The requested Service Protocol is checked against the supported protocols of GCE Internal LB. The supported protocols are TCP and UDP.
SCTP is not supported by OpenStack LBaaS. If SCTP is requested in a Service with type=LoadBalancer, the request is rejected. Comment style is also corrected.
SCTP is not allowed for LoadBalancer Service and for HostPort. Kube-proxy can be configured not to start listening on the host port for SCTP: see the new SCTPUserSpaceNode parameter
changed the vendor github.com/nokia/sctp to github.com/ishidawataru/sctp. I.e. from now on we use the upstream version.
netexec.go compilation fixed. Various test cases fixed
SCTP related conformance tests removed. Netexec's pod definition and Dockerfile are updated to expose the new SCTP port(8082)
SCTP related e2e test cases are removed as the e2e test systems do not support SCTP
sctp related firewall config is removed from cluster/gce/util.sh. Variable name sctp_addr is corrected to sctpAddr in pkg/proxy/ipvs/proxier.go
cluster/gce/util.sh is copied from master
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66491, 66587, 66856, 66657, 66923). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
optimize ipvs get nodeIP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Optimize ipvs get nodeIP.
The original ipvs `NodeIPs` need first get all local type address to set1, then get address of dummy device `kube-ipvs0` to set2, then do diff of set1 and set2 to get local addresses we need.
This work gonna result in unnecessary resource consumption, especially for large cluster, will have lots address in dummy device `kube-ipvs0`.
This pr optimized the workaround.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
ipvs: add addrtype match for nodeport
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
before this PR:
```
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-TCP dst -j KUBE-NODE-PORT
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes service cluster ip + port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j ACCEPT
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port with externalTrafficPolicy=local" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-LOCAL-TCP dst -j RETURN
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
```
after this PR:
```
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port with externalTrafficPolicy=local" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-LOCAL-TCP dst -j RETURN
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-TCP dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes service cluster ip + port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j ACCEPT
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m addrtype --dst-type LOCAL -j KUBE-NODE-PORT
```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65459
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
manually tested cases:
- ClusterIP distributed to pod on same node
- ClusterIP distributed to pod on other node
- NodePort distributed to pod on same node
- NodePort distributed to pod on other node
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66136, 64999, 65425, 66120, 66074). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Not step into ipvs.CleanupLeftovers() if canUseIPVS's false
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Earlier we decide whether we should clean up the left-over ipvs rules inside `ipvs.CleanupLeftovers()`, therefore we call function `ipvs.CanUseIPVSProxier()` two times (and `GetModules()` two times). Actually no need to step into `ipvs.CleanupLeftovers()` if `canUseIPVS` is false.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66064, 66040). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix Local externalTrafficPolicy is not respected for ipvs NodePort
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Local externalTrafficPolicy is not respected for ipvs NodePort.
This PR fixes it.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66062
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Manually tested accessing NodePort with externalTrafficPolicy=Local and externalTrafficPolicy=Cluster.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.
Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
applied ammend for:
pkg/cloudprovider/provivers/vsphere/nodemanager.go
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add cleanLegacyBindAddr
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65263
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
To fix the issue,
use `activeBindAddrs` map which represents ip address successfully bind to DefaultDummyDevice in the round of sync
use `currentBindAddrs` map which represents ip addresses bind to DefaultDummyDevice from the system
create a function `cleanLegacyBindAddr` to unbind address which is in `currentBindAddrs` map but not in `activeBindAddrs` map
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig network
/area kube-proxy
Duplicated masq rules are created by current implementation:
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -m comment --comment "mark MASQ for
externaltrafficpolicy=cluster" -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
The last one is always there. So the one inside if statement could
just be removed.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix bug excludeCIDRs was not assign in func NewProxier
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix bug excludeCIDRs was not assign in func NewProxier
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Init ipvsInterface only when ipvs modules are present
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#61074
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64034, 64072, 64146, 64059, 64161). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix session affinity for LoadBalancer service with ESIPP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix session affinity for LoadBalancer service with ESIPP
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#63351
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
In cases that loadbalancer type service with externaltrafficpolicy=local and session-affinity specified, traffic to loadbalancer should only route to backends that in the same node with kube-proxy.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Enable checking whether ipvs modules are built-in or not
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Enable checking whether ipvs modules are built-in or not.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#63801
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63787, 62003). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix localport open with --nodeport-addresses specified
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix localport open with --nodeport-addresses specified.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#61953
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@ephur
**Release note**:
```release-note
Services can listen on same host ports on different interfaces with --nodeport-addresses specified
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix problem that ipvs can't work with hostPort
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Make ipvs proxy mode can work with pods that have hostPort.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#61938#60688 and #60305 are related too.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
IPVS proxier will create dummy device named `kube-ipvs0`, which will maintain all ipvs virtual service address. That means all ipvs maintained clusterIP/externalIP/ingress will be treat as local address.
Then if we have a pod with hostPort, cni will attach this rule to `PREROUTING` chain:
```
KUBE-HOSTPORTS all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 /* kube hostport portals */ ADDRTYPE match dst-type LOCAL
```
so if a service have same port with pod's hostport, then this service can't be access.
In this pr, we added `ACCESS` rule for traffic that aim to ipvs virtual service, to prevent those traffic from be blocked by other rules.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63129, 63066, 60009, 63136, 63086). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
ipvs proxy bind externalIP and lb ingress.IP to dummy interface
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
IPVS proxy bind externalIP and lb ingress.IP to dummy interface.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#59976
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add --ipvs-exclude-cidrs flag to kube-proxy.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add a flag to kube-proxy called --ipvs-exclude-cidrs. This flag allows a user to specify a list of CIDR ranges that should not be included in the cleanup of IPVS rules.
Fixes: #59507
**Release note**:
```
Use --ipvs-exclude-cidrs to specify a list of CIDR's which the IPVS proxier should not touch when cleaning up IPVS rules.
```
/assign @m1093782566
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Refactor kube-proxy service/endpoints update so that can be consumed among different proxiers
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There are huge duplication among different proxiers. For example, the service/endpoints list/watch part in iptables, ipvs and windows kernel mode(to be get in soon).
I think the more places this is replicated the harder it becomes to keep correct. We may need to refactor it and let different proxiers consume the same code.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes#52464
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
* This refactor reduces **500** Lines in iptables proxy, so it will reduce **500*N**(number of proxiers) lines in total. People no need to care the service/endpoints update logic any more and can be more focus on proxy logic.
* I would like to do the following things in follow-ups:
1. rsync it to ipvs proxier
2. rsync it to winkernel proxier
**Release note**:
```release-note
Refactor kube-proxy service/endpoints update so that can be consumed among different proxiers
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
validate ipset set and entry - ipvs proxier validate entry before adding it and validate set before creating it
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
validate ipset util.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#57269
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
I splitted this PR into some small pieces for the sake of code review.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55606, 59185, 58763, 59072, 59251). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
make ipvs 'cleanupIptablesLeftovers' simplier
Since there are only four iptables chains in ipvs mode, no need to restore all chains when cleanup iptables chain created by ipvs.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Make ipvs `cleanupIptablesLeftovers` function much simplier.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56689
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove ExternalTrafficLocalOnly from kube_feature gate
*What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR is for v1.10.
External Source IP Preservation (ESIPP) had been promoted to GA since 1.7. Following the proposal on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46404#issuecomment-303939180, we should be able to remove it from feature gate now.
Added release note to announce this.
Also ref the previous attempt: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/45857.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#56645
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
"ExternalTrafficLocalOnly" has been removed from feature gate. It has been a GA feature since v1.7.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 57906, 57425, 56939, 57317, 57762). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add "Not Found" error for ipset set & entry delete
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add "not found error" for ipset set and entry delete. For example,
```
[root@SHA1000130405 k8s-yml]# ipset list
Name: KUBE-LOOP-BACK
Type: hash:ip,port,ip
Revision: 2
Header: family inet hashsize 1024 maxelem 65536
Size in memory: 16776
References: 1
Members:
172.17.0.2,udp:53,172.17.0.2
172.17.0.2,tcp:53,172.17.0.2
100.106.89.164,tcp:6443,100.106.89.164
[root@SHA1000130405 k8s-yml]# ipset delete foo
ipset v6.19: The set with the given name does not exist
[root@SHA1000130405 k8s-yml]# ipset del KUBE-LOOP-BACK 1.2.3.4,tcp:80,1.2.3.4
ipset v6.19: Syntax error: Third element is missing from 1.2.3.4,tcp:80,1.2.3.4.
```
Just need to filter the error message "does not exist" or "element is missing". We should ignore these error when try to make sure they are deleted.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#57318
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 57699, 57657). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix ipvs virutal server update
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix ipvs virutal server update.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#57698
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Test Proxy Mode
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Currently, IPVS-based kube-proxy is protected by feature gateway and there is no UT for it. We should test ipvs proxy mode when feature gateway is set.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#56404
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55954, 56037, 55866, 55984, 54994). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove dead code
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
remove dead code in IPVS kube-proxy
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Using ipset doing SNAT and packet filter in IPVS kube-proxy
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Try ipset in ipvs proxy mode.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes#54203
xref: #53393, #53775
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Using ipset doing SNAT and packet filtering in IPVS kube-proxy
```
/sig network
/area kube-proxy
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53780, 55663, 55321, 52421, 55659). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Validate kube-proxy options
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Validate ipvs proxy options
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes#53852
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55009, 55532, 55601, 52569, 55533). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix ipvs/proxy getLocalIPs inconsistency with iptables/proxy
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
* Fix ipvs/proxy `getLocalIPs()` inconsistency with iptables/proxy
* validate the ip address before pkg/proxy/util IPPart() return ip string.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** :
Fixes#55612
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55247, 55324, 55261, 55147, 54052). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Implement dummy device operation by netlink for ipvs proxier
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Currently, we implement network interface operations, e.g. create a dummy device and delete a dummy interface via ip cmd and then collect the exist code. For example, we assume the following command:
```
ip link add kube-ipvs0 type dummy
```
returns 2 means the dummy device `kube-ipvs0` exists, see https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/proxy/ipvs/proxier.go#L1529 .
However, from the man page of ip command, exit status 2 just means an error was reported by the kernel, see http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/ip.8.html#EXIT_STATUS.
So, that's a bug.
This PR implements dummy device operation by netlink for ipvs proxier so that can get ride of ip command operations.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes#54054
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig network
/area kube-proxy
/kind bug
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
kube-proxy IPVS: Fix IPVS availability check
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The current implementation of `CanUseIPVSProxier()` reads `/proc/modules`
to check whether IPVS related kernel modules can be loaded.
You might get a false-negative when the kernel modules are installed to
the system but haven't been loaded into the kernel.
This patch firstly try to run `modprobe` to load specified kernel
modules, then just log warnings if error occured.
Secondly, it will check loaded kernel modules by reading
`/proc/modules`, return an error if any required module is missing.
This change will not break the compatability of existing implementation.
Running kube-proxy in a container without mounting `/lib/modules` will
cause `modprobe` warnings, but not raise an error if all required modules are
present in the host kernel.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Fix IPVS availability check
```
The current implementation of `CanUseIPVSProxier()` reads `/proc/modules`
to check whether IPVS related kernel modules can be loaded.
You might get a false-negative when the kernel modules are installed to
the system but haven't been loaded into the kernel.
This patch firstly try to run `modprobe` to load specified kernel
modules, then just log warnings if error occured.
Secondly, it will check loaded kernel modules by reading
`/proc/modules`, return an error if any required module is missing.
This change will not break the compatability of existing implementation.
Running kube-proxy in a container without mounting `/lib/modules` will
cause `modprobe` warnings, but not raise an error if all required modules are
present in the host kernel.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Fix duplicate unbind action in kube-proxy
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix duplicate unbind action in kube-proxy. It will generate unnecessary error info If unbind multi-ports on one service .
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
fixes#51694
**Release-note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Kubernetes Submit Queue