Automatic merge from submit-queue
kube-proxy: add --write-config-to flag
Add --write-config-to flag to kube-proxy to write the default configuration
values to the specified file location.
@deads2k suggested I create my own scheme for this, so I followed the example he shared with me. The only bit currently still referring to `api.Scheme` is where we create the event broadcaster recorder. In order to use the custom private scheme, I either have to pass it in to `NewProxyServer()`, or I have to make `NewProxyServer()` a member of the `Options` struct. If the former, then I probably need to export `Options.scheme`. Thoughts?
cc @mikedanese @sttts @liggitt @deads2k @smarterclayton @timothysc @kubernetes/sig-network-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
```release-note
Add --write-config-to flag to kube-proxy to allow users to write the default configuration settings to a file.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41535, 45985, 45929, 45948, 46056)
remove useless flags from hack/verify-flags/known-flags.txt
Flags in known-flags.txt is used to check misspelling from "-" to "_" in
workspace, so a flag with out "-" should not show up in this file.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make real proxier in hollow-proxy optional (default=true)
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/45622
This allows using real proxier for hollow proxy, but we use the fake one by default.
cc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-misc @wojtek-t @gmarek
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enable shared PID namespace by default for docker pods
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR enables PID namespace sharing for docker pods by default, bringing the behavior of docker in line with the other CRI runtimes when used with docker >= 1.13.1.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: ref #1615
**Special notes for your reviewer**: cc @dchen1107 @yujuhong
**Release note**:
```release-note
Kubernetes now shares a single PID namespace among all containers in a pod when running with docker >= 1.13.1. This means processes can now signal processes in other containers in a pod, but it also means that the `kubectl exec {pod} kill 1` pattern will cause the pod to be restarted rather than a single container.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41583, 45117, 45123)
Implement shared PID namespace in the dockershim
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Defaults the Docker CRI to using a shared PID namespace for pods. Implements proposal in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/207 tracked by #1615.
//cc @dchen1107 @vishh @timstclair
**Special notes for your reviewer**: none
**Release note**:
```release-note
Some container runtimes share a process (PID) namespace for all containers in a pod. This will become the default for Docker in a future release of Kubernetes. You can preview this functionality if running with the CRI and Docker 1.13.1 by enabling the --experimental-docker-enable-shared-pid kubelet flag.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44601, 44842, 44893, 44491, 44588)
kubeadm: add flag to skip token print out
**What this PR does / why we need it**: When kubeadm init is used in an automated context, it still prints the token to standard out. When standard output ends up in a log file, it can be considered that the token is leaked there and can be compromised. This PR adds a flag you can select to not have it print out and explicitly disable this behavior.
This is a continuation from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42823 since it had to be closed.
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes #https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/160
**Special notes for your reviewer**: /cc @luxas @errordeveloper
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44862, 42241, 42101, 43181, 44147)
Feature/hpa upscale downscale delay configurable
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Makes "upscale forbidden window" and "downscale forbidden window" duration configurable in arguments of kube-controller-manager. Those are options of horizontal pod autoscaler.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please have a look @DirectXMan12 , the PR as discussed in Slack.
**Release note**:
```
Make "upscale forbidden window" and "downscale forbidden window" duration configurable in arguments of kube-controller-manager. Those are options of horizontal pod autoscaler. Right now are hardcoded 3 minutes for upscale, and 5 minutes to downscale. But sometimes cluster administrator might want to change this for his own needs.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43500, 44073)
[Federation] Add option to retrieve e2e cluster config from secrets
Previously the federation e2e setup was reading member cluster configuration from the test run's kubeconfig. This change removes that dependency in favor of reading member cluster configuration from secrets in the hosting cluster, and caches the configuration to avoid having to read it separately for each test.
cc: @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews @perotinus
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43000, 44500, 44457, 44553, 44267)
Add Kubernetes 1.6 support to Juju charms
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This adds Kubernetes 1.6 support to Juju charms.
This includes some large architectural changes in order to support multiple versions of Kubernetes with a single release of the charms. There are a few bug fixes in here as well, for issues that we discovered during testing.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Thanks to @marcoceppi, @ktsakalozos, @jacekn, @mbruzek, @tvansteenburgh for their work in this feature branch as well!
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add Kubernetes 1.6 support to Juju charms
Add metric collection to charms for autoscaling
Update kubernetes-e2e charm to fail when test suite fails
Update Juju charms to use snaps
Add registry action to the kubernetes-worker charm
Add support for kube-proxy cluster-cidr option to kubernetes-worker charm
Fix kubernetes-master charm starting services before TLS certs are saved
Fix kubernetes-worker charm failures in LXD
Fix stop hook failure on kubernetes-worker charm
Fix handling of juju kubernetes-worker.restart-needed state
Fix nagios checks in charms
```
Add the option to configure e2e access to member clusters from the
same secrets in the host cluster used by the federation control plane.
The default behavior will continue to be sourcing this configuration
from the e2e kubeconfig. The optional behavior can be enabled by
passing --federation-config-from-cluster=true as an argument to
ginkgo.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Adding load balancer src cidrs to GCE cloudprovider
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As of January 31st, 2018, GCP will be sending health checks and l7 traffic from two CIDRs and legacy health checks from three CIDS. This PR moves them into the cloudprovider package and provides a flag for override.
Another PR will need to be address firewall rule creation for external L4 network loadbalancing #40778
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Step one of #40778
Step one of https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress/issues/197
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add flags to GCE cloud provider to override known L4/L7 proxy & health check source cidrs
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add dockershim only mode
This PR added a `experimental-dockershim` hidden flag in kubelet to run dockershim only.
We introduce this flag mainly for cri validation test. In the future we should compile dockershim into another binary.
@yujuhong @feiskyer @xlgao-zju
/cc @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add test for provisioning with storage class
This PR re-introduces e2e test for dynamic provisioning with storage classes.
It adds the same test as it was merged in PR #32485 with an extra patch adding region to AWS calls. It works well on my AWS setup, however I'm using shared company account and I can't run kube-up.sh and run the tests in the "official" way.
@zmerlynn, can you please try to run tests that led to #34961?
@justinsb, you're my AWS guru, would there be a way how to introduce fully initialized AWS cloud provider into e2e test framework? It would simplify everything. GCE has it there, but it's easier to initialize, I guess. See https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/test/e2e/pd.go#L486 for example - IMO tests should not talk to AWS directly.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 43642, 43170, 41813, 42170, 41581)
Be able to specify the timeout to wait for pod for kubectl logs/attach
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41786
current flag is `get-pod-timeout`, we can have a discussion if you have better one, default unit is seconds, above 0
@soltysh @kargakis ptal, thanks
@kubernetes/sig-cli-feature-requests
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41139, 41186, 38882, 37698, 42034)
create configmap from-env-file
Allow ConfigMaps to be created from Docker based env files.
See proposal https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/165
**Release-note:**
```release-note
1. create configmap has a new option --from-env-file that populates a configmap from file which follows a key=val format for each line.
2. create secret has a new option --from-env-file that populates a configmap from file which follows a key=val format for each line.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41794, 42349, 42755, 42901, 42933)
[Federation][e2e] Add framework for upgrade test in federation
Adding framework for federation upgrade tests. please refer to #41791
cc @madhusudancs @nikhiljindal @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42734, 42745, 42758, 42814, 42694)
Implement automated downgrade testing.
Node version cannot be higher than the master version, so we must
switch the node version first. Also, we must use the upgrade script
from the appropriate version for GCE.
Node version cannot be higher than the master version, so we must
switch the node version first. Also, we must use the upgrade script
from the appropriate version for GCE.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubeadm: Hook up kubeadm against the BootstrapSigner
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR makes kubeadm able to use the BootstrapSigner.
Depends on a few other PRs I've made, I'll rebase and fix this up after they've merged.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Example usage:
```console
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm init --kubernetes-version v1.7.0-alpha.0.377-2a6414bc914d55
[sudo] password for lucas:
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[init] Using Kubernetes version: v1.7.0-alpha.0.377-2a6414bc914d55
[init] Using Authorization mode: RBAC
[preflight] Running pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[certificates] Generated CA certificate and key.
[certificates] Generated API server certificate and key.
[certificates] Generated API server kubelet client certificate and key.
[certificates] Generated service account token signing key.
[certificates] Generated service account token signing public key.
[certificates] Generated front-proxy CA certificate and key.
[certificates] Generated front-proxy client certificate and key.
[certificates] Valid certificates and keys now exist in "/etc/kubernetes/pki"
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/admin.conf"
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf"
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/controller-manager.conf"
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/scheduler.conf"
[apiclient] Created API client, waiting for the control plane to become ready
[apiclient] All control plane components are healthy after 21.301384 seconds
[apiclient] Waiting for at least one node to register and become ready
[apiclient] First node is ready after 8.072688 seconds
[apiclient] Test deployment succeeded
[token-discovery] Using token: 67a96d.02405a1773564431
[apiconfig] Created RBAC rules
[addons] Created essential addon: kube-proxy
[addons] Created essential addon: kube-dns
Your Kubernetes master has initialized successfully!
To start using your cluster, you need to run:
export KUBECONFIG=/etc/kubernetes/admin.conf
You should now deploy a pod network to the cluster.
Run "kubectl apply -f [podnetwork].yaml" with one of the options listed at:
http://kubernetes.io/docs/admin/addons/
You can now join any number of machines by running the following on each node:
kubeadm join --token 67a96d.02405a1773564431 192.168.1.115:6443
other-computer $ ./kubeadm join --token 67a96d.02405a1773564431 192.168.1.115:6443
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Trying to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Cluster info signature and contents are valid, will use API Server "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Successfully established connection with API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[bootstrap] Detected server version: v1.7.0-alpha.0.377+2a6414bc914d55
[bootstrap] The server supports the Certificates API (certificates.k8s.io/v1beta1)
[csr] Created API client to obtain unique certificate for this node, generating keys and certificate signing request
[csr] Received signed certificate from the API server, generating KubeConfig...
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf"
Node join complete:
* Certificate signing request sent to master and response
received.
* Kubelet informed of new secure connection details.
Run 'kubectl get nodes' on the master to see this machine join.
# Wrong secret!
other-computer $ ./kubeadm join --token 67a96d.02405a1773564432 192.168.1.115:6443
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Trying to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Failed to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443": failed to verify JWS signature of received cluster info object, can't trust this API Server
[discovery] Trying to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Failed to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443": failed to verify JWS signature of received cluster info object, can't trust this API Server
^C
# Poor method to create a cluster-info KubeConfig (a KubeConfig file with no credentials), but...
$ printf "kind: Config\n$(sudo ./kubeadm alpha phas --client-name foo --server https://192.168.1.115:6443 --token foo | head -6)\n" > cluster-info.yaml
$ cat cluster-info.yaml
kind: Config
apiVersion: v1
clusters:
- cluster:
certificate-authority-data: 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
server: https://192.168.1.115:6443
name: kubernetes
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ sudo ./kubeadm token list
TOKEN TTL EXPIRES USAGES DESCRIPTION
67a96d.02405a1773564431 <forever> <never> authentication,signing The default bootstrap token generated by 'kubeadm init'.
# Any token with the authentication usage set works as the --tls-bootstrap-token arg here
other-computer $ ./kubeadm join --skip-preflight-checks --discovery-file cluster-info.yaml --tls-bootstrap-token 67a96d.02405a1773564431
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Synced cluster-info information from the API Server so we have got the latest information
[bootstrap] Detected server version: v1.7.0-alpha.0.377+2a6414bc914d55
[bootstrap] The server supports the Certificates API (certificates.k8s.io/v1beta1)
[csr] Created API client to obtain unique certificate for this node, generating keys and certificate signing request
[csr] Received signed certificate from the API server, generating KubeConfig...
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf"
Node join complete:
* Certificate signing request sent to master and response
received.
* Kubelet informed of new secure connection details.
Run 'kubectl get nodes' on the master to see this machine join.
# Delete the RoleBinding that exposes the cluster-info ConfigMap publicly. Now this ConfigMap will be private
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ kubectl -n kube-public edit rolebindings kubeadm:bootstrap-signer-clusterinfo
# This breaks the token joining method
other-computer $ sudo ./kubeadm join --token 67a96d.02405a1773564431 192.168.1.115:6443
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Trying to connect to API Server "192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Failed to request cluster info, will try again: [User "system:anonymous" cannot get configmaps in the namespace "kube-public". (get configmaps cluster-info)]
[discovery] Failed to request cluster info, will try again: [User "system:anonymous" cannot get configmaps in the namespace "kube-public". (get configmaps cluster-info)]
^C
# But we can still connect using the cluster-info file
other-computer $ sudo ./kubeadm join --skip-preflight-checks --discovery-file /k8s/cluster-info.yaml --tls-bootstrap-token 67a96d.02405a1773564431
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Could not access the cluster-info ConfigMap for refreshing the cluster-info information, but the TLS cert is valid so proceeding...
[discovery] The cluster-info ConfigMap isn't set up properly (no kubeconfig key in ConfigMap), but the TLS cert is valid so proceeding...
[bootstrap] Detected server version: v1.7.0-alpha.0.377+2a6414bc914d55
[bootstrap] The server supports the Certificates API (certificates.k8s.io/v1beta1)
[csr] Created API client to obtain unique certificate for this node, generating keys and certificate signing request
[csr] Received signed certificate from the API server, generating KubeConfig...
[kubeconfig] Wrote KubeConfig file to disk: "/etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf"
Node join complete:
* Certificate signing request sent to master and response
received.
* Kubelet informed of new secure connection details.
Run 'kubectl get nodes' on the master to see this machine join.
# What happens if the CA in the cluster-info file and the API Server's CA aren't equal?
# Generated new CA for the cluster-info file, a invalid one for connecting to the cluster
# The new cluster-info file is here:
lucas@THENINJA:~/luxas/kubernetes$ cat cluster-info.yaml
kind: Config
apiVersion: v1
clusters:
- cluster:
certificate-authority-data: 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
server: https://192.168.1.115:6443
name: kubernetes
# Try to join an API Server with the wrong CA
other-computer $ sudo ./kubeadm join --skip-preflight-checks --discovery-file /k8s/cluster-info.yaml --tls-bootstrap-token 67a96d.02405a1773564431
[kubeadm] WARNING: kubeadm is in alpha, please do not use it for production clusters.
[preflight] Skipping pre-flight checks
[preflight] Starting the kubelet service
[discovery] Created cluster-info discovery client, requesting info from "https://192.168.1.115:6443"
[discovery] Failed to validate the API Server's identity, will try again: [Get https://192.168.1.115:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-public/configmaps/cluster-info: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "kubernetes")]
[discovery] Failed to validate the API Server's identity, will try again: [Get https://192.168.1.115:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-public/configmaps/cluster-info: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "kubernetes")]
[discovery] Failed to validate the API Server's identity, will try again: [Get https://192.168.1.115:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-public/configmaps/cluster-info: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "kubernetes")]
[discovery] Failed to validate the API Server's identity, will try again: [Get https://192.168.1.115:6443/api/v1/namespaces/kube-public/configmaps/cluster-info: x509: certificate signed by unknown authority (possibly because of "crypto/rsa: verification error" while trying to verify candidate authority certificate "kubernetes")]
^C
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
@jbeda @mikedanese @justinsb @pires @dmmcquay @roberthbailey @dgoodwin
Kubernetes Submit Queue