Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54572, 54686). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix service session affinity e2e failure cases
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix service session affinity e2e failure cases - debuging...
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
xref #54571#54524
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig network
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54728, 54818). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Metadata concealment e2e
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Add e2e for metadata concealment. Ref #8867.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54165, 53909). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add conformance test test.
Add new `test/conformance` subdir, add code to generate a list of conformance tests, and add a test that verifies the list of tests.
The intent is to move management of the definition of conformance to sig-architecture.
```release-note
NONE
```
ref. #54726
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54331, 54655, 54320, 54639, 54288). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Ability to do object count quota for all namespaced resources
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Defines syntax for generic object count quota `count/<resource>.<group>`
- Migrates existing objects to support new syntax with old syntax
- Adds support to quota all standard namespace resources
- Updates the controller to do discovery and replenishment on those resources
- Updates unit tests
- Tweaks admission configuration around quota
- Add e2e test for replicasets (demonstrate dynamic generic counting)
```
$ kubectl create quota test --hard=count/deployments.extensions=2,count/replicasets.extensions=4,count/pods=3,count/secrets=4
resourcequota "test" created
$ kubectl run nginx --image=nginx --replicas=2
$ kubectl describe quota
Name: test
Namespace: default
Resource Used Hard
-------- ---- ----
count/deployments.extensions 1 2
count/pods 2 3
count/replicasets.extensions 1 4
count/secrets 1 4
```
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
- simple object count quotas no longer require writing code
- deferring support for custom resources pending investigation about how to share caches with garbage collector. in addition, i would like to see how this integrates with downstream quota usage in openshift.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Object count quotas supported on all standard resources using `count/<resource>.<group>` syntax
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
convert testFailedDeployment e2e test to integration test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR convert a deployment e2e test named "testFailedDeployment" to integration test.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: xref #52113
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53730, 51608, 54459, 54534, 54585). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add probe, pre_stop, and networking related container annotations.
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
Add probe, pre_stop, and networking related container annotations.
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds probe, pre_stop, and networking related conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the pod based e2e conformance tests.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53730, 51608, 54459, 54534, 54585). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add conformance annotations for projected volume tests
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
Add projected volume related conformance annotations
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds projected volume related related conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the pod based e2e conformance tests.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54112, 54150, 53816, 54321, 54338). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add service latency and secret related conformance annotations
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds service latency and secret related conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the pod based e2e conformance tests.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54112, 54150, 53816, 54321, 54338). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add conformance annotations for expansion and service tests
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds expansion and service test conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the pod based e2e conformance tests.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54112, 54150, 53816, 54321, 54338). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove federation
This PR removes the federation codebase and associated tooling from the tree.
The first commit just removes the `federation` path and should be uncontroversial. The second commit removes references and associated tooling and suggests careful review.
Requirements for merge:
- [x] Bazel jobs no longer hard-code federation as a target ([test infra #4983](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/pull/4983))
- [x] `federation-e2e` jobs are not run by default for k/k
**Release note**:
```release-note
Development of Kubernetes Federation has moved to github.com/kubernetes/federation. This move out of tree also means that Federation will begin releasing separately from Kubernetes. The impact of this is Federation-specific behavior will no longer be included in kubectl, kubefed will no longer be released as part of Kubernetes, and the Federation servers will no longer be included in the hyperkube binary and image.
```
cc: @kubernetes/sig-multicluster-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-testing-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54455, 54431). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add conformance annotations for proxy and scheduler predicate tests
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds proxy and scheduler predicate related conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the pod based e2e conformance tests.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54455, 54431). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Migrate cluster dns test to sig network
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Just migrate dns relevant e2e test files to sig network.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Ref Umbrella issue #49161
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53000, 52870, 53569). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fallback to internal addrs in e2e tests when no external addrs available
This change modifies the way that config.NodeIP is selected at the
start of e2e Networking tests such that if no external addresses are
available from the cloud provider (e.g. either no cloud provider being
used [baremetal or VMs], or the provider doesn't have external IPs
configured), then one of the internal addresses is used.
Without this change, the e2e service-related Networking tests will always
panic when config.ExternalAddrs[0] is accessed and the slice is empty.
This change eliminates the panic, and in some setups, the fallback choice
of using an internal address will provide the necessary connectivity
for the e2e Networking tests to access each node.
fixes#53568
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This change modifies the way that config.NodeIP is selected at the
start of e2e Networking tests such that if no external addresses are
available from the cloud provider (e.g. either no cloud provider being
used [baremetal or VMs], or the provider doesn't have external IPs
configured), then one of the internal addresses is used.
Without this change, the e2e service-related Networking tests will always
panic when no cloud provider is being used, or the cloud provider does
not have external addresses configured.
This change eliminates the panic, and in some setups, the fallback choice
of using an internal address will provide the necessary connectivity
for the e2e Networking tests to access each node.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#53568
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54593, 54607, 54539, 54105). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Move deployment e2e test for hash label adoption to integration
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: #52113
**Special notes for your reviewer**: depends on #53918
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53760, 48996, 51267, 54414). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix CI error for service session affinity
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix CI error for service session affinity -- debug
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes#53741
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I remove the [slow] tag so that these test cases can be run in PR request. We may need to add back the [slow] tag when this PR is ready to get in.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52868, 53196, 54207). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
eviction/detach test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
e2e test for detach after a pod is evicted.
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes#52676
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @jingxu97 @copejon
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54107, 54184, 54377, 54094, 54111). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add e2e tests for NEG
This PR includes tests:
- ingress conformance test
- scaling up and down backends
- switching backend between IG and NEG
- rolling update backend should not cause service disruption
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54107, 54184, 54377, 54094, 54111). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix detach metric flake by not using exact equals
Also poll for detach value increase.
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/52871
I have ran these tests for more than 3 hours in a tight loop and did not see it flake. The changes here include dropping exact equality test and making sure we poll for increase in detach metric count.
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54270, 54479). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Delete maxNumPVs and maxNumPVCs const of persistent_volume.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
the two const of maxNumPVs and maxNumPVCs haven't used and delete it!
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54229, 54380, 54302, 54454). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Speed up volume tests by reducing pod grace period
busybox based pods don't react to docker stop nicely. By reducing the pod grace period we can save ~29 seconds per volume test.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Move deployment e2e test for rollback with no revision to integration
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: #52113
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
NetworkPolicy e2e: use ClientSet and update to CoreV1 and NetworkingV1 apis.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Update NetworkPolicy e2e test: use the public ClientSet and update to CoreV1 and NetworkingV1 apis.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Aggregator test uses framework namespace
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Remove namespace duplicate in aggregator test, using test framework namespace instead of creating a new one.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#53478
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig api-machinery
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Updating E2E test for deleting PVC when PVC is in use
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This test updates an existing e2e test and adds extra verification.
Updated workflow of the test is as below
1. Create PVC, Wait until PV is provisioned. Create POD using PVC.
2. Verify POD is running and PV is attached to the node.
3. Delete PVC.
4. Verify Volume remains attached to the pod after deleting claim.
5. Verify Volume is accessible in the pod after deleting claim.
6. Verify associated PV is present and its status should be failed.
7. Delete Pod and wait until PV is unmounted and detached from the Node.
6. Wait and Verify PV is deleted after POD is deleted.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes # https://github.com/vmware/kubernetes/issues/279
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Test logs
```
# go run hack/e2e.go --check-version-skew=false -v -test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=should\snot\sdetach\sand\sunmount\sPV\swhen\sassociated\spvc\swith\sdelete\sas\sreclaimPolicy\sis\sdeleted\swhen\sit\sis\sin\suse\sby\sthe\spod'
flag provided but not defined: -check-version-skew
Usage of /tmp/go-build371606839/command-line-arguments/_obj/exe/e2e:
-get
go get -u kubetest if old or not installed (default true)
-old duration
Consider kubetest old if it exceeds this (default 24h0m0s)
2017/10/16 15:42:40 e2e.go:55: NOTICE: go run hack/e2e.go is now a shim for test-infra/kubetest
2017/10/16 15:42:40 e2e.go:56: Usage: go run hack/e2e.go [--get=true] [--old=24h0m0s] -- [KUBETEST_ARGS]
2017/10/16 15:42:40 e2e.go:57: The separator is required to use --get or --old flags
2017/10/16 15:42:40 e2e.go:58: The -- flag separator also suppresses this message
2017/10/16 15:42:40 e2e.go:77: Calling kubetest --check-version-skew=false -v -test --test_args=--ginkgo.focus=should\snot\sdetach\sand\sunmount\sPV\swhen\sassociated\spvc\swith\sdelete\sas\sreclaimPolicy\sis\sdeleted\swhen\sit\sis\sin\suse\sby\sthe\spod...
2017/10/16 15:42:40 util.go:154: Running: ./cluster/kubectl.sh --match-server-version=false version
2017/10/16 15:42:40 util.go:156: Step './cluster/kubectl.sh --match-server-version=false version' finished in 293.775296ms
2017/10/16 15:42:40 util.go:154: Running: ./hack/e2e-internal/e2e-status.sh
Skeleton Provider: prepare-e2e not implemented
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"9+", GitVersion:"v1.9.0-alpha.1.913+297ab03890a6a7-dirty", GitCommit:"297ab03890a6a76f268eb5415e0fb16f20b2309e", GitTreeState:"dirty", BuildDate:"2017-10-16T20:50:38Z", GoVersion:"go1.8.3", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"9+", GitVersion:"v1.9.0-alpha.1.1181+77b83e446b4e65", GitCommit:"77b83e446b4e655a71c315ad3f3890dc2a220ccf", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2017-10-16T07:07:02Z", GoVersion:"go1.8.3", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
2017/10/16 15:42:40 util.go:156: Step './hack/e2e-internal/e2e-status.sh' finished in 317.940582ms
2017/10/16 15:42:40 util.go:154: Running: ./hack/ginkgo-e2e.sh --ginkgo.focus=should\snot\sdetach\sand\sunmount\sPV\swhen\sassociated\spvc\swith\sdelete\sas\sreclaimPolicy\sis\sdeleted\swhen\sit\sis\sin\suse\sby\sthe\spod
Conformance test: not doing test setup.
Oct 16 15:42:42.327: INFO: Overriding default scale value of zero to 1
Oct 16 15:42:42.327: INFO: Overriding default milliseconds value of zero to 5000
I1016 15:42:42.577720 8325 e2e.go:369] Starting e2e run "51f11717-b2c3-11e7-bd54-0050569c26b8" on Ginkgo node 1
Running Suite: Kubernetes e2e suite
===================================
Random Seed: 1508193761 - Will randomize all specs
Will run 1 of 706 specs
Oct 16 15:42:42.678: INFO: >>> kubeConfig: /root/.kube/config
Oct 16 15:42:42.686: INFO: Waiting up to 4h0m0s for all (but 0) nodes to be schedulable
Oct 16 15:42:42.724: INFO: Waiting up to 10m0s for all pods (need at least 0) in namespace 'kube-system' to be running and ready
Oct 16 15:42:42.883: INFO: 13 / 13 pods in namespace 'kube-system' are running and ready (0 seconds elapsed)
Oct 16 15:42:42.883: INFO: expected 4 pod replicas in namespace 'kube-system', 4 are Running and Ready.
Oct 16 15:42:42.891: INFO: Waiting for pods to enter Success, but no pods in "kube-system" match label map[name:e2e-image-puller]
Oct 16 15:42:42.891: INFO: Dumping network health container logs from all nodes...
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
------------------------------
[sig-storage] PersistentVolumes [Feature:ReclaimPolicy] [sig-storage] persistentvolumereclaim:vsphere
should not detach and unmount PV when associated pvc with delete as reclaimPolicy is deleted when it is in use by the pod
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/pv_reclaimpolicy.go:136
[BeforeEach] [sig-storage] PersistentVolumes [Feature:ReclaimPolicy]
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:133
STEP: Creating a kubernetes client
Oct 16 15:42:42.904: INFO: >>> kubeConfig: /root/.kube/config
STEP: Building a namespace api object
STEP: Waiting for a default service account to be provisioned in namespace
[BeforeEach] [sig-storage] PersistentVolumes [Feature:ReclaimPolicy]
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/pv_reclaimpolicy.go:48
Oct 16 15:42:42.994: INFO: Waiting up to 4h0m0s for all (but 0) nodes to be schedulable
[BeforeEach] [sig-storage] persistentvolumereclaim:vsphere
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/pv_reclaimpolicy.go:56
[It] should not detach and unmount PV when associated pvc with delete as reclaimPolicy is deleted when it is in use by the pod
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/pv_reclaimpolicy.go:136
STEP: running testSetupVSpherePersistentVolumeReclaim
STEP: creating vmdk
STEP: creating the pv
STEP: creating the pvc
Oct 16 15:42:44.595: INFO: Waiting for PV vspherepv-ksccp to bind to PVC pvc-n4rq7
Oct 16 15:42:44.595: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-n4rq7 to have phase Bound
Oct 16 15:42:44.606: INFO: PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-n4rq7 found but phase is Pending instead of Bound.
Oct 16 15:42:47.625: INFO: PersistentVolumeClaim pvc-n4rq7 found and phase=Bound (3.029926391s)
Oct 16 15:42:47.625: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for PersistentVolume vspherepv-ksccp to have phase Bound
Oct 16 15:42:47.632: INFO: PersistentVolume vspherepv-ksccp found and phase=Bound (6.598243ms)
STEP: Creating the Pod
STEP: Deleting the Claim
Oct 16 15:42:59.709: INFO: Deleting PersistentVolumeClaim "pvc-n4rq7"
STEP: Verify the volume is attached to the node
STEP: Verify the volume is accessible and available in the pod
Oct 16 15:43:00.076: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.55.64 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec pvc-tester-r9ww9 --namespace=e2e-tests-persistentvolumereclaim-6pfpf -- /bin/touch /mnt/volume1/emptyFile.txt'
Oct 16 15:43:00.604: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 16 15:43:00.604: INFO: stdout: ""
Oct 16 15:43:00.604: INFO: Verified that Volume is accessible in the POD after deleting PV claim
Oct 16 15:43:00.610: INFO: Waiting up to 1m0s for PersistentVolume vspherepv-ksccp to have phase Failed
Oct 16 15:43:00.619: INFO: PersistentVolume vspherepv-ksccp found and phase=Failed (9.016306ms)
STEP: Deleting the Pod
Oct 16 15:43:00.619: INFO: Deleting pod pvc-tester-r9ww9
Oct 16 15:43:00.650: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9" in namespace "e2e-tests-persistentvolumereclaim-6pfpf" to be "terminated due to deadline exceeded"
Oct 16 15:43:00.668: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 18.507993ms
Oct 16 15:43:02.675: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 2.024854663s
Oct 16 15:43:04.682: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 4.03197856s
Oct 16 15:43:06.688: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 6.037718623s
Oct 16 15:43:08.697: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 8.047192574s
Oct 16 15:43:10.703: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 10.052754761s
Oct 16 15:43:12.708: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 12.057876018s
Oct 16 15:43:14.714: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 14.063962712s
Oct 16 15:43:16.719: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 16.068826626s
Oct 16 15:43:18.725: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 18.074735397s
Oct 16 15:43:20.730: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 20.080498293s
Oct 16 15:43:22.736: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 22.086586123s
Oct 16 15:43:24.742: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 24.092219324s
Oct 16 15:43:26.747: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 26.097385301s
Oct 16 15:43:28.753: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 28.103127591s
Oct 16 15:43:30.758: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Running", Reason="", readiness=true. Elapsed: 30.108014823s
Oct 16 15:43:32.764: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 32.113847674s
Oct 16 15:43:34.772: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 34.122010171s
Oct 16 15:43:36.787: INFO: Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9" in namespace "e2e-tests-persistentvolumereclaim-6pfpf" not found. Error: pods "pvc-tester-r9ww9" not found
Oct 16 15:43:36.787: INFO: Ignore "not found" error above. Pod "pvc-tester-r9ww9" successfully deleted
STEP: Verify PV is detached from the node after Pod is deleted
Oct 16 15:43:46.913: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 1874c359-f300-a0cc-fd7e-02002a623c85/e2e-vmdk-1508193763110460154.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node2".
Oct 16 15:43:56.918: INFO: Waiting for Volume "[vsanDatastore] 1874c359-f300-a0cc-fd7e-02002a623c85/e2e-vmdk-1508193763110460154.vmdk" to detach from "kubernetes-node2".
Oct 16 15:44:06.905: INFO: Volume "[vsanDatastore] 1874c359-f300-a0cc-fd7e-02002a623c85/e2e-vmdk-1508193763110460154.vmdk" appears to have successfully detached from "kubernetes-node2".
STEP: Verify PV should be deleted automatically
Oct 16 15:44:06.905: INFO: Waiting up to 30s for PersistentVolume vspherepv-ksccp to get deleted
Oct 16 15:44:06.909: INFO: PersistentVolume vspherepv-ksccp was removed
[AfterEach] [sig-storage] persistentvolumereclaim:vsphere
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/pv_reclaimpolicy.go:62
STEP: running testCleanupVSpherePersistentVolumeReclaim
Oct 16 15:44:06.962: INFO: Deleting PersistentVolume "vspherepv-ksccp"
[AfterEach] [sig-storage] PersistentVolumes [Feature:ReclaimPolicy]
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:134
Oct 16 15:44:06.967: INFO: Waiting up to 3m0s for all (but 0) nodes to be ready
STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-tests-persistentvolumereclaim-6pfpf" for this suite.
Oct 16 15:44:15.325: INFO: namespace: e2e-tests-persistentvolumereclaim-6pfpf, resource: bindings, ignored listing per whitelist
Oct 16 15:44:15.638: INFO: namespace e2e-tests-persistentvolumereclaim-6pfpf deletion completed in 8.651759385s
• [SLOW TEST:92.734 seconds]
[sig-storage] PersistentVolumes [Feature:ReclaimPolicy]
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/framework.go:22
[sig-storage] persistentvolumereclaim:vsphere
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/framework.go:22
should not detach and unmount PV when associated pvc with delete as reclaimPolicy is deleted when it is in use by the pod
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/pv_reclaimpolicy.go:136
------------------------------
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOct 16 15:44:15.651: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all node
Oct 16 15:44:15.651: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1
Ran 1 of 706 Specs in 92.974 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 705 Skipped PASS
Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 1m33.830856163s
Test Suite Passed
2017/10/16 15:44:15 util.go:156: Step './hack/ginkgo-e2e.sh --ginkgo.focus=should\snot\sdetach\sand\sunmount\sPV\swhen\sassociated\spvc\swith\sdelete\sas\sreclaimPolicy\sis\sdeleted\swhen\sit\sis\sin\suse\sby\sthe\spod' finished in 1m34.75838192s
2017/10/16 15:44:15 e2e.go:81: Done
```
VVMware Reviewers: @rohitjogvmw @BaluDontu @tusharnt
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53903, 53914, 54374). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Migrate resource relevant e2e test files to sig scheduling
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Migrate resource relevant e2e test files to sig scheduling. Not fully sure whether these e2e files belong to sig-node or sig-scheduling, feel free to contact me if you have better solution.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Ref Umbrella issue #49161
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Try in-cluster config before using localhost:8080
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When starting an e2e test in a pod in a cluster, if the host is
not specified in the command line, we default to using
'http://127.0.0.1:8080' currently. We should be discovering the
host/port using the in-cluster config and using that if
possible.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes#53894
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52794, 54243, 54248, 53491, 53841). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
revamp deployment upgrade test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR revamps existing deployment upgrade test, removing redundant steps that is covered by replicaset upgrade test.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: xref #52113
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The replicaset upgrade test PR is here: #52449
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Adding e2e test for statefulsets for vsphere cloud provider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds a new e2e test for statefulsets for vSphere cloud Provider.
Test does following tasks.
- Create a storage class with thin diskformat.
- Create nginx service.
- Create nginx statefulsets with 3 replicas.
- Wait until all Pods are ready and PVCs are bounded with PV.
- Verify volumes are accessible in all statefulsets pods with creating empty file.
- Scale down statefulsets to 2 replicas.
- Scale up statefulsets to 3 replicas.
- Scale down statefulsets to 0 replicas and delete all pods.
- Delete all PVCs from the test namespace.
- Delete the storage class.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
fixes # https://github.com/vmware/kubernetes/issues/275
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Test Logs
```
root@k8s-dev-vm-02:~/divyenp/kubernetes# go run hack/e2e.go --check-version-skew=false --v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=vsphere\sstatefulset\stesting'
flag provided but not defined: -check-version-skew
Usage of /tmp/go-build247641121/command-line-arguments/_obj/exe/e2e:
-get
go get -u kubetest if old or not installed (default true)
-old duration
Consider kubetest old if it exceeds this (default 24h0m0s)
2017/10/18 19:24:33 e2e.go:55: NOTICE: go run hack/e2e.go is now a shim for test-infra/kubetest
2017/10/18 19:24:33 e2e.go:56: Usage: go run hack/e2e.go [--get=true] [--old=24h0m0s] -- [KUBETEST_ARGS]
2017/10/18 19:24:33 e2e.go:57: The separator is required to use --get or --old flags
2017/10/18 19:24:33 e2e.go:58: The -- flag separator also suppresses this message
2017/10/18 19:24:33 e2e.go:77: Calling kubetest --check-version-skew=false --v --test --test_args=--ginkgo.focus=vsphere\sstatefulset\stesting...
2017/10/18 19:24:33 util.go:154: Running: ./cluster/kubectl.sh --match-server-version=false version
2017/10/18 19:24:34 util.go:156: Step './cluster/kubectl.sh --match-server-version=false version' finished in 290.682219ms
2017/10/18 19:24:34 util.go:154: Running: ./hack/e2e-internal/e2e-status.sh
Skeleton Provider: prepare-e2e not implemented
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"9+", GitVersion:"v1.9.0-alpha.1.1217+8b041da0f996c1-dirty", GitCommit:"8b041da0f996c185438a7ed8282f92734a2ed0e7", GitTreeState:"dirty", BuildDate:"2017-10-19T00:46:00Z", GoVersion:"go1.8.3", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"9+", GitVersion:"v1.9.0-alpha.1.1293+d462bac7805f53", GitCommit:"d462bac7805f536a43c7d5fb98aca138ba1237eb", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2017-10-18T07:07:08Z", GoVersion:"go1.8.3", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
2017/10/18 19:24:34 util.go:156: Step './hack/e2e-internal/e2e-status.sh' finished in 305.965323ms
2017/10/18 19:24:34 util.go:154: Running: ./hack/ginkgo-e2e.sh --ginkgo.focus=vsphere\sstatefulset\stesting
Conformance test: not doing test setup.
Oct 18 19:24:35.808: INFO: Overriding default scale value of zero to 1
Oct 18 19:24:35.808: INFO: Overriding default milliseconds value of zero to 5000
I1018 19:24:36.073718 7768 e2e.go:383] Starting e2e run "a63561de-b474-11e7-8f6b-0050569c26b8" on Ginkgo node 1
Running Suite: Kubernetes e2e suite
===================================
Random Seed: 1508379875 - Will randomize all specs
Will run 1 of 713 specs
Oct 18 19:24:36.132: INFO: >>> kubeConfig: /root/.kube/config
Oct 18 19:24:36.139: INFO: Waiting up to 4h0m0s for all (but 0) nodes to be schedulable
Oct 18 19:24:36.177: INFO: Waiting up to 10m0s for all pods (need at least 0) in namespace 'kube-system' to be running and ready
Oct 18 19:24:36.321: INFO: 13 / 13 pods in namespace 'kube-system' are running and ready (0 seconds elapsed)
Oct 18 19:24:36.321: INFO: expected 4 pod replicas in namespace 'kube-system', 4 are Running and Ready.
Oct 18 19:24:36.326: INFO: Waiting for pods to enter Success, but no pods in "kube-system" match label map[name:e2e-image-puller]
Oct 18 19:24:36.326: INFO: Dumping network health container logs from all nodes...
Oct 18 19:24:36.338: INFO: Client version: v1.9.0-alpha.1.1217+8b041da0f996c1-dirty
Oct 18 19:24:36.340: INFO: Server version: v1.9.0-alpha.1.1293+d462bac7805f53
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
------------------------------
[sig-storage] vsphere statefulset
vsphere statefulset testing
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_statefulsets.go:155
[BeforeEach] [sig-storage] vsphere statefulset
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:133
STEP: Creating a kubernetes client
Oct 18 19:24:36.349: INFO: >>> kubeConfig: /root/.kube/config
STEP: Building a namespace api object
STEP: Waiting for a default service account to be provisioned in namespace
[BeforeEach] [sig-storage] vsphere statefulset
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_statefulsets.go:63
[It] vsphere statefulset testing
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_statefulsets.go:155
STEP: Creating StorageClass for Statefulset
STEP: Creating statefulset
Oct 18 19:24:36.489: INFO: Parsing statefulset from test/e2e/testing-manifests/statefulset/nginx/statefulset.yaml
Oct 18 19:24:36.503: INFO: Parsing service from test/e2e/testing-manifests/statefulset/nginx/service.yaml
Oct 18 19:24:36.514: INFO: creating web service
Oct 18 19:24:36.527: INFO: creating statefulset e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp/web with 3 replicas and selector &LabelSelector{MatchLabels:map[string]string{app: nginx,},MatchExpressions:[],}
Oct 18 19:24:36.561: INFO: Found 0 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:24:46.567: INFO: Found 1 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:24:56.568: INFO: Found 1 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:25:06.568: INFO: Found 1 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:25:16.566: INFO: Found 1 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:25:26.567: INFO: Found 1 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:25:36.567: INFO: Found 1 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:25:46.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:25:56.568: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:26:06.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:26:16.568: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:26:26.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:26:36.568: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:26:46.568: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:26:56.571: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:27:06.568: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:27:16.569: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:27:26.568: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:27:36.569: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:27:46.569: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:27:56.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:28:06.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:28:16.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:28:26.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:28:36.574: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:28:46.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:28:56.571: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:29:06.569: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:29:16.568: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:29:26.566: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:29:36.568: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:29:46.566: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:29:56.567: INFO: Found 2 stateful pods, waiting for 3
Oct 18 19:30:06.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:06.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:06.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:30:16.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:16.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:16.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:30:26.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:26.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:26.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:30:36.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:36.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:36.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:30:46.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:46.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:46.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:30:56.566: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:56.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:30:56.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:31:06.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:06.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:06.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:31:16.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:16.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:16.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:31:26.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:26.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:26.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:31:36.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:36.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:36.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:31:46.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:46.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:46.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:31:56.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:56.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:31:56.568: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:32:06.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:32:06.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:32:06.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:32:16.571: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:32:16.571: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:32:16.571: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Pending - Ready=false
Oct 18 19:32:26.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-0 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:32:26.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-1 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:32:26.567: INFO: Waiting for pod web-2 to enter Running - Ready=true, currently Running - Ready=true
Oct 18 19:32:26.567: INFO: Waiting for statefulset status.replicas updated to 3
Oct 18 19:32:26.605: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-0 -- /bin/sh -c ls -idlh /usr/share/nginx/html'
Oct 18 19:32:27.170: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:27.170: INFO: stdout of ls -idlh /usr/share/nginx/html on web-0: 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Oct 19 02:25 /usr/share/nginx/html
Oct 18 19:32:27.171: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-1 -- /bin/sh -c ls -idlh /usr/share/nginx/html'
Oct 18 19:32:27.687: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:27.688: INFO: stdout of ls -idlh /usr/share/nginx/html on web-1: 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Oct 19 02:29 /usr/share/nginx/html
Oct 18 19:32:27.688: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-2 -- /bin/sh -c ls -idlh /usr/share/nginx/html'
Oct 18 19:32:28.177: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:28.177: INFO: stdout of ls -idlh /usr/share/nginx/html on web-2: 2 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K Oct 19 02:32 /usr/share/nginx/html
Oct 18 19:32:28.183: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-0 -- /bin/sh -c find /usr/share/nginx/html'
Oct 18 19:32:28.690: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:28.690: INFO: stdout of find /usr/share/nginx/html on web-0: /usr/share/nginx/html
/usr/share/nginx/html/lost+found
Oct 18 19:32:28.690: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-1 -- /bin/sh -c find /usr/share/nginx/html'
Oct 18 19:32:29.166: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:29.166: INFO: stdout of find /usr/share/nginx/html on web-1: /usr/share/nginx/html
/usr/share/nginx/html/lost+found
Oct 18 19:32:29.166: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-2 -- /bin/sh -c find /usr/share/nginx/html'
Oct 18 19:32:29.696: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:29.696: INFO: stdout of find /usr/share/nginx/html on web-2: /usr/share/nginx/html
/usr/share/nginx/html/lost+found
Oct 18 19:32:29.707: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-0 -- /bin/sh -c touch /usr/share/nginx/html/1508380346587629054'
Oct 18 19:32:30.171: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:30.171: INFO: stdout of touch /usr/share/nginx/html/1508380346587629054 on web-0:
Oct 18 19:32:30.171: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-1 -- /bin/sh -c touch /usr/share/nginx/html/1508380346587629054'
Oct 18 19:32:30.653: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:30.653: INFO: stdout of touch /usr/share/nginx/html/1508380346587629054 on web-1:
Oct 18 19:32:30.654: INFO: Running '/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/bin/kubectl --server=https://10.192.38.85 --kubeconfig=/root/.kube/config exec --namespace=e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp web-2 -- /bin/sh -c touch /usr/share/nginx/html/1508380346587629054'
Oct 18 19:32:31.149: INFO: stderr: ""
Oct 18 19:32:31.150: INFO: stdout of touch /usr/share/nginx/html/1508380346587629054 on web-2:
STEP: Scaling down statefulsets to number of Replica: 2
Oct 18 19:32:31.263: INFO: Scaling statefulset web to 2
Oct 18 19:32:51.314: INFO: Waiting for statefulset status.replicas updated to 2
STEP: Verify Volumes are detached from Nodes after Statefulsets is scaled down
Oct 18 19:32:51.524: INFO: Waiting for Volume: "[vsanDatastore] 1874c359-f300-a0cc-fd7e-02002a623c85/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-67b7e88c-b475-11e7-a38c-0050569c555f.vmdk" to detach from Node: "kubernetes-node2"
Oct 18 19:33:01.657: INFO: Volume "[vsanDatastore] 1874c359-f300-a0cc-fd7e-02002a623c85/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-67b7e88c-b475-11e7-a38c-0050569c555f.vmdk" appears to have successfully detached from "kubernetes-node2".
STEP: Scaling up statefulsets to number of Replica: 3
Oct 18 19:33:01.657: INFO: Scaling statefulset web to 3
Oct 18 19:33:11.731: INFO: Waiting for statefulset status.replicas updated to 3
Oct 18 19:33:11.747: INFO: Waiting for statefulset status.replicas updated to 3
STEP: Verify all volumes are attached to Nodes after Statefulsets is scaled up
Oct 18 19:33:13.823: INFO: Verify Volume: "[vsanDatastore] 1874c359-f300-a0cc-fd7e-02002a623c85/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-a6cf15ef-b474-11e7-a38c-0050569c555f.vmdk" is attached to the Node: "kubernetes-node4"
Oct 18 19:33:15.990: INFO: Verify Volume: "[vsanDatastore] 1874c359-f300-a0cc-fd7e-02002a623c85/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-cfb65f92-b474-11e7-a38c-0050569c555f.vmdk" is attached to the Node: "kubernetes-node3"
Oct 18 19:33:18.154: INFO: Verify Volume: "[vsanDatastore] 1874c359-f300-a0cc-fd7e-02002a623c85/kubernetes-dynamic-pvc-67b7e88c-b475-11e7-a38c-0050569c555f.vmdk" is attached to the Node: "kubernetes-node2"
[AfterEach] [sig-storage] vsphere statefulset
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:134
Oct 18 19:33:18.323: INFO: Waiting up to 3m0s for all (but 0) nodes to be ready
STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp" for this suite.
Oct 18 19:33:44.960: INFO: namespace: e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp, resource: bindings, ignored listing per whitelist
Oct 18 19:33:44.960: INFO: namespace e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp deletion completed in 26.620223678s
[AfterEach] [sig-storage] vsphere statefulset
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_statefulsets.go:67
Oct 18 19:33:44.960: INFO: Deleting all statefulset in namespace: e2e-tests-vsphere-statefulset-gnfmp
• [SLOW TEST:548.654 seconds]
[sig-storage] vsphere statefulset
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/framework.go:22
vsphere statefulset testing
/root/divyenp/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/vsphere_statefulsets.go:155
------------------------------
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOct 18 19:33:45.006: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all node
Oct 18 19:33:45.006: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1
Ran 1 of 713 Specs in 548.875 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 712 Skipped PASS
Ginkgo ran 1 suite in 9m9.728218415s
Test Suite Passed
2017/10/18 19:33:45 util.go:156: Step './hack/ginkgo-e2e.sh --ginkgo.focus=vsphere\sstatefulset\stesting' finished in 9m10.656371481s
2017/10/18 19:33:45 e2e.go:81: Done
```
VMware Reviewers: @rohitjogvmw @BaluDontu @tusharnt
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52753, 54034, 53982, 54209). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use multi-arch busybox for e2e
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Since [multi-arch is supported already for Official images on Dockerhub](https://blog.docker.com/2017/09/docker-official-images-now-multi-platform/), we can use `busybox` directly instead of having our own `GetBusyBoxImage` for multi-arch.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
xref #53958
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @mkumatag @ixdy
**Release note**:
```release-note
Use multi-arch busybox image for e2e
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Replace storage-class annotations with field in examples
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
storage class is already GA. Replace annotations with field `StorageClassName` in examples.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#51435 (update: thanks @gyliu513 for the issue)
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50654#discussion_r134954171
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
We may also want to remove the beta annotations in 1.8 since the field will have already been in two releases. If @kubernetes/sig-storage-api-reviews confirm this, I'd like to help remove it.
/cc @liggitt @jsafrane @msau42
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
pkg/api: extract Scheme/Registry/Codecs into pkg/api/legacyscheme
This serves as
- a preparation for the pkg/api->pkg/apis/core move
- and makes the dependency to the scheme explicit when vizualizing
left depenncies.
The later helps with our our efforts to split up the monolithic repo
into self-contained sub-repos, e.g. for kubectl, controller-manager
and kube-apiserver in the future.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add pod related conformance annotations
Signed-off-by: Brad Topol <btopol@us.ibm.com>
/sig testing
/area conformance
@sig-testing-pr-reviews
This PR adds pod related conformance annotations to the e2e test suite.
The PR fixes a portion of #53822. It focuses on adding conformance annotations as defined by the Kubernetes Conformance Workgroup for a subset of the pod based e2e conformance tests.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please see https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WWSOqFaG35VmmPOYbwetapj1VPOVMqjZfR9ih5To5gk/edit#gid=62929400
for the list of SIG Arch approved test names and descriptions that I am using.
**Release note**:
```release-note NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
refactor pd.go for future tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Refactored _test/e2e/storage/pd.go_ so that it will be easier to add new tests, which I plan on doing to address issue 52676
1. Condenses 8 `It` blocks into 3 table driven tests.
2. Adds several `By` descriptions and `Logf` messages.
3. provides more consistent formatting and messages.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The diff is large but mostly I've not altered any test. The one semantic change I made was to remove the call to verify a write to a PD when, in fact, nothing had been written yet. This was essentially a no-op since the verify code returned immediately if the passed-in map was empty (which it was since nothing had been written).
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @jingxu97 @copejon
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54036, 53739). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove Sprintf when there are no placeholders in the formatting.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Minor cleanup.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53978, 54008, 53037). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix expected result in Custom Metrics - Stackdriver Adapter e2e test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR fixes a bug in e2e tests for Custom Metrics - Stackdriver Adapter
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53575, 53794). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add e2e test case for downward API exposing pod UID
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Pod UID is added to downward API env var in #48125 for 1.8. This PR adds a e2e test case for it.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
ref: #48125
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48665, 52849, 54006, 53755). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add named-port ingress test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Validate correct behavior when a `NetworkPolicyIngressRule` refers to a named port rather than a numerical port, e.g. `serve-80` rather than `80`.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53106, 52193, 51250, 52449, 53861). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add replicaset upgrade test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds existing replicaset upgrade test.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: xref #52118
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
When starting an e2e test in a pod in a cluster, if the host is
not specified in the command line, we default to using
'http://127.0.0.1:8080' currently. We should try the in-cluster
config, save it to a temporary file and use that with kubectl
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53507, 53772, 52903, 53543). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Split downward API e2e test case for pod/host IP into two
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Split the test case in order to avoid version block pod IP e2e test.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42717#discussion_r144026427
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @timothysc @andrewsykim
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53507, 53772, 52903, 53543). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Adding e2e tests to verify vsphere volume lifecycle on a clustered datastore
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR introduces tests for volume provisioning on a clustered datastore. It does so in three ways
1. Static provisioning (create vsphere volume and then create a pod with it)
2. Dynamic provisioning (specify clustered datastore in storage class parameters)
3. Dynamic provisioning with spbm policy (specify storage policy name in storage class parameters. This policy is a tag based policy and tagged to a clustered datastore)
**Which issue this PR fixes** :
fixes vmware#278
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Set env as per following example due to the need mentioned in description
```
export CLUSTER_DATASTORE="dscl1/sharedVmfs-1"
export VSPHERE_SPBM_POLICY_DS_CLUSTER="gold_cluster"
```
Internally reviewed by VMware reviewers @divyenpatel @BaluDontu @tusharnt
**Release note**:
```
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use gcloud for enabling/disabling autoscaling in e2e tests
This removes temporary solution added in #28011 as it's no longer necessary. Should reduce flakes caused by not waiting for master restart after disabling autoscaling.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Improve e2e tests of audit logging.
Now test includes:
* Verbs: create, list, watch, delete, get, update, patch.
* Resources: pods, deployments, secrets, config maps, custom resource
definition.
* More fields: user, resource, level, stage, presence of request and
response objects.
Fixes#49653
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53668, 53624, 52639, 53581, 51215). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Local e2e test fixes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. Remove tests using TestContainerOutput because they don't wait for unmount
2. Fix scheduling error test to handle updated event msgs.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#53597
**Release note**:
NONE
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Bump kube-dns version used in e2e
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Updates the version of kube-dns used in the e2e network tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: ref #53153
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Skip podpreset test if the alpha feature setttings/v1alpha1 is disabled
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Skip this test if it is not able to find the requested resource, so the test does not consistently fail.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#53079
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Skip podpreset test if the alpha feature setttings/v1alpha1 is disabled
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50223, 53205). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Create e2e tests for Custom Metrics - Stackdriver Adapter and HPA based on custom metrics from Stackdriver
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
- Add e2e test for Custom Metrics - Stackdriver Adapter
- Add 2e2 test for HPA based on custom metrics from Stackdriver
- Enable HorizontalPodAutoscalerUseRESTClients option
**Release note**:
```release-note
Horizontal pod autoscaler uses REST clients through the kube-aggregator instead of the legacy client through the API server proxy.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Increase backoffLimit for job that we expect to fail several times
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Since the introduction of `backoffLimit` for a job that single test failed majority of times on: `BackoffLimitExceeded: Job has reach the specified backoff limit`.
I'm bumping this to 999, so that it has enough room to fail several times.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Fixes#35507.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53678, 53677, 53682, 53673). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix to prevent downward api change break on older versions
Signed-off-by: Timothy St. Clair <timothysc@gmail.com>
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Prevents "should provide pod and host IP as an env var [Conformance]" from running on older versions whose api does not have that field and will break on those clusters.
This is not a upstream tested configuration, but downstream folks do this regularly.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
N/A
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
N/A
**Release note**:
```
Prevent downward api-change from breaking on older version
```
/cc @kubernetes/sig-testing-bugs @jpbetz @marun
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53678, 53677, 53682, 53673). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix typo in StatefulSet e2e test
Found it while reviewing #53218
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
wait for pod to be fully deleted
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix flaky glusterfs io-streaming tests.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#49529
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
1) max potential wait for complete pod deletion is ~~15m~~ 5m.
2) ~~removed [Flaky] from HostCleanup, _e2e/node/kubelet.go_ since pod deletion is reliable now.~~
3) ~~added tag [Slow] to HostCleanup due to long max wait for pod deletion.~~
After all CI tests run reliably we can consider removing the [Flaky] tag (2, above), or do that in a separate pr.
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @msau42
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52354, 52949, 53551). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add client and server versions to the e2e.test output.
Fixes#53502.
```release-note
NONE
```
Sample output:
```
Oct 6 15:02:44.001: INFO: Client version: v1.9.0-alpha.1.737+3b1b19a1e2a9a4-dirty
Oct 6 15:02:44.039: INFO: Server version: v1.8.0
```
/assign @timothysc
The etcd3 storage now attempts to fill partial pages to prevent clients
having to make more round trips (latency from server to etcd is lower
than client to server). The server makes repeated requests to etcd of
the current page size, then uses the filter function to eliminate any
matches. After this change the apiserver will always return full pages,
but we leave the language in place that clients must tolerate it.
Reduces tail latency of large filtered lists, such as viewing pods
assigned to a node.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53621, 52320, 53625). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
revamp replicaset e2e tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR removes some replicaset e2e tests as they will be converted to integration tests:
(1) condition check test
(2) pod adoption test
(3) pod release(orphaning) test
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: xref #52118
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53567, 53197, 52944, 49593). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Clean up in `cluster_size_autoscaling.go`
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix `golint` errors.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50447, 53308). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
[e2e] add service session affinity test case
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
Add service session affinity test case for e2e
fixes#31712
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 51771, 52971). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
pass labelSelector to server side opaquely
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
From @smarterclayton
> The server is responsible for handling label selection for the most part. There is some level of client side processing possible, but for the most part `label selector` should be able to be passed opaquely.
xref #50140
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @smarterclayton @liggitt
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Janet Kuo