Since v1.5 and the removal of --configure-cbr0:
0800df74ab "Remove the legacy networking mode --configure-cbr0"
kubelet hasn't done any shaping operations internally. They
have all been delegated to network plugins like kubenet or
external CNI plugins. But some shaping code was still left
in kubelet, so remove it now that it's unused.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46239, 46627, 46346, 46388, 46524)
move labels to components which own the APIs
During the apimachinery split in 1.6, we accidentally moved several label APIs into apimachinery. They don't belong there, since the individual APIs are not general machinery concerns, but instead are the concern of particular components: most commonly the kubelet. This pull moves the labels into their owning components and out of API machinery.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @kubernetes/api-reviewers @kubernetes/api-approvers
@derekwaynecarr since most of these are related to the kubelet
Replaces the current kubelet server side self signed certs with certs
signed by the Certificate Request Signing API on the API server. Also
renews expiring kubelet server certs as expiration approaches.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Moved qos to api.helpers.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The `GetPodQoS` is also used by other components, e.g. kube-scheduler and it's not bound to kubelet; moved it to api helpers so client-go.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #N/A
**Release note**:
```release-note-none
```
Module remotecommand originally part of kubernetes/pkg/client/unversioned was moved
to client-go/tools, and will be used as authoritative in kubectl, e2e and other places.
Module remotecommand relies on util/exec module which will be copied to client-go/pkg/util
This commit deletes code in dockertools that is only used by
DockerManager. A follow-up change will rename and clean up the rest of
the files in this package.
The commit also sets EnableCRI to true if the container runtime is not
rkt. A follow-up change will remove the flag/field and all references to
it.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44406, 41543, 44071, 44374, 44299)
Decouple remotecommand
Refactored unversioned/remotecommand to decouple it from undesirable dependencies:
- term package now is not required, and functionality required to resize terminal size can be plugged in directly in kubectl
- in order to remove dependency on kubelet package - constants from kubelet/server/remotecommand were moved to separate util package (pkg/util/remotecommand)
- remotecommand_test.go moved to pkg/client/tests module
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41139, 41186, 38882, 37698, 42034)
Make kubelet never delete files on mounted filesystems
With bug #27653, kubelet could remove mounted volumes and delete user data.
The bug itself is fixed, however our trust in kubelet is significantly lower.
Let's add an extra version of RemoveAll that does not cross mount boundary
(rm -rf --one-file-system).
It calls lstat(path) three times for each removed directory - once in
RemoveAllOneFilesystem and twice in IsLikelyNotMountPoint, however this way
it's platform independent and the directory that is being removed by kubelet
should be almost empty.
With bug #27653, kubelet could remove mounted volumes and delete user data.
The bug itself is fixed, however our trust in kubelet is significantly lower.
Let's add an extra version of RemoveAll that does not cross mount boundary
(rm -rf --one-file-system).
It calls lstat(path) three times for each removed directory - once in
RemoveAllOneFilesystem and twice in IsLikelyNotMountPoint, however this way
it's platform independent and the directory that is being removed by kubelet
should be almost empty.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41994, 41969, 41997, 40952, 40576)
Guaranteed admission for Critical Pods
This is the first step in implementing node-level preemption for critical pods.
It defines the AdmissionFailureHandler interface, which allows callers, like the kubelet, to define how failed predicates are handled, and take steps to correct failures if necessary.
In the kubelet's implementation, it triggers preemption if the pod being admitted is critical, and if the only failed predicates are InsufficientResourceErrors, then it prempts (not yet implemented) other other pods to allow admission of the critical pod.
cc: @vishh
Where possible, switch the scheduler to use generated listers and
informers. There are still some places where it probably makes more
sense to use one-off reflectors/informers (listing/watching just a
single node, listing/watching scheduled & unscheduled pods using a field
selector).
Changes the kubelet so it doesn't use the cert/key files directly for
starting the TLS server. Instead the TLS server reads the cert/key from
the new CertificateManager component, which is responsible for
requesting new certificates from the Certificate Signing Request API on
the API Server.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40239, 40397, 40449, 40448, 40360)
move the discovery and dynamic clients
Moved the dynamic client, discovery client, testing/core, and testing/cache to `client-go`. Dependencies on api groups we don't have generated clients for have dropped out, so federation, kubeadm, and imagepolicy.
@caesarxuchao @sttts
approved based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40363
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Delay deletion of pod from the API server until volumes are deleted
Depends on #37228, and will not pass tests until that PR is merged, and this is rebased.
Keeps all kubelet behavior the same, except the kubelet will not make the "Delete" call (kubeClient.Core().Pods(pod.Namespace).Delete(pod.Name, deleteOptions)) until the volumes associated with that pod are removed. I will perform some performance testing so that we better understand the latency impact of this change.
Is kubelet_pods.go the correct file to include the "when can I delete this pod" logic?
cc: @vishh @sjenning @derekwaynecarr