Not all users of the E2E framework want to run cloud-provider specific
tests. By splitting out the code it becomes possible to decide in
a E2E test suite which providers are supported.
This is achieved in two ways:
- the framework calls certain functions through a provider
interface instead of calling specific cloud provider functions
directly
- tests that are cloud-provider specific directly import the
new provider packages
The ingress test utilities are only needed by a few tests. Splitting
them out into a separate package makes the framework simpler for test
suites not using those tests.
Fixes: #66649
Individual implementations are not yet being moved.
Fixed all dependencies which call the interface.
Fixed golint exceptions to reflect the move.
Added project info as per @dims and
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project.
Added dims to the security contacts.
Fixed minor issues.
Added missing template files.
Copied ControllerClientBuilder interface to cp.
This allows us to break the only dependency on K8s/K8s.
Added TODO to ControllerClientBuilder.
Fixed GoDeps.
Factored in feedback from JustinSB.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67461, 67464, 67416). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use const v1.ProtocolTCP replace of string TCP in test/e2e/network/
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
use const v1.ProtocolTCP replace of string TCP in test/e2e/network/
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67061, 66589, 67121, 67149). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Get load balancer name per provider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
GetLoadBalancerName() should be implemented per cloud provider as opposed to one neutral implementation.
This PR will address this by moving `cloudprovider.GetLoadBalancerName()` to the `LoadBalancer interface` and then provide an implementation for each cloud provider, while maintaining previously expected functionality.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes [#43173](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43173)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This is a work in progress. Looking for feedback as I work on this, from any interested parties.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
delete broken test for a deprecated feature.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This test is broken and it's for a deprecated feature.
https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/tree/master/service-loadbalancer
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Use the same pattern everywhere in the e2e test
harness, use busybox (from dockerhub) instead
of using the one from k8s.gcr.io registry.
Change-Id: I57c3b867408c1f9478a8909c26744ea0368ff003
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Switch to multi arch test/images with manifests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Recently we updated the test container images to use multi-arch fat manifests and pushed the new images to the `gcr.io/kubernetes-e2e-test-images` repository. In this changeset, we are switching to using the new images and cleaning up some of the unused image definitions from manifest.go. We are removing the folders corresponding to the unused images as well.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66626
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc @mkumatag
/cc @luxas
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66342, 66330, 65641). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
bump ingress version to 1.2
```release-note
Bump Ingress-gce version to 1.2.0
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64174, 64187, 64216, 63265, 64223). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Extend dns configmap tests to include CoreDNS
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR extends the DNS configmap e2e tests to include testing the CoreDNS ConfigMap.
The tests now test the equivalent `stubdomain`, `federation` and `upstreamnameserver` configuration of kube-dns for CoreDNS, when CoreDNS is the installed DNS server.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#62865
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63881, 64046, 63409, 63402, 63221). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Disable the public cadvisor port by default
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Quoting @tallclair in #56523:
> We should add the deprecation warning in 1.10 along with a release note, but not change the default. The notes should warn that the default will change in 1.11. We disable the flag by default in 1.11, and remove it entirely in 1.12 or 1.13.
> If you currently depend on the UI or the API, speak up! Going forward, the recommended way of taking advantage of those features will be to run cAdvisor as a DaemonSet.
Disabling the publicly-available cAdvisor port is beneficial for security, as you might not want to expose the UI with lots of information about what your system is doing. We already did this for all kubeadm deployments in v1.7, and haven't recieved any issues for that. This should be okay to do at this stage, as this flag was deprecated in v1.10. Given we need to support this flag for one more release (v1.11), it makes perfect sense to instead switch it off in preparation for v1.12 when we can delete it (see the [deprecation policy](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/deprecation-policy/#deprecating-a-flag-or-cli))
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Part of #56523
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I removed the e2e test that expects cAdvisor to be running, as we don't expect it to be anymore.
**Release note**:
```release-note
[action required] The formerly publicly-available cAdvisor web UI that the kubelet ran on port 4194 by default is now turned off by default. The flag configuring what port to run this UI on `--cadvisor-port` was deprecated in v1.10. Now the default is `--cadvisor-port=0`, in other words, to not run the web server. The recommended way to run cAdvisor if you still need it, is via a DaemonSet. The `--cadvisor-port` will be removed in v1.12
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-auth-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 62495, 63003, 62829, 62151, 62002). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
[e2e ingress-gce] Fix race condition for appending services and ingresses
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
From https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-gce/issues/219, how the test appends services and ingresses is not thread-safe. This PR fixes it by using channel.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-gce/issues/219
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/assign @nicksardo
I picked this up as it is fun :) Hoping you haven't worked on it yet.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Patrick Ohly