Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42053, 41282, 42056, 41663, 40927)
Allow getting logs directly from deployment, job and statefulset
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@smarterclayton you asked for it in OpenShift
```release-note
kubectl logs allows getting logs directly from deployment, job and statefulset
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42044, 41694, 41927, 42050, 41987)
Add apply set-last-applied subcommand
implement part of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/287, will rebase after https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41699 got merged, EDIT: since bug output format has been confirmed, will update the behavior of output format soon
cc @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @AdoHe @pwittrock
```release-note
Support kubectl apply set-last-applied command to update the applied-applied-configuration annotation
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35408, 41915, 41992, 41964, 41925)
add secret option to flag
To resolve the issue of security(pr #35030 ),
> @smarterclayton commented 5 days ago
> This is unfortunately not all flags that could be secrets. The best option would be to add support in spf13/pflag to tag a flag as a secret, and then use that bit to determine the list.
>
> Also, Command() could be used in contexts that need exact parameters (for subshell execution), so we would need to add a new method or extend the signature here to allow exact flags to be retrieved.
we could add a secret option to the flags.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41994, 41969, 41997, 40952, 40576)
Updating kubectl to send delete requests with orphanDependents=false if --cascade is true
Ref https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/40568#38897
Updating kubectl to always set `DeleteOptions.orphanDependents=false` when deleting a resource with `--cascade=true`.
This is primarily for federation where we want to use server side cascading deletion.
Impact on kubernetes: kubectl will do another GET after sending a DELETE and wait till the resource is actually deleted. This can have an impact if the resource has a finalizer. kubectl will wait till the finalizer is removed and then the resource is deleted, which is the right thing to do but a notable change in behavior.
cc @caesarxuchao @lavalamp @smarterclayton @kubernetes/sig-federation-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41857, 41864, 40522, 41835, 41991)
kubectl: Allow 'drain --force' to remove orphaned pods
If the managing resource of a given pod (e.g. DaemonSet/ReplicaSet/etc) is deleted (effectively orphaning the pod), and ``kubectl drain --force`` is invoked on the node hosting the pod, the command would fail with an error indicating that the managing resource was not found. This PR reduces the error to a warning if ``--force`` is specified, allowing nodes with orphaned pods to be drained.
Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424678
cc: @derekwaynecarr
```release-note
Allow drain --force to remove pods whose managing resource is deleted.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)
add kubectl can-i to see if you can perform an action
Adds `kubectl auth can-i <verb> <resource> [<name>]` so that a user can see if they are allowed to perform an action.
@kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @fabianofranz
This particular command satisfies the immediate need of knowing if you can perform an action without trying that action. When using RBAC in a script that is adding permissions, there is a lag between adding the permission and the permission being realized in the RBAC cache. As a user on the CLI, you almost never see it, but as a script adding a binding and then using that new power, you hit it quite often.
There are natural follow-ons to the same area (hence the `auth` subcommand) to figure out if someone else can perform an action, what actions you can perform in total, and who can perform a given action. Someone else is an API we have already, what-can-i-do was a proposed API a while back and a very useful one for interfaces, and who-can is common question if someone is administering a namespace.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41621, 41946, 41941, 41250, 41729)
Refactor printers and describers into their own package.
This sets the stage for using printer code from the server side (decoupled from kubectl) and loosens the coupling between kubectl and the printers. `pkg/printers` contains interfaces and has an import restriction against pulling in API specific code, while `pkg/printers/internalversion` can be used for internal types.
Add a method on `Factory` for retrieving PrinterForCommand which uses the Scheme and RESTMapper from the Factory, not the hardcoded ones. This further separates kubectl from the core API scheme and allows better composition.
Change NamePrinter to use RESTMapper (previously it was hardcoding those conversions). This means that we now return plural resource names (`pods/foo`) but is correct once aliases and shortnames start being returned by the mapper.
This is a prerequisite for server side get, but is pure refactor (contains no new features).
@deads2k @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41854, 41801, 40088, 41590, 41911)
Add storage.k8s.io/v1 API
v1 API is direct copy of v1beta1 API. This v1 API gets installed and exposed in this PR, I tested that kubectl can create both v1beta1 and v1 StorageClass.
~~Rest of Kubernetes (controllers, examples,. tests, ...) still use v1beta1 API, I will update it when this PR gets merged as these changes would get lost among generated code.~~ Most parts use v1 API now, it would not compile / run tests without it.
**Release note**:
```
Kubernetes API storage.k8s.io for storage objects is now fully supported and is available as storage.k8s.io/v1. Beta version of the API storage.k8s.io/v1beta1 is still available in this release, however it will be removed in a future Kubernetes release.
Together with the API endpoint, StorageClass annotation "storageclass.beta.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" is deprecated and "storageclass.kubernetes.io/is-default-class" should be used instead to mark a default storage class. The beta annotation is still working in this release, however it won't be supported in the next one.
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
The factory knows all possible types, and should abstract the process of
creating all printers. A future refactor can further reduce the
dependencies between printer code and internal types.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41146, 41486, 41482, 41538, 41784)
Added `kubectl create clusterrole` command.
Added `kubectl create clusterrole` command.
Fixed part of #39596
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@deads2k, please help to review this patch, thanks
**Release note**:
```
Added one new command `kubectl create clusterrole` to help user create a single ClusterRole from command line.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41146, 41486, 41482, 41538, 41784)
Add apply view-last-applied subcommand
reopen pr https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/40984, implement part of https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/287
for now unit test all pass, the output looks like:
```console
shiywang@dhcp-140-33 template $ ./kubectl apply view last-applied deployment nginx-deployment
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
name: nginx-deployment
spec:
strategy: {}
template:
metadata:
creationTimestamp: null
labels:
app: nginx
spec:
containers:
- image: nginx:1.12.10
name: nginx
ports:
- containerPort: 80
resources: {}
status: {}
```
```release-note
Support new kubectl apply view-last-applied command for viewing the last configuration file applied
```
not sure if there is any flag I should updated or the some error handling I should changed.
will generate docs when you guys think is ok.
cc @pwittrock @jessfraz @AdoHe @ymqytw
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38957, 41819, 41851, 40667, 41373)
Wrap and extract some flag description strings.
Moving on from help strings to flag descriptions.
@zen @fabianofranz @kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41709, 41685, 41754, 41759, 37237)
Tolerate unknown fields in strategic merge patch
When using `apply` or `edit` with an object that has a compiled-in struct, if an unknown server-side field is sent, or is present in a provided file, the strategic merge patch computation fails looking up type info from the go struct
If the field only exists in one side of the patch (is being added or removed), or is identical in both sides of the patch, we should tolerate missing type info, since it doesn't affect the patch.
change to GetOriginalConfiguration
add bazel
refactor apply view-last-applied command
update some changes
minor change
add unit tests, update
update some codes and genreate docs
update LongDesc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41706, 39063, 41330, 41739, 41576)
deprecate and disconnect --output-version
For at least two releases, there haven't been multiple versions of API groups and we don't plan to support conversions in commands other than `kubectl convert`. This disconnects the `--output-version` option to be consistent with conversion agnostic command before it becomes an issue.
@kubernetes/sig-cli-pr-reviews @fabianofranz @smarterclayton
```release-note
`--output-version` is ignored for all commands except `kubectl convert`. This is consistent with the generic nature of `kubectl` CRUD commands and the previous removal of `--api-version`. Specific versions can be specified in the resource field: `resource.version.group`, `jobs.v1.batch`.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
fix kubectl create configmap help messages
Signed-off-by: bruceauyeung <ouyang.qinhua@zte.com.cn>
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. the first example command actually doesn't specify any keys. i think `with keys for each file` is incorrect.
2. `names on disk` is confusing. in usage the word `NAME` means configmap, so i think it's better saying `file basenames on disk`
3. in this context, `--from-file` can be specified multiple times, but in each occurance only one key file can be specified, besides we should keep consistent with the later case (key is specified). so i changed words in this sentence to singular. and to avoid confusing, i use `key` instead of `name`
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41604, 41273, 41547)
remove validNonResourceVerbs in create role
non-resource-url is only reasonable for clusterroles
Automatic merge from submit-queue
only construct shortcutmapper when we have the discovery client
Resource shortnames come from the discoveryclient, so we should only wrap with that mapper when we have the information we need.
Kubernetes Submit Queue