This implements Bulk volume polling using ideas presented by
justin in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39564
But it changes the implementation to use an interface
and doesn't affect other implementations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41814, 41922, 41957, 41406, 41077)
pv_controller: Do not report exponential backoff as error.
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
This just pollutes logs without any useful information:
```
E0214 08:00:30.428073 77288 pv_controller.go:1410] error scheduling operaion "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]": Failed to create operation with name "delete-pvc-1fa0e8b4-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb[1fbd52ee-f2b5-11e6-a8bb-fa163ecb84eb]". An operation with that name failed at 2017-02-14 08:00:15.631133152 -0500 EST. No retries permitted until 2017-02-14 08:00:31.631133152 -0500 EST (16s). Last error: "Cannot delete the volume \"11a4faea-bfc7-4713-88b3-dec492480dba\", it's still attached to a node".
```
```release-note
NONE
```
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41364, 40317, 41326, 41783, 41782)
changes to cleanup the volume plugin for recycle
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Code cleanup. Changing from creating a new interface from the plugin, that then calls a function to recycle a volume, to adding the function to the plugin itself.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#26230
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Took same approach from closed PR #28432.
Do you want the approach to be the same for NewDeleter(), NewMounter(), NewUnMounter() and should they be in this same PR or submit different PR's for those?
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove alpha provisioning
This is the first part of https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/36
@kubernetes/sig-storage-misc
**Release note**:
```release-note
Alpha version of dynamic volume provisioning is removed in this release. Annotation
"volume.alpha.kubernetes.io/storage-class" does not have any special meaning. A default storage class
and DefaultStorageClass admission plugin can be used to preserve similar behavior of Kubernetes cluster,
see https://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/persistent-volumes/#class-1 for details.
```
It's not an error when recycle/delete/provision operation cannot be started
because it has failed recently. It will be restarted automatically when
backoff expires.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40855, 40859)
PV binding: send an event when there are no PVs to bind
This is similar to scheduler that says "no nodes available to schedule pods"
when it can't schedule a pod.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
This fix prevents the PV controller from forcefully overwriting the provisioned volume's name with the generated PV name. Instead, it allows dynamic provisioner implementers to set the name of the volume to a value that they choose.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39064, 40294)
Refactor persistent volume tests
This is an attempt to make the binder tests a bit more concise. The PVCs are being created by a "templating" function. There is also a handful of PVs in the tests but those vary quite more and I don't think similar approach would save us much code.
Reference:
https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/29006#-KPJuVeDE0O6TvDP9jia
@jsafrane: I hope this is what you have on mind.
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38377, 36365, 36648, 37691, 38339)
Exponential back off when volume delete fails
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements ability in pv_controller to back off when deleting a volume fails from plugin API.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
Partly fixes#38295 , but I think volume delete is most problematic thing happening in pv_controller without any sort of backoff.
After this change the attempts of volume deletion look like:
```
controller : I1208 00:18:35.532061 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:20:50.578325 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:23:05.563488 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:25:20.599158 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:27:35.560009 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:29:50.594967 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:32:05.539168 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:34:20.581665 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
```
This implements pv_controller to exponentially backoff
when deleting a volume fails in Cloud API. It ensures that
we aren't making too many calls to Cloud API
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37608, 37103, 37320, 37607, 37678)
Fix issue #37377: Report an event on successful PVC provisioning
This is a simple patch to fix the issue #37377: On a successful PVC provisioning an event is emitted so it's clear the provisioning actually succeeded.
cc: @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement external provisioning proposal
In other words, add "provisioned-by" annotation to all PVCs that should be provisioned dynamically.
Most of the changes are actually in tests.
@kubernetes/sig-storage
Gluster provisioner is interested in pvc.Namespace and I don't want to add
at as a new field in VolumeOptions - it would contain almost whole PVC.
Let's pass direct reference to PVC instead and let the provisioner to pick
information it is interested in.
persistentvolumecontroller.NewPersistentVolumeController has 11 arguments now,
put them into a structure.
Also, rename NewPersistentVolumeController to NewController, persistentvolume
is already name of the package.
Fixes#30219
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Do not report error when deleting an attached volume
Persistent volume controller should not send warning events to a PV and mark the PV as failed when the volume is still attached.
This happens when a user quickly deletes a pod and associated PVC - PV is slowly detaching, while the PVC is already deleted and the PV enters Failed phase.
`Deleter.Deleter` can now return `tryAgainError`, which is sent as INFO to the PV to let the user know we did not forget to delete the PV, however the PV stays in Released state. The controller tries again in the next sync (15 seconds by default).
Fixes#31511
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Send recycle events from pod to pv.
This allows users to diagnose what's wrong with recycler. Recycler pods are started automatically with a cryptic name and they are deleted immediately when they finish.
e.g, `kubectl describe pv` could show that NFS cannot be mounted (and how many pods have tried it):
```
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
59m 59m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(5421800e-347b-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
53m 53m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(3c9809e5-347c-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
46m 46m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(250dd2a2-347d-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
40m 40m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(0d84ea33-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
33m 33m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(f5fb63bf-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
27m 27m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(de7128fd-347f-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
1h 3m 75 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Successfully assigned recycler-for-nfs to 127.0.0.1
1h 3m 76 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Pod was active on the node longer than specified deadline
1h 1m 12 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Error syncing pod, skipping: timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
20m 1m 4 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod (events with common reason combined)
```
These steps were necessary:
- added event watcher to volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion
- pass all these events through volume plugins to volume controller
- rework volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion unit tests to a table (too much copy-paste)
- fix all unit tests along the way
When Kubernetes does not have a plugin to delete a PV it should wait for
either external deleter or storage admin to delete the volume instead of
throwing an error.
Related to #32077
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use PV shared informer in PV controller
Use the PV shared informer, addressing (partially) https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/26247 . Using the PVC shared informer is not so simple because sometimes the controller wants to `Requeue` and...
This allows users to diagnose what's wrong with recycler. Recycler pods are
started automatically with a cryptic name and they are deleted immediately
when they finish.
kubectl describe pods will show:
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
59m 59m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(5421800e-347b-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
53m 53m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(3c9809e5-347c-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
46m 46m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(250dd2a2-347d-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
40m 40m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(0d84ea33-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
33m 33m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(f5fb63bf-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
27m 27m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(de7128fd-347f-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
1h 3m 75 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Successfully assigned recycler-for-nfs to 127.0.0.1
1h 3m 76 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Pod was active on the node longer than specified deadline
1h 1m 12 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Error syncing pod, skipping: timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
20m 1m 4 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod (events with common reason combined)
These steps were necessary:
- added event watcher to volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion
- pass all these events through volume plugins to volume controller
- rework volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion unit tests to a table
(too much copy-paste)
- fix all unit tests along the way
with StorageClass.Provisioner == <unknown plugin>, we should wait for
either external provisioner or volume admin to provide a PV for a claim
instead of reporting an error.
Fixes#31723
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Don't bind pre-bound pvc & pv if size request not satisfied
as discussed briefly here https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/30522 , volume size ought to be verified before binding a pv & pvc regardless of what's in the pv's claimRef. @thockin
Currently kubelet volume management works on the concept of desired
and actual world of states. The volume manager periodically compares the
two worlds and perform volume mount/unmount and/or attach/detach
operations. When kubelet restarts, the cache of those two worlds are
gone. Although desired world can be recovered through apiserver, actual
world can not be recovered which may cause some volumes cannot be cleaned
up if their information is deleted by apiserver. This change adds the
reconstruction of the actual world by reading the pod directories from
disk. The reconstructed volume information is added to both desired
world and actual world if it cannot be found in either world. The rest
logic would be as same as before, desired world populator may clean up
the volume entry if it is no longer in apiserver, and then volume
manager should invoke unmount to clean it up.
Also, fix unit tests to have the same claim and volume sizes in most of the
tests where we don't test matching based on size and test for a specific size
when we do actually test the matching.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Stabilize volume unit tests by waiting for exact state
Wait for specific final state instead of waiting for specific number of
operations in controller unit tests. The tests are more readable and will survive
random goroutine ordering (PV and PVC controller have both their own
goroutine).
@kubernetes/sig-storage
According to the documentation for Go package time, `time.Ticker` and
`time.Timer` are uncollectable by garbage collector finalizers. They
leak until otherwise stopped. This commit ensures that all remaining
instances are stopped upon departure from their relative scopes.
Wait for specific final state instead of waiting for specific number of
operations in volume unit tests. The tests are more readable and will survive
random goroutine ordering (PV and PVC controller have both their own
goroutine).
Hemant Kumar