Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43642, 43170, 41813, 42170, 41581)
Be able to specify the timeout to wait for pod for kubectl logs/attach
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41786
current flag is `get-pod-timeout`, we can have a discussion if you have better one, default unit is seconds, above 0
@soltysh @kargakis ptal, thanks
@kubernetes/sig-cli-feature-requests
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41139, 41186, 38882, 37698, 42034)
create configmap from-env-file
Allow ConfigMaps to be created from Docker based env files.
See proposal https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/165
**Release-note:**
```release-note
1. create configmap has a new option --from-env-file that populates a configmap from file which follows a key=val format for each line.
2. create secret has a new option --from-env-file that populates a configmap from file which follows a key=val format for each line.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41794, 42349, 42755, 42901, 42933)
[Federation][e2e] Add framework for upgrade test in federation
Adding framework for federation upgrade tests. please refer to #41791
cc @madhusudancs @nikhiljindal @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42734, 42745, 42758, 42814, 42694)
Implement automated downgrade testing.
Node version cannot be higher than the master version, so we must
switch the node version first. Also, we must use the upgrade script
from the appropriate version for GCE.
Node version cannot be higher than the master version, so we must
switch the node version first. Also, we must use the upgrade script
from the appropriate version for GCE.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Hook up kubeadm against the BootstrapSigner
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR makes kubeadm able to use the BootstrapSigner.
Depends on a few other PRs I've made, I'll rebase and fix this up after they've merged.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Example usage:
```console
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm init --kubernetes-version v1.7.0-alpha.0.377-2a6414bc914d55
[sudo] password for lucas:
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[init] Using Kubernetes version: v1.7.0-alpha.0.377-2a6414bc914d55
[init] Using Authorization mode: RBAC
[preflight] Running pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[certificates] Generated CA certificate and key.
[certificates] Generated API server certificate and key.
[certificates] Generated API server kubelet client certificate and key.
[certificates] Generated service account token signing key.
[certificates] Generated service account token signing public key.
[certificates] Generated front-proxy CA certificate and key.
[certificates] Generated front-proxy client certificate and key.
[certificates] Valid certificates and keys now exist in "/etc/kubernetes/pki"
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/admin.conf"
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf"
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/controller-manager.conf"
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/scheduler.conf"
[apiclient] Created API client, waiting for the control plane to become ready
[apiclient] All control plane components are healthy after 21.301384 seconds
[apiclient] Waiting for at least one node to register and become ready
[apiclient] First node is ready after 8.072688 seconds
[apiclient] Test deployment succeeded
[token-discovery] Using token: 67a96d.02405a1773564431
[apiconfig] Created RBAC rules
[addons] Created essential addon: kube-proxy
[addons] Created essential addon: kube-dns
Your Kubernetes master has initialized successfully!
To start using your cluster, you need to run:
export KUBECONFIG=/etc/kubernetes/admin.conf
You should now deploy a pod network to the cluster.
Run "kubectl apply -f [podnetwork].yaml" with one of the options listed at:
http://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/addons/
You can now join any number of machines by running the following on each node:
kubeadm join --token 67a96d.02405a1773564431 192.168.1.115:6443
other-computer $ ./kubeadm join --token 67a96d.02405a1773564431 192.168.1.115:6443
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Trying to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Cluster info signature and contents are valid, will use API Server "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Successfully established connection with API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[bootstrap] Detected server version: v1.7.0-alpha.0.377+2a6414bc914d55
[bootstrap] The server supports the Certificates API (certificates.k8s.io/v1beta1)
[csr] Created API client to obtain unique certificate for this node, generating keys and certificate signing request
[csr] Received signed certificate from the API server, generating KubeConfig...
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf"
Node join complete:
* Certificate signing request sent to master and response
received.
* Kubelet informed of new secure connection details.
Run 'kubectl get nodes' on the master to see this machine join.
# Wrong secret!
other-computer $ ./kubeadm join --token 67a96d.02405a1773564432 192.168.1.115:6443
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Trying to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Failed to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443": failed to verify JWS signature of received cluster info object, can't trust this API Server
[discovery] Trying to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Failed to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443": failed to verify JWS signature of received cluster info object, can't trust this API Server
^C
# Poor method to create a cluster-info KubeConfig (a KubeConfig file with no credentials), but...
$ printf "kind: Config\n$(sudo ./kubeadm alpha phas --client-name foo --server https://192.168.1.115:6443 --token foo | head -6)\n" > cluster-info.yaml
$ cat cluster-info.yaml
kind: Config
apiVersion: v1
clusters:
- cluster:
certificate-authority-data: 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
server: https://192.168.1.115:6443
name: kubernetes
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm token list
TOKEN TTL EXPIRES USAGES DESCRIPTION
67a96d.02405a1773564431 <forever> <never> authentication,signing The default bootstrap token generated by 'kubeadm init'.
# Any token with the authentication usage set works as the --tls-bootstrap-token arg here
other-computer $ ./kubeadm join --skip-preflight-checks --discovery-file cluster-info.yaml --tls-bootstrap-token 67a96d.02405a1773564431
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Synced cluster-info information from the API Server so we have got the latest information
[bootstrap] Detected server version: v1.7.0-alpha.0.377+2a6414bc914d55
[bootstrap] The server supports the Certificates API (certificates.k8s.io/v1beta1)
[csr] Created API client to obtain unique certificate for this node, generating keys and certificate signing request
[csr] Received signed certificate from the API server, generating KubeConfig...
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf"
Node join complete:
* Certificate signing request sent to master and response
received.
* Kubelet informed of new secure connection details.
Run 'kubectl get nodes' on the master to see this machine join.
# Delete the RoleBinding that exposes the cluster-info ConfigMap publicly. Now this ConfigMap will be private
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ kubectl -n kube-public edit rolebindings kubeadm:bootstrap-signer-clusterinfo
# This breaks the token joining method
other-computer $ sudo ./kubeadm join --token 67a96d.02405a1773564431 192.168.1.115:6443
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Trying to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Failed to request cluster info, will try again: [User "system:anonymous" cannot get configmaps in the namespace "kube-public". (get configmaps cluster-info)]
[discovery] Failed to request cluster info, will try again: [User "system:anonymous" cannot get configmaps in the namespace "kube-public". (get configmaps cluster-info)]
^C
# But we can still connect using the cluster-info file
other-computer $ sudo ./kubeadm join --skip-preflight-checks --discovery-file /k8s/cluster-info.yaml --tls-bootstrap-token 67a96d.02405a1773564431
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Could not access the cluster-info ConfigMap for refreshing the cluster-info information, but the TLS cert is valid so proceeding...
[discovery] The cluster-info ConfigMap isn't set up properly (no kubeconfig key in ConfigMap), but the TLS cert is valid so proceeding...
[bootstrap] Detected server version: v1.7.0-alpha.0.377+2a6414bc914d55
[bootstrap] The server supports the Certificates API (certificates.k8s.io/v1beta1)
[csr] Created API client to obtain unique certificate for this node, generating keys and certificate signing request
[csr] Received signed certificate from the API server, generating KubeConfig...
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf"
Node join complete:
* Certificate signing request sent to master and response
received.
* Kubelet informed of new secure connection details.
Run 'kubectl get nodes' on the master to see this machine join.
# What happens if the CA in the cluster-info file and the API Server's CA aren't equal?
# Generated new CA for the cluster-info file, a invalid one for connecting to the cluster
# The new cluster-info file is here:
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ cat cluster-info.yaml
kind: Config
apiVersion: v1
clusters:
- cluster:
certificate-authority-data: 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
server: https://192.168.1.115:6443
name: kubernetes
# Try to join an API Server with the wrong CA
other-computer $ sudo ./kubeadm join --skip-preflight-checks --discovery-file /k8s/cluster-info.yaml --tls-bootstrap-token 67a96d.02405a1773564431
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Failed to validate the API Server's identity, will try again: [Get https://192.168.1.115:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-public/configmaps/cluster-info: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "kubernetes")]
[discovery] Failed to validate the API Server's identity, will try again: [Get https://192.168.1.115:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-public/configmaps/cluster-info: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "kubernetes")]
[discovery] Failed to validate the API Server's identity, will try again: [Get https://192.168.1.115:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-public/configmaps/cluster-info: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "kubernetes")]
[discovery] Failed to validate the API Server's identity, will try again: [Get https://192.168.1.115:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-public/configmaps/cluster-info: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "kubernetes")]
^C
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
@jbeda @mikedanese @justinsb @pires @dmmcquay @roberthbailey @dgoodwin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41919, 41149, 42350, 42351, 42285)
kubelet: enable qos-level memory limits
```release-note
Experimental support to reserve a pod's memory request from being utilized by pods in lower QoS tiers.
```
Enables the QoS-level memory cgroup limits described in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/314
**Note: QoS level cgroups have to be enabled for any of this to take effect.**
Adds a new `--experimental-qos-reserved` flag that can be used to set the percentage of a resource to be reserved at the QoS level for pod resource requests.
For example, `--experimental-qos-reserved="memory=50%`, means that if a Guaranteed pod sets a memory request of 2Gi, the Burstable and BestEffort QoS memory cgroups will have their `memory.limit_in_bytes` set to `NodeAllocatable - (2Gi*50%)` to reserve 50% of the guaranteed pod's request from being used by the lower QoS tiers.
If a Burstable pod sets a request, its reserve will be deducted from the BestEffort memory limit.
The result is that:
- Guaranteed limit matches root cgroup at is not set by this code
- Burstable limit is `NodeAllocatable - Guaranteed reserve`
- BestEffort limit is `NodeAllocatable - Guaranteed reserve - Burstable reserve`
The only resource currently supported is `memory`; however, the code is generic enough that other resources can be added in the future.
@derekwaynecarr @vishh
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42365, 42429, 41770, 42018, 35055)
kubeadm: Add --cert-dir, --cert-altnames instead of --api-external-dns-names
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- For the beta kubeadm init UX, we need this change
- Also adds the `kubeadm phase certs selfsign` command that makes the phase invokable independently
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This PR depends on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41897
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
@dmmcquay @pires @jbeda @errordeveloper @mikedanese @deads2k @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41984, 41682, 41924, 41928)
Add options to kubefed telling it to generate HTTP Basic and/or token credentials for the Federated API server
fixes#41265.
**Release notes**:
```release-note
Adds two options to kubefed, `-apiserver-enable-basic-auth` and `-apiserver-enable-token-auth`, which generate an HTTP Basic username/password and a token respectively for the Federated API server.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42128, 42064, 42253, 42309, 42322)
kubeadm: Rename some flags for beta UI and fixup some logic
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In this PR:
- `--api-advertise-addresses` becomes `--apiserver-advertise-address`
- The API Server's logic here is that if the address is `0.0.0.0`, it chooses the host's default interface's address. kubeadm here uses exactly the same logic. This arg is then passed to `--advertise-address`, and the API Server will advertise that one for the service VIP.
- `--api-port` becomes `--apiserver-bind-port` for clarity
ref the meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1deJYPIF4LmhGjDVaqrswErIrV7mtwJgovtLnPCDxP7U/edit#
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
@jbeda @dmmcquay @pires @lukemarsden @dgoodwin @mikedanese
This commit switches over the HPA controller to use the custom metrics
API. It also converts the HPA controller to use the generated client
in k8s.io/metrics for the resource metrics API.
In order to enable support, you must enable
`--horizontal-pod-autoscaler-use-rest-clients` on the
controller-manager, which will switch the HPA controller's MetricsClient
implementation over to use the standard rest clients for both custom
metrics and resource metrics. This requires that at the least resource
metrics API is registered with kube-aggregator, and that the controller
manager is pointed at kube-aggregator. For this to work, Heapster
must be serving the new-style API server (`--api-server=true`).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Extend experimental support to multiple Nvidia GPUs
Extended from #28216
```release-note
`--experimental-nvidia-gpus` flag is **replaced** by `Accelerators` alpha feature gate along with support for multiple Nvidia GPUs.
To use GPUs, pass `Accelerators=true` as part of `--feature-gates` flag.
Works only with Docker runtime.
```
1. Automated testing for this PR is not possible since creation of clusters with GPUs isn't supported yet in GCP.
1. To test this PR locally, use the node e2e.
```shell
TEST_ARGS='--feature-gates=DynamicKubeletConfig=true' FOCUS=GPU SKIP="" make test-e2e-node
```
TODO:
- [x] Run manual tests
- [x] Add node e2e
- [x] Add unit tests for GPU manager (< 100% coverage)
- [ ] Add unit tests in kubelet package
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41921, 41695, 42139, 42090, 41949)
kubeadm: join ux changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Update `kubeadm join` UX according to https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/381
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes # https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/176
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @jbeda
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42058, 41160, 42065, 42076, 39338)
New command for stand-alone GKE certificates controller
New stand-alone certificates controller for GKE. Rather than requiring the CA's private key on disk, this allows making external calls to GKE in order to sign cluster certificates.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#39761
**Release note**:
```release-note
New GKE certificates controller.
```
CC @mikedanese @jcbsmpsn
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42044, 41694, 41927, 42050, 41987)
Add apply set-last-applied subcommand
implement part of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/287, will rebase after https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41699 got merged, EDIT: since bug output format has been confirmed, will update the behavior of output format soon
cc @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @AdoHe @pwittrock
```release-note
Support kubectl apply set-last-applied command to update the applied-applied-configuration annotation
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
kubeadm: Secure the control plane communication and add the kubeconfig phase command
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This generates kubeconfig files for the controller-manager and the scheduler, ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/172
The second commit adds the `kubeadm alpha phase kubeconfig` command as described in the design doc: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/pull/156
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@dmmcquay What kind of tests would you like for the kubeconfig phase command?
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
@jbeda @mikedanese @dmmcquay @pires @liggitt @deads2k @errordeveloper
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)
add kubectl can-i to see if you can perform an action
Adds `kubectl auth can-i <verb> <resource> [<name>]` so that a user can see if they are allowed to perform an action.
@kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @fabianofranz
This particular command satisfies the immediate need of knowing if you can perform an action without trying that action. When using RBAC in a script that is adding permissions, there is a lag between adding the permission and the permission being realized in the RBAC cache. As a user on the CLI, you almost never see it, but as a script adding a binding and then using that new power, you hit it quite often.
There are natural follow-ons to the same area (hence the `auth` subcommand) to figure out if someone else can perform an action, what actions you can perform in total, and who can perform a given action. Someone else is an API we have already, what-can-i-do was a proposed API a while back and a very useful one for interfaces, and who-can is common question if someone is administering a namespace.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40665, 41094, 41351, 41721, 41843)
kubeadm: Add a --ca-cert-path flag to kubeadm join
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR makes it possible to customize where the CA file is written
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
@pires @mikedanese @dmmcquay @jbeda @errordeveloper
This adds a new stand-alone certificates controller for use on GKE. It
allows calling GKE to sign certificates instead of requiring the CA
private key locally.
It does not aim for 100% feature parity with kube-controller-manager
yet, so for instance, leader election support is omitted.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41812, 41665, 40007, 41281, 41771)
kube-apiserver: add a bootstrap token authenticator for TLS bootstrapping
Follows up on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36101
Still needs:
* More tests.
* To be hooked up to the API server.
- Do I have to do that in a separate PR after k8s.io/apiserver is synced?
* Docs (kubernetes.io PR).
* Figure out caching strategy.
* Release notes.
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-api-reviews @liggitt @luxas @jbeda
```release-notes
Added a new secret type "bootstrap.kubernetes.io/token" for dynamically creating TLS bootstrapping bearer tokens.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Added a basic monitor for providing etcd version related info
Fixes#41071
This tool scrapes metrics partly from etcd's /version and /metrics endpoints and partly using etcdctl and exposes them as prometheus metrics at `http://localhost:9101/metrics` endpoint on the master. Here is a summary of the metrics it exposes (self-explanatory from the code):
- etcdVersionFetchCount = prometheus.NewCounterVec(
prometheus.CounterOpts{
Namespace: "etcd",
Name: "version_info_fetch_count",
Help: "Number of times etcd's version info was fetched, labeled by etcd's server binary and cluster version",
},
[]string{"serverversion", "clusterversion"})
- etcdGRPCRequestsTotal = prometheus.NewCounterVec(
prometheus.CounterOpts{
Namespace: namespace,
Name: "grpc_requests_total",
Help: "Counter of received grpc requests, labeled by grpc method and grpc service names",
},
[]string{"grpc_method", "grpc_service"})
For further info on how to run this as a binary/docker-container/kubernetes-pod and checking the metrics, have a look at the README.md file.
cc @fgrzadkowski @wojtek-t @piosz
Haoran Wang