value to
the Selector map field in the external version.
4. HPA now just converts the LabelSelector field to a Selector interface
type to list the pods.
5. Scale Get and Update etcd methods for Deployments and ReplicaSets now
return extensions.Scale instead of autoscaling.Scale.
6. Consequently, SubresourceGroupVersion override and is "autoscaling"
enabled check is now removed from pkg/master/master.go
7. Other small changes to labels package, fuzzer and LabelSelector
helpers to piece this all together.
8. Add unit tests to HPA targeting Deployments and ReplicaSets.
9. Add an e2e test to HPA targeting ReplicaSets.
In podSecurityPolicy:
1. Rename .seLinuxContext to .seLinux
2. Rename .seLinux.type to .seLinux.rule
3. Rename .runAsUser.type to .runAsUser.rule
4. Rename .seLinux.SELinuxOptions
1,2,3 as suggested by thockin in #22159.
I added 3 for consistency with 2.
Added selector generation to Job's
strategy.Validate, right before validation.
Can't do in defaulting since UID is not known.
Added a validation to Job to ensure that the generated
labels and selector are correct when generation was requested.
This happens right after generation, but validation is in a better
place to return an error.
Adds "manualSelector" field to batch/v1 Job to control selector generation.
Adds same field to extensions/__internal. Conversion between those two
is automatic.
Adds "autoSelector" field to extensions/v1beta1 Job. Used for storing batch/v1 Jobs
- Default for v1 is to do generation.
- Default for v1beta1 is to not do it.
- In both cases, unset == false == do the default thing.
Release notes:
Added batch/v1 group, which contains just Job, and which is the next
version of extensions/v1beta1 Job.
The changes from the previous version are:
- Users no longer need to ensure labels on their pod template are unique to the enclosing
job (but may add labels as needed for categorization).
- In v1beta1, job.spec.selector was defaulted from pod labels, with the user responsible for uniqueness.
In v1, a unique label is generated and added to the pod template, and used as the selector (other
labels added by user stay on pod template, but need not be used by selector).
- a new field called "manualSelector" field exists to control whether the new behavior is used,
versus a more error-prone but more flexible "manual" (not generated) seletor. Most users
will not need to use this field and should leave it unset.
Users who are creating extensions.Job go objects and then posting them using the go client
will see a change in the default behavior. They need to either stop providing a selector (relying on
selector generation) or else specify "spec.manualSelector" until they are ready to do the former.
Clayton Coleman