- don't update nominatedMap cache when Pop() an element from activeQ
- instead, delete the nominated info from cache when it's "assumed"
- unit test behavior adjusted
- expose SchedulingQueue in factory.Config
- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
Loop over priorityConfigs seperately. The node loop can only safely
modify result[i][index]. Before this change it sometimes modified
result[i] concurrently with other loops.
Fixes: 7164967662
==================== Test output for //pkg/scheduler/core:go_default_test:
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x00c0005e8ed0 by goroutine 22:
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/scheduler/core.PrioritizeNodes.func2()
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler.go:667 +0x2ea
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/util/workqueue.ParallelizeUntil.func1()
staging/src/k8s.io/client-go/util/workqueue/parallelizer.go:65 +0x9e
Previous write at 0x00c0005e8ed0 by goroutine 21:
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/scheduler/core.PrioritizeNodes.func2()
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler.go:668 +0x450
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/util/workqueue.ParallelizeUntil.func1()
staging/src/k8s.io/client-go/util/workqueue/parallelizer.go:65 +0x9e
Goroutine 22 (running) created at:
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/util/workqueue.ParallelizeUntil()
staging/src/k8s.io/client-go/util/workqueue/parallelizer.go:57 +0x1a3
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/scheduler/core.PrioritizeNodes()
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler.go:682 +0x592
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/scheduler/core.(*genericScheduler).Schedule()
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler.go:186 +0x77d
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/scheduler/core.TestGenericScheduler.func1()
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler_test.go:464 +0x91f
testing.tRunner()
GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:827 +0x162
Goroutine 21 (running) created at:
k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/util/workqueue.ParallelizeUntil()
staging/src/k8s.io/client-go/util/workqueue/parallelizer.go:57 +0x1a3
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/scheduler/core.PrioritizeNodes()
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler.go:682 +0x592
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/scheduler/core.(*genericScheduler).Schedule()
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler.go:186 +0x77d
k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/scheduler/core.TestGenericScheduler.func1()
pkg/scheduler/core/generic_scheduler_test.go:464 +0x91f
testing.tRunner()
GOROOT/src/testing/testing.go:827 +0x162
==================
--- FAIL: TestGenericScheduler (0.01s)
--- FAIL: TestGenericScheduler/test_6 (0.00s)
testing.go:771: race detected during execution of test
testing.go:771: race detected during execution of test
FAIL
This adds a counter to the scheduler that can be used to calculate
throughput and error ratio. Pods which fail to schedule are not counted
as errors, but can still be tracked separately from successes.
We already measure scheduler latency, but throughput was missing. This
should be considered a key metric for the scheduler.
- snapshot equivalence cache generation numbers before snapshotting the
scheduler cache
- skip update when generation does not match live generation
- keep the node and increment its generation to invalidate it instead of
deletion
- use predicates order ID as key to improve performance
- update logic of verifying incoming pod's anti-affinity
- rename podMatchesAffinityTermProperties to podMatchesAllAffinityTermProperties
- add podMatchesAnyAffinityTermProperties which is used in some PodAntiAffinity cases
- rename some functions to make it more readable
- add unit tests to verify correctness of PodAffinity and PodAntiAffinity
- verifying "Existing pod anti-affinity"
- verifying "incoming pod's anti-affinity"
- verifying "incoming pod's affinity"
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67950, 68195). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Consolidate componentconfig code standards
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR fixes a bunch of very small misalignments in ComponentConfig packages:
- Add sane comments to all functions/variables in componentconfig `register.go` files
- Make the `register.go` files of componentconfig pkgs follow the same pattern and not differ from each other like they do today.
- Register the `openapi-gen` tag in all `doc.go` files where the pkg contains _external_ types.
- Add the `groupName` tag where missing
- Fix cases where `addKnownTypes` was registered twice in the `SchemeBuilder`
- Add `Readme` and `OWNERS` files to `Godeps` directories if missing.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @sttts @thockin
From current AWS documentation:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/volume_limits.html
T3, C5, C5d, M5, M5d, R5, R5d, and z1d instances support a maximum of
28 attachments, and every instance has at least one network interface
attachment. If you have no additional network interface attachments on
these instances, you could attach 27 EBS volumes.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67555, 68196). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Not split nodes when searching for nodes but doing it all at once
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Not split nodes when searching for nodes but doing it all at once.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@bsalamat
This is a follow up PR of #66733.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66733#discussion_r205932531
**Release note**:
```release-note
Not split nodes when searching for nodes but doing it all at once.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Add validation for kube-scheduler configuration options
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This adds validation to the kube-scheduler so that we're not accepting bogus values to the kube-scheduler. As requested by @bsalamat in issue https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/66743
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#66743
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
- Not sure if this validation is too heavy handed. Would love some feedback.
- I started working on this before I realized @islinwb was also working on this same problem... https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66787 I put this PR up anyways since I'm sure good code exists in both. I wasn't aware of the /assign command so didn't assign myself before starting work.
- I didn't have time to work on adding validation to deprecated cli options. If the rest of this looks ok, I can finish that up.
- I hope the location of IsValidSocketAddr is correct. Lmk if it isn't.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Adding validation to kube-scheduler at the API level
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Affinity/Anti-Affinity Optimization of Pod Being Scheduled
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Following #66948, it was noticed that the applied optimizations for anti-affinity rules lookup of existing pods could be further applied to checking affinity and anti-affinity terms of the Pod being scheduled. This is done by mapping topology pairs to pods that potentially match the pod being scheduled instead of mapping nodes to matching pods, and accordingly the search space is reduced.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67738
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig scheduling
/sig scalability
**Release note**:
```release-note
Improve performance of Pod affinity/anti-affinity in the scheduler
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63437, 68081). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Enable ImageLocalityPriority by default with integration tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is a follow-up to [#63842](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/63842). It moves the ImageLocalityPriority function to default priority functions of the default algorithm provider and adds integration tests for the updated scheduling policy.
- Compared to [#64662](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/64662), this PR does note provide e2e test due to concerns about a large image may add too much overhead to the testing infrastructure and pipeline. We should add e2e tests in the future with the use of large enough image(s) in following PRs.
- Compared to [#64662](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/64662), this PR simplifies the code changes and keeps code changes under test/integration/scheduler/.
- The PR contains a bug fix for [#65745](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65745) - caught by the integration test - where the image states are not properly cloned to the scheduler's cachedNodeInfoMap. We might split this fix into a separate PR.
The integration test covers what follows: a pod requiring a large image (~= 3GB) is submitted to the cluster and there is a single node in the cluster has the same large image; the pod should get scheduled to that node. We might also consider whether more scenarios are desired.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Kindly ping @resouer and @bsalamat
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
adding validation for componentconfig
adding validation to cmd kube-scheduler
Add support for ipv6 in IsValidSocketAddr function
updating copyright date in componentconfig/validation/validation.go
updating copyright date in componentconfig/validation/validation_test.go
adding validation for cli options
adding BUILD files
updating validate function to return []errors in cmd/kube-scheduler
ok, really returning []error this time
adding comments for exported componentconfig Validation functions
silly me, not checking structs along the way :'(
refactor to avoid else statement
moving policy nil check up one function
rejigging some deprecated cmd validations
stumbling my way around validation slowly but surely
updating according to review from @bsalamat
- not validating leader election config unless leader election is enabled
- leader election time values cannot be zero
- removing validation for KubeConfigFile
- removing validation for scheduler policy
leader elect options should be non-negative
adding test cases for renewDeadline and leaseDuration being zero
fixing logic in componentconfig validation 😅
removing KubeConfigFile reference from tests as it was removed in master
2ff9bd6699
removing bogus space after var assignment
adding more tests for componentconfig based on feedback
making updates to validation because types were moved on master
update bazel build
adding validation for staging/apimachinery
adding validation for staging/apiserver
adding fieldPaths for staging validations
moving staging validations out of componentconfig
updating test case scenario for staging/apimachinery
./hack/update-bazel.sh
moving kube-scheduler validations from componentconfig
./hack/update-bazel.sh
removing non-negative check for QPS
resourceLock required
adding HardPodAffinitySymmetricWeight 0-100 range to cmd flag help section
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67766, 67642, 67772). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add unit test cases for scheduler/algorithm/predicates.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add unit test cases for scheduler/algorithm/predicates for more code coverage.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66257, 67750). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add unit test cases for scheduler/util.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add unit test cases for scheduler/util for more code coverage.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Complement unit test case TestNodesWherePreemptionMightHelp for scheduler/core
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix golint error under scheduler/factory.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix golint error under scheduler/factory.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
NONE
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Moving KubeSchedulerConfiguration from ComponentConfig API types to staging repos
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixeskubernetes/kubeadm#528
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc luxas timothysc
/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
Moving KubeSchedulerConfiguration from ComponentConfig API types to staging repos
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66862, 67618). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Use sync.map to scale equiv class cache better
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Change the current lock in first level ecache into `sync.Map`, which is known for scaling better than `sync. Mutex ` on machines with >8 CPUs
ref: https://golang.org/pkg/sync/#Map
And the code is much cleaner in this way.
5k Nodes, 10k Pods benchmark with ecache enabled in 64 cores VM:
```bash
// before
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/0Pods-64 10000 17550089 ns/op
// after
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/0Pods-64 10000 16975098 ns/op
```
Comparing to current implementation, the improvement after this change is noticeable, and the test is stable in 8, 16, 64 cores VM.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Use sync.map to scale ecache better
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67041, 66948). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Anti affinity optimization
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This pull request aims to optimize the performance of anti-affinity rules lookup of existing pods
This optimization maps the topology values to a list of pods running on nodes that match this value and store that map in the pod metadata. Accordingly, when validating anti-affinity rules of existing pods we will only check those running on nodes with similar topology values to the current candidate (node) for scheduling.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#63937
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig scalability
/sig scheduling
**Release note**:
```release-note
improve performance of anti-affinity predicate of default scheduler.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
scheduler: add metrics to equivalence cache
This adds counters to equiv. cache reads & writes. Reads are labeled by
hit/miss, while writes are labeled to indicate whether the write was
discarded.
This will give us visibility into,
- hit rate of cache reads
- ratio of reads to writes
- rate of discarded writes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/63259
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67461, 67464, 67416). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Delete dead code in pkg/scheduler
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is just some cleanup. I found some unused code while evaluating the scheduler code.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/kind cleanup
/sig scheduling
This adds counters to equiv. cache reads & writes. Reads are labeled by
hit/miss, while writes are labeled to indicate whether the write was
discarded.
This will give us visibility into,
- hit rate of cache reads
- ratio of reads to writes
- rate of discarded writes
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66491, 66587, 66856, 66657, 66923). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add space for output
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65570, 65616). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Retry scheduling on StorageClass events
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56163
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I have taken over #60006.
It's hard to test in e2e, because we cannot know reschedule of pod is triggered by which event (periodically service/node events will move pods to active queue too). ~~I'll add integration tests for this functionality after [this PR](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65296) get merged.~~ (already added)
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63955, 66685, 66671). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove unused code in pkg/scheduler/algorithm/scheduler_interface_test.go
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
remove unused code in pkg/scheduler/algorithm/scheduler_interface_test.go
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66540, 66599). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Invalidate CheckVolumeBinding predicate only when VolumeScheduling feature is enabled
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Invalidate CheckVolumeBinding predicate only when VolumeScheduling feature is enabled.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66540, 66599). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
replace predicates string with corresponding const in TestDefaultPredicates
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
replace predicates string with corresponding const in TestDefaultPredicates. Unify with the const in func defaultPredicates().
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66291, 66471, 66499). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Improve unit test TestZeroRequest
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66468
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Extender preemption should respect IsInterested()
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Extender preemption should respect IsInterested()
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66289
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The bug is reported and the first commit is co-authored by: @chenchun
**Release note**:
```release-note
Extender preemption should respect IsInterested()
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/core)
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Update scheduler's unit table tests to use subtest
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
breaks up PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63281
/ref #63267
**Release note**:
```release-note
This PR will leverage subtests on the existing table tests for the scheduler units.
Some refactoring of error/status messages and functions to align with new approach.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66410, 66398, 66061, 66397, 65558). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix volume limit for EBS on m5 and c5 instances
This is a fix for lower volume limits on m5 and c5 instance types while we wait for https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/554 to land GA.
This problem became urgent because many of our users are trying to migrate to those instance types in light of spectre/meltdown vulnerability but lower volume limit on those instance types often causes cluster instability. Yes they can workaround by configuring the scheduler with lower limit but often this becomes somewhat difficult to do when cluster is mixed.
The newer default limits were picked from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/volume_limits.html
Text about spectre/meltdown is available on - https://community.bitnami.com/t/spectre-variant-2/54961/5
/sig storage
/sig scheduling
```release-note
Fix volume limit for EBS on m5 and c5 instance types
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Re-design equivalence class cache to two level cache
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The current ecache introduced a global lock across all the nodes, and this patch tried to assign ecache per node to eliminate that global lock. The improvement of scheduling performance and throughput are both significant.
**CPU Profile Result**
Machine: 32-core 60GB GCE VM
1k nodes 10k pods bench test (we've highlighted the critical function):
1. Current default scheduler with ecache enabled:
2. Current default scheduler with ecache disabled:
3. Current default scheduler with this patch and ecache enabled:
**Throughput Test Result**
1k nodes 3k pods `scheduler_perf` test:
Current default scheduler, ecache is disabled:
```bash
Minimal observed throughput for 3k pod test: 200
PASS
ok k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/scheduler_perf 30.091s
```
With this patch, ecache is enabled:
```bash
Minimal observed throughput for 3k pod test: 556
PASS
ok k8s.io/kubernetes/test/integration/scheduler_perf 11.119s
```
**Design and implementation:**
The idea is: we re-designed ecache into a "two level cache".
The first level cache holds the global lock across nodes and sync is needed only when node is added or deleted, which is of much lower frequency.
The second level cache is assigned per node and its lock is restricted to per node level, thus there's no need to bother the global lock during whole predicate process cycle. For more detail, please check [the original discussion](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/63784#issuecomment-399848349).
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#63784
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
~~Tagged as WIP to make sure this does not break existing code and tests, we can start review after CI is happy.~~
**Release note**:
```release-note
Re-design equivalence class cache to two level cache
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58487, 63666). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/factory)
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Update scheduler's unit table tests to use subtest
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
breaks up PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63281
/ref #63267
**Release note**:
```release-note
This PR will leverage subtests on the existing table tests for the scheduler units.
Some refactoring of error/status messages and functions to align with new approach.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66011, 66111, 66106, 66039, 65745). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Enable adaptive scoring in ImageLocalityPriority
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR replaces the original, pure image-size based scoring to an adaptive scoring scheme. The new scoring scheme considers not only the image size but also its `"spread" `- the definition of `"spread"` is described in what follows:
> Given an image`i`, `spread_i = num_node_has_i / total_num_nodes`
And the image receives the score: `score_i = size_i * spread_i`, as proposed by @resouer. The final node score is the summation of image scores for all images found existing on the node that are mentioned in the pod spec.
The goal of this heuristic is to better _balance image locality with other scheduling policies_. In particular, it aims to mitigate and prevent the undesirable "node heating problem", _i.e._, pods get assigned to the same or a few nodes due to preferred image locality. Given an image, the larger `spread` it has the more image locality we can consider for it - since we can expect more nodes having this image.
The new image state information in scheduler cache, enabled in this PR, allows other potential heuristics to be explored.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@resouer
Additional unit tests are WIP.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
scheduler: update tests to use sub-benchmarks (pkg/scheduler/cache)
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Go 1.7 added the subtest feature which can make table-driven tests much easier to run and debug. Some tests are not using this feature.
Further reading: [Using Subtests and Sub-benchmarks](https://blog.golang.org/subtests)
/kind cleanup
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix scheduler config decoding
Fixes#65413
Implements a custom unmarshaler for a single scheduler config type which did not correctly specify JSON tags until https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/65414 is resolved
Adds missing compatibility tests for scheduler extenders back to 1.7
```release-note
Fixes incompatibility with custom scheduler extender configurations specifying `bindVerb`
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Improve scheduler's performance by eliminating sorting of nodes by their score
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Profiling scheduler, I noticed that scheduler spends a significant amount of time in sorting the nodes after we score them to find nodes with the highest score. Finding nodes with the highest score does not need sorting the array. This PR replaces the sort with a linear scan.
Eliminating the sort results in over 10% improvement in throughput of the scheduler.
Before (3 runs for 5000 nodes, scheduling 1000 pods in a cluster running 2000 pods):
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/2000Pods-12 1000 20682552 ns/op
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/2000Pods-12 1000 20464729 ns/op
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/2000Pods-12 1000 21188906 ns/op
After:
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/2000Pods-12 1000 18485866 ns/op
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/2000Pods-12 1000 18457749 ns/op
BenchmarkScheduling/5000Nodes/2000Pods-12 1000 18418200 ns/op
**Release note**:
```release-note
Improve scheduler's performance by eliminating sorting of nodes by their score.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65388, 64995). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add more conditions to the list of predicate failures that won't be resolved by preemption
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds more conditions to the list of predicate failures that won't be resolved by preemption. This change can potentially improve performance of preemption by avoiding the nodes that won't be able to schedule the pending pod no matter how many other pods are removed from them.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add more conditions to the list of predicate failures that won't be resolved by preemption.
```
/sig scheduling
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 65024, 65287, 65345, 64693, 64941). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix some typos in code comments.
Signed-off-by: xiechengsheng <XIE1995@whut.edu.cn>
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix some typos in code comments.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
NONE
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Split scheduler latency metric to fine-grained steps
This splits the summary metric we recently added into finer steps. It should be very useful for performance experiments.
/cc @wojtek-t
fyi - @bsalamat @misterikkit
Strictly speaking this is a breaking change, but since this metric was added only ~week ago I think it should fine (we should port this change to 1.11).
```release-note
Split 'scheduling_latency_seconds' metric into finer steps (predicate, priority, premption)
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64285, 63660, 63661, 63662, 64883). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/algorithmprovider)
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Update scheduler's unit table tests to use subtest
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
breaks up PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63281
/ref #63267
**Release note**:
```release-note
This PR will leverage subtests on the existing table tests for the scheduler units.
Some refactoring of error/status messages and functions to align with new approach.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64285, 63660, 63661, 63662, 64883). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler)
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Update scheduler's unit table tests to use subtest
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
breaks up PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63281
/ref #63267
**Release note**:
```release-note
This PR will leverage subtests on the existing table tests for the scheduler units.
Some refactoring of error/status messages and functions to align with new approach.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64285, 63660, 63661, 63662, 64883). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
use subtest for table units (pkg/scheduler/algorithm/predicates)
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Update scheduler's unit table tests to use subtest
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
breaks up PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63281
/ref #63267
**Release note**:
```release-note
This PR will leverage subtests on the existing table tests for the scheduler units.
Some refactoring of error/status messages and functions to align with new approach.
```
Jordan Liggitt
