Automatic merge from submit-queue
Let load and density e2e tests use GC if it's on
I've run the 100 and 500 nodes tests and they both pass.
The test-infra half of the PR is https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/pull/369
cc @lavalamp
The test tries to launch a pod with an anti-affinity annotation, waits 10
seconds and then checks that it is still pending.
But the anti-affinity annotation does not forbid to launch that pod on just
another node that does not have the zone label at all.
This commit changes this behavior by labeling two nodes with the zone label
and then forcing the pod to be launched on one of those two nodes.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Limit number of pods spawned in SchedulerPredicates validates resourc…
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/29190,
With this patch test should spawn at most 10 pods on the smallest node.
Add min size of pod and max number of pods for SchedulerPredicates validate resouce limits test
Fix typo in patch for SchedulerPredicates validate resouce limits test
Moving max number of pods and min pod cpu request to constants
bindata and yaml, Gobindata automation
bindata utils for generating, go generate
match server version
gitignore for dirty, ca, rbase, KUBE_ROOT, buildfix
(rebased jul-25,29)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Rework pod waiting mechanism in e2e tests to accept pod and watch based
This PR re-applies #28212 which was reverted in #29223. The only difference is that the initial PR contained also `PodStartTimeout` shortening (see [here](4b0c0bd924)) which might caused the problems. Let's give it a 2nd try. I've tested all the flakes and they were passing on my machine.
@smarterclayton @apelisse ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
use regular client instead of kubectl in scheduler predicate tests when checking/setting/cleanning taints/labels
The existing implementation in scheduler predicate tests uses kubectl to check/set/clean taints/labels on node, which makes the test very related to kubectl.
This PR is to use regular client instead.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Switched watches in tests require ResourceVersion to be passed
For testing the Watches are not sufficient in that it might miss the event of transitioning a Pod from one state to another which might happen before we start Watching events. To remedy this, I'm proposing to switch to Gets to always read the actual state of a Pod.
@smarterclayton this fixes https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/9192 and hopefully all `gave up waiting for pod...` flakes
[]()
Automatic merge from submit-queue
e2e.framework.util.StartPods: panic if the number or replicas is zero
The number of pods to start must be non-zero.
Otherwise the function waits for pods forever if ``waitForRunning`` is true.
It the number of replicas is zero, panic so the mistake is heard all over the e2e realm.
Update all callers of StartPods to test for non-zero number of replicas.
The number of pods to start must be non-zero.
Otherwise the function waits for pods forever if waitForRunning is true.
It the number of replicas is zero, panic so the mistake is heard all over the e2e realm.
Update all callers of StartPods to test for non-zero number of replicas.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use pause image depending on the server's platform when testing
Removed all pause image constant strings, now the pause image is chosen by arch. Part of the effort of making e2e arch-agnostic.
The pause image name and version is also now only in two places, and it's documented to bump both
Also removed "amd64" constants in the code. Such constants should be replaced by `runtime.GOARCH` or by looking up the server platform
Fixes: #22876 and #15140
Makes it easier for: #25730
Related: #17981
This is for `v1.3`
@ixdy @thockin @vishh @kubernetes/sig-testing @andyzheng0831 @pensu
Many tests expect all kube-system pods to be running and ready. The newly
added image prepull add-on pod can in the "succeeded" state. This commit fixes
the tests to allow kube-system pods to be succeeded.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
SchedulerPredicates e2e test: be more verbose about requested resource
When ``validates resource limits of pods that are allowed to run [Conformance]`` test is run, logs could give more information about requested resource and say it is for cpu and in mili units.
cpu is stored in m units here:
```
nodeToCapacityMap[node.Name] = capacity.MilliValue()
```
Kubernetes Submit Queue