Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42692, 42169, 42173)
DaemonSet: Respect ControllerRef
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings DaemonSet into full compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
This ensures that DaemonSet does not fight with other controllers over control of Pods.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
DaemonSet now respects ControllerRef to avoid fighting over Pods.
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41919, 41149, 42350, 42351, 42285)
enable cgroups tiers and node allocatable enforcement on pods by default.
```release-note
Pods are launched in a separate cgroup hierarchy than system services.
```
Depends on #41753
cc @derekwaynecarr
This commit switches over the HPA controller to use the custom metrics
API. It also converts the HPA controller to use the generated client
in k8s.io/metrics for the resource metrics API.
In order to enable support, you must enable
`--horizontal-pod-autoscaler-use-rest-clients` on the
controller-manager, which will switch the HPA controller's MetricsClient
implementation over to use the standard rest clients for both custom
metrics and resource metrics. This requires that at the least resource
metrics API is registered with kube-aggregator, and that the controller
manager is pointed at kube-aggregator. For this to work, Heapster
must be serving the new-style API server (`--api-server=true`).
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow multipe DNS servers as comma-seperated argument for kubelet --dns
This PR explores how kubectls "--dns" could be extended to specify multiple DNS servers for in-cluster PODs. Testing on the local libvirt-coreos cluster shows that multiple DNS server are injected without issues.
Specifying multiple DNS servers increases resilience against
- Packet drops
- Single server failure
I am debugging services that do 50+ DNS requests for a single incoming interactive request, thus highly increase the chance of a slowdown (+5s) due to a single packet drop. Switching to two DNS servers will reduce the impact of the issues (roughly +1s on glibc, 0s on musl, error-rate goes down to error-rate^2).
Note that there is no need to change any runtime related code as far as I know. In the case of "default" dns the /etc/resolv.conf is parsed and multiple DNS server are send to the backend anyway. This only adds the same capability for the clusterFirst case.
I've heard from @thockin that multiple DNS entries are somehow considered. I've no idea what was considered, though. This is what I would like to see for our production use, though.
```release-note
NONE
```
This change makes kubelet to use the CRI implementation by default,
unless the users opt out explicitly by using --enable-cri=false.
For the rkt integration, the --enable-cri flag will have no effect
since rktnetes does not use CRI.
Also, mark the original --experimental-cri flag hidden and deprecated,
so that we can remove it in the next release.
Depending on an exact cluster setup multiple dns may make sense.
Comma-seperated lists of DNS server are quite common as DNS servers
are always plain IPs.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove proxy-mode annotation from kube-proxy
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This removes the net.experimental.kubernetes.io/proxy-mode and net.beta.kubernetes.io/proxy-mode annotations from kube-proxy.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#40582
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Remove outdated net.experimental.kubernetes.io/proxy-mode and net.beta.kubernetes.io/proxy-mode annotations from kube-proxy.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39469, 40557)
Forgiveness api changes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Splited from #34825 , contains api changes that are needed to implement forgiveness:
1. update toleration api types to support forgiveness, added a new field forgivenessSeconds to indicate the duration of time it tolerates a taint.
2. update taint api types, added a new field to indicate the time the taint is added.
**Which issue this PR fixes** :
Related issue: #1574
Related PR: #34825
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
forgiveness alpha version api definition
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37228, 40146, 40075, 38789, 40189)
move apimachinery/announced to apimachinery
This also rewires the announce package to allow installation into multiple groups via multiple calls to `install.Install`. At some point, we'll want to unwire the hardcoded, "install to this scheme" call.
@lavalamp something we've wanted for a while and need for genericapiserver
@seh you've asked related questions
@sttts ptal. First commit is interesting, second commit is a straight move.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39807, 37505, 39844, 39525, 39109)
Admission control support for versioned configuration files
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Today, the `--admission-control-config-file=` argument takes an opaque file that is shared across all admission controllers to provide configuration. This file is not well-versioned and it's shared across multiple plug-ins. Some plugins take file based configuration (`ImagePolicyWebhook`) and others abuse flags to provide configuration because we lacked a good example (`InitialResources`). This PR defines a versioned configuration format that we can use moving forward to provide configuration input to admission controllers that is well-versioned, and does not require the addition of new flags.
The sample configuration file would look as follows:
```
apiVersion: componentconfig/v1alpha1
kind: AdmissionConfiguration
plugins:
- name: "ImagePolicyWebhook"
path: "image-policy-webhook.json"
```
The general behavior is each plugin that requires additional configuration is enumerated by name. An alternate file location is provided for its specific configuration, or the configuration can be embedded as a raw extension via the configuration section.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
A follow-on PR will be needed to make `ImagePolicyWebhook` to use versioned configuration. This PR maintains backwards compatibility by ignoring configuration it cannot understand and therefore treating the file as opaque. I plan to make use of this PR to complete https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36765 which attempts to allow more configuration parameters to the `ResourceQuota` admission plugin.
Jordan Liggitt