Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
CSI Node info registration in kubelet
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67683
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Feature issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/557
Design doc: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2034
Missing pieces:
* CSI client retry and exponential backoff logic.
* CSINodeInfo object validation
* e2e test with all the CSI machinery.
An RBAC rule is also added to support external-provisioner topology updates.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Registers volume topology information reported by a node-level Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver. This enables Kubernetes support of CSI topology mechanisms.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67950, 68195). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Consolidate componentconfig code standards
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR fixes a bunch of very small misalignments in ComponentConfig packages:
- Add sane comments to all functions/variables in componentconfig `register.go` files
- Make the `register.go` files of componentconfig pkgs follow the same pattern and not differ from each other like they do today.
- Register the `openapi-gen` tag in all `doc.go` files where the pkg contains _external_ types.
- Add the `groupName` tag where missing
- Fix cases where `addKnownTypes` was registered twice in the `SchemeBuilder`
- Add `Readme` and `OWNERS` files to `Godeps` directories if missing.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @sttts @thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Update bazel deps
**What this PR does / why we need it**: updates relevant bazel dependencies to pull in minor feature enhancements and bug fixes:
* rules_go 0.15.3: some speed improvements and better compatibility on Windows and Mac, among other bugfixes / enhancements
* repo-infra: fixes needed to support rules_go 0.15.1, and also a fix for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65501#issuecomment-400761696
* rules_docker v0.5.1: various enhancements/fixes, but we need this to support new manifest lists from upstream
* busybox latest: we last updated this a while ago. since Docker hub now uses manifest lists for core images like this, we needed the rules_docker update
* gazelle 0.14.0: among other enhancements, adds a feature to remove the need to build protoc for every build, which we aren't even using.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Depends on https://github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra/pull/81. I believe we also need bazel 0.16+.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 68171, 67945, 68233). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Move the CloudControllerManagerConfiguration to an API group in `cmd/`
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is the last piece of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/67233.
It moves the `CloudControllerManagerConfiguration` to its own `cloudcontrollermanager.config.k8s.io` config API group, but unlike the other components this API group is "private" (only available in `k8s.io/kubernetes`, which limits consumer base), as it's located entirely in `cmd/` vs a staging repo.
This decision was made for now as we're not sure what the story for the ccm loading ComponentConfig files is, and probably a "real" file-loading ccm will never exist in core, only helper libraries. Eventually the ccm will only be a library in any case, and implementors will/can use the base types the ccm library API group provides. It's probably good to note that there is no practical implication of this change as the ccm **cannot** read ComponentConfig files. Hencec the code move isn't user-facing.
With this change, we're able to remove `pkg/apis/componentconfig`, as this was the last consumer. That is hence done in this PR as well (so the move is easily visible in git, vs first one "big add" then a "big remove"). The only piece of code that was used was the flag helper structs, so I moved them to `pkg/util/flag` that I think makes sense for now.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
ref: kubernetes/community#2354
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This PR builds on top of (first two commits, marked as `Co-authored by: @stewart-yu`) https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/67689
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @liggitt @sttts @thockin @stewart-yu
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add --server-dry-run flag to `kubectl apply`
- Adds the flag
- changes the helper so that we can pass options for patch,
- Adds a test to make sure it doesn't change the object
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add new `--server-dry-run` flag to `kubectl apply` so that the request will be sent to the server with the dry-run flag (alpha), which means that changes won't be persisted.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67578, 68154, 68162, 65545). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
make deps-approvers the approvers of sample-cli-plugin/Godeps
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add ability to build with runtime coverage instrumentation
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds the ability to instrument a subset of kubernetes binaries to report code coverage information. The specific use-case is to help determine coverage of our end-to-end Conformance tests, as well as provide data that can be used to help determine where to focus. This PR focuses on making it possible to build with instrumentation; collecting and using the generated coverage data will be done in later PRs. For more details as to the intent, see the [design doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FKMBFxz7vtA-6ZgUkA47F8m6yR00fwqLcXMVJqsHt0g/edit?usp=sharing) (google doc; requires kubernetes-dev membership).
Specifically, this PR adds a new `KUBE_BUILD_WITH_COVERAGE` make variable, which when set will cause `kube-apiserver`, `kube-controller-manager`, `kube-scheduler`, `kube-proxy` and `kubelet` to be built with coverage instrumentation. These coverage-instrumented binaries will flush coverage information to disk every five seconds, defaulting to a temporary directory unless the `KUBE_COVERAGE_FILE` environment variable is set at launch, in which case it will write to that file instead.
The mechanism used to achieve coverage instrumentation is to build the targeted binaries as "unit tests" with coverage enabled, and then rigging the unit tests to just execute the binary's usual entry point. This is implemented only for the bash build system.
/sig testing
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add spiffxp to OWNERS files in bash-heavy dirs
I'm comfortable approving changes in hack/, I think I still need
to build up a corpus of reviews in build/ and cluster/ before I'm
comfortable asking for those rights. I'm willing to be voluntold
otherwise if existing approvers feel differently.
Approvers, WDYT?
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67571, 67284, 66835, 68096, 68152). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
add make targets for building server images
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Adds `make release-images` and `make quick-release-images`, which allow building the docker-wrapped images without building a full release. Without these you can either use `make {quick}-release` and build test tarballs etc, or hack around in the build system yourself. Using this can be considerably faster if you just want to build the binaries and images, and not the release tarballs etc.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig release
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64283, 67910, 67803, 68100). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
CSI Cluster Registry and Node Info CRDs
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Introduces the new `CSIDriver` and `CSINodeInfo` API Object as proposed in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2514 and https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2034
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/594
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Per the discussion in https://groups.google.com/d/msg/kubernetes-sig-storage-wg-csi/x5CchIP9qiI/D_TyOrn2CwAJ the API is being added to the staging directory of the `kubernetes/kubernetes` repo because the consumers will be attach/detach controller and possibly kubelet, but it will be installed as a CRD (because we want to move in the direction where the API server is Kubernetes agnostic, and all Kubernetes specific types are installed).
**Release note**:
```release-note
Introduce CSI Cluster Registration mechanism to ease CSI plugin discovery and allow CSI drivers to customize Kubernetes' interaction with them.
```
CC @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 68051, 68130, 67211, 68065, 68117). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Update `kubectl get` sorter to deal with server-side printing
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
### Why?
Currently, we default to non-server-side printing when sorting items in `kubectl get`. This means that instead of taking advantage of having the server tell `kubectl` how to display information, `kubectl` falls back to using hardcoded resource types to figure out how to print its output. This does not really work with resources that `kubectl` does not know about, and it goes against our goal of snipping any dependencies that `kubectl` has on the core repo.
This patch adds a sorter capable of dealing with Table objects sent by the server when using "server-side printing".
A few things left to take care of:
- ~~[ ] When printing `all` resources, this implementation does not handle sorting every single Table object, but rather _only_ the rows in each object. As a result, output will contain sorted resources of the same _kind_, but the overall list of mixed resources will _not_ itself be sorted. Example:~~
```bash
$ kubectl get all --sort-by .metadata.name
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
# pods here will be sorted:
pod/bar 0/2 Pending 0 31m
pod/foo 1/1 Running 0 37m
NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY AGE
# replication controllers here will be sorted as well:
replicationcontroller/baz 1 1 1 37m
replicationcontroller/buz 1 1 1 37m
# ... but the overall mixed list of rc's and pods will not be sorted
```
This occurs because each Table object received from the server contains all rows for that resource _kind_. We would need a way to build an ambiguous Table object containing all rows for all objects regardless of their type to have a fully sorted mixed-object output.
- [ ] handle sorting by column-names, rather than _only_ with jsonpaths (Tracked in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/68027)
cc @soltysh @kubernetes/sig-cli-maintainers @seans3 @mengqiy
I'm comfortable approving changes in hack/, I think I still need
to build up a corpus of reviews in build/ and cluster/ before I'm
comfortable asking for those rights
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add function comment to fix golint error in cmd/kube-scheduler/app.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add function comment to fix golint error in cmd/kube-scheduler/app.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Refactor admission webhook client code to a apiserver/pkg/util package
As part of #67006 This refactoring enable us to share code between admission webhooks and CRD conversion webhooks.
@deads2k @lavalamp @sttts @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Move kubelet internal ComponentConfig types to `pkg/kubelet/apis/config`
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is split out from the main PR of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/67263, in order to make merging each scoped piece of the puzzle easier and smoother.
This PR simply moves the `k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/kubeletconfig` as-is to `k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/apis/config` as agreed in the KEP.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
ref: kubernetes/community#2354
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
/assign @mtaufen @thockin @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Promote AdvancedAuditing to GA
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Removes deprecated legacy code used for basic audit logging in favor of advanced audit logging.
```release-note
Promote AdvancedAuditing to GA, replacing the previous (legacy) audit logging mechanisms.
```
Refactoring for non-csi e2e test similar to below commit in csi e2e test.
4d11dab272 (diff-0d9ecaa3e6a0297186ad33f57aad472e)
Scopes for this refactoring are below four files:
- test/e2e/storage/volumes.go
- test/e2e/storage/volume_io.go
- test/e2e/storage/persistent_volumes-volumemode.go
- test/e2e/storage/subpath.go
fixes: #66571
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64597, 67854, 67734, 67917, 67688). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Move kubeproxy ComponentConfig external types to `k8s.io/kube-proxy`
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements most of kubernetes/community#2354 for the kube-proxy.
The PR:
- Moves k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/proxy/apis/kubeproxyconfig as-is to k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/proxy/apis/config as agreed
- Moves the external types to the new staging repo k8s.io/kube-proxy, in the k8s.io/kube-proxy/config/v1beta1 package.
- Makes k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/proxy/apis/config/v1beta1 source the types from k8s.io/kube-proxy/config/v1beta1. The defaulting and conversion code is kept in this package as before.
- All references to these packages have been updated.
Ref #67233
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
kube-proxy v1beta1 external ComponentConfig types are now available in the `k8s.io/kube-proxy` repo
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix "hack/make-rules/test.sh"
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
For “make test”, it will output "dirname: missing operand".
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66916, 67252, 67794, 67619, 67328). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Using a fixed set of locks, then we don't need to free unused locks anymore.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Using a fixed set of locks, then we don't need to free unused locks anymore.
See kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66442 for discussions.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65113
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @msau42
/assign @thockin