1. pcb and pcb controller are removed and their functionality is
encapsulated in StatefulPodControlInterface.
2. IdentityMappers has been removed to clarify what properties of a Pod are
mutated by the controller. All mutations are performed in the
UpdateStatefulPod method of the StatefulPodControlInterface.
3. The statefulSetIterator and petQueue classes are removed. These classes
sorted Pods by CreationTimestamp. This is brittle and not resilient to
clock skew. The current control loop, which implements the same logic,
is in stateful_set_control.go. The Pods are now sorted and considered by
their ordinal indices, as is outlined in the documentation.
4. StatefulSetController now checks to see if the Pods matching a
StatefulSet's Selector also match the Name of the StatefulSet. This will
make the controller resilient to overlapping, and will be enhanced by
the addition of ControllerRefs.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39466, 39490, 39527)
bump gengo to latest
bumping gengo to limit surprises while working on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39475
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove incorrect groupName comment for apps.k8s.io
The group name is "apps", not "apps.k8s.io"
The comment didn't actually affect client generation because there was an extra space between it and the package declaration, but removing it to avoid confusion
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35300, 36709, 37643, 37813, 37697)
Add generated informers
Add informer-gen and the informers it generates. We'll do follow-up PRs to convert everything currently using the hand-written informers to the generated ones.
TODO:
- [x] switch to `GroupVersionResource`
- [x] finish godoc
@deads2k @caesarxuchao @sttts @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove ExportOptions from api/internal and use unversioned
Should only have one internal object in use
Part of #37530
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/apis
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Previously we refused to emit 'autoConvert_*' functions if any field was not
convertible. The way around this was to write manual Conversion functions, but
to do so safely you must handle every fields. Huge opportunity for errors.
This PR cleans up the filtering such that it only operates on types that should
be converted (remove a lot of code) and tracks when fields are skipped. In
that case, it emits an 'autoConvert' function but not a public 'Convert'
function. If there is no manual function, the compile will fail.
This also means that manual conversion functions can call autoConvert functions
and then "patch up" what they need.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Improvements on OpenAPI spec generation
- Generating models using go2idl library (no reflection anymore)
- Remove dependencies on go-restful/swagger
- Generate one swagger.json file for each web-service
- Bugfix: fixed a bug in trie implementation
Reference: #13414
**Release note**:
```release-note
Generate separate OpenAPI spec for each API GroupVersion on /<Group>/<Version>/swagger.json
```
There's been enough people broken by not committing generated code, that we
should undo that until we have a proper client that is `go get` compatible.
This is temporary.
This mostly takes the previously checked in files and removes them, and moves
the generation to be on-demand instead of manual. Manually verified no change
in generated output.
This drives conversion generation from file tags like:
// +conversion-gen=k8s.io/my/internal/version
.. rather than hardcoded lists of packages.
The only net change in generated code can be explained as correct. Previously
it didn't know that conversion was available.
This is the last piece of Clayton's #26179 to be implemented with file tags.
All diffs are accounted for. Followup will use this to streamline some
packages.
Also add some V(5) debugging - it was helpful in diagnosing various issues, it
may be helpful again.
This drives most of the logic of deep-copy generation from tags like:
// +deepcopy-gen=package
..rather than hardcoded lists of packages. This will make it possible to
subsequently generate code ONLY for packages that need it *right now*, rather
than all of them always.
Also remove pkgs that really do not need deep-copies (no symbols used
anywhere).
In bringing back Clayton's PR piece-by-piece this was almost as easy to
implement as his version, and is much more like what I think we should be
doing.
Specifically, any time which defines a .DeepCopy() method will have that method
called preferentially. Otherwise we generate our own functions for
deep-copying. This affected exactly one type - resource.Quantity. In applying
this heuristic, several places in the generated code were simplified.
To achieve this I had to convert types.Type.Methods from a slice to a map,
which seems correct anyway (to do by-name lookups).
Jordan Liggitt