* Properly return ImageNotFoundError
* Support inject "Images" or "ImageInspects" and keep both in sync.
* Remove the FakeDockerPuller and let FakeDockerClient subsumes its
functinality. This reduces the overhead to maintain both objects.
* Various small fixes and refactoring of the testing utils.
The enum constants are not namespaced. The shorter, unspecifc names are likely
to cause naming conflicts in the future.
Also replace "SandBox" with "Sandbox" in the API.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
CRI: Image pullable support in dockershim
For #33189.
The new test `ImageID should be set to the manifest digest (from RepoDigests) when available` introduced in #33014 is failing, because:
1) `docker-pullable://` conversion is not supported in dockershim;
2) `kuberuntime` and `dockershim` is using `ListImages with image name filter` to check whether image presents. However, `ListImages` doesn't support filter with `digest`.
This PR:
1) Change `kuberuntime.IsImagePresent` to use `runtime.ImageStatus` and `dockershim.InspectImage` instead. ***Notice an API change: `ImageStatus` should return `(nil, nil)` for non-existing image.***
2) Add `docker-pullable://` support.
3) Fix `RemoveImage` in dockershim https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/29316.
I've tried myself, the test can pass now.
@yujuhong @feiskyer @yifan-gu
/cc @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add seccomp and apparmor support.
This PR adds seccomp and apparmor support in new CRI.
This a WIP because I'm still adding unit test for some of the functions. Sent this PR here for design discussion.
This PR is similar with https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/33450.
The differences are:
* This PR passes seccomp and apparmor configuration via annotations;
* This PR keeps the seccomp handling logic in docker shim because current seccomp implementation is very docker specific, and @timstclair told me that even the json seccomp profile file is defined by docker.
Notice that this PR almost passes related annotations in `api.Pod` to the runtime directly instead of introducing new CRI annotation.
@yujuhong @feiskyer @timstclair
Kubernetes expects a brief CamelCase string as "Reason" and a human-readable
string as "Message" in the conatiner status. It is difficult for kubelet to
derive the other one if the runtime only provides one of the two fields.
Augment the API by adding the "Message" field.
Pengfei Ni