Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40239, 40397, 40449, 40448, 40360)
move the discovery and dynamic clients
Moved the dynamic client, discovery client, testing/core, and testing/cache to `client-go`. Dependencies on api groups we don't have generated clients for have dropped out, so federation, kubeadm, and imagepolicy.
@caesarxuchao @sttts
approved based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40363
Deployments get cleaned up only when they are paused, they get scaled up/down,
or when the strategy that drives rollouts completes. This means that stuck
deployments that fall into none of the above categories will not get cleaned
up. Since cleanup is already safe by itself (we only delete old replica sets
that are synced by the replica set controller and have no replicas) we can
execute it for every deployment when there is no intention to rollback.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Updated unit tests
@janetkuo updated the flaky unit test to have the same structure with regard to uncasting as the rest of the tests. ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39807, 37505, 39844, 39525, 39109)
Update deployment equality helper
@mfojtik @janetkuo this is split out of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38714 to reduce the size of that PR, ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38608, 38299)
controller: set unavailableReplicas correctly when scaling down
```
deployment_controller.go:299] Error syncing deployment
e2e-tests-kubectl-2l7xx/e2e-test-nginx-deployment:
Deployment.extensions "e2e-test-nginx-deployment" is invalid:
status.unavailableReplicas: Invalid value: -1:
must be greater than or equal to 0
```
The validation error above occurs usually when a Deployment is
scaled down. In such a case we should default unavailableReplicas
to 0 instead of making an invalid api call.
@kubernetes/deployment
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38377, 36365, 36648, 37691, 38339)
controller: sync stuck deployments in a secondary queue
@kubernetes/deployment this makes Deployments not depend on a tight resync interval in order to estimate progress.
deployment_controller.go:299] Error syncing deployment
e2e-tests-kubectl-2l7xx/e2e-test-nginx-deployment:
Deployment.extensions "e2e-test-nginx-deployment" is invalid:
status.unavailableReplicas: Invalid value: -1:
must be greater than or equal to 0
The validation error above occurs usually when a Deployment is
scaled down. In such a case we should default unavailableReplicas
to 0 instead of making an invalid api call.
Dr. Stefan Schimanski