Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41709, 41685, 41754, 41759, 37237)
kubeadm: Add the --use-service-account-credentials to controller-manager
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As outlined in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PqI--ql3LQsA69fEvRq1nQWgiIoE5Dyftja5Um9ML7Q/edit, the controller-manager should run with `--use-service-account-credentials` for new clusters.
Also removing a totally unnecessary flag
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@dmmcquay @deads2k @liggitt @mikedanese
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Hide the unnecessary --fuzz-iters flag
super straightforward. We don't want this flag to leak into our UX.
cc @jbeda @dmmcquay @deads2k
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41420, 41500)
Set OrphanDependents=&falseVar so the GC will (or should) remove the dummy Pod
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/149
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This doesn't remove the Pod yet, only the ReplicaSet, but once the GC is working as expected, it'll remove the Pod with this configuration
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@errordeveloper @mikedanese @pires @caesarxuchao @krmayankk @kargakis
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38101, 41431, 39606, 41569, 41509)
kubeadm: Reorder the token packages more logically
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
In order to be able to implement https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41417, the token functionality (which now is spread across the codebase), should be in two places: a generic token functions library, which in the future _may_ [move into client-go](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41281#discussion_r101357106) in some form, and a package for the token handling against the api server.
This commit has no large functional changes.
```
kubeadm: Aggregate the token functionality in sane packages.
- Factor out token constants to kubeadmconstants.
- Move cmd/kubeadm/app/util/{,token/}tokens.go
- Use the token-id, token-secret, etc constants provided by the bootstrapapi package
- Move cmd/kubeadm/app/master/tokens.go to cmd/kubeadm/app/phases/token/csv.go
This refactor basically makes it possible to hook up kubeadm to the BootstrapSigner controller later on
```
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@mikedanese @pires @errordeveloper @dmmcquay @jbeda @GheRivero
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41505, 41484, 41544, 41514, 41022)
add front proxy to kubeadm created kube-apiservers
The front proxy authenticator configuration has been in a release or two. It allows a front proxy (secured by mutual TLS auth) to provide user information for a request. The kube-aggregator uses this to securely terminate authentication (has to terminate TLS and thus client-certs) and communicate user info to backing API servers.
Since the kube-apiserver always verifies the front-proxy via a client certificate, this isn't open for abuse unless you already have access to either the signing key or client cert which kubeadm creates locally. If you got there, you already owned the box. Therefore, this adds the authenticator unconditionally.
@luxas Are there e2e tests for `kubeadm`?
@liggitt @kubernetes/sig-auth-misc
- Factor out token constants to kubeadmconstants.
- Move cmd/kubeadm/app/util/{,token/}tokens.go
- Use the token-id, token-secret, etc constants provided by the bootstrapapi package
- Move cmd/kubeadm/app/master/tokens.go to cmd/kubeadm/app/phases/token/csv.go
This refactor basically makes it possible to hook up kubeadm to the BootstrapSigner controller later on
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41466, 41456, 41550, 41238, 41416)
add check to authorization config
Prompt user to create the config when using abac/webhook.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41104, 41245, 40722, 41439, 41502)
Bump the minimum kubeadm control plane version to v1.6.0-alpha.2
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There went in quite a lot of useful features into v1.6.0-alpha.2 that kubeadm will use.
This bump the minimum limit so we can depend on those features.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@mikedanese @errordeveloper @pires @dmmcquay @dgoodwin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41104, 41245, 40722, 41439, 41502)
add sample fuzzing tests
Make fuzzing tests as simple as possible from both the API installer and the scheme, so its easy to add for api groups and so that I can build a scheme and then make sure I got it right.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews @sttts @mikedanese
Some imports dont exist yet (or so it seems) in client-go (examples
being:
- "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/api/validation"
- "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/initsystem"
- "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/node"
one change in kubelet to import to client-go
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41360, 41423, 41430, 40647, 41352)
move kubeadm api group testing to kubeadm package
I think this is sufficient to at least preserve round trip testing.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: add dmmcquay as a reviewer
**What this PR does / why we need it**: add dmmcquay (myself) as a reviewer to kubeadm.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41216, 41362, 41275, 41277, 41412)
kubeadm: test-cmd: join{config, discovery}
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Adding test-cmds for kubeadm join {config, discovery}. Will followup with more test-cmds for other flags as soon as validation for the flags works.
Adding tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41216, 41362, 41275, 41277, 41412)
kubeadm: test-cmd: init{config, version, api-port}
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Adding test-cmds for kubeadm init {config, version, api-port}. Will followup with more test-cmds for other flags as soon as validation for the flags works.
Adding tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41216, 41362, 41275, 41277, 41412)
kubeadm: added unit tests for discovery pkg
**What this PR does / why we need it**: added tests to discovery pkg and raised coverage from ~25% to ~71%.
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: test-cmd: token{delete}
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Adding test-cmds for kubeadm ex token delete. Will followup with more test-cmds for other flags as soon as validation for the flags works.
Adding tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41382, 41407, 41409, 41296, 39636)
Update the DNS spec from upstream
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Updates kubeadm to use the latest DNS spec.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@bowei @MrHohn @thockin In the future, kubedns changes should be applied to this kubeadm file as well
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@pires @errordeveloper @dmmcquay @mikedanese
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41337, 41375, 41363, 41034, 41350)
kubeadm: adding tests for util/tokens.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**: added tests to util pkg and raised coverage from ~48% to ~67%. Will get better coverage once migration to client-go is complete. Included a fix for a logic error in tokens.go found through writing tests
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41342, 41257, 41295, 41367, 41230)
kubeadm: unit tests for apis/kubeadm/validation
**What this PR does / why we need it**: added tests to apis/kubeadm/validation pkg and raised coverage from ~21% to 100%.
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41259, 41260)
kubeadm: changed manifest files to yaml
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Static Pods are currently stored as .json files in /etc/kubernetes/manifests. This PR instead writes them as YAML, as requested by the SIG.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes #https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/153
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38252, 41122, 36101, 41017, 41264)
Fix cluster-cidr flag
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fixes the kube-proxy daemonset config when using the `pod-network-cidr flag`. The return value of `getClusterCIDR` should be prefixed with a `-`.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
None
@luxas
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38252, 41122, 36101, 41017, 41264)
BootstrapSigner and TokenCleaner controllers
This is part of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/130 and is an implementation of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/189.
Work that needs to be done yet in this PR:
* [ ] ~~e2e tests~~ Will come in new PR.
* [x] flag to disable this by default
```release-note
Native support for token based bootstrap flow. This includes signing a well known ConfigMap in the `kube-public` namespace and cleaning out expired tokens.
```
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle @dgoodwin @roberthbailey @mikedanese
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41223, 40892, 41220, 41207, 41242)
kubeadm: preflight should only warn about unresolvable hostnames
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is quite often the case on AWS, and we really don't care if
the hostname is resolvable or not. It's not an easy requirement
to ask user to fix, and there is no functional penalty at the
Kubernetes level, also it's possible that users fixes their host
resolution eventually, we don't have to make them do so.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: @dmmcquay @luxas PTAL 👍
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40796, 40878, 36033, 40838, 41210)
kubeadm: added tests for preflight checks
**What this PR does / why we need it**: There hadn't been much care to add more unit tests as more preflight checks were added. I added tests that increased coverage from ~9% to ~71%
Adding unit tests is a WIP from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This is quite often the case on AWS, and we really don't care if
the hostname is resolvable or not. It's not an easy problem
to ask user to fix, and there is no functional penalty at the
Kubernetes level, also it's possible that users fixes their host
resolution eventually, we don't have to make them do so.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40917, 41181, 41123, 36592, 41183)
fix ca cert in kubeadm
[certificates] Valid certificates and keys now exist in "/etc/kubernetes/pki"
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41074, 41147, 40854, 41167, 40045)
kubeadm: adding integration tests for init
**What this PR does / why we need it**: integration tests for kubeadm init focused on valid and invalid discovery tokens
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
This was taken from Pires's work in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40008 . This is just the testing aspect of it
As it stands, these tests will never complete. The reason being is once it passes with a valid discovery token, it will wait until `[apiclient] Created API client, waiting for the control plane to become ready ` which is an infinite poll (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/cmd/kubeadm/app/master/apiclient.go#L71).
This is a WIP
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40175, 41107, 41111, 40893, 40919)
kubeadm: skip integration tests if kubeadm-cmd-skip flag passed
Will skip integration tests for token generation if it can't find a file by the given --kubeadm-path or default value.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Tests would fail if just running `go test` in the dir because it expects to have more values. This won't change the behavior of `make test-cmd` which gets run here:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/Makefile#L258
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#40155
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @pires @pipejakob @liggitt
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41061, 40888, 40664, 41020, 41085)
kubeadm: Small cleanup and fixes, validate the service subnet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Validate the minimum subnet cidr so there are always 10 available addresses
- Remove an old proxy arg function, add clustercidr to the proxy manifest and automatically calculate the dns ip
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@errordeveloper @pires @mikedanese @dmmcquay @dgoodwin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41061, 40888, 40664, 41020, 41085)
kubeadm: added tests cert/pkiutil pkg
raised coverage from ~37% to ~77%
**What this PR does / why we need it**: added tests to cert/pkiutil pkg and raised coverage from ~37% to ~77%
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41064, 41090, 41068, 41073, 40882)
kubeadm: updated tests in app/util pkg
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Tests did not follow the standard of being table driven. Updated to make future changes (Adding/deleting tests) easier as well as more readable
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
After today's SIG meeting, it was discussed how to proceed with these
types of test-cmd tests. They will live in kubeamd/test/cmd and will
provide a flag that will allow you to skip them (--kubeadm-cmd-skip) and
by default will fail if kubeadm binary is not present
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40385, 40786, 40999, 41026, 40996)
kubeadm: change os.Remove to os.RemoveAll
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This would not correctly clean out the tmp dir, since os.Remove doesn't recursively remove dirs, which could exist in the tmp dir.
Unit tests are a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39681, 39321, 41018, 40883)
kubeadm: app/util/template.go has unit tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**: There was a TODO tag about adding unit tests, but unit tests have been added and the coverage for that file is ~90%. Tag should be removed.
Adding unit tests is a WIP from #34136
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Kubeadm discovery remove error passing
**What this PR does / why we need it**: In the app/discovery there is some confusion about the passing of error values created in the discovery/token, discovery/https/ and discovery/file pkgs. Since they always return `nil` , it was very confusing in discovery/flags.go why to propagate them up as if there was a chance for them to return a value other than `nil`. This change makes it much more clear what is being passed.
I noticed this as I was making a sweep through trying to add more unit tests and it was very confusing to read the code.
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes #https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/141
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @pires
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: fix reset error logging.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: while investigating https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/142 I realized error logging was misleading. This PR is meant to fix it.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Refactoring the apiconfig and addons phases
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
First commit: Fix the defaulting for AuthorizationMode - **Ready for review**
Second commit: Refactoring the apiconfig and addons phases in kubeadm - **work in progress, broken at the moment**
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please take a look at the first commit now. You can also see the direction I'm going with the addons and apiconfig phases.
For example, I'm using Go templates instead of creating native Go structs for kube-dns and kube-proxy now. The question is if I should do it for the RBAC rules as well, it might make sense there as well.
Converting the dns addon to a yaml spec makes it 100x easier to maintain when changes are made to the "upstream" DNS spec, and also more swappable. We could for instance have a configuration param for it for those who want a custom file, etc.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@mikedanese @pires @lukemarsden @errordeveloper @dgoodwin @liggitt @andrewrynhard
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40574, 40806, 40308, 40771, 39440)
kubeadm: kube-proxy needs to know the pod subnet CIDR
**What this PR does / why we need it**: `kube-proxy` 1.5 has a new flag `cluster-cidr` that isn't specified by `kubeadm`, thus resulting in bug https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/102.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/102
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @luxas @dmmcquay
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40574, 40806, 40308, 40771, 39440)
kubeadm: preflight check for incorrect FQDN
**What this PR does / why we need it**: There are a variety of system configuration errors (such as cloud-init bugs when deploying on AWS) which can cause hostname and uname -n to be wrong for a given host. This will cause kubeadm setup to fail in interesting and hard-to-figure-out ways (it doesn't fail until you start trying to set up DNS on the master, for example).
This PR adds a preflight check to test whether or not the server can reach itself using that name. This does not catch the case that the FQDN belongs to a different but valid server, but it would catch some of the cases.
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/135
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Move some code from apiclient.go to the dedicated apiconfig phase
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add constants and somewhat refactor the RBAC code as well + some cleanup.
I'm planning to rewrite the code in `setupmaster.go` later, but this PR has only the move of the code for easier reviewing.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is broken out from: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40556
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@mikedanese @pires @dmmcquay @dgoodwin
Lucas Käldström