This reverts commit f4afdecef8, reversing
changes made to e633a1604f.
This also fixes a bug where Kubemark was still using the core api scheme
to manipulate the Kubelet's types, which was the cause of the initial
revert.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50087, 39587, 50042, 50241, 49914)
Add node e2e test for Docker's shared PID namespace
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42926
This PR adds a simple test for the shared PID namespace that's enabled when Docker is 1.13.1+.
/sig node
/area node-e2e
/assign @yujuhong
**Release note**:
```
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49651, 49707, 49662, 47019, 49747)
Add support for `no_new_privs` via AllowPrivilegeEscalation
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Implements kubernetes/community#639
Fixes#38417
Adds `AllowPrivilegeEscalation` and `DefaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation` to `PodSecurityPolicy`.
Adds `AllowPrivilegeEscalation` to container `SecurityContext`.
Adds the proposed behavior to `kuberuntime`, `dockershim`, and `rkt`. Adds a bunch of unit tests to ensure the desired default behavior and that when `DefaultAllowPrivilegeEscalation` is explicitly set.
Tests pass locally with docker and rkt runtimes. There are also a few integration tests with a `setuid` binary for sanity.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Adds AllowPrivilegeEscalation to control whether a process can gain more privileges than it's parent process
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add dockershim checkpoint node e2e test
Add a bunch of disruptive cases to test kubelet/dockershim's checkpoint work flow.
Some steps are quite hacky. Not sure if there is better ways to do things.
This PR adds two features:
1. add support for isolating the emptyDir volume use. If user
sets a size limit for emptyDir volume, kubelet's eviction manager
monitors its usage
and evict the pod if the usage exceeds the limit.
2. add support for isolating the local storage for container overlay. If
the container's overly usage exceeds the limit defined in container
spec, eviction manager will evict the pod.
This PR adds the check for local storage request when admitting pods. If
the local storage request exceeds the available resource, pod will be
rejected.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
node e2e: improve the validate OOM score test for infra containers
The test blindly checked all "pause" processes on the node, assuming
they were all infra containers. This change takes a snapshot of all
existing "pause" processes on the node, and exclude them in the
validation. The test still relies on the fact that it runs exclusively
on the node. If that assumption changes, we will need other methods to
locate the PIDs of the infra containers.
This fixes#37580
Automatic merge from submit-queue
test/e2e_node: prepull images with CRI
Part of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40739
- This PR builds on top of #40525 (and contains one commit from #40525)
- The second commit contains a tiny change in the `Makefile`.
- Third commit is a patch to be able to prepull images using the CRI (as opposed to run `docker` to pull images which doesn't make sense if you're using CRI most of the times)
Marked WIP till #40525 makes its way into master
@Random-Liu @lucab @yujuhong @mrunalp @rhatdan
bazel update
added new files to reflect that only one method has changed between arch types.
forgot to add changes to a commit.
changes made and gfmt run.
changed node_problem_detector to node_problem_detector_linux and made it linux only.
updated bazel
The test blindly checked all "pause" processes on the node, assuming
they were all infra containers. This change takes a snapshot of all
existing "pause" processes on the node, and exclude them in the
validation. The test still relies on the fact that it runs exclusively
on the node. If that assumption changes, we will need other methods to
locate the PIDs of the infra containers.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Eviction Manager Enforces Allocatable Thresholds
This PR modifies the eviction manager to enforce node allocatable thresholds for memory as described in kubernetes/community#348.
This PR should be merged after #41234.
cc @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-node-feature-requests @vishh
** Why is this a bug/regression**
Kubelet uses `oom_score_adj` to enforce QoS policies. But the `oom_score_adj` is based on overall memory requested, which means that a Burstable pod that requested a lot of memory can lead to OOM kills for Guaranteed pods, which violates QoS. Even worse, we have observed system daemons like kubelet or kube-proxy being killed by the OOM killer.
Without this PR, v1.6 will have node stability issues and regressions in an existing GA feature `out of Resource` handling.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41984, 41682, 41924, 41928)
Move node problem detector test into node e2e.
Move current NPD e2e test into node e2e.
In fact, current NPD e2e test is only a functionality test for NPD. It creates test NPD pod, sets test configuration, generates test logs and verifies test result.
It doesn't actually test the NPD really deployed in the cluster.
So it doesn't actually need to run in cluster e2e. Running it in node e2e will:
1) Make it easier to run the test.
2) Make it more light weight to introduce this as a pre/post submit test in NPD repo in the future.
Except this, I'm working on a cluster e2e to run some basic functionality test and benchmark test against the real NPD deployed in the cluster. Will send the PR later.
/cc @dchen1107 @kubernetes/node-problem-detector-reviewers
Manjunath A Kumatagi