Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35094, 42095, 42059, 42143, 41944)
Use chroot for containerized mounts
This PR is to modify the containerized mounter script to use chroot
instead of rkt fly. This will avoid the problem of possible large number
of mounts caused by rkt containers if they are not cleaned up.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35094, 42095, 42059, 42143, 41944)
add aggregation integration test
Wires up an integration test which runs a full kube-apiserver, the wardle server, and the kube-aggregator and creates the APIservice object for the wardle server. Without services and DNS the aggregator doesn't proxy, but it does ensure we don't have an obvious panic or bring up failure.
@sttts @ncdc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40746, 41699, 42108, 42174, 42093)
Avoid fake node names in user info
Node usernames should follow the format `system:node:<node-name>`,
but if we don't know the node name, it's worse to put a fake one in.
In the future, we plan to have a dedicated node authorizer, which would
start rejecting requests from a user with a bogus node name like this.
The right approach is to either mint correct credentials per node, or use node bootstrapping so it requests a correct client certificate itself.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
clean up generic apiserver options
Clean up generic apiserver options before we tag any levels. This makes them more in-line with "normal" api servers running on the platform.
Also remove dead example code.
@sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)
[Federation] ReplicaSet e2es should let the API server to generate the names to avoid collision while running tests in parallel.
cc @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41937, 41151, 42092, 40269, 42135)
Add a unit test for idempotent applys to the TPR entries.
The test in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
The apply operation expects a last-modified-configuration annotation.
That is written verbatim in the test/fixture file.
References #40841
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds one unit test for TPR's using applies.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
References:
https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/95https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40841#issue-204769102
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I am not super proud of the tpr-entry name.
But I feel like we need to call the two objects differently.
The one which has Kind:ThirdPartyResource
and the one has Kind:Foo.
Is the name "ThirdPartyResource" used interchangeably for both ? I used tpr-entry for the Kind:Foo object.
Also I !assume! this is testing an idempotent apply because the last-applied-configuration annotation is the same as the object itself.
This is the state I see in the logs of kubectl if I do a proper idempotent apply of a third party resource entry.
I guess I will know more once I start playing around with apply command that change TPR objects.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41234, 42186, 41615, 42028, 41788)
Additional upgrade e2e tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Add basic upgrade tests for DaemonSet and Job, and add "during upgrade" testing to ConfigMap test. Add a simple harness for testing upgrade tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**: continuation of #41296 @krousey please review, thanks
**Release note**: `NONE`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enforce Node Allocatable via cgroups
This PR enforces node allocatable across all pods using a top level cgroup as described in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/348
This PR also provides an option to enforce `kubeReserved` and `systemReserved` on user specified cgroups.
This PR will by default make kubelet create top level cgroups even if `kubeReserved` and `systemReserved` is not specified and hence `Allocatable = Capacity`.
```release-note
New Kubelet flag `--enforce-node-allocatable` with a default value of `pods` is added which will make kubelet create a top level cgroup for all pods to enforce Node Allocatable. Optionally, `system-reserved` & `kube-reserved` values can also be specified separated by comma to enforce node allocatable on cgroups specified via `--system-reserved-cgroup` & `--kube-reserved-cgroup` respectively. Note the default value of the latter flags are "".
This feature requires a **Node Drain** prior to upgrade failing which pods will be restarted if possible or terminated if they have a `RestartNever` policy.
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests
TODO:
- [x] Adjust effective Node Allocatable to subtract hard eviction thresholds
- [x] Add unit tests
- [x] Complete pending e2e tests
- [x] Manual testing
- [x] Get the proposal merged
@dashpole is working on adding support for evictions for enforcing Node allocatable more gracefully. That work will show up in a subsequent PR for v1.6
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41205, 42196, 42068, 41588, 41271)
Implements an upgrade test for Job
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements a cluster upgrade test for Job. Some functionality for Job testing has been moved from the e2e package to the framework package to facilitate code reuse between the e2e package and the upgrade package without introducing cyclic dependencies.
We need this PR to help automate the testing of cluster upgrades between versions.
**Release note**
```release-note
NONE
```
This changes the userspace proxy so that it cleans up its conntrack
settings when a service is removed (as the iptables proxy already
does). This could theoretically cause problems when a UDP service
as deleted and recreated quickly (with the same IP address). As
long as packets from the same UDP source IP and port were going to
the same destination IP and port, the the conntrack would apply and
the packets would be sent to the old destination.
This is astronomically unlikely if you did not specify the IP address
to use in the service, and even then, only happens with an "established"
UDP connection. However, in cases where a service could be "switched"
between using the iptables proxy and the userspace proxy, this case
becomes much more frequent.
Updates the dnsmasq cache/mux layer to be managed by dnsmasq-nanny.
dnsmasq-nanny manages dnsmasq based on values from the
kube-system:kube-dns configmap:
"stubDomains": {
"acme.local": ["1.2.3.4"]
},
is a map of domain to list of nameservers for the domain. This is used
to inject private DNS domains into the kube-dns namespace. In the above
example, any DNS requests for *.acme.local will be served by the
nameserver 1.2.3.4.
"upstreamNameservers": ["8.8.8.8", "8.8.4.4"]
is a list of upstreamNameservers to use, overriding the configuration
specified in /etc/resolv.conf.
The tests in apply_test follows the general pattern of other tests.
We load from a file in test/fixtures and mock the API server in the
function closure in the HttpClient call.
In PATCH request rount-tripper we check that the kubectl apply
implementation worked as expected.
References #40841
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41116, 41804, 42104, 42111, 42120)
make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Part of feature forgiveness implementation, make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Related Issue: #1574
Related PR: #39469
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
make kubectl taint command respect effect NoExecute
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41962, 42055, 42062, 42019, 42054)
Update flag to --check-version-skew instead of --check_version_skew
https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/2012
Also add a `--` to send the flags to kubetest without triggering a warning.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41962, 42055, 42062, 42019, 42054)
PV upgrade test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds a PV upgrade test to the new upgrade test framework. Before, this test had to be done manually. Currently the upgrade test framework only works on the GCE environment, so I plan to add support for other providers later. In order to write the test, I had to modify and refactor some volume test util libraries. I reran the impacted tests to make sure they still passed.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
It's probably easier to review the two commits separately. I split it up into the refactor changes, and the upgrade test changes.
**Release note**:
NONE
cc @saad-ali @krousey
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42044, 41694, 41927, 42050, 41987)
Use existing nginx image in the node
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fixes a test flake: `[k8s.io] Garbage collector should orphan pods created by rc if delete options say so`
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes#35771
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42044, 41694, 41927, 42050, 41987)
Add apply set-last-applied subcommand
implement part of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/287, will rebase after https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41699 got merged, EDIT: since bug output format has been confirmed, will update the behavior of output format soon
cc @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @AdoHe @pwittrock
```release-note
Support kubectl apply set-last-applied command to update the applied-applied-configuration annotation
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35408, 41915, 41992, 41964, 41925)
e2e/upgrade: add sysctls
Add sysctl upgrade tests.
How can these be effectively tested?
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41954, 40528, 41875, 41165, 41877)
Updating apiserver to return 202 when resource is being deleted asynchronously via cascading deletion
As per https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33196#issuecomment-278440622.
cc @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews @smarterclayton @caesarxuchao @bgrant0607 @kubernetes/api-reviewers
```release-note
Updating apiserver to return http status code 202 for a delete request when the resource is not immediately deleted because of user requesting cascading deletion using DeleteOptions.OrphanDependents=false.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
Optimization of on-wire information sent to scheduler extender interfaces that are stateful
The changes are to address the issue described in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40991
```release-note
Added support to minimize sending verbose node information to scheduler extender by sending only node names and expecting extenders to cache the rest of the node information
```
cc @ravigadde
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41994, 41969, 41997, 40952, 40576)
Guaranteed admission for Critical Pods
This is the first step in implementing node-level preemption for critical pods.
It defines the AdmissionFailureHandler interface, which allows callers, like the kubelet, to define how failed predicates are handled, and take steps to correct failures if necessary.
In the kubelet's implementation, it triggers preemption if the pod being admitted is critical, and if the only failed predicates are InsufficientResourceErrors, then it prempts (not yet implemented) other other pods to allow admission of the critical pod.
cc: @vishh
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41994, 41969, 41997, 40952, 40576)
Inode Eviction test Tests that Innocent pods are not evicted throughout test.
The current version of the inode eviction test only makes sure that the two abusive pods are evicted before the innocent pod. This change adds a check during the post-eviction monitoring period to ensure that the innocent pod is not evicted, even after the abusive pods.
This will likely result in a higher failure rate for this test, but since it is in the flaky test suite, this is not an issue.
This change should help give us a better perspective on eviction issues.
cc @Random-Liu @vishh @derekwaynecarr
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40932, 41896, 41815, 41309, 41628)
Modify CronJob API to add job history limits, cleanup jobs in controller
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As discussed in #34710: this adds two limits to `CronJobSpec`, to limit the number of finished jobs created by a CronJob to keep.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#34710
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
cc @soltysh, please have a look and let me know what you think -- I'll then add end to end testing and update the doc in a separate commit. What is the timeline to get this into 1.6?
The plan:
- [x] API changes
- [x] Changing versioned APIs
- [x] `types.go`
- [x] `defaults.go` (nothing to do)
- [x] `conversion.go` (nothing to do?)
- [x] `conversion_test.go` (nothing to do?)
- [x] Changing the internal structure
- [x] `types.go`
- [x] `validation.go`
- [x] `validation_test.go`
- [x] Edit version conversions
- [x] Edit (nothing to do?)
- [x] Run `hack/update-codegen.sh`
- [x] Generate protobuf objects
- [x] Run `hack/update-generated-protobuf.sh`
- [x] Generate json (un)marshaling code
- [x] Run `hack/update-codecgen.sh`
- [x] Update fuzzer
- [x] Actual logic
- [x] Unit tests
- [x] End to end tests
- [x] Documentation changes and API specs update in separate commit
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add configurable limits to CronJob resource to specify how many successful and failed jobs are preserved.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42106, 42094, 42069, 42098, 41852)
Pod deletion observation is flaking, increase timeout and debug more
We can afford to wait longer than 30 seconds, and we should be printing
more error and output information about the cause of the failure.
Fixes / triages #41902
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42106, 42094, 42069, 42098, 41852)
Add ncdc to test/OWNERS
**What this PR does / why we need it**: add me to test/OWNERS
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-testing-pr-reviews @smarterclayton @bgrant0607
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41854, 41801, 40088, 41590, 41911)
Add storage.k8s.io/v1 API
v1 API is direct copy of v1beta1 API. This v1 API gets installed and exposed in this PR, I tested that kubectl can create both v1beta1 and v1 StorageClass.
~~Rest of Kubernetes (controllers, examples,. tests, ...) still use v1beta1 API, I will update it when this PR gets merged as these changes would get lost among generated code.~~ Most parts use v1 API now, it would not compile / run tests without it.
**Release note**:
```
Kubernetes API storage.k8s.io for storage objects is now fully supported and is available as storage.k8s.io/v1. Beta version of the API storage.k8s.io/v1beta1 is still available in this release, however it will be removed in a future Kubernetes release.
Together with the API endpoint, StorageClass annotation "storageclass.beta.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" is deprecated and "storageclass.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" should be used instead to mark a default storage class. The beta annotation is still working in this release, however it won't be supported in the next one.
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Supports 'ensure exist' class addon in Addon-manager
Fixes#39561, fixes#37047 and fixes#36411. Depends on #40057.
This PR splits cluster addons into two categories:
- Reconcile: Addons that need to be reconciled (`kube-dns` for instance).
- EnsureExists: Addons that need to be exist but changeable (`default-storage-class`).
The behavior for the 'EnsureExists' class addon would be:
- Create it if not exist.
- Users could do any modification they want, addon-manager will not reconcile it.
- If it is deleted, addon-manager will recreate it with the given template.
- It will not be updated/clobbered during upgrade.
As Brian pointed out in [#37048/comment](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/37048#issuecomment-272510835), this may not be the best solution for addon-manager. Though #39561 needs to be fixed in 1.6 and we might not have enough bandwidth to do a big surgery.
@mikedanese @thockin
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-misc
---
Tasks for this PR:
- [x] Supports 'ensure exist' class addon and switch to use new labels in addon-manager.
- [x] Updates READMEs regarding the new behavior of addon-manager.
- [x] Updated `test/e2e/addon_update.go` to match the new behavior.
- [x] Go through all current addons and apply the new labels on them regarding what they need.
- [x] Bump addon-manager and update its template files.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41714, 41510, 42052, 41918, 31515)
Switch scheduler to use generated listers/informers
Where possible, switch the scheduler to use generated listers and
informers. There are still some places where it probably makes more
sense to use one-off reflectors/informers (listing/watching just a
single node, listing/watching scheduled & unscheduled pods using a field
selector).
I think this can wait until master is open for 1.7 pulls, given that we're close to the 1.6 freeze.
After this and #41482 go in, the only code left that references legacylisters will be federation, and 1 bit in a stateful set unit test (which I'll clean up in a follow-up).
@resouer I imagine this will conflict with your equivalence class work, so one of us will be doing some rebasing 😄
cc @wojtek-t @gmarek @timothysc @jayunit100 @smarterclayton @deads2k @liggitt @sttts @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
This PR is to modify the containerized mounter script to use chroot
instead of rkt fly. This will avoid the problem of possible large number
of mounts caused by rkt containers if they are not cleaned up.
Fix bash command's execution in MakePod().
Add isPriviledged as a parameter to MakePod().
Move PD utils to pv_util.go
Ran all the tests in pd.go, persistent_volumes.go,
persistent_volumes-disruptive.go.
These changes are needed for the PV upgrade test I am working on.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41667, 41820, 40910, 41645, 41361)
Switch admission to use shared informers
Originally part of #40097
cc @smarterclayton @derekwaynecarr @deads2k @liggitt @sttts @gmarek @wojtek-t @timothysc @lavalamp @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
node cache don't need to get all the information about every
candidate node. For huge clusters, sending full node information
of all nodes in the cluster on the wire every time a pod is scheduled
is expensive. If the scheduler is capable of caching node information
along with its capabilities, sending node name alone is sufficient.
These changes provide that optimization in a backward compatible way
- removed the inadvertent signature change of Prioritize() function
- added defensive checks as suggested
- added annotation specific test case
- updated the comments in the scheduler types
- got rid of apiVersion thats unused
- using *v1.NodeList as suggested
- backing out pod annotation update related changes made in the
1st commit
- Adjusted the comments in types.go and v1/types.go as suggested
in the code review
Where possible, switch the scheduler to use generated listers and
informers. There are still some places where it probably makes more
sense to use one-off reflectors/informers (listing/watching just a
single node, listing/watching scheduled & unscheduled pods using a field
selector).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41812, 41665, 40007, 41281, 41771)
Bump golang versions to 1.7.5
**What this PR does / why we need it**: While #41636 might not make it in until 1.7, this would bump current golang versions from 1.7.4 to 1.7.5 to integrate the fixes from that patch version. This would include, among other things, a fix to ensure cross-built binaries for darwin don't have certificate validation errors (golang/go#18688)
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: none
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Upgrade golang versions to 1.7.5
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41146, 41486, 41482, 41538, 41784)
Switch statefulset controller to shared informers
Originally part of #40097
I *think* the controller currently makes a deep copy of a StatefulSet before it mutates it, but I'm not 100% sure. For those who are most familiar with this code, could you please confirm?
@beeps @smarterclayton @ingvagabund @sttts @liggitt @deads2k @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews @timothysc @gmarek @wojtek-t
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41146, 41486, 41482, 41538, 41784)
Add apply view-last-applied subcommand
reopen pr https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40984, implement part of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/287
for now unit test all pass, the output looks like:
```console
shiywang@dhcp-140-33 template $ ./kubectl apply view last-applied deployment nginx-deployment
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
name: nginx-deployment
spec:
strategy: {}
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
containers:
- image: nginx:1.12.10
name: nginx
ports:
- containerPort: 80
resources: {}
status: {}
```
```release-note
Support new kubectl apply view-last-applied command for viewing the last configuration file applied
```
not sure if there is any flag I should updated or the some error handling I should changed.
will generate docs when you guys think is ok.
cc @pwittrock @jessfraz @AdoHe @ymqytw
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38957, 41819, 41851, 40667, 41373)
Move pvutil.go from e2e package to framework package
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR moves pvutil.go to the e2e/framework package.
I am working on a PV upgrade test, and would like to use some of the wrapper functions in pvutil.go. However, the upgrade test is in the upgrade package, and not the e2e package, and it cannot import the e2e package because it would create a circular dependency. So pvutil.go needs to be moved out of e2e in order to break the circular dependency. This is a refactoring name change, no logic has been modified.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38957, 41819, 41851, 40667, 41373)
Change taints/tolerations to api fields
This PR changes current implementation of taints and tolerations from annotations to API fields. Taint and toleration are now part of `NodeSpec` and `PodSpec`, respectively. The annotation keys: `scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/tolerations` and `scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/taints` have been removed.
**Release note**:
Pod tolerations and node taints have moved from annotations to API fields in the PodSpec and NodeSpec, respectively. Pod tolerations and node taints that are defined in the annotations will be ignored. The annotation keys: `scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/tolerations` and `scheduler.alpha.kubernetes.io/taints` have been removed.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Removes additional columns in test_owners.csv
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fixes a huge collection of typos with the number of columns in the CSV file that probably has broken the auto assign bot
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
None
**Release note**:
`NONE`
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41349, 41532, 41256, 41587, 41657)
Update kubectl in addon-manager to use HPA in autoscaling/v1
Addon-manager is broken since HPA objects were removed from extensions api group.
Came across the logs from [the latest addon-manager on Jenkins](https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce/4290/artifacts/bootstrap-e2e-master/kube-addon-manager.log):
```
INFO: == Entering periodical apply loop at 2017-02-16T17:33:37+0000 ==
error: error pruning namespaced object extensions/v1beta1, Kind=HorizontalPodAutoscaler: the server could not find the requested resource
WRN: == Failed to execute /usr/local/bin/kubectl apply --namespace=kube-system -f /etc/kubernetes/addons --prune=true -l kubernetes.io/cluster-service=true --recursive >/dev/null at 2017-02-16T17:33:38+0000. 2 tries remaining. ==
error: error pruning namespaced object extensions/v1beta1, Kind=HorizontalPodAutoscaler: the server could not find the requested resource
WRN: == Failed to execute /usr/local/bin/kubectl apply --namespace=kube-system -f /etc/kubernetes/addons --prune=true -l kubernetes.io/cluster-service=true --recursive >/dev/null at 2017-02-16T17:33:46+0000. 1 tries remaining. ==
error: error pruning namespaced object extensions/v1beta1, Kind=HorizontalPodAutoscaler: the server could not find the requested resource
WRN: == Failed to execute /usr/local/bin/kubectl apply --namespace=kube-system -f /etc/kubernetes/addons --prune=true -l kubernetes.io/cluster-service=true --recursive >/dev/null at 2017-02-16T17:33:53+0000. 0 tries remaining. ==
WRN: == Kubernetes addon update completed with errors at 2017-02-16T17:33:58+0000 ==
```
And notice this commit (f66679a4e9) came in two weeks ago, which removed HorizontalPodAutoscaler from extensions/v1beta1.
Addon-manager is now partially functioning that it could successfully create and update addons, but will fail to prune objects, which means upgrade tests may mostly fail.
Pushed another version of addon-manager with kubectl v1.6.0-alpha.2 ([release 2 days ago](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/releases/tag/v1.6.0-alpha.2)) for fixing, including below images:
- gcr.io/google-containers/kube-addon-manager:v6.4-alpha.2
- gcr.io/google-containers/kube-addon-manager-amd64:v6.4-alpha.2
- gcr.io/google-containers/kube-addon-manager-arm:v6.4-alpha.2
- gcr.io/google-containers/kube-addon-manager-arm64:v6.4-alpha.2
- gcr.io/google-containers/kube-addon-manager-ppc64le:v6.4-alpha.2
- gcr.io/google-containers/kube-addon-manager-s390x:v6.4-alpha.2
@mikedanese
cc @wojtek-t @shyamjvs
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41349, 41532, 41256, 41587, 41657)
Enable pod level cgroups by default
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
It enables pod level cgroups by default.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is intended to be enabled by default on 2/14/2017 per the plan outlined here:
https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/314
**Release note**:
```release-note
Each pod has its own associated cgroup by default.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41844, 41803, 39116, 41129, 41240)
NPD: Update NPD test.
For https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/issues/58.
Update NPD e2e test based on the new behavior.
Note that before merging this PR, we need to merge all pending PRs in npd, and release the v0.3.0-alpha.1 version of NPD.
/cc @dchen1107 @kubernetes/node-problem-detector-reviewers
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41844, 41803, 39116, 41129, 41240)
Allow for not-ready pods in large clusters
This is to workaround issues with non-starting pods in large clusters in roughly 1/3rd of runs.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41844, 41803, 39116, 41129, 41240)
test: fetch updated deployment before finding new and old rss
@krousey @janetkuo ptal
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41518
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41364, 40317, 41326, 41783, 41782)
Debug what is hapening in large clusters
What I'm seeing in large clusters is:
```
I0219 19:34:29.994] [90m/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/secrets.go:44[0m
I0219 19:34:29.994] [90m------------------------------[0m
I0219 21:27:11.421] Dumping master and node logs to /workspace/_artifacts
I0219 21:27:11.422] Master SSH not supported for gke
```
i have no idea what is happening during those 2 hours, and would like to understand this.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Federation] Modify the comments in Federation E2E tests to use standard Go conventions for documentation comments
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41709, 41685, 41754, 41759, 37237)
Projected volume plugin
This is a WIP volume driver implementation as noted in the commit for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35313.
change to GetOriginalConfiguration
add bazel
refactor apply view-last-applied command
update some changes
minor change
add unit tests, update
update some codes and genreate docs
update LongDesc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41706, 39063, 41330, 41739, 41576)
[Kubemark] Add option to log hollow-node logs
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41613
Added an option to log kubemark hollow-node logs which includes kubelet, kubeproxy and npd logs for each hollow-node.
Setting the env var `ENABLE_HOLLOW_NODE_LOGS=true` should now enable logging for tests.
cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc @wojtek-t @gmarek @yujuhong @Random-Liu
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41421, 41440, 36765, 41722)
Use watch param instead of deprecated /watch/ prefix
Switches clients to use watch param instead of /watch/ prefix
```release-note
Clients now use the `?watch=true` parameter to make watch API calls, instead of the `/watch/` path prefix
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41421, 41440, 36765, 41722)
ResourceQuota ability to support default limited resources
Add support for the ability to configure the quota system to identify specific resources that are limited by default. A limited resource means its consumption is denied absent a covering quota. This is in contrast to the current behavior where consumption is unlimited absent a covering quota. Intended use case is to allow operators to restrict consumption of high-cost resources by default.
Example configuration:
**admission-control-config-file.yaml**
```
apiVersion: apiserver.k8s.io/v1alpha1
kind: AdmissionConfiguration
plugins:
- name: "ResourceQuota"
configuration:
apiVersion: resourcequota.admission.k8s.io/v1alpha1
kind: Configuration
limitedResources:
- resource: pods
matchContains:
- pods
- requests.cpu
- resource: persistentvolumeclaims
matchContains:
- .storageclass.storage.k8s.io/requests.storage
```
In the above configuration, if a namespace lacked a quota for any of the following:
* cpu
* any pvc associated with particular storage class
The attempt to consume the resource is denied with a message stating the user has insufficient quota for the matching resources.
```
$ kubectl create -f pvc-gold.yaml
Error from server: error when creating "pvc-gold.yaml": insufficient quota to consume: gold.storageclass.storage.k8s.io/requests.storage
$ kubectl create quota quota --hard=gold.storageclass.storage.k8s.io/requests.storage=10Gi
$ kubectl create -f pvc-gold.yaml
... created
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix kubemark default e2e test suite's name
Seems like the suite "[Feature:performance]" doesn't trigger tests anymore. Changed it to "[Feature:Performance]" in kubemark run-e2e-tests.sh.
cc @wojtek-t @gmarek
Shyam Jeedigunta