- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
This will allow for kube-proxy to be run without `privileged` and
with only adding the capability `NET_ADMIN`.
Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <acidburn@microsoft.com>
The requested Service Protocol is checked against the supported protocols of GCE Internal LB. The supported protocols are TCP and UDP.
SCTP is not supported by OpenStack LBaaS. If SCTP is requested in a Service with type=LoadBalancer, the request is rejected. Comment style is also corrected.
SCTP is not allowed for LoadBalancer Service and for HostPort. Kube-proxy can be configured not to start listening on the host port for SCTP: see the new SCTPUserSpaceNode parameter
changed the vendor github.com/nokia/sctp to github.com/ishidawataru/sctp. I.e. from now on we use the upstream version.
netexec.go compilation fixed. Various test cases fixed
SCTP related conformance tests removed. Netexec's pod definition and Dockerfile are updated to expose the new SCTP port(8082)
SCTP related e2e test cases are removed as the e2e test systems do not support SCTP
sctp related firewall config is removed from cluster/gce/util.sh. Variable name sctp_addr is corrected to sctpAddr in pkg/proxy/ipvs/proxier.go
cluster/gce/util.sh is copied from master
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66491, 66587, 66856, 66657, 66923). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
optimize ipvs get nodeIP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Optimize ipvs get nodeIP.
The original ipvs `NodeIPs` need first get all local type address to set1, then get address of dummy device `kube-ipvs0` to set2, then do diff of set1 and set2 to get local addresses we need.
This work gonna result in unnecessary resource consumption, especially for large cluster, will have lots address in dummy device `kube-ipvs0`.
This pr optimized the workaround.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
ipvs: add addrtype match for nodeport
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
before this PR:
```
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-TCP dst -j KUBE-NODE-PORT
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes service cluster ip + port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j ACCEPT
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port with externalTrafficPolicy=local" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-LOCAL-TCP dst -j RETURN
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
```
after this PR:
```
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port with externalTrafficPolicy=local" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-LOCAL-TCP dst -j RETURN
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-TCP dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes service cluster ip + port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j ACCEPT
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m addrtype --dst-type LOCAL -j KUBE-NODE-PORT
```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65459
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
manually tested cases:
- ClusterIP distributed to pod on same node
- ClusterIP distributed to pod on other node
- NodePort distributed to pod on same node
- NodePort distributed to pod on other node
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66136, 64999, 65425, 66120, 66074). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Not step into ipvs.CleanupLeftovers() if canUseIPVS's false
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Earlier we decide whether we should clean up the left-over ipvs rules inside `ipvs.CleanupLeftovers()`, therefore we call function `ipvs.CanUseIPVSProxier()` two times (and `GetModules()` two times). Actually no need to step into `ipvs.CleanupLeftovers()` if `canUseIPVS` is false.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66064, 66040). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix Local externalTrafficPolicy is not respected for ipvs NodePort
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Local externalTrafficPolicy is not respected for ipvs NodePort.
This PR fixes it.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66062
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Manually tested accessing NodePort with externalTrafficPolicy=Local and externalTrafficPolicy=Cluster.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.
Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
applied ammend for:
pkg/cloudprovider/provivers/vsphere/nodemanager.go
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add cleanLegacyBindAddr
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65263
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
To fix the issue,
use `activeBindAddrs` map which represents ip address successfully bind to DefaultDummyDevice in the round of sync
use `currentBindAddrs` map which represents ip addresses bind to DefaultDummyDevice from the system
create a function `cleanLegacyBindAddr` to unbind address which is in `currentBindAddrs` map but not in `activeBindAddrs` map
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig network
/area kube-proxy
Duplicated masq rules are created by current implementation:
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -m comment --comment "mark MASQ for
externaltrafficpolicy=cluster" -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
The last one is always there. So the one inside if statement could
just be removed.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix bug excludeCIDRs was not assign in func NewProxier
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix bug excludeCIDRs was not assign in func NewProxier
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Init ipvsInterface only when ipvs modules are present
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#61074
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64034, 64072, 64146, 64059, 64161). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix session affinity for LoadBalancer service with ESIPP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix session affinity for LoadBalancer service with ESIPP
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#63351
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
In cases that loadbalancer type service with externaltrafficpolicy=local and session-affinity specified, traffic to loadbalancer should only route to backends that in the same node with kube-proxy.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Enable checking whether ipvs modules are built-in or not
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Enable checking whether ipvs modules are built-in or not.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#63801
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Laurent Bernaille