It is useful to apply the storage testsuite also to "external" (=
out-of-tree) storage drivers. One way of doing that is setting up a
custom E2E test suite, but that's still quite a bit of work.
An easier alternative is to parameterize the Kubernetes e2e.test
binary at runtime so that it instantiates the testsuite for one or
more drivers. Some parameters have to be provided before starting the
test because they define configuration and capabilities of the driver
and its storage backend that cannot be discovered at runtime. This is
done by populating the DriverDefinition with the content of the file
that the new -storage.testdriver parameters points to.
The universal .yaml and .json decoder from Kubernetes is used. It's
flexible, but has some downsides:
- currently ignores unknown fields (see https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/71589)
- poor error messages when fields have the wrong type
Storage drivers have to be installed in the test cluster before
starting e2e.test. Only tests involving dynamically provisioned
volumes are currently supported.
This is the 2nd PR to move CSINodeInfo/CSIDriver APIs to
v1beta1 core storage APIs. It includes controller side changes.
It depends on the PR with API changes:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/73883
Debugging the CSI driver tests depends a lot on the output of the CSI
sidecar containers and the CSI driver, but that information was not
captured automatically and thus unavailable after a test run. This is
particularly bad when running in a remote CI system, but also manually
watching the cluster during a test was cumbersome.
Now pod events and log messages get copied to the test's output at the
time that they happen (when running without report directory) or get
written to individual log files (when running with report directory in
the CI).
Refactoring for non-csi e2e test similar to below commit in csi e2e test.
4d11dab272 (diff-0d9ecaa3e6a0297186ad33f57aad472e)
Scopes for this refactoring are below four files:
- test/e2e/storage/volumes.go
- test/e2e/storage/volume_io.go
- test/e2e/storage/persistent_volumes-volumemode.go
- test/e2e/storage/subpath.go
fixes: #66571
This set of e2e tests is to confirm that persistent volume works well for all volumeModes.
Coverage of the tests are shown in the figure of [Test cases], below.
Once implementation policy is confirmed to be good, we can add plugins and test cases to this.
[Test cases]
# plugin volumeMode Test case Expectation
--- ---------- -------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ------------
1 iSCSI Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
2 iSCSI FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
3 RBD Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
4 RBD FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
5 CephFS Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Fail
6 CephFS FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
7 NFS Block (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Fail
8 NFS FileSystem (a) Create Pod with PV and confirm Read/Write to PV Success
fixes: #56803
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46903, 61721, 62317). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove the use of storage class beta annotations in e2e tests.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Since we are going to remove storage class beta annotations, we'd like to remove the use of it in e2e tests to avoid upgrade test issues when it's finally removed.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/51440#discussion_r180290591
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This should be cherry-picked to 1.10 as well. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/51440#discussion_r178919464
/cc @msau42
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Patrick Ohly