Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51628, 51637, 51490, 51279, 51302)
Fix iSCSI WaitForAttach not mounting a volume
WaitForAttach failed consistently with this error:
```
Heuristic determination of mount point failed:stat /var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/iscsi/iface-default/10.128.0.3:3260-iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.f21.x8664:sn.4b0aae584f7c-lun-0: no such file or directory
```
We should ignore "no such file or directory" eror, the directory is created just few lines below.
Fixes: #51625
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig storage
/assign @mtanino
WaitForAttach failed consistently with this error:
Heuristic determination of mount point failed:stat /var/lib/kubelet/plugins/kubernetes.io/iscsi/iface-default/10.128.0.3:3260-iqn.2003-01.org.linux-iscsi.f21.x8664:sn.4b0aae584f7c-lun-0: no such file or directory
We should ignore "no such file or directory" eror, the directory is created
just few lines below.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51439, 51361, 51140, 51539, 51585)
Iscsi handle failed mount
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#50556
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix swallowed error in iscsi package
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Fixes a swallowed error in the iscsi package.
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51108, 51035, 50539, 51160, 50947)
iscsi: Use VolumeHost.GetExec() to execute stuff in volume plugins
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR updates iSCSI volume plugin to use `VolumeHost.GetExec()` to execute utilities like mkfs and lsblk instead of simple `os/exec`. This prepares the volume plugin to run these utilities in containers instead of running them on the host + makes the volume plugin more independent and less hardcoded.
See proposal in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/589.
Note that this PR does **not** change place where the utilities are executed - `VolumeHost.GetExec()` still leads directly to `os/exec`. It will be changed when the aforementioned proposal is merged and implemented.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38947, 50239, 51115, 51094, 51116)
Call Fatalf instead of Errorf when mounter/unmounter is nil in volume tests
If we get a nil mounter or unmounter, a panic will occur. Should call `Fatalf` instead of `Errorf`.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50806, 48789, 49922, 49935, 50438)
iSCSI volume plugin: iSCSI initiatorname support
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds iSCSI initiatorname parameter to ISCSIVolumeSource to enable automatic configuration of initiator name per volume. This would allow for more fine grained configuration, and remove the need to configure the initiator name on the host by administrator.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#47311
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @rootfs @jsafrane @msau42
**Release note**:
```
iSCSI volume plugin: Support customization of iSCSI initiator name per volume
```
This PR adds iSCSI initiatorname parameter to ISCSIVolumeSource
to enable automatic configuration of initiator name per volume.
This would allow for more fine grained configuration, and remove
the need to configure the initiator name on the host by
administrator.
fixes: #47311
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47619, 47951, 46260, 48277)
iSCSi plugin: Remove redundant nil check
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This patch is for cleanup of redundant nil check in iSCSI plugin.
This was mentioned at the code review on origin github thread.
https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/14565
**Which issue this PR fixes**
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
If iscsiTransport is not tcp, iSCSI plugin tries to
find devicepath using filepath.Glob but never updates
devicepath with the filepath.Glob result.
This patch fixes the problem.
Fixes#47253
When using iscsi storage with multiple target portal (TP)
addresses and multipathing the volume manager logs on to
the IQN for all portal addresses, but when a pod gets
destroyed the volume manager only logs out for the primary
TP and sessions for another TPs are always remained.
This patch adds methods to store and load iscsi disk
configrations, then uses the stored config at DetachDisk
path.
Fix#45394
This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/volume
cc @jsafrane @spothanis @agonzalezro @justinsb @johscheuer @simonswine @nelcy @pmorie @quofelix @sdminonne @thockin @saad-ali @rootfs
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)