Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/api
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Contination of #1111
I tried to keep this PR down to just a simple search-n-replace to keep
things simple. I may have gone too far in some spots but its easy to
roll those back if needed.
I avoided renaming `contrib/mesos/pkg/minion` because there's already
a `contrib/mesos/pkg/node` dir and fixing that will require a bit of work
due to a circular import chain that pops up. So I'm saving that for a
follow-on PR.
I rolled back some of this from a previous commit because it just got
to big/messy. Will follow up with additional PRs
Signed-off-by: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Before this change we have a mish-mash of ways to pass field names around for
error generation. Sometimes string fieldnames, sometimes .Prefix(), sometimes
neither, often wrong names or not indexed when it should be.
Instead of that mess, this is part one of a couple of commits that will make it
more strongly typed and hopefully encourage correct behavior. At least you
will have to think about field names, which is better than nothing.
It turned out to be really hard to do this incrementally.
All external types that are not int64 are now marked as int32,
including
IntOrString. Prober is now int32 (43 years should be enough of an initial
probe time for anyone).
Did not change the metadata fields for now.
When etcd is down today we don't specifically handle the error involved,
which means clients get a generic 500 error. This commit adds a formal
error type internally for both WatchExpired and EtcdUnreachable, and
then converts them to api/errors before returning to the client. It also
upgrades the client to retry on any 429 or 5xx error that has a
Retry-After header, instead of just 429.
In combination, this allows the apiserver to exert backpressure on
controllers that are hotlooping. Picked 2 seconds by default, but we
could potentially ramp that up even further in a future iteration.
deads2k